Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENYULUHAN HUKUM PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA DI DESA MUARO, KECAMATAN SENTAJO RAYA, KABUPATEN KUANTAN SINGINGI: Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Muhammad Iqbal; Aprinelita Aprinelita; Afrinald Rizhan; Ita Iryanti; Shilvirichiyanti Shilvirichiyanti; Rismahayani Rismahayani; Halmadi Asmara; M.Musa M.Musa; Rosyidi Hamzah; Desi Apriani; Admiral Admiral; Surizki Febrianto; Heni Susanti; Teguh Rama Prasja; Selvi Harviasantri; Moza Dela Fudika; Sri Arlina
BHAKTI NAGORI (Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): BHAKTI NAGORI (Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) Desember 2023
Publisher : LPPM UNIKS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36378/bhakti_nagori.v3i2.3152

Abstract

Lembaga perkawinan merupakan lembaga yang mengesahkan hubungan antara seorang laki-laki dengan seorang wanita dalam sebuah perkawinan. Tujuan perkawinan adalah untuk membentuk rumah tangga yang bahagia lahir dan batin. Namun tidak selamanya tujuan perkawinan ini. Dalam berbagai tindak pidana klekerasan dalam rumah tangga terdapat bentuk-bentuk tindak kekerasan, yang meliputi: Kekerasan fisik,Kekerasan psikis, Kekerasan seksual, Penelantaran rumah tangga. Tim Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dapat memberikan solusi terhadap masalah-masalah yang dihadapi oleh masyarakat dalam hal perlindungan terhadap kekerasan didalam rumah tangga. Faktor Penyebab Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.Dalam berbagai perkara kekersan dalam rumah tangga, faktor penyebab nya adalah ekonomi dan perkembangan teknologi, apakah dalam hal ini media sosisal dan tontonan.
Asset Recovery For Victims of Investment Fraud in Money Laundering Offenses: A John Rawlsian Perspective Erdiansyah Erdiansyah; Suparto; Surizki Febrianto
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3393

Abstract

The growth of digital investment has contributed to a significant increase in investment fraud, resulting in substantial and collective financial losses for the public. In practice, proceeds of such crimes are frequently concealed through various money laundering schemes, thereby complicating the tracing and return of assets to victims. Although Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering provides effective instruments for asset tracing, seizure, and forfeiture, its normative orientation and law enforcement practice remain predominantly focused on forfeiture for the benefit of the state. Consequently, asset recovery for victims does not operate as an automatic legal consequence of proving money laundering, but rather depends on other legal mechanisms that are fragmented and often ineffective. This study aims to critically examine asset recovery for victims of investment fraud in money laundering cases in Indonesia by applying John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness. Employing a normative juridical approach with prescriptive and evaluative analysis of legislation and judicial practice, the study finds a structural imbalance in asset recovery mechanisms that remains state-centered and has not yet reflected substantive justice for victims as the most disadvantaged group. Therefore, the study underscores the need for normative reconstruction and policy reorientation toward a victim-oriented asset recovery mechanism to ensure that victims’ economic rights are restored in a fair, proportionate, and meaningful manner.