Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : 10.31078

Core Subject : Education, Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 896 Documents

3 4 5 6 7

Politik Hukum Pengaturan Right to Vote and Right to be Candidate dalam Undang-Undang Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Rachman, Irfan Nur
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The Constitutional Court in some award restored the right to vote (right to vote) and the right to choose (right to be candidate) for citizens. Some verdict related to the recovery of the political rights, namely the ruling Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on Return Political Rights For former members of the Illegal organization of the Communist Party of Indonesia and Other Illicit Organization and decision Number 102/PUU-VII/2009 on the use of ID card or passport in the elections. The ruling of the Constitutional Court have a legal binding force since spoken in plenary session. The nature of the ruling of the Constitutional Court are final and binding, it means there is no other remedy that can be reached by the parties and also the ruling of the Constitutional Court is not only binding on the parties but also binds all citizens of Indonesia (erga omnes). The ruling of the Constitutional Court was to be acted upon by the ruling of the Constitutional Court, addressad in this case is the President and DPR through a revision of the provisions that have been

Urgensi Legislasi Pelaksanaan mandat UUD 1945 Mengantisipasi ASEAN Economic Community 2015 Arundhati, Gautama Budi; Martua Samosir, Samuel Saut; Chandra, Ratih Listyana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Societal welfare is the achievement that should be supported by Government which essentialy has the obligation for the societal welfare through the arrangements within the scope of authority under the mandate of the preamble and articles of the Indonesian Constitution of 1945 and relevant laws. The mandate of ASEAN Charter, which was ratified by House of Representative by Law Number 38 of 2008 concerning Ratification of the Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, is not an opponent of the Constitution of 1945 in terms of societal welfare, as long as the legislation is implemented on the right way, which can protect Indonesian. The legislative action must reflect the needs and the factual conditions of Indonesian. Regulation relating to the implementation of the ASEAN Charter should always be accompanied by exemption or exception to the path of liberation from the regional competition law which is a logical consequence of the free market of ASEAN in some fields.

Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Aziz, Machmud
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

PENDAHULUAN1. Pengertian PengujianPengertian Kata “Pengujian” (toetsing/review) dalam konteks tulisan ini adalah pengujian undang-undang (UU) dalam arti luas yaitu dalam arti formal dan material, sedangkan pengujinya (lembaganya) tidak hanya lembaga peradilan saja melainkan juga lembaga legislatif dan/atau ekskutif. Khusus untuk mengetahui apa yang dimaksud dengan pengujian UU melalui lembaga peradilan(judicial review) kita lihat dalam Kamus Hukum. ...

Implementasi Putusan No. 27/PhPu.D-VIII/2010 Mengenai Perselisihan hasil Pemilihan umum Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Lamongan Siahaan, Maruarar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The objection of petitioner on the recount results by the Election Commission of Lamongan on the orders of the interlocutory injunction of the Court ,was not examined further and be heard simultaneously with the Commission report on the implementation of interlocutory injunction in a hearing open to the public, and thereafter immediately the Constitutional Court considered the objection has no juridical value. The final decision then confirmed the Commission’s decision on the result of the recounting. Nonetheless, the function of the interlocutory verdict must be understood as a mechanism to prepare the final verdict. Therefore, the results of the interlocutory verdict must be heard and examined in a session open to the parties and the public, to be used as the basis for a final decision. The hearing process before the final verdict has been decide, does not end with the announcement of the interlocutory verdict. Implementation of the Constitutional Court decision on the district election dispute has been uninhibited, but in one case. Although the number is quantitatively insignificant, it is qualitatively very important as a lesson learned in that the Court is still in need to improve its performance in guarding the consolidation of democracy.

Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Penafsiran Hukum yang Progresif Ali, Mahrus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The main maxim of progressive law is law for human, not human for law. Since stressing to human existence to enforce the law, the progressive law rejects the status quo based on legal positivism, the existence of written legal text containing many weaknesses, and pays more attentions to the role of human behavior. In the context of constitutional court roles as the sole and the highest interpreter of the constitution, the interpretation of progressive law wants the institutional court not strictly rely on the written text, not to use legal positivism as a paradigm in interpreting the law, but focusing on rechtsidee, values, and way of life written on Pancasila to implement the substantive justice, not the existence of legal texts in constitution of 1945.

Problematika Tugas Konstitusional Komisi Yudisial Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 4 (2010)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

PendahuluanJabatan hakim di satu sisi merupakan jabatan yang sangat mulia, dan di sisi lain, jika tidak hati-hati, dapat merendahkan martabatnya karena banyak godaan yang siap menjerumuskannya. Sebagaimana diketahui jabatan Hakim boleh dikatakan merupakan jabatan yang dekat sekali dengan godaan-godaan duniawi. Betapa tidak, di tangan seorang hakim nasib dan masa depan seseorang akan ditentukan. Orang yang tadinya kaya raya dan terkenal sebagai donator di lingkungannya misalnya, tiba-tiba jatuh martabatnya sebagai manusia karena masuk penjara akibat putusan hakim. Oleh karena itu sudah menjadi suatu pandangan umum apabila orang yang berurusan dengan pengadilan akan berusaha semaksimal mungkin, dengan segala cara (baca menghalalkan segala cara) melakukan segala hal asalkan putusan hakim dapat berpihak kepadanya. ...

Aspek Keadilan dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Soeroso, Fajar Laksono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The final nature of the Constitutional Court’s decisions is often questioned. The main problem, among others, when the justice seekers of Constitutional Court, there is nothing else to do but to accept and implement the Court’s decision although shackled and deprived of justice by the Constitutional Court. This paper confirms the absence of the issue of the fairness aspect of the Constitutional Court when the justice seekers recognize and understand at least three (3) terms, namely (1) the nature of the final position is attached to the nature of the Constitution as the supreme law so that there is no other commandment greater height of it is an effort to keep constitutional judicial authority and legal certainty; (2) the nature of the final decision of the Constitutional Court is an attempt to preserve the constitutional authority of the courts so different from the general court; and (3) possibility Constitutional Court contains the error persists considering Constitutional Court Judges are human beings, but until now, there is no better alternative replaces the final nature of the Decision.

Pemilu Serentak dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi Arrsa, Ria Casmi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The development of democracy in Indonesia is running very rapidly after the 1945 amendment. One of the developments within the frame of politics characterized by constitutional formula that provides a basic framework state that sovereignty belongs to the people and carried out in accordance with the Constitution. On the basis of the formulation of the succession of leadership in the executive and legislative branches are directly implemented as the mandate of Article 22 E of paragraph ( 2). However, in practice the constitutional arrangements in the Law Number 42 Year 2008 concerning General Pemlihan President and Vice President shows inconsistent with the statement in the constitution . As set out in Article 3 paragraph ( 5 ) states that the election of President and Vice- President held after an election DPR, DPD and DPRD. At the end of the Constitutional Court through Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013 stated that the selection of models is unconstitutional. Based on that assessment constitutionality of norms selection method based on the simultaneous interpretation of the constitution of both the original intent and interpretation of history. Design constitutional elections simultaneously referred born as an attempt to shift the direction of the transition towards democracy in the reinforcement system in order consolidation of democratic practice direct democracy tends opaque transactional, corrupt, manipulative, high costs and preserve power can be minimized in the practice of constitutional democracy dimention to understand and sovereignty of the people.

Desain Institusional Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Sebagai Peradilan Etik Chakim, M. Lutfi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Ethics basically teach and emphasize to every individual including the organizer of election to take a stand and ensure that any action taken always relying on moral values. Ethics is an important element that must be adhered to every organizer of election, because it is one of the fundamental aspects for realizing democratic elections. Therefore, to enforce the Code of Ethic organizer of election, then formed Honorary Board of Organizer of Elections (DKPP) which aims to maintain independence, integrity and credibility of the Election Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) that is certainly going well and correctly. DKPP is an institution designed as a court of ethics, applying an open model and applying all the principles as in a court. So, for the organizer of election found to have violated the Code of Ethics, DKPP can provide sanctions in accordance with the level of the offense, that consists of a written reprimand, dismissal meantime, and permanent dismissal. Moreover DKPP decision is final and binding.

Wacana Constitutional Questions dalam Situs Mahkamah: Konteks e-Deliberative Democracy Putra, Anom Surya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 4 (2010)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

PengantarPertengahan akhir tahun 2010 ini terdapati perkara yang menyita perhatian publik ditingkat nasional seperti putusan dalam perkara permohonan Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia terhadap Undang- Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.2 Muatan putusan menggunakan pola deduktif-matematis dari jurisprudence (ajaran hukum) yang menghasilkan keputusan “konstitusional bersyarat” (conditionally constitutional) atas ketentuan Pasal 22 ayat UU Kejaksaan. Teks putusan itu diikuti pula dengan pendapat berbeda (dissenting opinion) dari 2 (dua) hakim MK yang masing- masing mencerminkan realisme hukum (legal realism). 3 Logika hakim MK yang mengajukan pendapat berbeda (dissenting opinion) ini beralih ke soal kegunaan atau kemanfaatan hukum yaitu diantaranya melihat ketidakbermanfaatan preseden hukum formal “konstitusional bersyarat” dalam perkara ini.4 Realisme hukum cenderung mengandalkan kemampuan hakim menangkap makna yang ia artikan sebagai kebenaran atas pengaruh nilai-nilai yang dipegangi, latar belakang pengalaman pribadi dan kecenderungan pilihannya.5 Pengambilan keputusan atas perkara tak dapat berlangsung secara deduksi-matematis dan tak hendak telalu mementingkan unsur-unsur etis dan unsur-unsur ideal. Amatan yang lebih dalam lebih tepat kiranya bila kita melakukan riset terhadap perbedaan-perbedaan paradigma, metode dan dinamika masalah yang dihadapi oleh hakim MK secara keseluruhan dengan mengambil objek studi seluruh putusan MK, sementara tulisan ini masih jauh dari kelengkapan studi hukum seperti itu. ...

Page 5 of 90 | Total Record : 896

3 4 5 6 7

Filter by Year

2010 2022

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 19, No 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA