cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 366 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)" : 366 Documents clear
Timbulnya Keyakinan Hakim dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Peradilan Indonesia Gulo, Nimerodi; Cornelius Dikae Zolohefona Gulo
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1672

Abstract

Legal proof in a criminal case is the process of convincing a judge of the truth of an event that is the basis of a claim or defence in a case. Legal proof has various aspects, methods, and systems that are governed by the rules of the law in force. Legal proof also relates to the concepts of justice, certainty, and validity of the law. The purpose of legal proof is to a fair, true, and in accordance with the facts and law. Law proof faces a variety of challenges and problems, such as the limitation of the means of proof, the difficulty of testing the validity and authenticity of evidence, and the influence of non-law factors on proof. Therefore, legal proof requires improved quality, professionalism, and integrity of the perpetrators, whether judges, prosecutors, lawyers, or witnesses. The methods used are the Legislative approach, the Case approach, and the Conceptual approach. By looking at whether the law of our events is still relevant to the existing case, then how to solve the problem with the emerging views and doctrines in criminal law. The legal proof in criminal cases is also very close to the emergence of judges' beliefs, so the judge is obliged to apply the theory relevant to the conditions that exist at the time of the decision of a case. Thus, theory used must follow the case and the development of the doctrine in the law of criminal cases.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Marketplace di Indonesia terkait Pelanggaran Hak Cipta: Tantangan, Regulasi, dan Upaya Pencegahan dalam Era E-Commerce Djamaludin, Samsul; Fuad, Fokky
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1674

Abstract

Marketplace legal liability in Indonesia regarding copyright infringement in the E-Commerce era faces increasing complexity and a rise in copyright infringement cases. The formulation of the problem in this research is the complexity of the problem of copyright infringement in the market, as well as obstacles in demanding market accountability, the role of the market, and what preventive measures need to be strengthened to overcome this problem. This research combines normative and empirical perspectives to understand the crucial aspects of market legal accountability. The research results show the need for revisions in the legal framework regarding market legal responsibility for copyright infringement in Indonesia. The inconsistency between Article 15 of the ITE Law and Article 10 of the Copyright Law creates obstacles in implementing the rules. Therefore, concrete measures are needed to harmonize regulations and improve copyright protection in the market.
Peran Advokat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana melalui Restorative justice Putra, Aista Wisnu; Aryaputra, Muhammaf Iftar
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1676

Abstract

Dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana terdapat beberapa teori tujuan pemidanaan yang tentunya berimplikasi secara siginifikan terhadap nilai keadilan penyelesaian perkara. Teori tujuan pemidanaan klasik yang banyak dianut oleh banyak hukum pidana di seluruh dunia dahulu adalah teori pembalasan (retributive justice). Teori pembalasan dewasa ini dianggap sudah tidak sesuai dengan perekmbangan zaman, karena hanya menekankan pada titik jera pelaku dan tidak fokus memperhatikan kerugian korban. Sehingga muncul teori tujuan pemidaan baru yang lebih fokus terhadap penggantian kerugian terhadap korban. Teori penggantian kerugian yang disebut restorative justice ini mengedepankan pemulihan keadaan korban menjadi seperti semula daripada pembalasan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan kualitatif atas data terdahulu tentang peran advokat. Hasil dari penelitian ini menemukan bahwa advokat sangat berperan penting sebagai katalisator perdamaian antara korban dan pelaku tindak pidana. Advokat berperan sebagai mediator yang bersetujuan mencapai kesepakatan ganti kerugian kepada korban dan hukuman pidana yang pantas dituntutkan kepada pelaku. Hambatan dalam perwujudan restorative justive adalah kurangnya sumber daya manusia, sarana prasarana, hingga sulitnya mencapai kesepakatan antara para stakeholder yakni korban, pelaku dan aparat penegak hukum.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Klien Akibat Tidak Diketahuinya Keberadaan Protokol Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) yang Meninggal Dunia Yuniawaty Lunandi, Yenny; Tjoneng, Arman
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1677

Abstract

Notary and PPAT Protocols whose whereabouts are unknown and whose whereabouts are not known so that the protocol is not handed over will result in losses for clients using Notary and PPAT services because various data and files belonging to clients are stored by the Notary/PPAT so this becomes a legal issue related to protection legal clients who experience events like this. The type of research or approach method used is the normative legal research method and the approach used is the statutory approach. Based on research, when something like this happens, clients who experience the incident can contact the relevant agencies such as the Police, BPN and follow all established procedures.
Ada Apa di Balik Belum Berhasinya Reforma Agraria di Indonesia? Nevia Cahyana , Intan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1679

Abstract

This article aims to find out what are the problems and obstacles that are not well-implemented agrarian reform in Indonesia, and what recommendations that can be implemented so that agrarian reform runs properly. This research is a normative type of research conducted by examining library materials, also known as literature studies. Agrarian reform in Indonesia is faced with several problems that include inequality of land ownership, uncertainty of land ownership status, as well as conflict over land rights, and uncertainty of land ownership status and lack of law enforcement exacerbate the situation, causing uncertainty and conflict to the detriment of rural communities. Industrial expansion and development projects also place significant pressure on land resources and community land rights. The growth of the plantation, mining, and infrastructure sectors often has negative impacts on rural communities and the environment, complicating agrarian reform efforts. Resolving these issues requires a strong commitment from the government, collaboration between various parties, and progressive policy implementation to achieve inclusive and sustainable agrarian reform.
Peran Komitmen Organisasi, Kepemimpinan, dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Kasus BPKAD Provinsi Papua Barat) Peres Sefaniwi, Samuel; Lambi, Manuel
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1680

Abstract

This research aims to analyze: 1) The partial and simultaneous influence of organizational commitment, leadership and organizational culture on employee performance, 2) The most dominant variables that influence employee performance at BPKAD West Papua Province. The population of this study was 48 people. The sample was determined using a saturated sampling technique so that the entire population was sampled. Data collection uses questionnaires and documents, data analysis uses multiple linear regression. The research results show that: 1) Organizational Commitment, leadership and organizational culture have a partially positive and significant effect on employee performance, 2) Organizational commitment, leadership and organizational culture have a simultaneous positive and significant effect on employee performance, 3) Leadership is the most dominant variable influence on employee performance at BNPKAD West Papua Province. 4) The coefficient of determination results show a value of 89.8%, meaning that employee performance variables can be explained by the variables Organizational Commitment, Leadership and Organizational Culture, while the remaining 10.2% is explained by other variables outside the model.
Analisis Kompetensi Individu dan Keadilan Organisasional Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Empiris Kantor BPKAD Provinsi Papua Barat) Mawirampakel, Febrilian; D. Resi, Yohanes
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1681

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the influence of individual competence and organizational justice on job satisfaction and employee performance. Data collection is through distributing questionnaires. The research sample was 48 people, using a saturated sampling technique. Meanwhile, this research uses path analysis and descriptive analysis. The research results show that: 1) Individual competency and Organizational Justice have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction; 2) Individual competency and Organizational Justice have a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 3) Job satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on employee performance. 4) Job satisfaction is able to mediate the influence of individual competence on employee performance. 5) Satisfaction is not able to mediate the influence of organizational justice on employee performance. The Head of BPKAD needs to improve individual competence and organizational justice so that it can create job satisfaction which has an impact on improving performance.
Suatu Kelemahan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Desain Industri di Indonesia Zulkarnain, A.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1683

Abstract

Penelitian ini berfokus pada Desain Industri sebagai bagian dari Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual yang masih lemah dalam Perlindungan hukumnya di Indonesia.Metode penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif / doktrinal dengan pendekatan konsep, teori dan perundang-undangan . Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlunya perlindungan hukum atas Desain Industri yang didasarkan atas pemikiran bahwa lahirnya Desain Industri tidak terlepas dari kemampuan kreativitas cipta, rasa dan karsa yang dimiliki oleh manusia yang harus dilindungi. Namun terdapat beberapa faktor yang memperngaruhi lemahnya perlindungan hukum atas Desain Industri tersebut karena beberapa faktor yaitu faktor tuntutan pidana, sistem pendaftaran, pembebanan biaya pendaftaran hak desain industri dan pengetahuan masyarakat masih kurang tentang desain industri. Solusinya supaya merevisi Undang-Undang No.31 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri sekaligus melakukan sosialisasi.
Pengaruh Keberagaman terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan: Studi Kasus Pemerintah Desa Ngadas Achadiat, Karina Ayu Triutami; David, Aaron Kris; Syukri, Mohammad Kholis; Purnama, Gita Aulia; Paskarina, Caroline
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1687

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas mengenai proses pengambilan keputusan di tengah masyarakat yang majemuk di wilayah Desa Ngadas, Kecamatan Poncokusumo, Kabupaten Malang, Provinsi Jawa Timur. Penelitian dilakukan guna mengetahui bagaimana proses pengambilan keputusan yang berlangsung di Desa Ngadas dan bagaimana proses tersebut mengakomodasi keberagaman masyarakat yang ada. Penelitian ini dirasa memiliki urgensi atau signifikansi yang cukup tinggi sebab pada umumnya masih sedikit penelitian yang membahas terkait aspek multikulturalisme dalam ranah politik daerah khususnya di desa, terutama yang dikaitkan dengan proses pengambilan keputusan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan metode deskriptif dengan pengumpulan data primer dilakukan melalui wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Desa Ngadas dengan keberagaman masyarakatnya, terutama pada agama yang dianut dalam melakukan pengambilan keputusan selalu melalui musyawarah bersama yang diwadahi oleh pemerintah desa dan Badan Permusyawaratan Desa (BPD). Keputusan yang diambil bisa jadi tidak mengakomodasi seluruh warga mengingat sifat peraturan pemerintah yang mengikat, tetapi pemerintah Desa Ngadas selalu menerapkan prinsip partisipatif, mencakup: gotong royong; musyawarah; peran adat.
Pengelolaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Oleh Perusahaan Swasta di Indonesia Studi Perbandingan Dengan Negara Amerika Serikat Amin, Khairul; Oktavia, Maria One
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1688

Abstract

The existence of criminal law is part of the national law that organizes efforts to combat crime through the criminal justice system. Lapas plays a crucial role in the modern criminal justice system, with a focus on the rehabilitation of prisoners. The fact that Lapas is managed by the Indonesian state so far has never been rid of some problems such as overcapacity, inadequate facilities, and a lack of allocation of funds to operate prison facilities, which ultimately affects the quality of Lapas performance in Indonesia. This research using comparative legal methods to find out the similarities and differences among the elements of each legal system. The object of comparison is the State of the United States, which is administered in accordance with private parties. The results show that the Indonesian government has indeed issued a budget for the management of Lapas but has not been able to create an effective Lapas organization. Efforts that can be made by the government for future Lapas management can be achieved in cooperation with private companies in the framework of the development of Lapas infrastructure and funding sources, which are fundamental needs in order to efficiently manage Lapas.

Page 2 of 37 | Total Record : 366

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue