Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila dan Wawasan Kebangsaan Bagi Kalangan Muda di Kabupaten Wonogiri Aziz Widhi Nugroho; Retno Eko Mardani; Rengga Kusuma Putra; Satriya Nugraha; Linda Ikawati; Bagus Hermanto; Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub; Dian Karisma; Sitta Saraya; Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Khasanah
Dinamika Sosial : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Transformasi Kesejahteraan Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Dinamika Sosial : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Transformasi Kese
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/dinsos.v2i4.2601

Abstract

A clear national insight can guarantee the achievement of national interests, both internally and externally. This means that national insight provides a clear picture and direction for the nation's survival, as well as the future development of the nation and state. The organization of national and state life must proceed on the basis of mutual agreement, namely Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI), and Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity). Indonesia's existence as a state based on the rule of law (rechtstaat) based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution requires the development of Pancasila ideology and national insight as instruments that serve as catalysts or drivers in strengthening national insight and spirit, love of the homeland, democracy, legal awareness, respect for diversity, and participation in building a Pancasila-based nation in Wonogiri, especially among intellectuals. In accordance with its function, the Pancasila Ideology and National Insight Development organizes national, democratic, legal, multicultural and citizenship education to support the realization of citizens who are aware of their rights and obligations, as well as intelligent, skilled and have character so that they can be relied upon to build the nation and the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia.
Rekonfigurasi Batas Diskresi Pejabat Administrasi Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub; Santi Suryani; Fitriyani Yuliawati; Muhamad Reza Atqia; Wili Suminar
SOSIAL : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS Vol 4 No 1 (2026): SOSIAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/sosial.v4i1.1570

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the position of statutory regulations as the main limiting framework for administrative discretion in Indonesian administrative law, particularly after the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. The main issue examined is the normative shift caused by the removal of the requirement that discretion must not contradict statutory regulations, which potentially weakens legal certainty and judicial control. This research uses a normative juridical method with a regulatory and conceptualization approach, and is supported by the theory of discretionary justice, balance of legal objectives, and good governance. The findings indicate that the elimination of formal legality requirements transforms discretion from a legally constrained authority into a broader administrative freedom, increasing the risk of abuse of power and weakening the objective standards of judicial review in administrative courts. The study concludes that such a shift undermines the core principles of the rule of law and necessitates constitutional review to restore legal certainty, accountability, and effective judicial oversight.
Religious Harmony and Identity Politics in Indonesia’s Electoral Democracy Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub; Santi Suryani; Faisal Fadilla Noorikhsan; Muhamad Reza Atqia; Novia Laela
SOSIAL : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS Vol 4 No 1 (2026): SOSIAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/sosial.v4i1.1571

Abstract

This research is driven by the increasing strength of religion-based identity politics in Indonesia’s post-reform electoral democracy, which creates a dilemma between legitimate political competition and threats to interfaith harmony. The problem formulation of this study concerns how identity politics challenges religious harmony and to what extent harmony can serve as an instrument to reduce polarization and reinforce democratic consolidation. The research questions focus on two main aspects: (1) how the dynamics of harmony are tested by the exploitation of religious issues within electoral contests, and (2) how harmonization strategies can function as social capital in maintaining democratic stability. Using a qualitative approach with a juridical-normative and socio-political framework, this study relies on a literature review involving laws and regulations, court decisions, official state documents, and national and international academic works, combined with content analysis of religiously nuanced political narratives in media and public discourse. The findings indicate that harmony is not a natural social condition but a socio-political construction that is vulnerable to instrumentalization by electoral interests. FKUB and harmony-related regulations tend to remain normative and less effective in the absence of substantive justice. Nonetheless, harmony still holds potential as strategic capital for democracy if it is developed through a framework of justice, religious political literacy, and inclusive democratic governance.
Keadilan Kewarisan Beda Agama: Integrasi Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘Ah dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Enung Herningsih; Santi Suryani; Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub; Novia Laela; Ahmad Saeful Rahman
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3241

Abstract

Cross-religious inheritance remains a contested legal issue in Indonesia because it involves the tension between classical Islamic inheritance doctrine, which generally prohibits inheritance between individuals of different religions, and the demand for substantive justice in a pluralistic society. The development of judicial practice through the application of wasiat wajibah (mandatory bequest) reflects an effort to harmonize Islamic law with Indonesian positive law while maintaining the fundamental principles of Sharīʿah. This study aims to examine cross-religious inheritance from the perspective of Islamic law and analyze the formulation of Indonesian positive law in achieving justice through the wasiat wajibah mechanism based on the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah approach. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. Legal materials consist of primary sources, including legislation, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and Supreme Court decisions, as well as secondary sources from books, scholarly journals, and relevant literature. The materials were analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The findings indicate that although the prohibition of cross-religious inheritance retains normative legitimacy in Islamic jurisprudence, wasiat wajibah represents a form of legal ijtihād that balances Islamic legal principles with substantive justice. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, this mechanism can protect religion, property, and family relationships. Therefore, stronger legal regulation is needed to ensure consistent legal certainty and equitable protection in Indonesia's pluralistic society.
Analisis Keabsahan Akad Nikah Secara Online Menurut Hukum Keluarga Islam Asep Muhamad Ropeul Hidayah; Iim Ali Ismail; Santi Suryani; Sandra Leoni Prakasa Yakub
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6655

Abstract

The development of communication technology has given rise to the practice of conducting marriage contracts online through media such as video calls and video conferencing, raising questions concerning their validity under Islamic family law. This study aims to analyze the validity of online marriage contracts based on the pillars and requirements of marriage, particularly the concepts of ittiḥād al-majlis (unity of the session) and ‘adālah (the integrity of witnesses), as well as to examine their implications for positive law and marriage registration in Indonesia. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials analyzed include the Qur’an, Hadith, Islamic jurisprudential literature, the Compilation of Islamic Law, legislation, court decisions, and previous studies concerning online marriage contracts. The analysis is conducted qualitatively by comparing the views of the Shafi‘i school of thought with those of contemporary Islamic scholars and relating them to the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and legal certainty. The findings indicate that an online marriage contract conducted without the physical presence of the parties in the same place, in principle, does not fulfill the concept of ittiḥād al-majlis, nor the requirements of the physical presence of the guardian and direct observation by witnesses according to the majority of Shafi‘i scholars. However, in genuine emergencies or unavoidable circumstances, the use of digital media may be considered on a limited basis, subject to identity verification, real-time communication, supervision by a marriage registrar, and the use of tawkīl (delegation of the guardian’s authority). This study emphasizes the importance of legal certainty and prudence in adapting digital technology to marriage practices.