Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Unggul Pamekas
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pentingnya Hak Pemilihan Umum dalam Proses Demokratisasi Devina Cahya Kamila; Anggita Dita Sari; Andika Putra Kamajaya; Gamaliel Yudo Widiyanto; Arvi Octaviana; Unggul Pamekas; Kuswan Hadji
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli : Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v1i3.265

Abstract

Elections or general elections have an important role in determining the future of the nation by electing leaders and officials who are directly elected by the people and for the people. Democracy is the main factor in holding elections as people are free to choose according to their conscience without any coercion or threat. However, the process of implementing elections in Indonesia still experiences obstacles such as the white group (golput) who choose to give up their voting rights in determining the future of the nation. Therefore, we provide solutions and suggestions that can be used to reduce the percentage of the white group by means of election education, voting training, encouraging political parties to be more active, using the media to publish information about elections, election monitoring, research and opinion surveys as described in this research article that we wrote in the hope that it will create a movement to suppress white groups who throw away their voting rights. Then, in compiling this research article, we used an empirical juridical qualitative research method by raising two problem formulations that are problems in the current era. With the results of this research article, hopefully it can help you and can be a source of reference in preparing research that has the same aims and objectives.
Persepsi Masyarakat Tentang Dispensasi Nikah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Lindi Kartika Dewi; Balqis Dewi Rahayu; Intan Rahayu; Bagus Fajar Ardiyanto; Rakha Salman Sanusi Putra; Unggul Pamekas; Athalla Fikra Yazdaniar; Stephanus Louis Scaeva Tapiheru
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 2 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i2.1131

Abstract

Dispensasi nikah merupakan mekanisme hukum yang memberikan izin khusus kepada calon pengantin di bawah umur untuk menikah, yang dalam praktiknya sering digunakan sebagai solusi terhadap situasi darurat sosial seperti kehamilan di luar nikah, tekanan budaya, dan persoalan ekonomi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik dispensasi nikah dalam perspektif hukum Islam dan hukum nasional, serta mengevaluasi respons masyarakat dan peran pengadilan agama dalam menerapkan prinsip perlindungan anak. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan, data dianalisis menggunakan content analysis berbasis sosiologis dan empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dispensasi nikah umumnya didorong oleh tiga faktor utama: ekonomi, degradasi moral, dan rendahnya tingkat pendidikan. Di sisi lain, praktik ini masih menimbulkan pro dan kontra, di mana sebagian masyarakat memandangnya sebagai solusi syar’i dan kultural, sementara sebagian lainnya menilai sebagai bentuk pembiaran terhadap pernikahan dini yang berisiko tinggi. Dalam konteks hukum Islam, dispensasi dapat diterima sebagai bentuk darurat (darurah), namun harus dibatasi dengan prinsip maslahat dan tidak dijadikan alasan permanen untuk melanggar hukum. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pentingnya penguatan sinergi antara hukum Islam dan hukum nasional, edukasi hukum kepada masyarakat, serta reformasi kebijakan dispensasi agar berpihak pada perlindungan hak anak dan pembangunan keluarga yang berkualitas
Keterbatasan Transparansi DPR Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Legislasi : Analisis Partisipasi Publik Dalam Kasus UU Cipta Kerja Syafiqa Nadhira Kusuma; Janter Panjaitan; Unggul Pamekas; Adhirajasa Shidqi Muhamad; Rafli Akbar Rafsanjani; Fidanzani Zulfadikhan Azhar; Kuswan Hadji
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i4.2686

Abstract

This article examines the limitation of transparency within the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) during the formulation of the Job Creation Act (Law No. 11 of 2020) and its implications for legislative performance and public participation. Transparency represents a fundamental requirement in a democratic legal system as it ensures accountability, public oversight, and the legitimacy of legal products. However, the legislative process of the Job Creation Act demonstrated significant procedural issues, including inconsistent draft versions, restricted access to essential documents, accelerated deliberation, and the marginalization of meaningful public participation. This study highlights how these limitations hinder the public’s constitutional rights, weaken legislative oversight, and create asymmetrical power relations that enable elite dominance in policymaking. The lack of transparency also led to procedural defects acknowledged by the Constitutional Court, reflecting a systemic decline in democratic legislative practices. Using a normative juridical method supported by legislative analysis and doctrinal studies, this paper argues that the absence of transparency not only reduces the quality of participation but also erodes the legitimacy and accountability of the DPR. The findings emphasize the urgent need for open access to legislative documents, inclusive public consultation, and strengthened accountability mechanisms to ensure democratic and lawful policy making.
Co-Authors adhirajasa shidqi muhamad Andika Putra Kamajaya Anggita Dita Sari Arvi Octaviana Athalla Fikra Yazdaniar Bagus Fajar Ardiyanto Balqis Dewi Rahayu Devina Cahya Kamila Fidanzani Zulfadikhan Azhar Gamaliel Yudo Widiyanto Intan Rahayu Janter Panjaitan Kuswan Hadji Lindi Kartika Dewi Rafli Akbar Rafsanjani Rakha Salman Sanusi Putra Stephanus Louis Scaeva Tapiheru Syafiqa Nadhira Kusuma