cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 166   167   168   169   170 
Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Rahasia Bank dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Muhammad Amin; Lilik Prihatin; Bayusakti Yudhopramudyo
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2105

Abstract

The legal consequences of bank secrecy in money laundering crimes in Indonesia are examined in this research. While bank secrecy is an important tool for maintaining consumer trust, efforts to reduce money laundering may face resistance. By using normative research techniques as well as conceptual and legislative approaches, this research assesses the effectiveness and impact of bank secrecy laws in money laundering crimes. The findings of this study indicate that although bank secrecy is critical to maintaining public confidence in the banking system, this importance must be balanced with the need for strong law enforcement measures to combat money laundering.
Akibat Hukum dan Penerapan Asas Nebis In Idem dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase di Pengadilan Romario Tandaraja Hasian
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2106

Abstract

Dalam konteks hukum arbitrase, prinsip "nebis in idem" adalah prinsip yang mengatur bahwa seseorang tidak boleh diadili dua kali atas perbuatan yang sama (double jeopardy). Prinsip ini sering kali diterapkan dalam sistem hukum pidana untuk melindungi individu dari penuntutan ganda. Namun, dalam konteks pembatalan putusan arbitrase di pengadilan, prinsip "ne bis in idem" memiliki implikasi yang berbeda. Di banyak yurisdiksi, pengadilan memiliki kewenangan untuk membatalkan atau memutuskan suatu putusan arbitrase. Salah satu pertimbangan utama dalam hal ini adalah apakah proses arbitrase tersebut telah dilakukan sesuai dengan hukum atau prosedur yang berlaku. Penerapan asas "ne bis in idem" dalam konteks pembatalan putusan arbitrase menyoroti pentingnya kepatuhan terhadap prosedur hukum dan keadilan dalam proses arbitrase. Pengadilan harus mempertimbangkan apakah putusan arbitrase yang dilakukan sudah sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku, serta apakah ada pelanggaran yang membenarkan pembatalan putusan tersebut. Jadi, dalam pembatalan putusan arbitrase di pengadilan, prinsip "ne bis in idem" dapat mempengaruhi penilaian pengadilan terhadap kepatuhan prosedural dan legalitas putusan arbitrase yang bersangkutan.
Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme yang Melibatkan Perempuan dan Anak (Studi Kasus Di Wilayah Sumatera Utara) Yudha Prasetyo, Achmad; Yunara, Edi; Rosmalinda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2107

Abstract

Criminal acts of terrorism are generally committed by men, but there is an interesting fact that these acts of terrorism are not only committed by adult men but also involve women and children in them. This is a new mode or strategy carried out by the perpetrators of terrorism in order to trick the security forces. The formulation of the problem in this thesis research is the first, namely what is the policy for punishing children who are involved in criminal acts of terrorism, second, what is the policy for punishing woman who are involved in criminal acts of terrorism, and the third, how are efforts to prevent terrorism crimes involving women and children in the future? will be reviewed based on statutory regulations. The research used is normative legal research supported by empirical juridical data by conducting interviews with North Sumatra Regional Police. The nature of this research is a descriptive analysis with a statutory approach (state approach) and an analytical approach (analytical approach) using qualitative methods to draw deductive conclusions. The results of the study show that firstly, the criminal policy for terrorism crimes involving children is that children who commit acts of terrorism cannot be subject to specific minimum criminal sanctions in Articles 6, 8 to 13 and 15 of Law Number 5 of 2018 while capital punishment or life imprisonment Life also cannot be enforced but replaced with a maximum imprisonment of 10 years. Second, the criminal policy against terrorism crimes involving women has been regulated in Law Number 5 of 2018, but nothing regulates non-penal policies against women who are involved in criminal acts of terrorism. Then the third, efforts to prevent terrorism crimes involving women and children in the future are reviewed based on laws and regulations, namely by preparing National Preparedness, Counter-Radicalization, and Deradicalization. Conclusions and suggestions can be seen that first, in the absence of laws governing the criminalization of children as terrorist actors, it is necessary to form a related regulation. Second, in the absence of anything that regulates women's non-penal policies against criminal acts of terrorism, it is necessary to establish a special regulation regarding this matter. Third, by preparing National Preparedness, Counter-Radicalization, and Deradicalization, synergy is needed between law enforcement officials, the government, the community, the private sector and other parties
Kedudukan dan Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Artificial Intelegence Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia Hardiyanti Qurrahman, Shofika; Ayunil, Safira; Aurelia Rahim, Tsabita
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2108

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, or better known as AI, in a technological era like this, is developing very rapidly. AI was created and designed to hamper the human brain, digging information, providing information, even solving problems. With AI designed just like humans, when AI commits an act against the law and causes loss, then AI cannot be brought to criminal responsibility. AI can not commit an offence independently, in its operation requires human help. In positive law in Indonesia, AI is not a legal subject like human beings and legal bodies that are jurisprudently recognized as legal subjects.
Pertanggungjawaban Orang Tua Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Studi Pada Satlantas Polres Pematangsiantar) Panjaitan, Syaidilla; Syahbana, Tengku Erwin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2109

Abstract

This research aims to analyze how parents are responsible for children who commit criminal acts. Children often do not receive the right parenting style by parents or institutions for child development and education, so many children are trapped in juvenile delinquency. Giving permission for minors to drive motorized vehicles is a form of lack of parental responsibility towards their children, because apart from requiring driving skills, a strong mentality and a sense of responsibility are needed when driving, this is necessary to prevent undesirable things from happening. like a traffic accident. However, if the child is the perpetrator of a traffic crime and the parents find out, they can be held criminally responsible for the traffic crime committed by their child. So it can be concluded that in this research the author describes the requirements for criminal responsibility of a child as a criminal as well as the role of responsibility of the child's parents in the responsibility of parents towards children who are perpetrators of criminal traffic accidents which cause death in Pematangsiantar.
Delik Pidana Materiil Penipuan Melalui Media Sosial Setiawan, Hari; Dj. Sidarta, Dudik
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2110

Abstract

Fraud is a form of general crime in Indonesia according to the Criminal Code. Social media is also developing rapidly with the development of information flow and technology. However, along with the development of the times and the improvement of information and communication technology, fraud is not only carried out directly through face to face, but also through cyberspace/internet or more trendingly through social media. The forms of fraud through social media that occur are quite diverse, including online arisan, investment, and savings and loans, as the author made the thesis material, namely the decision of the Surabaya District Court regarding the decision of the case court fraud via social media. The main issues taken are how the material offense is against fraud through social media and what are the considerations in deciding cases of fraud through social media in question. The research conducted is normative juridical law research. "Normative Legal Research is legal research conducted by examining library materials, both primary data and secondary data. According to article 28 paragraph (1) of RI Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions Jo article 45 paragraph (2) of RI Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to RI Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions Jo Article 64 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, the defendant is suspected of having committed a crime if several actions, although each of them is a crime or violation, are connected in such a way that it must be seen as an act that continues intentionally and without the right to spread news lie and mislead which results in consumer losses in electronic transactions. The elements include whoever deliberately and without right spreads false and misleading news which results in consumer losses in electronic transactions and if several actions, although each of them constitutes a crime or violation, are connected in such a way that it must be viewed as one act. continues.
Analisis Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Oleh Aktivis Lingkungan Hidup Terhadap Tambak Udang Ilegal di Taman Nasional Karimunjawa (Study Kasus Daniel Frits Tangkilisan) Nur Azmi, Fitri; Nurhilmiyah, Nurhilmiyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2111

Abstract

This research aims to analyze criminal acts of defamation by environmental activists against illegal shrimp ponds in Karimunjawa National Park. The research approach uses a statutory approach, namely using the laws of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, the Criminal Code. Criminal Procedure Code, Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and Article 66 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH). Type of research, in this research the author uses qualitative data. The results of this research are that a speech can be said to be hate speech if there is a malicious intention from the perpetrator of the speech to encourage hostility, invite discrimination, and calls for violence (incitement to violence), against certain groups of the population based on ethnicity, religion, race and between groups and Daniel Frits' upload is far from all of that. Efforts that an activist can take if he is criminally sued is by filing an appeal against the judge's verdict, in this case Daniel, who has been sentenced by the judge, files an appeal with the help of his attorney, because Daniel's attorney assesses Daniel as an environmental fighter in Karimunjawa who has experienced the impact. due to illegal shrimp farming, and is supported by Articles 65 and 66 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. Legal Protection of Environmental Activists in a Criminal Perspective, From a criminal law perspective environmental activists are supported by Article 66 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH) which states that everyone who fights for the right to a good and healthy environment cannot be prosecuted criminally or sued civilly, it has multiple interpretations and is not implemented
Kontruksi Hukum Perampasan Aset Dalam Persfektif Economic Analysis of Law Anang Indrianto
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2113

Abstract

The author identifies economic factors influencing the development of asset seizure legislation and conducts a literature review on related economic theories and the concept of asset seizure. The study also includes case analyses from various countries to investigate the application of economic theory in the context of asset forfeiture law, viewed from the perspective of economic analysis of law. This research aims to examine the need for regulating the concept of asset seizure without punishment in legislation. Legal analysis incorporating economic concepts is known as economic analysis of law. The study will investigate the economic impact of asset confiscation without conviction, as well as its effect on the effectiveness and efficiency of regulations.While asset seizure has been previously studied from criminal law and human rights perspectives, it has not been extensively examined from the viewpoint of economic analysis of law. Therefore, this research is expected to contribute to the development of economic analysis of law theory and provide a new perspective on asset seizure regulation.
Ratio Legis Hak Sipil Dalam Masyarakat Hukum Adat Novita Sari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2114

Abstract

The existence of customary law communities has been recognized in Indonesia in various policies. However, existing policies are unable to accommodate the fulfillment of the rights of indigenous peoples themselves. Discrimination against the rights of indigenous peoples often occurs, one of which is in policy making that does not involve indigenous peoples technically for the granting of Environmental Feasibility permits for Oil Palm Plantation Development Plans and Palm Oil Processing Mills for oil palm plantation companies. Ratio legis guana policy protecting the rights of indigenous peoples must accommodate the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples. So that the legal standing of indigenous peoples to obtain healthy and good environmental justice will continue to be echoed with the principles of legal standing of indigenous peoples who have special interests.
Politik Hukum Pemerintah Indonesia Bidang Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja Menjadi Undang-Undang Sihotang, Nurleli; Leviza, Jelly; Akbar Nasution, Faisal; Afnila
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2115

Abstract

The Indonesian government's legal policy in the environmental sector has been regulated in Article 28H paragraph (1) and Article 33 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, namely regarding the right to a good and healthy environment as a human right and the implementation of the national economy based on the principles of sustainable and environmentally sound development. To increase investment and make it easier to obtain environmental approval, the Government made changes to regulations regarding the environment which were previously regulated by Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. The problems discussed in this study are how the shift in legal politics in the environmental sector after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law, how changes in environmental regulations after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law, how is the settlement of environmental disputes through filing an administrative lawsuit at the State Administrative Court after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law. This research uses normative legal research methods by examining library materials and the type of research used in this research is an inventory of positive law. The results of this study indicate that the government's legal politics in the environmental sector has shifted after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law because of the ease of obtaining environmental approval and increasing investment, not in accordance with the legal politics of environmental management and protection stipulated in Article 28 H paragraph (1) and Article 33 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the environmental development agenda which is a national priority agenda in the 2020-2024 National Medium-Term Development Plan.The ease of obtaining environmental approval can be seen from the loss of public participation in the AMDAL document, the change of environmental permits to environmental approval, the withdrawal of the authority of the Regional Government to the authority of the Central Government, the revocation of the provisions of the article regarding absolute liability without the need to prove the element of fault (stict liability), the revocation of the provisions of the article regarding the cancellation of environmental permits through court decisions, the revocation of the provisions of the article regarding the right to administrative lawsuits in environmental disputes in the State Administrative Court, and the change of articles regarding environmental crimes from formal crimes to material crimes. The settlement of environmental disputes through administrative lawsuits at the State Administrative Court after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law is Individuals, business entities incorporated or not incorporated, and / or Environmental Organizations whose interests have been and / or have the potential to be harmed by State Administrative Decisions and / or Government Administrative Actions can file a lawsuit at the State Administrative Court with the legal basis of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation Number 1 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Environmental Cases.

Page 168 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 166   167   168   169   170 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue