Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management

Operational Performance Analysis of the Talud Tegak Wharf at the Public Port Owned by PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia (PELINDO) Gresik Dwi Surya, Akbar; Dahri, Muhammad; Yudianto, Prima Yudha; Rakhman, Rizqi Aini
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management (JES-TM) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jestm.v6i1.405

Abstract

The Public Port of PELINDO Gresik is one of the strategic ports in East Java that functions as a major hub for regional cargo and logistics movement. Talud Tegak Wharf is one of the operational facilities that plays an important role in supporting cargo handling activities, particularly log timber commodities. This study aims to analyze the operational performance of Talud Tegak Wharf in supporting the smooth provision of port services. This research was conducted at Talud Tegak Wharf of the Public Port owned by PT Pelabuhan Indonesia (PELINDO) Gresik over a one-year observation period. The research employed a quantitative method using an operational performance analysis approach. Data were obtained through field observations and port operational records, analyzed then based on operational performance indicators, including vessel arrival trends, berthing time, cargo handling productivity, and berth utilization rate or Berth Occupancy Ratio (BOR). The analysis results were subsequently compared with port operational performance standards specified in the technical regulations of the Directorate General of Sea Transportation. The results indicate that the operational performance of Talud Tegak Wharf is in a good category. The average productivity of log timber cargo handling reached 63.52 m³/hour, exceeding the minimum operational performance standard. Meanwhile, the average BOR value of 82.04 percent indicates a high level of berth utilization while still remaining within safe limits. Overall, the analyzed operational performance indicators demonstrate that Talud Tegak Wharf has met the applicable port operational service performance standards at the Public Port of PELINDO Gresik
Comparison Of LCL Handling Charges At The Container Freight Station (CFS) Line 1 And Line 2 Depots Prasasti, Naiya; Dahri, Muhammad; Yudianto, Prima Yudha; Rakhman, Rizqi Aini
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management (JES-TM) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jestm.v6i1.406

Abstract

Less than Container Load (LCL) is defined as cargo whose volume does not fill a full container and its movement requires allocation of LCL handling charges. This study aims to conduct a comparative study of LCL handling charges between Line 1 Container Freight Station (CFS) facilities and Line 2 depot facilities. Differences in operational locations and customs status between Line 1 CFS and Line 2 depots are predicted to cause variations in cost structures that directly affect the efficiency of the logistics supply chain. This study has three main objectives: identifying LCL service procedures, analyzing the development of LCL throughput volume for the period 2021–2024, and comparing LCL handling charges between the two locations. The methodology used is quantitative with a descriptive approach. Data were obtained through observation, interviews, and document studies at the Commercial and Business Development Department. Data analysis involved calculating the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) to measure volume trends and descriptive comparative analysis to evaluate cost structures. The results show that LCL services are implemented through three main Job Orders: Receiving Service LCL (RSL), MIM, and Delivery Cargo. The LCL throughput trend shows a positive increase with a CAGR of 17.996%. Furthermore, the cost analysis results show that the Line 2 depot charges a higher LCL handling charge, which is around 26%–30% compared to the Line 1 CFS. Thus, the Line 1 CFS is proven to provide a competitive advantage for service users through a more efficient LCL charge handling structure.