Unes Law Review
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Articles
3,910 Documents
<![CDATA[Kajian Kelangkaan Minyak Goreng Akibat Penimbunan Terjadinya Penimbunan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Falih Abdi Nugroho]]>;
<![CDATA[Jean N Sally]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1304
<![CDATA[One of the problems that often occurs in Indonesia is the problem of food shortages, one of which is cooking oil. This has a negative impact on the Indonesian people because their basic needs are decreasing. This is caused by many business actors hoarding cooking oil and reselling it at high prices to make a profit. Hoarding is defined as buying something and saving it so that the item decreases in society so that the price will increase and people will have difficulty meeting their basic needs. This kind of hoarding is prohibited because it is a crime and evidence of moral badness and makes it difficult for people to fulfill their daily needs. Humans in this case are focused on the continuity of consumer life in fulfilling their basic life needs. The researcher applies a normative juridical legal research approach, namely an approach that uses the legal positivist concept, which views law as identical to written norms created and promulgated by authorized institutions or officials. This legal concept is a normative system that is independent, closed, and apart from real social life.]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Pengaturan Sanksi bagi Perusahaan yang Tidak Melaksanakan Corporate Social Responsibility ]]>
<![CDATA[Auliya Rahmania]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1305
<![CDATA[One of the company's obligations is to carry out a corporate social responsibility (CSR) program, where this obligation contains sanctions for companies that do not carry out CSR. The aim of this research is to determine the urgency of regulating sanctions for companies that do not implement Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research which is carried out to look for legal problems or issues and existing legal problems. The research results show that the urgency of regulating sanctions for companies that do not implement TJSL, which departs from the basic understanding that the implementation of TJSL which is a legal obligation (legal mandatory) basically confirms that TJSL is no longer interpreted as voluntary, but as a legal obligation ( legal mandatory) to be implemented.]]>
<![CDATA[Perubahan Pidana Minimal Khusus Terhadap Delik Korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Axel Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Ade Adhari]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1306
<![CDATA[Tindak pidana korupsi dikatakan sebagai extraordinary crime karena dampaknya merugikan finansial juga perekonomian negara dan orang lain, delik korupsi diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU Tipikor). Namun, karena perkembangan produk hukum menjadikan beberapa acuan pasal yang sebelumnya diatur dalam UU Tipikor diubah ke dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Bagian Ketiga (UU KUHP). Perubahannya salah satunya terkait mengganti strafmaat pidana minimal khusus, permasalahan yang diangkat dalam artikel ini adalah bagaimana perubahan dan kelemahan pidana minimal khusus terhadap delik korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Selain itu, metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif yang dalam penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder, hasil kajian menunjukan bahwa penjatuhan pidana minimal khusus dinilai tidak selaras dengan konsideran dalam UU KUHP yang menyatakan bahwa harus menyesuaikan pada salah satunya keadaan, perkembangan kehidupan di masyarakat. Akan tetapi faktanya dalam acuan pasal yang baru penjatuhan pidana minimal khusus menjadi semakin ringan, dampaknya tidak dapat memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku.]]>
<![CDATA[Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur Dengan Menggunakan Media Sosisal Elektronik ]]>
<![CDATA[Margaretha Andini Oktavina]]>;
<![CDATA[Hery Firmansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1309
<![CDATA[The criminal act of defamation by minors via electronic social media is an important issue in criminal law. This research aims to determine the threat of punishment for criminal acts of defamation using electronic social media and criminal liability for minors who commit ITE criminal offenses. The research method used is the normative juridical method. The results of the research show that there is a threat of strict sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation using electronic social media, where the perpetrator can be punished with a maximum imprisonment of 4 years and/or a maximum fine of IDR 750,000,000.00. Criminal liability for minors who commit criminal acts of defamation through social media can be implemented by paying attention to the special provisions regarding children's rights in Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. This responsibility is imposed in accordance with the criminal elements which have been reviewed from the terms of criminal liability, so that perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation through social media can be held accountable for their actions as decided in court. Thus, the protection of children's rights and the application of criminal sanctions need to be harmonized with applicable legal provisions and pay attention to the special implementation of children's rights in the juvenile justice system.]]>
<![CDATA[Rangkap Jabatan Menteri dalam Konteks Kepentingan Negara Berdasarkan Asas – Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik Perspektif Siyasah Tanfidziyah ]]>
<![CDATA[Amin Rahmad Panjaitan]]>;
<![CDATA[Irwansyah Irwansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1310
<![CDATA[Rangkap jabatan" is a term in Indonesian that refers to an individual holding multiple positions in different companies or institutions. In Indonesia, the issue of ministers holding multiple positions has become controversial. The purpose is to understand the laws and general principles of good governance that apply. The author uses a normative juridical research method to analyze every writing, rule, and its application. Based on Article 23 of Law Number 39 of 2008, it is stated that ministers are prohibited from holding multiple positions as other officials in accordance with laws and regulations, commissioners or directors of state-owned or private companies, and leaders of organizations funded by the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget/Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget. Meanwhile, in Article 10 of Law Number 30 of 2014, it is stated that officials in carrying out their duties must be based on the principles of Good Governance and must not be contradictory. In Indonesia, there are several ministers who hold positions as chairman of political parties and other large organizations at the same time. This is certainly contrary to the applicable rules. It is concluded that the practice of ministers holding multiple positions in Indonesia as chairman of political parties and leaders of other large organizations is contrary to the explanation of Article 23 of Law Number 39 of 2008 and Article 10 of Law Number 30 of 2014. Based on the perspective of siyasah tandfiziyyah, holding multiple positions by ministers in Indonesia is not in accordance with one of the principles used in the Islamic governance system.]]>
<![CDATA[Implikasi Yuridis Perjanjian Perkawinan yang Didaftarkan Pada Saat Proses Perceraian ]]>
<![CDATA[Delia Astrid Zahara]]>;
<![CDATA[Antarin Prasanthi Sigit]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1311
<![CDATA[A marriage agreement made by a husband and wife before or during the marriage is binding on both parties who have promised since the marriage took place unless otherwise stated in the marriage agreement. In order for a marriage agreement to be binding on third parties involved in the marriage agreement, the marriage agreement must be recorded by a marriage registrar. The marriage agreement should be immediately registered with the marriage registrar to fulfill the principle of publicity. However, in reality, many married couples do not immediately register their marriage agreement with the marriage registrar, and there are even marriage agreements which are only registered with the marriage registrar when the divorce process is underway by only one of the parties. The aim of this research is to analyze whether there is good faith on the part of the party registering the marriage agreement with the marriage registrar employee when the divorce process is in progress as well as the legal consequences of the marriage agreement registered with the marriage registrar employee during the divorce process on joint property. The form of research used in this research is normative juridical, namely research that uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials to analyze the problems raised in this research. The results of this research indicate that recording a marriage agreement with a marriage registrar during the divorce process by one party without the knowledge of the other party is evidence of a lack of good faith on the part of that party. Apart from that, the results were also obtained that the marriage agreement that had just been registered with the marriage registrar during the divorce process had no effect on the marital assets obtained by involving a third party and were obtained during the marriage, before the marriage agreement was recorded by the marriage registrar.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Sekolah Dasar dari Tindakan Kekerasan dan Bulyying ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Taroreh]]>;
<![CDATA[Rabiatul Adawiah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1312
<![CDATA[Children are God's creation that we need to work together to protect because of their limitations. One of the forms of protection provided is legal protection for children who experience some form of violence and bullying. The forms of violence that children often receive will have a negative impact on the child's future. The essence of this article aims to find out how necessary it is to provide legal protection for children as victims of violence and bullying and legal protection for children as victims of violence and bullying according to statutory regulations. Legal protection for children is provided so that children's rights remain protected as stated in the laws and regulations governing child protection, namely that they do not suffer any form of violence as stated in Articles 76A to 76B of Law Number 35 of 2014 as well as legal protection. given for justice for children. In this way, the state provides legal protection to all children which has been regulated to be implemented in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection.]]>
<![CDATA[Tanggung Jawab Pemegang Protokol Notaris Terhadap Gugatan Pemalsuan Akta Otentik ]]>
<![CDATA[Yenny Rahmadiyanti Rahayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Dominikus Rato]]>;
<![CDATA[Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1314
<![CDATA[In essence, a notary as a public official has the authority to make deeds authentic in accordance with norms, values and provisions of laws and regulations applicable so that the law can work in society. Every deed made by the notary must be kept in the notary's protocol, and the protocol must be transferred in the case of the notary died or his term of office has expired or retired. The existence of a lawsuit addressed to the notary protocol holder regarding the forgery of authentic deeds that have been transferred to him will become a problem in the future. The notary who receives the protocol will still be summoned for information if there are problems related to the protocol in his control, because this is one of the responsibilities of the notary protocol recipient. Article 65 of the Notary's Position Law explains that a notary is responsible for every deed he makes even though the Notarial Protocol has been submitted and transferred to the party holding the Notarial Protocol. The notary holding the Protocol only has the obligation to care for and maintain the deed that has been submitted to him, and is not responsible for the contents of the deed. The storage of notary protocols as state archives is also not regulated in detail in the Notary Public Law. So there needs to be special arrangements regarding policies, guidance and management of notary protocols. In order to create legal certainty for notaries in storing and maintaining notary protocols.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Peran Media Sosial dalam Eksploitasi Anak ]]>
<![CDATA[Alynne Jean Ranice Siregar]]>;
<![CDATA[Hery Firmansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1315
<![CDATA[Pada kemajuan era digital, sosial media memiliki peran yang cukup besar dalam kehidupan dan membantu mobilitas masyarakat. Dalam hal ini sangat disayangkan pada kenyataannya sering kali penggunaan media sosial disalahgunakan oleh oknum yang tidak bertanggungjawab untuk melanggar hukum, salah satunya media sosial juga memiliki pengaruh terhadap terjadinya eksploitasi terhadap anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normative dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan menggunakan dokumen, asas, prinsip, doktrin para ahli, maupun teori hukum. Adapun, spesifikasi sifat penelitian yang dilakukan adalah secara deskriptif dengan menjelaskan relevansi antara berbagai teori dan regulasi perundang-undangan dalam peristiwa hukum yang akan diteliti secara lebih rinci. Data yang didapatkan melalui teknik pengumpulan data secara studi kepustakaan yang dilakukan merupakan jenis data sekunder dengan pendekatan yuridis yang berlandaskan pada menganalisis regulasi perundang-undangan. Oleh karena itu, melalui penulisan ini diharapkan dapat memberikan penggambaran mengenai bagaimana hukum di Indonesia dalam menyikapi peran media sosial terhadap terjadinya kasus eksploitasi terhadap anak.]]>
<![CDATA[Kompetensi Notaris Pengganti dalam Menggantikan Notaris yang Cuti Sebagai Pejabat Negara ]]>
<![CDATA[Maxwell Kurniadi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1316
<![CDATA[Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang memiliki wewenang untuk membuat akta otentik dan kewenangan lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 1 angka (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Sedangkan Notaris Pengganti adalah seseorang yang untuk sementara waktu diangkat sebagai Notaris untuk menggantikan tugas Notaris yang sedang cuti, sakit atau untuk sementara berhalangan menjalankan jabatannya sebagai seorang Notaris. Syarat menjadi Notaris Pengganti yakni seorang warga negara Indonesia yang berijazah sarjana hukum dan telah bekerja sebagai karyawan kantor Notaris paling sedikit 2 (dua) tahun berturut-turut. Notaris Pengganti sendiri memiliki kewajiban dan wewenang yang sama dengan Notaris biasa. Hal menimbulkan suatu kondisi yang timpang dimana syarat menjadi Notaris Pengganti tidak sebanding dengan syarat menjadi Notaris biasa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat preskriptif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, diperlukan adanya revisi Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris dan revisi Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengangkatan, Cuti, Perpindahan, Pemberhentian dan Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Notaris mengenai syarat Notaris Pengganti.]]>
