Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Efek Kebakaran Hutan Kalimantan Pada Hukum Internasional Andhika Ivan Putra Pamungkas; Felixs Ade Santoso; Deaz Aji Pratama; Mohammad Arya Dharmaputra; Janter Panjaitan; Syahputraaditya Kusrin Surbakti; Rani Pajrin
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v3i2.3741

Abstract

Indonesia is an archipelagic country where almost more than half of its area has forests that store various kinds of plants, it indicates that almost all regions of Indonesia have a forest ecosystem that are very important for the survival of Indonesia and the world. Forests have many positive impacts that can be used by the community to become a livelihood. Behind the forests owned by Indonesia, there are various problems that are of international concern, one of which is forest fires. The causes of forest fires are very diverse which causes the impact of smoke from forest fires to spread to our neighboring countries such as Singapore and Malaysia which makes smoke from these forest fires a negative view of the international world on Indonesia. Human resource factors are important in the prevention and handling of forest fires, human factors such as opposing loads are positive and negative, on the one hand humans can prevent forest fires on the other hand humans can be the cause of forest fires. These things are complications experienced by Indonesia in handling and preventing forest fires, however, natural factors can also affect the occurrence of forest fires. The country has a responsibility in maintaining its natural sustainability as well as the country has a responsibility in the smoke problem that causes neighboring countries to suffer losses from both the economic sector and other sectors.
Perlindungan Pelaku Terorisme dari Segi Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Perlindungan Korban Terorisme Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2018 Janter Panjaitan; SyahputraAditya K S; Elyassin Firdaus; Prastian Nur Huda
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.888

Abstract

The handling of terrorism crimes in Indonesia requires a balance between safeguarding the rights of perpetrators as individuals entitled to human rights and fulfilling the rights of victims affected by such acts of violence. This study aims to evaluate how human rights protections for terrorism suspects are upheld during legal proceedings, as well as how the state strives to protect and rehabilitate victims of terrorism under Law No. 5 of 2018 on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Using a normative juridical approach, this research analyzes a case study based on the North Jakarta District Court’s Decision No. 1580/Pid.Sus.Terrorism/2020/PN.Jkt.Utr. The findings indicate that terrorism suspects are granted fair legal treatment, including the right to defense, a fair trial, and protection from torture, in accordance with the principle of non-derogable rights under international human rights law. On the other hand, Law No. 5 of 2018 establishes a clearer and more comprehensive legal framework to ensure victims' rights, including rehabilitation, compensation, and restitution. However, the implementation of victim protections still faces various technical and administrative challenges. This study recommends strengthening mechanisms for victim protection and enhancing legal enforcers' awareness of human rights principles in handling terrorism cases.
Dampak Ketidakpercayaan Masyarakat terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Terkait Transparansi Pengalokasian Pajak Daerah Bandar Lampung Anindya Rahma Fathiya; Janter Panjaitan; Andhika Ivan
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4722

Abstract

This study discusses the impact of public distrust on government performance, especially related to the transparency of regional tax allocation in Bandar Lampung. The purpose of the study was to analyze how public perception of government transparency affects the level of tax compliance and the effectiveness of regional tax management. The methods used are literature studies and normative juridical analysis of laws and regulations as well as secondary data related to tax revenues in Bandar Lampung. The results of the study show that the lack of transparency in the management and reporting of regional taxes lowers public trust, which has an impact on low participation and compliance of taxpayers. The implications of these findings underscore the importance of increasing transparency and accountability of local governments to rebuild public trust and achieve tax revenue targets optimally.
Keterbatasan Transparansi DPR Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Legislasi : Analisis Partisipasi Publik Dalam Kasus UU Cipta Kerja Syafiqa Nadhira Kusuma; Janter Panjaitan; Unggul Pamekas; Adhirajasa Shidqi Muhamad; Rafli Akbar Rafsanjani; Fidanzani Zulfadikhan Azhar; Kuswan Hadji
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i4.2686

Abstract

This article examines the limitation of transparency within the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) during the formulation of the Job Creation Act (Law No. 11 of 2020) and its implications for legislative performance and public participation. Transparency represents a fundamental requirement in a democratic legal system as it ensures accountability, public oversight, and the legitimacy of legal products. However, the legislative process of the Job Creation Act demonstrated significant procedural issues, including inconsistent draft versions, restricted access to essential documents, accelerated deliberation, and the marginalization of meaningful public participation. This study highlights how these limitations hinder the public’s constitutional rights, weaken legislative oversight, and create asymmetrical power relations that enable elite dominance in policymaking. The lack of transparency also led to procedural defects acknowledged by the Constitutional Court, reflecting a systemic decline in democratic legislative practices. Using a normative juridical method supported by legislative analysis and doctrinal studies, this paper argues that the absence of transparency not only reduces the quality of participation but also erodes the legitimacy and accountability of the DPR. The findings emphasize the urgent need for open access to legislative documents, inclusive public consultation, and strengthened accountability mechanisms to ensure democratic and lawful policy making.