Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

The Principles of Law to Resolve Disharmony of Regulations in the Calculation of Financial Loss to the State Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Proceedings of AICS - Social Sciences Vol 6 (2016): Proceeding of 6th AIC in conjuction with ICMSA
Publisher : Proceedings of AICS - Social Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (225.389 KB)

Abstract

Upholding the rule of law remains a serious challenge in Indonesia, that law enforcement should be carried out based on the principle of legality, included in the calculation of financial loss to the state in law enforcement against corruption. Certainty calculation of losses to the state is difficult to be achieved because of disharmony some regulations in the definition, the process and subjectivity in determining the method of calculation of losses to the state. Conflicts of some regulations makes law enforcement became ineffective, inefficient and inconsistent. This research aims to investigate the principles of law in the calculation of financial loss to the state to overcome conflicting regulations. This research is juridical normative. The data used are related regulations and court verdicts. This research use statue approach and conceptual approach. This research found that disharmony of regulations in the calculation of financial loss to the state can be solved with lex superiori derogat legi inferiori and lex specialis derogat legi generali.
Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Pengadaan Alat Kesehatan Di Indonesia Ahmad Feri Tanjung; Rizkan Zulyadi; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art7

Abstract

he financial loss of the state is determined by many factors leading the method of calculating the state financial loss  to  be  unstandard  and  then  causing  uncertainty in  calculation  of  the  state  financial  loss,  including  in  the procurement of medical devices. This study aims to (a) analyze the factors determining the financial loss of state in the procurement of medical devices and (b) to analyze the method used to calculate the financial loss of the state in the procurement of medical devices. This is a normative juridical research using a conceptual approach and a regulatory approach. The data used were secondary data collected through literature. From the research results, first, it can be concluded that the factors determining the fiancial loss of state in the procurement of medical devices were the factors of goods effectiveness as needed. The procurement of medical devices that has the nature of the goods is a unit to be  utilized as needed, and then the method of calculating the financial loss of state used is the method of calculating the total loss, but if the medical devices that have properties can be utilized separately,  the  calculation  of  financial  losses  used  is  net  loss.  Another  factor  affecting  was  the  price reasonableness if the procurement of medical devices can be utilized as needed but the price of medical devices exceeds the reasonableness. Second, the method of calculating financial loss of stated used due to the price reasonableness was the price reasonableness method.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP INVESTOR DALAM PERJANJIAN PINJAM MEMINJAM SECARA ONLINE (PEER TO PEER LENDING) DI PLATFORM TANIFUND Asty Thania Dayanty; Chrisnoven Pasaribu; Yeni Syahfitri Sigalingging; Alvines Alvines; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
UNES Law Review Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v3i4.198

Abstract

Through P2P Lending, we can invest. The purpose of this research is to analyze the parties responsible for the Loan Facility Distribution Agreement on the TaniFund Platform, along with legal protection for investors. In this research, we used juridical-normative and descriptive research..Theresults ofthis studyare basedon the agreementon theTaniFundplatform, the lender iscategorized as alender where the organizer is not responsible for the risk of borrowing and interest losses due to default of the loan recipient. Legal protection for investors is stated in article14 LawNumber 25of2007 concerning Investment. Based on agreements on the TaniFund platform, lenders can conduct deliberations or sue to the general court inthe eventof adispute with the organizer. Researchers hope that the government can be more optimal in supervising P2PLending platforms in Indonesia, so that organizers do not arbitrarily include the transfer of responsibility in making standard agreements that can harm investors.
Pandemi Corona Sebagai Dalil Force Majeure Dalam Pembatalan Suatu Kontrak Viderina Khotaro; Vania Zelin Lawrence Simanjorang; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), November
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (715.916 KB) | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v4i2.807

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the corona pandemic categorized in Force Majeure in a contract. This problem is focused on the existence of the Corona pandemic, which can make debtors delay in fulfilling achievements or canceling contracts. How to claim Force Majeuree in a business contract. In order to approach this problem, a normative juridical legal research type is used with a descriptive-analytic nature of research aimed at describing it systematically, factually. Data - data collected through secondary data and analyzed qualitatively. Covid-19 can be categorized as force majeure, used as an excuse for the debtor not to fulfill the contract. Force majeure conditions cannot be used as a reason for canceling a contract, but renegotiation can be carried out to cancel or change the contents of a previously agreed contract. With Covid-19 being able to make debtors delay in fulfilling their achievements or canceling contracts, Covid-19 is considered to be a force majeure depending on the meaning of force majeure if it is included in the contract. As long as the affected party is able to prove that the force majeure conditions have been met. How to claim force majeure in a business contract in the Covid-19 era, claim force majeure based on appropriate legal references. The claiming parties must analyze whether a pandemic, disaster or government action applies certain provisions including the scope of force majeure accommodated in the contract.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP HUTANG YANG JATUH TEMPO DAN DAPAT DITAGIH DALAM PERMOHONAN PKPU DAN PAILIT YANG DIAJUKAN OLEH DEBITUR Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Tengku Putra Muhammad Iqbal; Zeandrico Immanuel Ferdolin Hutabarat
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2021): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v10i2.1805

Abstract

Tujuan Penelitian ini merupakan untuk menjelaskan hubungan preindustrial antara perusahaan dan pekerja mengenai hutang menurut putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Niaga Mdn dan putusan Nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019/PN Niaga Mdn. Kepailitan suatu perusahaan dapat menyebabkan para pekerja di PHK dan secara tidak langsung perusahaan memiliki kewajiban membayarkan sejumlah uang kepada pekerja dan jatuh temponya perusahaan memiliki beberapa syarat berdasarkan keputusan pengadilan hubungan preindustrial. Menggunakan jenis penilitian yuridis-normatif, sumber data sekunder. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kepustakaan untuk mengumpulkan data. Kemudian data diolah serta dikaitkan dengan berbagai data sehingga menjadi kesimpulan yang memiliki makna. Ketidak mampuan perusahaan membayarkan piutang terhadap kreditur yang memberikan pinjaman menyebabkan perusahaan tersebut menjadi pailit, pailitnya perusahaan menyebabkan pekerja-pekerja yang diperusahaan itu mengalami PHK. Perusahaan yang mem PHK pekerja berkewajiban membayarkan sejumlah uang kepada pekerja tersebut dan kewajiban pembayaran itu termasuk kedalam hutang perusahaan kepada pekerja, namun kewajiban tersebut memiliki syarat-syarat waktu jatuh tempo yang diatur oleh keputusan pengadilan hubungan preindustrial. Menurut putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Niaga Mdn dan putusan Nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019/PN Niaga Mdn, perusahaan berkewajibkan membayar utang kepada pekerja dikarenakan perusahaan tersebut mengalami pailit dan memiliki rentang waktu untuk melakukan pembayaran piutang tersebut dimana diatur pada UU No 37 Tahun 2004.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PEMBAYARAN DENDA TILANG DENGAN SISTEM ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT ( ETLE ) Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Togar Mangapul Manurung; Andreas Candra
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v11i1.2464

Abstract

Pada saat ini masih banyak pengguna jalan raya khususnya pengendara yang kerap melakukan pelanggaran peraturan lalu lintas. Akibat dari adanya kesalahan berlalulintas, maka dengan ini Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia khususnya dibidang satuan lalulintas menerapkan sistem ETLE sebagai sanksi dalam bentuk penilangan yang tertuang pada UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 mengenai Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (LLAJ). Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif deskriptif. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penulisan makalah ini adalah metode penelitian kepustakaan. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan analisis data dengan metode kuantitatif yang menghasilkan data deskriptif analitis. Penerapan sistem ETLE sebagai sanksi berupa denda telah dilaksanakan dengan baik dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 22 (LLAJ) Tahun 2009 tentang Angkutan Jalan. Dalam pelaksaan sistem ini perlu diketahui bahwa adanya suatu asas hukum yaitu Asas “lex specialis derogat legi generali” yaitu hukum secara khusus didahulukan daripada hukum secara umum. Dimana kita ketahui asas hukum semacam ini menjadi penguat pertanggungjawaban hukum yang akan disanksikan kepada pelanggar lalu lintas.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pengadaan Barang/Jasa pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Putusan No. 28/PID.SUS-TPK/2022.PN.MDN) Julianus Lase; Karto Simamora; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Ahmad Feri Tanjung
Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya Vol 13, No 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/dikdaya.v13i1.433

Abstract

:  Since the announcement of the positive case of Covid-19 in Indonesia on March 2 2020, the government has stepped up steps to handle procurement of government goods and services amid the global Covid-19 pandemic. Presidential Decree No. 4 of 2020. Ordered all Ministries to act quickly, precisely, centrally and simultaneously. Provision of services and goods to accelerate the reduction of the virus. Legal Basis for the Implementation of services and goods, Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Government services and goods. Based on Article 59 of Presidential Decree No. 59. Government Institution Number 16 of 2018 (LKPP) No 13 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Government services and goods for Emergency Response. (SE Head of LKPP) Interpretation No 3 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Provision of services and goods for Pandemic Efforts. The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of services and goods during the Covid19 pandemic. Study the Policy Institute for the Implementation of Government goods and services. Learn more about the steps taken by the ministry to accelerate the delivery of services and goods. The technique used to collect data is the use of literature studies, but also used legal materials. The data analysis used is prescriptive data analysis. The research theory used is the theory of the implementation of government services and goods during a pandemic, namely the Ministry to do it quickly, precisely, focused, and coordinated.  
ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM MENGENAI KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN NO.57/PID.SUS/2014/PN.TJG Tifani Anastasya Br Sembiring; Tiara Miranda Br. Sihaloho; Ilham Ananta Sinulingga; Ferry Fridolind Hutasoit; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Meisias Sagala
JURNAL DARMA AGUNG Vol 30 No 2 (2022): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v30i2.3414

Abstract

Anak adalah generasi bangsa yang harus di lindungi. Namun eksploitasi seksual sering terjadi dalam kehidupan, dimana anak diperjual belikan untuk pemenuhan seksual seperti putusan No/57/Pid.sus/2014/PN.Tjg yang akan diteliti. Tujuan dalri penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaturan hukum, perlindungan hukum serta pertimbangan hukum pada Putusan No.57/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Tjg. Metode penelitiannya ialah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan UU serta konseptual. Dalam penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa Perlindungan hukumnya telah diatur pada KUHP Pasal 285 serta UU No.31 Tahun 2014 berupa perubahan UU No.13 Tahun 2006 serta dalam putusan No.57/Pid.Sus/2014/PN. Tjg hukuman yang dijatuhkan kepada terdakwa terlalu ringan tidak mengandung kepastian hukum. leh sebab itu seluruh aparat penegak hukum harus aktif mensosialisasikan terkait pencegahan pelecehan seksual kepada anak di bawah umur begitu juga bagi orang tua harus mampu menjadi teladan bagi seluruh anaknya untuk berperilaku baik serta para majelis hakim juga harus menjatuhkan maksimal ancaman hukuman yang dirumuskan pada ketentuan pidana yang di langgar dengan sehingga dapat menjadi upaya pencegahan tidak mengulangi dan pencegahan secara umum.
Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Persaingan Usaha dalam Pelaksanaan Tender Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Hot Dion Manurung; Sarjit Kaur; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (392.371 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i5.7038

Abstract

Dalam Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana bentuk dan pertimbangan KPPU untuk memutuskan perkara Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Persaingan usaha tidak sehat yang dimaksud adalah adanya persekongkolan dalam tender yaitu praktik persaingan yang terjadi antara sesama pemeran usaha yang sebetulnya saling bersaing secara sehat dalam suatu pengadaan tender. Namun para pemeran usaha tetap melakukan tindakan persekongkolan antara sesama mereka atau bersama pemerintah. Maka dalam Penelitian jurnal ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) harus berinisiatif melihat bagaimana proses terjadinya suatu persekongkolan pada tender dengan bersama meneliti beragam petunjuk persekongkolan yang selalu dijumpai pada pelaksanaan tender. Serta KPPU dapat memakai Pendekatan secara Per Se Illegal untuk mencapai tujuan pada Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan praktek monopoli dan Persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, serta spesifikasi penelitiannya dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif analitis berdasarkan sumber data primer dan sekunder yang didapat dari studi kepustakaan yang akan diteliti dengan analisis kualitatif. Pelaksanaan tender barang dan jasa akan terus ada demi kemajuan serta kesejahteraan masyarakat, untuk itu dengan adanya KPPU semoga para pemeran usaha tidak melakukan tindakan persekongkolan kembali baik persekongkolan secara horizontal, vertikal maupun horizontal dan vertikal (campuran).
Juridical Review of Delik Culpa on Traffic Accident Cases Hotryan Rivaldo Hamonangan Purba; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Jurnal Syntax Admiration Vol. 5 No. 8 (2024): Jurnal Syntax Admiration
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jsa.v5i8.1439

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of material criminal law to the crime of traffic negligence that results in the loss of life of another person in decision Number 142/Pid.Sus/2020./PN Jap and to find out the legal considerations by the panel of judges in imposing a penalty in the form of a penalty for the crime of traffic negligence that causes casualties Number 142/Pid.Sus/2020./PN Jap. This research was carried out by collecting data through literature research. In the study, it was found that, in decision number 142/Pid.Sus/2020./PN Jap, the indictment prepared by the Public Prosecutor had met the formal and material requirements. In his demand, the Public Prosecutor demanded that the defendant be guilty of committing the crime of traffic negligence Article 310 paragraphs (4), (3), and (2) No. 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation by the first indictment, based on the legal facts, both witness statements and the defendant's statements as well as the elements contained in the indictment are considered to have been proven by the Public Prosecutor so that the acts and the elements of the article match each other. The Judge's consideration in Applying criminal provisions against the perpetrators, in this case, is appropriate where the judge has considered both juridical considerations, trial facts, witness statements, existing evidence, judge's beliefs, and support matters. Based on the facts at the trial, the Panel of Judges considered that the defendant could be held responsible for the acts committed with the consideration that the defendant had been legally proven which resulted in the death of another person so the defendant was sentenced to a commensurate sentence.