Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Perumusan UU Cipta Kerja Klaster Ketenagakerjaan Berpotensi Menimbulkan Sengketa Ketatanegaraan Henry Kristian Siburian; Baren Sipayung; Andi Wahyudi; Rendra Alfonso Octavianus; Suyanto
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i2.5358

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini mengadopsi pendekatan doktrinal sebagai metode penelitian. Dalam pengumpulan data, metode studi kepustakaan dan dokumentasi digunakan. Proses analisis data terdiri dari beberapa tahapan yaitu perolehan data, reduksi data, penyajian data, dan validasi. Dalam penelitian ini mengkaji kasus perumusan UU cipta kerja klaster ketenagakerjaan berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa ketatanegaraan. UU Ciptaker klaster ketenagakerjaan berpotensi menimbulkan adanya gugatan judicial review oleh pekerja sebagai pihak yang mengalami kerugian konstitusionalitas. Jika judicial review dikabulkan oleh MK, maka hal tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa ketatanegaraan antara MK sendiri dengan Pemerintah (DPR dan/atau Presiden) selaku pembuat UU. Berdasarkan studi kasus hakim Aswanto dan menyikapi dinamika perubahan maupun putusan judicial review UU MK, adanya pembatalan UU berpengaruh negatif hal terhadap kelangsungan karier hakim MK maupun materi perubahan UU MK yang merugikan hakim MK itu sendiri. Kondisi ketidakharmonisan antara MK dengan DPR dan/atau Pemerintah jika berlarut-larut dapat menciptakan friksi kewenangan yang juga berpotensi menimbulkan adanya potensi sengketa ketatanegaraan. Kata Kunci: Cipta Kerja, Ketenakerjaan, Sengketa Ketatanegaraan
Legal Aspects of Audit 10% Participating interest Management on Mahakam Block Working Area Baren - Sipayung; Sardjana Orba Manullang; Henry Kristian Siburian; Karnawi - Kamar; Febrina Nafasati Prihantini
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.2982

Abstract

The efforts of the local government of East Kalimantan Province and Kutai Kartanegara Regency to increase local revenue by proactively taking part in receiving a 10% Participating Interest (PI) offer in the Mahakam Block working area have been successful based on Permen ESDM No. 37 of 2016. The ministerial regulation stipulates that the legal subject for managing the 10% PI has several alternative forms of business entity, namely the old BUMD, new BUMD, or Regional Public Company (Perseroda). Based on these administrative procedures, the legal subject deemed to fulfill the requirements as a legal subject for the 10% PI Manager at the Mahakam WK is PT MMPKM which was formed as a Perseroda business entity. However, this has implications for the emergence of new norms regarding the definition and composition of Perseroda share ownership, as well as the legal subject requirements for managing a 10% PI between the Permen ESDM No. 37 of 2016 and the Regional Government Law, PP BUMD, and PP No. 35 of 2004. Furthermore, because of the scope of state finances, the negative implication is that local governments do not get the maximum regional income from dividends from BUMD holding company PT MMPKM.
The Existence of Civil Sanctions in Spatial Law Enforcement in Indonesia Henry Kristian Siburian; Baren - Sipayung; Any - Andjarwati; Sardjana Orba Manulang; Muhammad Ade Kurnia Harahap
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4031

Abstract

Planning for territorial spatial arrangement is one of the problems with modern urban growth, as cities are growing faster than ever and the territorial government has to take a unique role in overseeing spatial arrangement. 2007 Law No. 26 The government is considering replacing Law Number 24 of 1992, which deals with spatial arranging, with this legislation, which unifies a courteous administration. This study's method of investigation was controlling valid research while taking the study's characteristics into account. The result of the review is the assertion that, taken as a whole, respecting legislation represents people's rights (personenrecht). of In particular, laws, customs, conventions, theories, and statutes give birth to two legitimate subjects: Separately, legal substances (rechts persoon) and humans (natuurlijke persoon). Articles 66, 67, and 75 of Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Arranging provide certain limitations on the occurrence of generous fines. If the last stated are ultimum remedium in nature, a claim based on reclamation may be used to seek for polite discipline for spatial arrangement violations in addition to official and criminal penalties.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL REGULATIONS BETWEEN THE NEW CRIMINAL LAW AND THE CORRUPTION ACT Suyanto; Henry Kristian Siburian; Eko Setyo Nugroho Nugroho; Sardjana Orba Manullang; Baren Sipayung
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i2.753

Abstract

The National CC’s (NCC) ratification has completed the mission of establishing a NCC adequately through a legislative process on the development of codified criminal science and practice adapted to the conditions and characteristics of the Indonesian nation and state, which differed from legal politics during the Dutch colonial administration. It can br concluded from the results of the study that the regulation of corruption crimes between the Corruption Law and the NCC is still classified as an extraordinary crime, but there is a slight difference of increase/decrease in the minimum/maximum prison terms and fines. This is motivated by the implementation of the legal principle of proportional criminal responsibility. Then, the existence of Article 630 of the NCC is the implementation of legal preference Lex Generalis Derogate Legi Specialis and Lex Posteriori Derogat Legi Priori principles, when there is a double arrangement between the Corruption Law and the NCC. However, the NCC also applies the In Dubio Pro Reo principle, which means that when considering two regulations that govern the same case, the rule that is more advantageous to the suspect or defendant is used. By taking into account the provisions of Article 632 of the NCC that this Criminal Code shall come into effect 2 (two) years from the date of promulgation, this should be seen as the implementation of the Government's task to socialize this NCC to the whole community before it is enacted.