cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 30   31   32   33   34 
TINJAUAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA (Studi Putusan Nomor 13/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Mks) Dian Eka Kusuma Wardani
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.459

Abstract

Corruption in the process of procuring goods and services generally occurs due to abuse of authority by state administrators who are involved in the procurement process, from planning to receiving goods and services, by the Budget User (PA) or the Budget User Authority (KPA). This article uses a type of normative research through a case approach, statutory approach Application of the law of material offenses against cases of abuse of authority in cases of corruption in goods and services by the defendant at the Makassar District Court has complied and fulfilled the elements of delict. The judge's aggravating consideration was that the defendant did not support the government's program, which was actively carrying out the prevention and eradication of corruption crimes. and terms of mitigating the sentence against the defendant The defendant was polite in court and frank in giving testimony.
IMPLEMENTASI TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN PT. GOJEK TOKOPEDIA MELALUI YAYASAN FAJAR SEJAHTERA INDONESIA DALAM MENGATASI KESENJANGAN DIGITAL Indri Yanti Ulfa; Adlin Budhiawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.460

Abstract

Program Literasi Digital ini dilaksanakan untuk mengatasi Kesenjangan Digital, bukan hanya untuk masyarakat umum dan anak-anak, program ini juga ditujukan bagi masyarakat penyandang disabilitas. Selain untuk mengatasi Kesenjangan Digital, Program Literasi Digital ini juga bertujuan untuk mengedukasi anak-anak agar dapat menggunakan media digital khususnya sosial media secara positif, sebab sosial media dapat memberikan pengaruh positif dan negatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari adanya tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan PT. Gojek Tokopedia dan implementasi Program Literasi Digital yang dilaksanakan oleh Yayasan Fajar Sejahtera Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis-empiris. Pendekatan yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan komparatif. Sumber data yang diperoleh pada penelitian ini terdiri dari data sekunder dan data primer. Untuk memperoleh informasi yang akan diolah pada penelitian ini, peneliti menggunakan metode pengumpulan data melalui observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Peneliti melakukan analisis data secara kualitatif dengan cara menggabungkan data yang terkumpul baik sebagai studi pustaka maupun studi lapangan menjadi satu kesatuan untuk memudahkan pemahaman dan interpretasi data. Dari hasil penelitian ini, dapat disimpulkan bahwa tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan PT. Gojek Tokopedia melalui Program Literasi Digital yang dijalankan oleh Yayasan Fajar Sejahtera Indonesia, dapat mengatasi kesenjangan digital atau digital divide yang terjadi di masyarakat.
PENGGELAPAN HARTA WARIS MENURUT PERATURAN PERUNDANGAN DI INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS: 1264/PDT.G/2020/PA.PRA) Moody Rizqy Syailendra; Dzikrina Aulia; Nanda Divabuena Purba
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.462

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan ini agar pembaca memahami isi dari pada penggelapan harta waris yang dimana penggelapan harta waris bagian dari kejahatan sudah diatur juga lama perundangan Indonesia juga untuk mengetahui proses penyelesaian penggelapan harta waris. Penulis sekaligus mengangkat permasalahan dengan mengangkat kasus dengan cara menganalisis kasus tersebut, bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam sengketa dan menetapkan mengabulkan kasus seperti dalam putusan nomor 1264/Pdt.G/2020/PA.pra. Metode yang digunakan penulis menggunakan yuridis normatif yang mana penelitian isi dari pada perundang - undangan, bahan pustaka, artikel ilmiah atau buku. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu penggelapan harta menyalahgunakan haknya agar menguasai suatu benda dan hak yang tidak boleh melalui dari hak sebagai orang diberikan kepercayaan untuk memiliki benda tersebut bukan karena adanya kejahatan. Ada pula unsur penggelapan melekat pada batang tubuh pasal yang mengatur pada penggelapan yaitu pasal 372 - 376 KUHP, ada dua kelompok berupa unsur subjektif dan unsur objektif. Kemudian, mempunyai struktur tata cara manusia menetapkan tanah, tanah termasuk benda tidak bergerak dan merupakan bagian dari harta waris. Harta waris menurut hukum waris perdata harta benda bersama ada hak dan kewajiban pewaris.
RESPONSIBILITAS DALAM PENJERATAN ILLEGAL FISHING BERDASARKAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Dzikrina Aulia; Sitti Nabila Yusri Budiman; Tanissa Mayra Tsabitha
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.463

Abstract

With the freedom to fish on the high seas according to article 86 of the 1982 law of the sea convention, the availability of high seas fish, especially species that are limited and have long migrations, has continued to decline sharply. This will encourage the international community to find a solution to this problem, not intend to fish illegally in other countries' seas. Illegal fishing or what is also known as illegal fishing is illegal fishing activity, a series of fishing that is not regulated by applicable regulations, there is no report to the fishing agency or institution that is available or authorized. The purpose of the author's research is so that the reader understands, the settlement of marine crimes by enforcement according to UNCLOS. Basic doctrinal legal research based on legal positivism uses an approach of convention regulations with legislation. The result of this research is that illegal fishing enforcement is presented as an activity carried out by the state in the form of international cooperation, countries need to work together to follow rules and agreements, either by themselves or with help from groups working with many countries. They can do things together, such as making sure boats are safe, taking care of living things in the sea, keeping the environment clean, learning about the sea, and using technology.
PROSES PELAKSANAAN TUGAS KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PEMERIKSAAN TERSANGKA MENURUT PERUNDANGAN INDONESIA Rasji Rasji; Dzikrina Aulia
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.464

Abstract

Tujuan dari pada penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui proses pelaksanaan tugas komisi pemberantasan korupsi dalam pemeriksaan tersangka menurut perundangan Indonesia. Metode yang yang digunakan penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan kaitannya pendekatan deskriptif, diaplikasikan menggunakan pendekatan perundang statute approach dimana peneliti memakai undang undang sebagai dasar melakukan analisis. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu komisi pemberantasan korupsi merupakan lembaga independen yang bebas daripada pengaruh kekuasaan, lantaran mengaplikasikan korupsi tidak serta merta sendiri peorangan melainkan beberapa orang kerap disebut berkelompok, membahas mengenai korupsi sudah pasti tidak akan ada habisnya, Banyaknya peraturan mengenai korupsi mengapa masih saja terus terjadi kegiatan yang keji ini sudah terlihat jelas, bahwa kegiatan ini sungguh merugikan sangat amat merugikan, tingkat kerugikan Indonesia pada tahun 2022 menurut Indonesia corruption watch (ICW), kerugian negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi ini terjadi karena 252 kasus korupsi dengan 612 tersangka dengan mencapai Rp. 33,665 trilun. Kemudian melaksanakan tugas komisi pemberantasan korupsi sebagaimana diatur dalam ayat (1) komisi pemberantasan korupsi berwenang memulai penyelidikan atau penyelesaian tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh kepolisian atau kejaksaan.
MASA DEPAN KEPAILITAN DAN PKPU DI INDONESIA DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN URGENSI REVISI UU KEPAILITAN DAN PKPU DITINJAU DARI PRESPEKTIF HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA Serlika Aprita; Hasanal Mulkan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.467

Abstract

Dalam menjalankan usahanya para pelaku usaha sering mengadakan perjanjian utang piutang.Perjanjian utang piutang merupakan suatu hal yang umum dilakukan antara kreditor dan debitor.Namun tidak jarang menimbulkan sengketa antara debitor yang lalai dan tidak sanggup membayar atas utang-utangnya kepada kreditor.Salah satu upaya untuk mengatasi utang yang tidak terbayarkan adalah melalui Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban PembayaranUtang (PKPU) yang dimohonkan oleh debitor atau kreditor. Kepailitan adalah sita umum atas semua kekayaan debitor pailit yangpengurusan dan pemberesannya dilakukan oleh Kurator di bawah pengawasan Hakim Pengawas.Sedangkan PKPU adalah penyelesaian utang piutang dengan tujuan untuk mengadakan rencana perdamaian yang meliputi tawaran pembayaran sebagian atau seluruh utang kepada kreditor. Kapailitan dan PKPU dalam penerapannya telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR), Reglement of de Rechtsvordering (Rv), Rechtsreglement Buitengewesten(RBg), dan diatur lebih lanjut dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata. Didalam pengaturan hukum acara kepailitan dan PKPU yang terdapat dalam berbagai peraturan dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata, masih terdapat kekurangan yang perlu dianalisis untuk memberikan dasar hukum terhadap pengaturan hukum acara kepailitan dan PKPU. Mengingat akan diundangkannya Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata maka dalam penelitian ini akan menganalisis beberapa poin penting yang dapat digunakan sebagai bahan masukan dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata.
PERMASALAHAN BAGI ANAK KAWIN CAMPUR UNTUK MEMILIH KEWARGANEGARAAN Sry Rahayu Eka Pratiwi Neoe; Elfrida Ratnawati
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.472

Abstract

In this Era of Globalization, people’s lives have increased greatly, the increasing number of nations has led to a country becoming open or having international relations with other countries. Mixed marriages have traversed all corners of the country and society, information globalization, economy, transportation, cyberspace have increased mobility by migratingfrom one country to another, causing people to meet and communicate with various different ethnic groups, cultures, religions and the customs and communication habits allow Indonesian citizens (WNI) to carry out marriage with foreign citizens (WNA) so that what is called mixed marriages arises. Mixed marriages result in legal consequences, including the legal relationship between parents and children, especially the legal status of child citizenship. And the promulgation of Law No 12 Year 2006 about Republic Indonesia of Citizenship executing dual citizenship to children of mixed marriage gives impact to International Civil Law in which they have to obey the law of two different countries.
INVESTASI BODONG BERKEDOK ROBOT TRADING DENGAN SKEMA PONZI Rizki Wijaya Kusuma; Efrida Ratnawati Gultom
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.473

Abstract

Businesses in Indonesia are currently experiencing rapid development following the digital era, namely by utilizing technology to facilitate the transaction process. The Indonesian financial services industry has taken advantage of a facility called fintech. Companies and individuals also feel the convenience of their business because it is assisted by fintech technology. However, in practice there are still many companies that use technology for illegal business, especially in the field of fraudulent investment with various schemes, one of which is a ponzi scheme. The research method used is normative legal research method, namely providing legal arguments in accordance with primary data and secondary data. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal consequences for ponzi scheme actors and legal protection for ponzi scheme victims. The results of the study found that while there are no specific regulations governing ponzi schemes, the law used is Article 378 of the Criminal Code concerning Fraud Article 105 and or Article 106 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade and or Article 4 and or Article 19 Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection Article 3 and/or Article 4 and/or Article 5 and/or Article 6 in conjunction with Article 10 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes and preventive measures that can be taken is to periodically provide insights regarding investment to the public.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 1025/Pdt.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL MENGENAI KUALITAS KENDARAAN BERMOTOR Jerry Jerry; Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.474

Abstract

The quality of motor vehicles, especially cars, is very important when used in various conditions. Car manufacturers/sellers are required to ensure the quality of their products. Consumers as buyers/consumers or users must receive protection from the quality of the products they buy. If the product consumed by consumers has hidden defects, it is appropriate for consumers to be given legal protection, so that in the future there will be no legal problems. Legal certainty regarding consumer protection needs to be understood by consumers, aiming for consumers to have the knowledge to make claims, as well as receive appropriate after-sales service from producers/sellers. Therefore, consumers need to be protected by the positive laws that apply in Indonesia. The law used for consumer protection is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. If there are legal issues related to products that are not suitable for consumption by consumers, consumers have several ways to settle through legal channels, namely through courts or alternative dispute resolution outside the court. So that in the future the relationship between the seller/manufacturer and the buyer/consumer has balance in the eyes of the law, and has legal certainty that can be accounted for.
PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM TERHADAP IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN BATUBARA (Studi Putusan No.10Pdt.G2015PN. Tgt) Muhammad Afdal Nazir; Elfrida Ratnawati
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.475

Abstract

The coal commodity mining industry in Indonesia has various kinds of legal problems in its management, including regarding overlapping coal Mining Business Permits (IUP), because in the same IUP Area coal IUP has been issued by the relevant government to two different parties, causing disputes between the parties holding the IUP that are protracted and tend to be no legal certainty for IUP holders to be able to carry out its business activities as experienced by PT Pasir Prima Coal Indonesia (PT. PPCI) as the holder of the Production Operation IUP, which in its IUP Area has been issued another IUP on behalf of PT Mandiri Sejahtera Energindo (PT. MSE), thus causing a dispute between the two parties, why did this happen, is there any unlawful act on it? For this reason, it needs to be legally tested through the Court in order to achieve legal certainty regarding who is more entitled to carry out mining activities in the IUP Area. After there is legal certainty with a court decision with permanent legal force (Inkracht van gewijsde), then what about IUP to carry out mining activities within the IUP Area after Decision No.10 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Tgt.? Therefore, the author is interested in analyzing Decision No.10/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Tgt using qualitative normative research methods, while the results found that the IUP holders of PT. PPCI, which has also been decided by the Tanah Grogot District Court (Inkracht van gewijsde) as the party entitled to the disputed IUP Area, has not been able to carry out mining activities in the IUP area, which on the contrary is PT. MSE that has carried out mining activities in the IUP area, or in other words, legal certainty has not been achieved for PT. PPCI.

Page 32 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 30   31   32   33   34 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue