cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dewanta Arya Nugraha
Contact Email
dewanta.an@gmail.com
Phone
+6289673449687
Journal Mail Official
jmme@fkip.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36A Kentingan Surakarta 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 20898878     EISSN : 27158276     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jmme
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Journal Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) is a peer-refereed open-access journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of mathematics and mathematics education. This journal was founded by the Magister of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret. It is published twice in a year (June and December). The JMME welcomes high-quality manuscripts resulted by researchers, scholars, teachers, and professionals from a research project in the scope of Pure Mathematics, Computing Mathematics, Statistics, Mathematics Learning, Evaluation and Assessment in Mathematics Learning, STEAM, Ethnomathematics, ICT in Mathematics Education, Design / Development Research in Mathematics Education
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 103 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
Implications of the Constructivism Philosophy Perspective in Mathematics Learning Hendrayanto, Dhani Nur
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v9i1.48285

Abstract

Implication has the aim of comparing the results of research between the past and those that have just been carried out. Basically, the implication of a theory can be defined as a direct result or a consequence of the findings of a research process. Thus various theories of research results emerged. This Constructivism learning theory has a strong influence in the world of education. As a result, the learning orientation in the classroom has shifted. Learning orientation shifted from teacher-centered teaching to student-centered learning. Students are no longer positioned as empty vessels ready to be filled. With a resigned attitude students are prepared to be filled with information by their teachers. Or students are conditioned in such a way to receive knowledge from their teachers. Now the teacher learning partners are students. Teachers are not the only information center or learning center. Meanwhile other learning sources can be peers, nature, the internet and others.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Meilasari, Venty; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10042

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium or low independence of learning students, (3) in each learning models, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium, or low independence of learning students, (4) in each categories of independence of learning, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction learning model. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The research design was a 3×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the eight class of junior high school in Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling and consisted of 281 students. The instruments used were independence of learning questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) TAI model provided the mathematics achievement as good as GI model, TAI model and GI model provided better mathematics achievement than direct instruction model. (2) The high independence of learning student had better mathematics achievement than medium and low independence of learning students, and the medium had better than low independence of learning students. (3) In TAI model and direct instruction model, the high, medium, and low independence of learning had the same mathematics achievement, in GI learning model, the high independence of learning students had mathematics achievement as good as the medium independence of learning students, the high independence of learning had better than the low independence of learning, and the medium independence of learning students had the same as the low independence of learning students. (4) In high and low independence of learning, TAI model, GI model, and direct instruction model provided the same achievement, in medium independence of learning, TAI model and GI model provided the same achievement, TAI model provided better achievement than direct instruction model, GI model was the same as direct instruction model.Keyword: TAI, GI, Direct Instruction, Independence of Learning, and Mathematics Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN JIGSAW BERBANTU MEDIA FLASH PADAMATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Kurniawati, Rina; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20244

Abstract

Abstract: This research was purposed to determine: (1) which one produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash, or direct instruction; (2) which one had better mathematics learning achievement between students with visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each learning style, which one learning model that produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash or direct instruction (4) on each learning model, which one student had better mathematics learning achievement , student who had visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style. This study was a quasi-experimental study with factorial 3x3 design. Population in this research were eleventh grade students of Vocational High School in Sragen. Sample collection were done by stratified cluster random sampling. Data collection were done by the method of documentation in order to test the balance of the population, the questionnaire were used to determine the students learning style and test were used to know the students achievement on material dimension three. Data analysis techniques used ANAVA two ways with unbalanced cells. The results of this study concluded as follows (1) cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (2) Students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style; students with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style; (3) on each learning style, cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (4) on each learning model (Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, and direct instruction), students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style.Keywords: Learning Model, Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, Learning Style, learning achievement
Profile Of Tourist Visits In Sangiran Site Area, Sragen Regency Subanti, Sri; Slamet, Isnandar; Sulandari, Winita; Zukhronah, Etik; Sugiyanto, Sugiyanto; Susanto, Irwan
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52744

Abstract

Tourism activities are chain activities that involve various sectors and related institutions. Tourism is one of the fields in the lives of the people of Sragen Regency, which has become one of the priorities in development in recent years. This is based on the local government's awareness that tourism development can support regional income while at the same time increasing the standard of living of people living in tourist areas. For this reason, evaluating the impact of tourism in an area on the socioeconomic conditions of the community is an important thing to know. Sangiran is one of the most complete paleontological sites in Indonesia. Sangiran has also been designated as a cultural heritage by UNESCO on December 5, 1996, with the designation number C.593. The Sangiran site itself is located in Sragen Regency and Karanganyar Regency, Central Java Province. In general, the background of the population in the Sangiran Site area comes from the Javanese ethnic group, who in daily life communicate using the Javanese language. The Sangiran site has been known as an ancient human area from the Pleistocene. Not only storing archaeological wealth, but Sangiran is also very rich in artistic potential, both from prehistoric times and the present. Many things can be enjoyed in Sangiran. Apart from the museum that presents archaeological findings full of meaning, the public can also enjoy the local culture, including traditional arts, traditional ceremonies, local architecture, and folk crafts, adding value to the site. This study aims to determine the profile of tourist visits in the Sangiran Site Area. This study found that the factors that influence the number of visits to the Sangiran Site Area are travel costs, age, gender, and monthly income of respondents related to visiting the Sangiran Site Area. Furthermore, the factors that influence the respondents' willingness to accept ticket offers in the market hypothesis scenario in the Sangiran Site Area are the nominal price of the entrance ticket to a market hypothesis given to respondents, age, gender, monthly income of respondents, education level of respondents, and origin of the respondent.
PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD DEPENDENT - FIELD INDEPENDENT Panglipur Yekti, Sherly Mayfana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10064

Abstract

Abstract: The research aims to describe the mathematical reasoning of students with Field Dependent (FI) and Field Independent (FD) cognitive style in solving algebra problems. Type of this research is descriptive qualitative. The cognitive styles of 32 students of class VIII H SMPN 2 Karanganyar were determined using Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). Each category of cognitive styles was taken three students with the high, medium, and low scores and were used as research subjects. Data was collected by interview based tasks. Validity of the data used time triangulation. Techniques of data analysis were done by: (1) classfying the data into Polya’s problem solving steps, (2) presenting the data in narrative text, and (3) concluding the students’ mathematical reasoning in each Polya’s problem solving steps. The results of this research showed that mathematical reasoning students with FD cognitive styles in algebra problem solving is: (1) able to identify the problem clearly and completely, (2) able to describe the conditions of the problem, (3) able to connect different elements of information but not perfect. While the mathematical reasoning students with FI cognitive styles in algebra problem solving is: (1) able to identify the problem clearly and completely, (2) able to describe the conditions of the problem, (3) able to connect different elements of information completely, (4) able to apply algebraic concepts that have been studied previously, and (5) able to make conjectures for problem solving strategies but incomplete.Keywords: Mathematical reasoning, algebra problems, cognitive styles
Mathematic Thinking Profile Of Students With High Learning Motivation Riawan, Nova
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52745

Abstract

This study aimed to know about high learning motivation students' in mathematical critical thinking skills. This study used a qualitative method and data collection techniques consisted of written tests and interviews. This study used triangulation techniques that compared data of test and interview data.  The qualitative data analysis techniques were data collection, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that subject critical thinking skills with high motivation are able to understand the problems in the problem and can use the information obtained appropriately to complete each step in the problem. These conditions, students can also explain what was done in the process and can get conclusions, do not forget the review that students do will help solve the problem.
Students' Conceptual Understanding In Terms Of Gender Differences Azizah, Nurul; Budiyono, Budiyono; Siswanto, Siswanto
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52746

Abstract

One of the basic skills that students must master to learn mathematics is conceptual understanding. Gender differences have an influence on the disparity level of students' conceptual understanding. This research is qualitative descriptive research that aimed to analyze the students' conceptual understanding in solving set problems in terms of gender differences. The research subjects were 9th-grade students of SMP N 3 Surakarta. The concept understanding ability test was used as a research instrument. The results showed that male students had an excellent conceptual understanding in applying concepts in mathematical calculations and translating images into other forms of interpretation, 2) Female students had a fairly good conceptual understanding in translating images into other forms of interpretation, although female students tend to be weak in determining the right concepts to be used in solving problems and applying concepts in mathematical calculations.
Mathematical Literacy of Junior High School Students in Solving Problems Pisa Content Quantity Salsabila, Nais Qonita; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i2.58132

Abstract

Mathematical literacy is defined as students’ capacity to formulate, employ and interpret mathematics in a variety of contexts. It includes reasoning mathematically and using mathematical concepts, procedures, facts and tools to describe, explain and predict phenomena. It assists individuals in recognising the role that mathematics plays in the world and to make the well-founded judgements and decisions needed by constructive, engaged and reflective citizens. Quantity content includes the ability in reasoning quantitatively, representing something into numbers, understanding mathematical steps, counting by heart and making assessments. The questions on quantity content are mostly implemented in everyday life, such as in exchanging currency exchange rates, determining bank interest, shopping, calculating taxes, measuring time, measuring distance and others. The purpose of this article is to describe the level of mathematical literacy ability of junior high school students in solving Quantity content PISA questions. The data from this study were taken from the results of the PISA test questions on quantity content and interviews. Subject taking is based on the test results of students who have the highest scores, as it is expected to get the results of the analysis of students’ high literacy skills. In this research, the researcher is using indicators of mathematical literacy level according to PISA. Based on the results of research and discussion, it is concluded that there are students who have high mathematical literacy skills equivalent to level 5.
Developing Mathematical Modeling Tasks Using Parking Fee for Learning Mathematics Riyanto, Bambang
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i2.57971

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to produce valid mathematical modeling tasks using parking fees for learning mathematical modeling in SMK. This study used a research development approach by Akker, Gravemeijer, McKenney and Nieveen. This research consists of 3 stages, namely analysis, design and evaluation. The analysis step was carried out by analyzing students, curriculum, vocational needs, context needed and mathematical modeling. The second step is design and product. The last step is a formative evaluation design which consists of self-evaluation, one-to-one, expert review, small group, and field test. The research only conducted self-evaluation, one-to-one, and expert review. Data analysis used descriptive walk through, expert commentary analysis, solution analysis and student comments to get a valid parking fee context mathematical modeling problem for learning mathematics. This research has produced mathematical modeling problems valid using the context of parking fees for mathematics learning in SMK. The results of this study suggest that it is important for teachers to design and implement mathematical modeling problems using interesting and meaningful real-world contexts in learning mathematics, further research is important to provide scaffolding for students in mathematical modeling problems for mathematics learning, finally, research and learning mathematical modeling crucial to be applied in the future.
Linear Program Problem-Solving Skills Based on Sequential and Gender Thinking Styles During Online Learning Rahmah, Adila; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i2.58129

Abstract

The study aims to describe linear program problem-solving skills reviewed from sequential thinking styles and genders as schools implement online learning due to the covid-19 pandemic. This research is a qualitative study that produces descriptive data. The subject of this study consisted of two male students and two female students of class XI MIPA High School MTA Surakarta. The study began by determining the study subjects using a thinking style questionnaire, followed by linear program problem-solving tests and interviews. Check the validity of the data using triangulation methods. The results show linear program problem-solving skills; 1) Sequential students of male and female concrete perform systematically and less carefully; 2) Abstract sequential male and female students collect complete data and analyze the information obtained regularly as well as female abstract sequential students strong in written decoding and symbols; 3) students' problem solving skills with sequential abstracts are higher than concrete sequential students ;4) male students with sequential thinking styles perform better at solving math problems than female students with sequential thinking styles.

Page 6 of 11 | Total Record : 103

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2016 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 2 (2024): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 14, No 1 (2024): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 13, No 2 (2023): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 13, No 1 (2023): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 2 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 2 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) More Issue