Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.794
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES CHEMICA Jurnal Teknik Kimia Profetika AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis JURNAL LENTERA : Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan dan Teknologi Dirosat : Journal of Islamic Studies al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies PeTeKa IJISH (International Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities) JURPIKAT (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam Taqaddumi: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN AGAMA Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam TAJDID Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Nur Kholis
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Keadilan Hakim dalam Hadis: Rekonstruksi Pemikiran T.M. Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy dalam Kitab Mutiara Hadis Muhammad Ilham; Nur Kholis
JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN AGAMA Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Oktober: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Kebudayaan dan Agama
Publisher : CV. ALIM'SPUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/jipa.v4i4.2580

Abstract

This article examines judicial justice in the Prophetic hadith through T.M. Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy’s interpretation in Mutiara Hadis, particularly the chapter on al-aqḍiyah. The study is grounded in the premise that judicial integrity depends not only on legal competence but also on the judge’s psychological condition, evidentiary objectivity, procedural equality, and moral accountability. This is a library-based study using Mutiara Hadis and authentic hadiths concerning the prohibition of adjudicating while angry and the obligation to decide cases on the basis of outward evidence. The analysis employs Musahadi HAM’s three stages of hadith interpretation: historical, eidetic, and practical criticism. The study finds that Hasbi’s thought can be reconstructed into four principles of judicial justice: clarity of the judge’s personal condition, evidence-based objectivity, procedural equality, and moral-transcendental accountability. The prohibition of judging while angry extends to conditions that impair clear reasoning, including hunger, thirst, illness, and psychological pressure. The hadith on disputing parties also emphasizes the judge’s epistemic limitation to observable evidence and the parties’ responsibility not to manipulate arguments. This reconstruction is relevant to Indonesia’s Code of Ethics and Conduct for Judges, especially the principles of fairness, independence, integrity, responsibility, and professionalism.
Co-Authors Aisyatur Rosyidah Budi Santosa Deni Ismanto Diyan Faturahman Dody Hartanto Eko Susanto Eko Susanto Hartanto, Dody Jannatul Husna Jannatul Husna Jannatul Husna Jannatul Husna M. Sayuti Miftachul Huda Mohammad Jailani Mohammad Jailani Mohammad Jailani Muh Fatkul Mubin Muh. Iqbal Muhammad Ilham Nani Aprilia Okimustava Okimustava Oqy Andaresta Qaem Aulassyahied, Qaem Siti Jamilatun Sudarsono, Bambang Suyadi, Suyadi Ulaya Ahdiani Ulaya Ahdiani Yusutria Yusutria Yusutria