Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.557
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Khazanah Hukum LEGAL BRIEF Journal of Judicial Review Journal of Muslim Community Health (JMCH) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Maarif, Ihsanul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Institutional Configuration and Competence of the Special Judiciary for Regional Election Disputes: A Comparative Study and Prospects for Implementation Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul; Suryana, Cece; Sugiarti, Taty; Murbani, Anastasia Wahyu
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30949

Abstract

The dispute resolution system for Regional Head Elections in Indonesia continues to face challenges related to fragmented authority, inconsistencies in judicial decisions, and procedural limitations, which may lead to legal uncertainty and undermine the legitimacy of election outcomes. This study aims to explore the weaknesses of the existing system and propose a more effective institutional model for resolving Pilkada disputes. Employing a normative legal approach with a comparative study method, this research analyzes electoral judicial systems in Mexico, the Philippines, and Germany to identify institutional principles that can be adapted to the Indonesian legal framework. Additionally, this study examines the national legal framework, including Constitutional Court rulings on Pilkada dispute resolution, to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the current mechanisms. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s Pilkada dispute resolution system still suffers from overlapping jurisdiction among institutions, inconsistencies in judicial rulings, and delays in dispute resolution processes. Comparative analysis suggests that a more integrated system, is more effective in ensuring legal certainty and judicial independence. Therefore, this study recommends the establishment of a specialized judicial body for Pilkada disputes, endowed with exclusive jurisdiction, institutional independence, and a transparent and expedited dispute resolution process. The implications of this research highlight that institutional reform in Pilkada dispute resolution is crucial for enhancing public trust in the electoral judicial system, strengthening electoral democracy, and upholding the rule of law in Indonesia’s  Regional Head Elections  process.
The Constitutionality of E-Voting in the Transformation of Digital Democracy: A Normative Analysis and Implications for Electoral Legitimacy Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul; Suryana, Cece; Permana, Fikri Chandra; Murbani, Anastasia Wahyu
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Legal Transformation and Policy Challenges in Indonesia: Navigating Technology
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v10i1.21193

Abstract

Digital technology has changed many parts of life, including how democracies and elections work. Electronic voting, or E-Voting, is a new idea that could make elections better and more open for everyone. But Indonesia still has big problems with putting it into practice. These problems involve legal issues, technical difficulties, and whether people trust elections that use technology. This study looks at if E-Voting fits Indonesia's constitution, what the main problems are, and what other countries do that Indonesia could use. This research uses legal analysis, comparing different systems, and looking at ideas about democratic rules. The results show that Indonesia does not have clear rules for digital elections. This causes problems with legal certainty and could lead to arguments about election results. Also, online security risks and differences in how well people understand technology are important things that could affect how well E-Voting works. The study also found that countries like Estonia, Switzerland, and Brazil have used E-Voting well. They did this by using strong digital checks, strict rules, and independent groups to watch over the process. This study suggests that E-Voting could make Indonesia's democracy more modern. However, it must be put in place slowly, with good rules, and with programs to teach people about digital technology. So, changing laws, making online security better, and teaching voters are important steps. These steps will help make sure that changing to digital elections supports democratic ideas, fair elections, and the power of the people.
Ambiguity and Contestation in Legal Standing Restrictions: Rethinking Public Interest and Constitutional Rights in Indonesia Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul; Bahri, Robi Assadul; Suryana, Cece; Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13192

Abstract

In Indonesia, the rules governing that can bring a legal case to the Constitutional Court often unclear and unevenly applied. This creates challenges for individuals and communities trying to protect their constitutional rights. In this article, we take a critical look at these obstacles by examining the Court’s past decisions. We show how the current legal framework overlooks issues of collective harm and structural inequalities, particularly affecting marginalized groups. To better understand these issues, we compare Indonesia’s approach to those of India, South Africa, and the United States, seeking out more inclusive models of judicial decision-making. Our findings show that Indonesia’s focus on specific interpretations of direct and personal harm limits the judiciary’s ability to meet its constitutional responsibilities. The paper draws on insights from other countries as well as Indonesia’s own legal traditions, such as adat (customary law) and musyawarah (deliberation), to propose a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to legal standing. We recommend several specific reforms, including rethinking existing laws, creating clearer judicial guidelines, and providing targeted judicial training for judges to improve access to constitutional justice for everyone.
From Legal Formalism to Algorithmic Justice: Rethinking Consumer Protection in the Digital Economy Prihartanto, Yudi; Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul; Kwarteng, Abdul Hamid
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/gqmmwr98

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the digital economy has challenged traditional notions of consumer protection, which historically relied on reactive and positivist legal principles. Increasing data commodification, the pervasive role of algorithms, and structural power asymmetries expose the inadequacy of existing legal doctrines to safeguard fairness in digital transactions. This study seeks to address a critical research gap by reconceptualizing consumer protection law through the lens of algorithmic justice and participatory digital rights. Employing a normative legal methodology combined with comparative and critical approaches, the research analyzes doctrinal evolution across jurisdictions such as the European Union, Brazil, and Indonesia. The findings reveal three major shifts. First, consumer law must move beyond post-transaction liability toward proactive models of oversight, including algorithm audits and design-based compliance. Second, legal doctrines should redefine the consumer as a relational subject embedded in data-driven ecosystems, rather than a rational and autonomous actor. Third, consumer rights need to be embedded within constitutional and ethical frameworks to ensure long-term enforceability and democratic legitimacy. The study contributes theoretically by advancing an interdisciplinary paradigm of consumer law that integrates digital fairness, equity, and human dignity. Practically, it offers strategic directions for regulators and policymakers in designing responsive frameworks that anticipate risks, enhance accountability, and strengthen consumer agency in the digital era.
Hubungan Kualitas Layanan Dengan Kepuasan Pasien Maarif, Ihsanul; Haeruddin, Haeruddin; Sumiati, Sumiati
Journal of Muslim Community Health Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI (JMCH)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52103/jmch.v4i2.1206

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Kualitas Layanan adalah cara melayani, membantu menyiapkan, mengurus, menyelesaikan keperluan, kebutuhan seseorang atau sekelompok orang. Kepuasan pasien diartikan sebagai interaksi antara harapan dan pengalaman sesudah memakai jasa atau pelayanan diberikan.. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui Hubungan kualitas layanan terhadap kepuasan pasien di Unit Rawat Jalan Puskesmas Mehalaan Tahun 2022. Metode: Rancangan penelitian yang digunakan Cross Sectional Study, dengan total sampel sebanyak 166 responden. Teknik Sampling yang digunakan pada penelitian kuantitatif ini ialah Purposive Sampling. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan analisis jalur (Path Analysis). Hasil: Penelitian menunjukan bahwa Kualitas layanan berHubungan positif signifikan secara langsung terhadap kepuasan pasien di unit rawat jalan Puskesmas Mehalaan tahun 2022 (0,000>0,05), Kualitas layanan tidak berHubungan positif signifikan secara langsung terhadap minat kembali di unit rawat jalan Puskesmas Mehalaan tahun 2022 (0,853>0,05), Kepuasan pasien berHubungan positif signifikan secara langsung terhadap minat kembali di unit rawat jalan Puskesmas Mehalaan tahun 2022 (0,013<0,05). Kesimpulan: (1) Penegakkan diagnosis berHubungan terhadap Kepuasan pasien (2) Ketersediaan obat berHubungan terhadap Kepuasan pasien (3) Kebersihan ruangan berHubungan terhadap Kepuasan pasien (4) kesopanan dan keramahan berHubungan terhadap Kepuasan pasien (5) pelayanan cepat tanggap berHubungan terhadap Kepuasan Pasien.
Analysis of Regulatory Reform Dynamics: A Comparative Study on the Ef-ficacy of the Omnibus Law Method and Legal Codification in National Regulatory Structure. Maarif, Ihsanul
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i4.1089

Abstract

The regulation of national laws in Indonesia faces significant challenges due to overlapping rules and regulatory inflation, which hinder legal certainty and economic efficiency. To address this issue, the government has adopted two primary approaches to regulatory reform: the Omnibus Law and Legal Codification. This study aims to analyze and compare the effectiveness of both approaches in Indonesian regulatory reform. The research employs a normative legal method with comparative analysis, utilizing data gathered from legal statutes, academic journals, and official documents. The findings indicate that the Omnibus Law is effective in addressing the need for rapid reform in dynamic sectors such as investment and labor, yet it poses risks of regulatory inconsistency, potentially leading to legal uncertainty. On the other hand, legal coding offers greater stability and consistency, though its implementation is slower and less adaptable to sectors requiring swift changes. This study's implications suggest that a selective approach is necessary, strategically applying the Omnibus Law to certain sectors while maintaining Legal Codification as the foundation for a more harmonious and sustainable legal system. This research provides recommendations for policymakers to enhance regulatory harmonization and consider the technical capacity of legal authorities in implementing reforms
Penapisan Materi Muatan Perundang-undangan Sebuah Pendekatan Sistematis: Keseimbangan antara Norma Primer dan Pengaturan Teknis Maarif, Ihsanul
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.2958

Abstract

Ketidakseimbangan antara norma primer dan pengaturan teknis dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sering kali menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum dan kesulitan dalam penerapan di lapangan. Norma primer yang terlalu abstrak atau pengaturan teknis yang terlalu rinci menghambat efektivitas hukum, menimbulkan interpretasi yang ambigu, serta mengurangi fleksibilitas dalam penerapannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan pendekatan sistematis yang dapat digunakan dalam proses legislasi untuk menyeimbangkan kedua elemen tersebut. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menganalisis sejumlah peraturan yang ada dan mengidentifikasi ketidakseimbangan antara norma primer dan pengaturan teknis dalam legislasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keseimbangan yang tepat antara norma primer dan pengaturan teknis mampu meningkatkan kepastian hukum dan memfasilitasi penegakan hukum yang lebih efektif. Pendekatan sistematis yang diusulkan dalam penelitian ini menawarkan kerangka kerja yang lebih terstruktur untuk menyaring materi muatan perundang-undangan, sehingga menghasilkan regulasi yang lebih adaptif, responsif, dan stabil di tengah dinamika sosial. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah perlunya reformasi dalam proses legislasi untuk meningkatkan kualitas dan konsistensi peraturan di berbagai yurisdiksi
Dinamika Kedudukan Peraturan Lembaga dalam Hierarki Perundang-Undangan: Tinjauan Yuridis dan Perspektif Praktis Maarif, Ihsanul
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2297

Abstract

Kedudukan peraturan lembaga dalam hierarki perundang-undangan di Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 8 Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011, masih belum memiliki kejelasan yang cukup, yang menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam praktik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis kedudukan yuridis peraturan lembaga dalam hierarki perundang-undangan serta dampaknya terhadap pelaksanaan hukum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, serta pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan yang mencakup peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peraturan lembaga sering kali berpotensi bertentangan dengan peraturan yang lebih tinggi, seperti undang-undang atau peraturan pemerintah, karena ketiadaan harmonisasi yang jelas. Hal ini menimbulkan konflik normatif dan menurunkan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya revisi Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 untuk memasukkan pedoman yang lebih rinci mengenai kedudukan peraturan lembaga serta mekanisme harmonisasi yang lebih jelas. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah pentingnya reformasi regulasi untuk meningkatkan kepastian dan konsistensi dalam pelaksanaan hukum di berbagai sektor di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abdullah, Mohd Kamarulnizam Bahri, Robi Asadul Bahri, Robi Assadul Bunyamin Bunyamin Farma, Mella Ismelina Firdaus Arifin, Firdaus Haeruddin Haeruddin I Gde Pantja Astawa Kwarteng, Abdul Hamid Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu Murbani, Anastasia Wahyu Permana, Fikri Chandra Prihartanto, Yudi Subrata, Rusli Sugiarti, Taty Sulastri, Dewi Sumiati Sumiati Suryana, Cece Susanto, Anthon F Yeti Kurniati