Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Critical Discourse The Epistemology of Muhammad Syahrur's Ijtihad Asep Suraya Maulana; Imam Yahya
Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 18 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jhi.v18i1.2668

Abstract

Syahrur's offer toward the sceptical-literalist and modernist-secularist attitudes of the Islamic community is, returning to Inzal (al-Qur'an), God's revelation that delivered to the Prophet. This qualitative study, to analyze the epistemology of Syahrur's ijtihad. The results show Syahrur's thinking about epistemology originates from material nature that is beyond human existence. Syahrur in interpreting the ahkam verses still agreed to maintain the purity of the teachings of the Qur'an, which shalah likulli zaman wa makan. According to Syahrur, the truth was based on three pillars, i.e: revelation, reason, and reality. The combination of the 122 Critical Discourse The Epistemology of ......121- 140. (Asep Suraya Maulana) Vol 18 No 1, Juni 2020 ISSN 1829-7382 (Print) 2502-7719 (Online) three resulted in new and modern Islamic legal knowledge. Syahrur's offer, on the theory of scientific historicity, linguistic hermeneutics and Marxist dialectics, shows an attempt to deconstruct science that has been patented in the application of Islamic law. The difference from the concept of classical ijtihad ushul fiqh with the concept of ijtihad Syahrur, i.e: 1) places ijtihad in a vital position for modern Islamic law; 2) ijtihad only at the stage of justifying or forbidding something; 3) requires scientific achievements and modern knowledge systems; 4) allows to ijtihad all legal texts, even though the ulama see as qath'i; and 5) can be done individually
Improving Understanding Of Muslim-Friendly Tourism Village Management In Indonesia Through Socialization and Education Hermawan Adinugraha, Hendri; Suroso; Slamet Nurchamid; Moh. Nasrudin; Maulana, Asep Suraya
Amala Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): May 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Islamic Business State Islamic University of Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/f3rf8z79

Abstract

This community service program aims to improve understanding of Muslim-friendly tourism village management in Indonesia through socialization and education. Muslim-friendly tourism villages have great potential in the halal tourism industry but still face challenges, such as limited understanding of halal standards, lack of supporting facilities, and lack of digital-based marketing strategies. To overcome these problems, this program adopts socialization, education, and mentoring methods involving local stakeholders. Socialization is conducted through interactive discussions and seminars, while education includes technical training for tourism actors related to halal service management and digital marketing. The program evaluation showed a significant increase in community understanding of halal tourism, readiness for Muslim-friendly accommodation, and the number of businesses applying for halal certification. The program contributes to strengthening the capacity of tourism village managers to provide Sharia-based services and increase attractiveness for Muslim tourists. Continuous assistance is needed to ensure the sustainability of the implementation of the halal tourism concept in various tourism villages in Indonesia.
Comparative Legal Perspectives on Halal Tourism Regulations in Indonesia, Pakistan, and Nigeria Hermawan Adinugraha, Hendri; Fikri, Muhammad Khoirul; Maulana, Asep Suraya; Sain, Zohaib Hassan; Lawal, Uthman Shehu
Abdurrauf Law and Sharia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Abdurrauf Law and Sharia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/arlash.v2i2.431

Abstract

The lack of harmonization in halal tourism regulations in Indonesia, Pakistan, and Nigeria has led to differences in standards, weak legal certainty, and inconsistent services that hinder the development of halal destinations. This study aims to analyse and compare the regulatory frameworks of halal tourism in Indonesia, Pakistan, and Nigeria, highlighting the differences in legal systems, institutional capacity, and their implications for the consistency of services and the development of the halal tourism industry. This research employs a qualitative method with a literature study approach, examining laws, government policies, institutional documents, and academic literature related to halal regulations. Data were analysed using content analysis techniques and comparative analysis to identify patterns of similarities, differences, and regulatory effectiveness across the three countries. The results of the study indicate that Indonesia has a more standardised halal regulatory framework, established through formal institutions such as BPJPH and MUI. In contrast, Pakistan adopts a market-driven approach due to the absence of formal regulations governing the halal tourism sector. Nigeria has fragmented rules due to its federal structure and dual legal system, resulting in varying standards of halal service across regions. The findings of this literature show that the legal system and the governance capacity of each country greatly influence the effectiveness of regulations. This research provides an understanding of the relationship between legal configuration and the efficacy of halal governance, offering a basis for regulatory harmonisation that strengthens the competitiveness of halal destinations. This study makes a new contribution by presenting a comprehensive comparative legal analysis of halal tourism regulations in three countries with distinct legal system characteristics, which have not been extensively discussed in previous studies. [Ketidakharmonisan regulasi pariwisata halal di Indonesia, Pakistan, dan Nigeria menimbulkan perbedaan standar, lemahnya kepastian hukum, dan inkonsistensi layanan yang menghambat pengembangan destinasi halal. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan membandingkan kerangka regulasi pariwisata halal di Indonesia, Pakistan, dan Nigeria dengan menyoroti perbedaan sistem hukum, kapasitas kelembagaan, serta implikasinya terhadap konsistensi layanan dan pengembangan industri pariwisata halal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi pustaka yang menelaah undang-undang, kebijakan pemerintah, dokumen kelembagaan, dan literatur akademik terkait regulasi halal. Data dianalisis melalui teknik analisis isi dan analisis komparatif untuk mengidentifikasi pola persamaan, perbedaan, dan efektivitas regulasi di ketiga negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia memiliki kerangka regulasi halal yang lebih terstandardisasi melalui lembaga formal seperti BPJPH dan MUI, sedangkan Pakistan mengadopsi pendekatan market-driven akibat ketiadaan regulasi formal yang mengatur sektor pariwisata halal. Nigeria menampilkan regulasi yang terfragmentasi karena struktur federal dan dual legal system, sehingga standar layanan halal berbeda antar wilayah. Temuan pustaka ini menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas regulasi sangat dipengaruhi sistem hukum dan kapasitas tata kelola masing-masing negara. Penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman mengenai hubungan antara konfigurasi hukum dan efektivitas tata kelola halal, serta menawarkan dasar bagi harmonisasi regulasi dalam memperkuat daya saing destinasi halal. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi baru dengan menyajikan analisis hukum perbandingan yang komprehensif mengenai regulasi pariwisata halal di tiga negara dengan karakter sistem hukum yang berbeda, yang belum banyak dibahas dalam kajian sebelumnya.]