cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Justitia et Pax
ISSN : 08521883     EISSN : 25413007     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
JEP is primarily aimed to facilitate the legal scholars, researchers or practitioners in publishing their original or reviewed articles as well as to support the enactment of in-depth discussions on the related issues. It is also purposed to become a source of reference for those are involved in legal field. JEP covers any topics related to Indonesian laws and legal system, spanning from the private and public law and covering various legal approaches, such as the comparative law, sociology of law, legal history and many others. Other contemporary legal studies, such as commercial and business law, medical law, law and technology, natural resources law and Islamic law are also covered. Hence, any contributions from legal scholars and practitioners are appreciatively welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 296 Documents
TINJAUAN PENANGANAN KASUS MALPRAKTEK MEDIS DI PENGADILAN PIDANA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KESEHATAN Albertus Soge
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i1.2467

Abstract

Legislation on Health Law is a Lex Specialist law that contains exceptional norms for legal protection for providers and receivers of health services. Law Number 36 of 2009 on Health and Law Number 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice are not used consistently in resolving medical malpractice cases in the Criminal Court, thus causing injustice and legal uncertainty. Incorrect application of the law and a long period of cases resolution in court requires reform in handling medical malpractice cases.
KESETARAAN GENDER UNTUK PEREMPUAN KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Dudi Badruzaman; Yus Hermansyah; Irpan Helmi
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.2475

Abstract

Discrimination against women is a problem that often occurs in almost all levels of society, even in most parts of the world. This study aims to determine the understanding of gender equality and how the results of the analysis in order to reduce violence and provide justice for women in Indonesia. The method used is field research by collecting data, conducting interviews and analyzing documentation data. Gender is not a movement that fights for women's destiny, on the contrary, it is a movement that erases maternal instincts from women by separating the natural and non-natural roles. Thus, gender is not just a term but a doctrinfeminist that erases human nature.Discrimination against women is a problem that often occurs in almost all levels of society, even in most parts of the world. This study aims to determine the understanding of gender equality and how the results of the analysis in order to reduce violence and provide justice for women in Indonesia. The method used is field research by collecting data, conducting interviews and analyzing documentation data. Gender is not a movement that fights for women's destiny, on the contrary, it is a movement that erases maternal instincts from women by separating the natural and non-natural roles. Thus, gender is not just a term but a doctrinfeminist that erases human nature
AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015 TERHADAP HAK TANAH PELAKU KAWIN CAMPUR Jihan Khairunnisa
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2497

Abstract

Land ownership for Indonesian citizens the result of mixed marriages without marriage agreement Indonesian citizen can only use the use rights and lease rights to buildings in the ownership of land. This study uses a normative juridical approach. It can be concluded that according to Law No. 5/1960 for Indonesian citizens, mixed marriages may own land with a status other than use rights and lease rights to buildings if there is a marriage agreement before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Constitutional Court ruling number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 gave a breath of fresh air for mixed marriages to still be able to receive their constitutional rights by making marriage agreements during the marriage.
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) Muhammad Addi Fauzani; Fandi Nur Rohman
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501

Abstract

This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to "open legal policy"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to"open legal policy"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of "political question"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.
EVALUASI YURIDIS SISTEM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM DAN IUS CONSTITUENDUM PERADILAN KHUSUS PEMILIHAN UMUM Nurul Ula Ulya; Fazal Akmal Musyarri
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2508

Abstract

The General Election Judicial System in Indonesia currently runs partially in Indonesia because the institutional structure that plays a role in handling General Election cases consists of elusive anatomy. Some of these institutions include the Constitutional Court, the Election Supervisory Body, the Administrative Court and the District Court which have different portions of authority and lack synergy in their representation. This can lead to miscoordination and overlapping of authority. Therefore, the formation of a Special Election Judicial body is an alternative solution that can be done to maintain the implementation of a democratic General Election up to the stage of case resolution.
HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN PEMILIK BANGUNAN CAGAR BUDAYA DI KOTA MALANG Diah Imaningrum Susanti; Rini Susriyani; Albertus Herwanta
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.2561

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to describe the implementation of the rights and duties of the owners of cultural properties (Cagar Budaya) in Malang City, especially the buildings of Cor Jesu School and Kayutangan Church, as well as to describe the responsibilities of the local government in protecting the buildings stipulated as cultural properties as stated in the Law Number  11 of 2010 on Cultural Properties. The status as “cultural property” is stipulated by local government through a recommendation by a Team of Experts in Cultural Property. After the stipulation, the rights and liabilities of the owner of such cultural property take effect and the protection of the property becomes the responsibility of the local government. The approach of this research is empirical, conducted by doing in-depth interviews with the owners of cultural properties, some informants such as the Cultural and Tourism Department of Malang City, and with the Assessor of Cultural Property for those buildings. This approach is done after identifying the rights, duties, and responsibilities dealing with the cultural proprties as stipulated in the Law Number 11 of 2010 on Cultural Property. It is concluded that the law as it is written in the Law still takes great efforts to be implemented in reality, in order to fulfill the requirements stated in the Law. 
PERKEMBANGAN PEMBUKTIAN PADA PUTUSAN VERSTEK: STUDI KASUS DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN DAN KOTA YOGYAKARTA Elisabeth Sundari; Nindry Sulistya Widiastiani
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2936

Abstract

Article 25 of HIR provides that in case the defendant does not appear at court process (verstek), the claim will be accepted unless it is unreasonable and against the rights. In the beginning, that article was interpreted that in case the defendant doesn’t  appear at court process (verstek), the plaintiff shall not obeyed to proof his claim. How is the development of that previous interpretation? Normative legal research has been conducted to redress that issue. The data were collected from secondary data resources from Sleman and Yogyakarta District Court decisions concerning the burden of proof  in verstek recently,  and being  analized  qualitatively. The research result shows that there is a development in  interpretating Article 125 HIR, where the judges burdened the plaintiff to proof his claim. That interpretation development supports the strive to get the truth beyond reasonable doubt, to meet a fair decision,  as good as to avoid fraud claim, and haphazard decision.
BAYANGAN AKAN BANGSA DALAM KONTEKS HAK UNTUK MENENTUKAN NASIB SENDIRI: SUATU WACANA Tristam Pascal Moeliono
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.2958

Abstract

Two issues shall be discussed: what is meant by people’s right to self determination and how has it been realized, also in the context of indigenous-tribal peoples. Analysis shall be done, by using a juridical doctrinal method. The purpose would go beyond explaining but also induce understanding of people’s right to self determination in the context of nation states. One determining faktor in the construction of a nation state is the emergence of an imagined solidarity between peoples from different races, tribes, or religious beliefs, being the result of suffering under colonialism. Notwithstanding that indigenous or tribal peoples may and in fact experience similar suffering under the state they are considered to be part of, international law, while recognizing their right to self determination, does not fully extend the same scope of rights to them.
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT’S JURISDICTION IN IMPUNITY PREVENTION Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya; Ariesta Wibisono Anditya
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.2966

Abstract

This research aims to describe and explain the International Criminal Court’s jurisdictions in an effort to prevent impunity. Additionally, this research provides answer to the question of ICC’s effectiveness in upholding justice over international crimes. This research is a normative law research. The research results shows, under Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998, the purpose of a trial is to end impunity over serious crimes. To implement such a purpose, ICC exercise their jurisdictions conform to Rome Statute. However, the exercise of ICC’s jurisdictions are still ineffective, such phenonemon could arise by many factors.
TELAAH YURIDIS PEMBERIAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN KEPADA PERSEKUTUAN KOMANDITER (CV) Nur Adhim; Siti Mahmudah; Kornelius Benuf
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.3070

Abstract

UUPA regulates that legal subjects to land rights, including land with the right to Building Rights (HGB), are owned by Indonesian citizens or legal entities established under Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia. A different thing happened when the issuance of a Circular from the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning (ATR) stated that a CV could apply for land rights in the form of HGB. The difference in the substance of the rules is the problem. This problem will be analyzed using normative juridical research methods, using secondary data, in the form of primary legal materials, and secondary legal materials. The author concludes that a CV cannot be granted a HGB certificate, because a CV is not a Legal Entity, and if it is done on behalf of another person or nominee there is a criminal threat.

Filter by Year

2015 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 41 No. 2 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 Vol. 41 No. 1 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 Vol. 40 No. 1 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Vol. 39 No. 2 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Vol. 38 No. 2 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Vol 37, No 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol 37, No 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol 35, No 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol 34, No 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol 33, No 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol 33, No 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol 32, No 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol 32, No 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol 31, No 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Vol. 31 No. 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 More Issue