Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Hubungan Antara Tingkat Pendidikan dengan Kejadian Diabetes Melitus Tipe II Jigibalom, Ance; Podung, Beatrix J; Sudirham, Sudirham
JURNAL ILMIAH KESEHATAN MANADO Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH KESEHATAN MANADO (JIKMA)
Publisher : Yayasan Syalom Cipta Sumikolah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a disease that poses a public health problem. Diabetes mellitus is listed as the fourth national research priority for degenerative diseases. Type II diabetes mellitus was among the ten most prevalent diseases in the Koya Tondano Community Health Center work area, with a total number of sufferers in 2016. The increase in the number of diabetes sufferers is also caused by risk factors, one of which is risky health behavior. Education level also plays a role in the increase in this disease. Education level usually influences health behavior. This study aims to examine the relationship between education level and the incidence of type II diabetes in the Koya Tondano Community Health Center work area. This study used an observational analytical study with a cross-sectional study design. The population used in this study was the average number of patients visiting the Koya Tondano Community Health Center in 2022, namely 161 people. The sampling technique in this study was purposive sampling with a sample size of 115 based on the Yamen formula. The results showed that the majority of respondents (81 people) had a high level of education, while 34 (29.6%) had a low level of education. Of the respondents who had diabetes at the time of the study, 40 (34.8%) had diabetes, while 75 (65.2%) did not have diabetes. Bivariate analysis showed a relationship between education level and the incidence of diabetes mellitus in the Koya Community Health Center, South Tondano District, with a P value of 0.026.
Gambaran Kualitas Hidup Penderita Diabetes Melitus di Desa Adow Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Selatan Kolintama, Tahsya V. S.; Pongoh, Lucyana L.; Tengker, Anita C. C.; Sudirham, Sudirham; Manoppo, Jonesius E.; Makadada, Fredrik A.
JURNAL ILMIAH KESEHATAN MANADO Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH KESEHATAN MANADO (JIKMA)
Publisher : Yayasan Syalom Cipta Sumikolah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic disease that affects various aspects of patients' lives, including physical, psychological, social, and environmental aspects. Health center data show an increase in Diabetes Mellitus cases from 21 patients in 2023 to 60 patients in 2024. This increase indicates the importance of understanding the quality of life of patients in order to support prevention and disease management efforts.This study aimed to describe the quality of life of patients with Diabetes Mellitus based on physical, psychological, social relationship, and environmental aspects, as well as satisfaction and concerns related to the disease. This study used a quantitative descriptive method with a total sampling technique involving 60 patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Data were collected using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire and the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out using univariate analysis in the form of frequency distribution and percentages. The results showed that the quality of life of patients with Diabetes Mellitus in various aspects was mostly in the poor category. In the physical health aspect, the majority of respondents were in the poor category with 43 people (71.7%). In the psychological aspect, most respondents were in the moderate category with 41 people (68.3%). In the social relationship aspect, the majority of respondents were in the poor category with 37 people (61.7%), while in the environmental aspect most respondents were in the moderate category with 36 people (60%). However, based on the DQOL questionnaire, the diabetes-specific quality of life was in the high category (100%), indicating that respondents had good self-efficacy and high satisfaction in managing their disease.