cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Leonard
Contact Email
leo.eduresearch@gmail.com
Phone
+6281382939050
Journal Mail Official
jurnalformatif@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Nangka No. 58c Tanjung Barat, Jakarta Selatan, 12530
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
ISSN : 2088351X     EISSN : 25025457     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics Other
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA (ISSN 2502 5457 for the electronic version and ISSN 2088 351X for the print version) first published in April 2011 is a double-blind peer-reviewed scientific open access journal. The journal is dedicated to publishing articles concerned with research, theory development, instructional methods, instructional strategy, instructional materials development, experiment, survey, and teacher development in Math and Science (Physic, Biology, and Chemistry) Education. The journal is published by Universitas Indraprasta PGRI.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 384 Documents
 26   27   28   29   30 
The Ideal-Actual Gap in the Roles of Research in Teaching: The Case of STEM Educators in a Philippine University Bryan Mallillin Nozaleda
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v11i2.6182

Abstract

The aim of this study is to create an image of how research integrates in university teaching particularly in STEM education in a state university in the Philippines. The participants were 104 teachers from five campuses of the university that offers STEM undergraduate programs. A quantitative research design was employed to address the central theme: The identification of the gap between the beliefs and perceptions of STEM Educators regarding the role of research in university teaching. The present study revealed that the STEM teachers highly valued the role of research in teaching. They especially considered the development of creative and critical dispositions as the most important goals of integrating research into teaching. However, the teachers reported low actual integration of research into their current teaching, revealing a major gap between their beliefs and the perceived actual integration research into their own teaching practices. It further showed that institutional background appeared to be critical in the integration of research in teaching. Ultimately, STEM education in the university is emphatic on research content in the delivery of instruction while creating opportunities for learners to participate along the learning process. However, a research-based approach remains to be unpopular, much less for a research-oriented classroom. Strengthening research support and widening the scope of research culture are recommended.
The Development of MONOTIKA (Monopoly Mathematics) Learning Media in Algebraic Material for Junior High School Students in Grade VII Shafira Ramadhani; Leonard Leonard; Muh. Aripin Nurmantoro; Juliana M. Sumilat
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.11959

Abstract

This research aims to develop MONOTIKA learning media (Monopoly Mathematics) and test the feasibility of MONOTIKA learning media (Monopoly Mathematics) in algebraic materials for middle school students. The learning development model is the ADDIE design model. This study's sources of needs analysis are SMP Negeri 126 and SMP Negeri 209 east Jakarta area. Data collection techniques used are teacher interviews and polling stations. Validation of the development of this learning media between 2 validators is material experts and media experts and students response usage if MONOTIKA media is used in schools. This media trial was conducted on 41 students in grades 7 G and 7 H at SMP Negeri 209 Jakarta. This study showed that MONOTIKA (Monopoly Mathematics) obtained a total average score for all aspects of all is 4.50 material expert validity and 4.28 valid expert media, which is an average media that deserves good both as a learning medium. Student poll results showed an average score of 4.47, which the average student gave responsibility for positive MONOTIKA (Monopoly Mathematics). Thus, the results of the development of MONOTIKA (Monopoly Mathematics) learning media for junior high school students in grade VII are valid and eligible for use.
Description of Student Responses Toward Implementation of Discovery Learning Model in Physics Learning Darmaji Darmaji; Dwi Agus Kurniawan; Astalini Astalini; Weni Sukarni
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.8168

Abstract

The learning model is one of the strategic approaches that must be carried out by the teacher systematically and procedurally in organizing learning activities to achieve optimal learning goals. In physics, the learning process is still centered on the teacher, where the teacher still conveys the overall concept on the blackboard which is not following the 2013 curriculum that has been set. This proves that teachers who have not applied the learning model according to the demands of the 2013 curriculum This research was conducted at SMAN 08 Muaro Jambi on grade X IPA 2 students which aimed to determine student responses when given a discovery learning model during the physics learning process. The instrument used was a student questionnaire with a sample of 21 students. This research uses a mixed-method with a sequential explanatory design. Data analysis techniques use descriptive statistics to get the average value, mode, median, minimum, maximum. Based on the results of the study found that the level of student response to the learning model is categorized as good with a percentage of 61.9%.
An Analysis of Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability at Class VII Social Arithmetic Materials Based on Learning Styles Joko Soebagyo; Khoerul Umam; Istikharoh Istikharoh; Huri Suhendri
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.10099

Abstract

Learning style is an activity of thinking, processing, and understanding something that is preferred and has the characteristics of each person. Problem-solving ability is a skill that needs to be possessed in the process of solving mathematical problems. This study aims to describe students' problem-solving abilities on social arithmetic material in terms of learning styles. The research was conducted through a descriptive qualitative research design. The population is all seventh-grade students of MTs Al-Khairiyah, South Jakarta. Sampling using a total sampling technique. Then three students were selected, namely students who scored the highest visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. The instrument uses a learning style questionnaire and a test of problem-solving skills and semi-structured interviews—data analysis techniques with data reduction, exposure, and concluding to explain mathematical problem-solving abilities. The findings of this study are students with the highest scores of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles can solve social arithmetic problems based on Polya's steps without any significant differences, only from different styles when solving problems
The Influence of Powerpoint-Based Discovery Learning Models on Biology Student Learning Outcomes Sariam Sariam; Hasmi Syahputra Harahap
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.12000

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the Power Point-Based Discovery Learning learning model on the learning outcomes of biology students on the circulatory system material in humans at MAS PP Nurul Huda Bangai. The research method used is quantitative research in the form of Quasi Experimental Design using a pretest-posttest control design. The PowerPoint-based Discovery Learning learning model is taught in class XI-A and the conventional learning model is taught in class XI-B. The instrument used in this study was a multiple-choice test for student learning outcomes. The data analysis technique used in this study is the Mann-Whitney technique using the SPSS 23.0 for Windows program. The results showed that there was an effect of the Power Point-Based Discovery Learning learning model on the learning outcomes of biology students (P=0.000<0.05), with the average score and standard deviation of the posttest in the Discovery Learning class 77.97 ± 10,848 and the average value and the posttest standard deviation in the conventional class was 69.82 ± 5.348. The results of this study are expected that teachers can apply the Power Point-Based Discovery Learning learning model when teaching the circulation system material in humans to improve student learning outcomes.
The Empowerment of Problem-Based Learning Models to Improve Students’ Quantitative Reasoning Muhammad Muzaini; Muhammad Hasbi; Ernawati Ernawati; Kristiawati Kristiawati
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.8502

Abstract

Quantitative reasoning has been highlighted as essential for middle-school student learning, particularly for themes that require students to make sense of relationships between quantities, according to a growing body of evidence. As a result, the current study adds to the body of literature that explores the growth of students' quantitative reasoning through teaching models. This study uses measuring tools such as a quantitative reasoning test and an observation sheet. The randomized pre-test–post-test control group design has been used in this investigation. The study included 95 second-year middle school students from Pangkep, Makassar, South Sulawesi, who were split into two groups: experimental and control. The N-gain index, which has high, medium, and low categories, was used to calculate the improvement of students' quantitative reasoning exam results. The finding of the data, 86.0 % of students in the experimental class increased their quantitative reasoning exam scores in the high category, while only 46.6% of students in the control class improved their quantitative reasoning exam scores. Students' quantitative reasoning improves substantially more when they utilize the problem-based learning models to learn about the linear program than when they use direct learning. As a result, students' quantitative reasoning can be improved by using problem-based learning models.
Male or Female, who is better? Student's Perception of the E-Module in Physics-Mathematics Vector Material Astalini Astalini; Darmaji Darmaji; Dwi Agus Kurniawan; Auliya Ramadhanti
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.10264

Abstract

This study aims to see how students from different classes perceive the e-Module Mathematics Physics I on vector material, besides that variations in gender differences will also be tested in this perception. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative research. The population in this study were students of Physics Education class 2019 with a sample of 80 students in regular classes A and C. The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially by using the IBM SPSS Statistic 22 application which consisted of descriptive test, normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test analysis. The results obtained are normal data with a sig of 0.190, and homogeneous with a sig of 0.305. While the t-test obtained a sig value of 0.019 for gender differences in class A, and 0.017 for gender differences in class C. So Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, meaning that there are significant (significant) differences in perceptions based on gender in each class A and C. Where the perception of male students is higher than the perception of female students, but overall students give a good perception of the Mathematics Physics e-module I on Vector material.
Development of Performance Technology Competency Training Model for Students of Chemical Education Zurweni Zurweni; Affan Malik
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.12143

Abstract

The free learning-campus program (MB-KM) contained in SN-Dikti 2020, is very relevant to the demands of 21st century education in order to address the challenges of learning in the global era. The MB-KM program provides opportunities for students to master various fields of science, develop creativity, capacity and other competencies related to the needs of the world of work. The results of the needs analysis show that there are still four competencies that have not been maximally mastered by students, namely: school management competencies, analytical thinking, technological novelty and science behavior with an average of 51.75%, while the other three competencies: pedagogical competence, high school chemistry science, and DIGITAL LEARNING IT competence have been very good with an average of 80.20%. Against the background, this was conducted research on the Development of Rational-Creative Performance Technology Training Model for Chemistry Education Students. This research is educational development research (Borg & Gall: 2007). The characteristic of this training model is in the form of Merdeka Learning Teacher Mover for school education. The MODEL ID used to design this training model is adapting the modified ASSURE model, while the Rational-Creative Performance Technology Training Model was developed by Zurweni & Affan Malik (2020). The results showed that the Rational-Creative Performance Technology Training Model has four synths: Innovation Intervention Orientation, Rational Exploration, Rational Technology Training and Evaluation. Evaluation and validation results and trials state that the Rational-Creative Performance Technology Training Model falls into the category of good, with field trials have not been successfully implemented due to the covid-19 pandemic. It was concluded that this Rational-Creative Performance Technology Training Model is worth using and is a new breakthrough as an alternative to enrichment in the debriefing of students who follow the PLP Program to partner schools. It is recommended to use this training model at the level of the Study Program as well as at the student debriefing enrichment session before following the introduction of the school field.
The Students’ Misconceptions in Using Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test on the Angle Relationships Desfi Ida Muryani; Padrul Jana; Sitti Mutia Umasugi
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.9641

Abstract

Understanding the concept is one ability that students must master in learning mathematics because concepts in mathematics are related to each other. Based on the result of observation, it showed that not all students had a good conceptual understanding. Another finding reported that students had met the criteria for understanding concepts, not understanding concepts, and having misconceptions. The conditions where students experience misconceptions needto be considered because the misconception is a condition in which students use a concept that is not following the agreement of the expert with full confidence in the correctness of the concept. If misconception is allowed, it will affect the following concepts. This study aimed to determine the process and results of the analysis of student misconceptions and determined the causes of student misconceptions. The design of this research was descriptive qualitative with the number of subjects as many as 20 students. Data collection used a diagnostic test in the form of three-level multiple-choice questions and interview results. The methodused a test,an interview, and documentation. The steps in the data analysis of this research included data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and concluding. The validity test of the data used triangulation, namely, comparing the test results with the interview result. The research resultsshowed that there were students' misconceptions in the low and medium-level understanding group. Meanwhile, students in the high conceptual understanding group found False Positive criteria where false positives were parts of the misconception. However, in this study, the false positives were caused by students' inaccuracy in answering the questions. The causes of student misconceptions included using the concept of angles that were not following the agreement of the experts; applying angles with the wrong concept; wrong in interpreting images or just seeing based on images; wrong in algebraic addition arithmetic operations; wrongly applying the concept of angles in triangles, and not being careful in solving algebraic equations. <w:LsdException Locked=
The Relationship between Mathematics Score and Mathematics Anxiety among Biology Education Students Benidiktus Tanujaya; Jeinne Mumu
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.10435

Abstract

Students need to be anxiety-free when it comes to mathematics. This phenomenon is an unpleasant sensation that interferes with someone's ability to communicate well with mathematics. Although several studies have investigated the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics proficiency, none have explored the effect of mathematics anxiety on individual students' mathematics scores, particularly in biology education students. A correlational analysis was performed with quantitative research methods to explore the association between mathematics scores and mathematics anxiety. 68 participants were recruited for the study, using non-probability sampling, voluntarily and purposively. A student's mathematics anxiety was assessed using a mathematical anxiety scale. The data were analyzed by correlation and regression analysis to determine whether mathematics anxiety was associated with student success. The mathematical model is the best approximation of the relationship between variables described by the equation (3.6 + 0.0 A1 - 0.5 A2 - 1.6 A3 - 2.3 A4 - 2.9 A5). The results suggest that poor mathematics skills increase with levels of anxiety. Students with the least amount of anxiety are predicted to get passing grades of A and B, whereas those with more anxiety are likely to get lower grades of D and E.

Page 28 of 39 | Total Record : 384

 26   27   28   29   30 

Filter by Year

2011 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 15, No 1 (2025): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 14, No 2 (2024): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 14, No 1 (2024): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 13, No 2 (2023): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 13, No 1 (2023): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 2 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 10, No 2 (2020): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 9, No 4 (2019): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 9, No 3 (2019): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 8, No 3 (2018): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 7, No 3 (2017): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 7, No 2 (2017): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 6, No 3 (2016): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 5, No 3 (2015): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 4, No 3 (2014) Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 3, No 3 (2013): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 3, No 2 (2013): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 3, No 1 (2013): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 2, No 3 (2012): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 1, No 3 (2011): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA More Issue