cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 31   32   33   34   35 
KEMUDAHAN PERIZINAN BERUSAHA PADA SEKTOR PERTAMBANGAN NIKEL DI INDONESIA PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Syukron Mahal Frawansa; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.476

Abstract

Nickel mining activities include various stages, such as investigation, exploration, feasibility study, building, mining, processing, refining, transportation, and post-mining are all examples of mining operations. The government has the authority to manage nickel mining, but usually grants licenses to other parties to carry out mining activities. Law Number 11/2020 on Job Creation was introduced to simplify licensing and bureaucracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of the law on the ease of business licencing and management of nickel mining in Indonesia. The research utilized both legal and non-legal materials and resulted in a descriptive and analytical juridical study. The study determined that nickel mining activities need a central government business licence, which is now simpler to obtain with a business identity number, standard certificate, and permission. The management of nickel mining following the passage of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation has had environmental and social consequences.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI PADA KJPP MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 Dudung Hamidi; Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.478

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the criminal code in articles 12, 20, 36, as well as in articles 45 to 50, states that corporations have legal responsibilities where the corporation is a business entity or not a legal entity in the form of a firm, limited partnership or equivalent according to law legislation. One of the business entities is the Office of public appraisal service (KJPP) was formed based on the regulation of the Minister of Finance number 228/PMK.01/2019. The research is a descriptive analysis research using a normative juridical and references in the form of legislation and literature that supports the research. The purpose of the research is to analyze the existence of corporate responsibility for KJPP to Law number 1 of 2023 and legal protection in carrying out appraisal professional service activities. The results of the analysis show that until recently: (1) KJPP is directly related to corporate criminal responsibility and (2) its activities of KJPP does not currently have good legal protection because in carrying out the appraisal profession it is still supported by a Ministerial of Finance Regulation which hierarchically, legislation are at the bottom.
URGENSI PENGATURAN LENIENCY PROGRAM TERHADAP DUGAAN KARTEL ATAS KELANGKAAN MINYAK GORENG DI INDONESIA Arya Putra Rizal Pratama; Ria Setyawati; L. Budi Kagramanto; Sinar Aju Wulandari
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.479

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition stipulates various prohibitions for actions that cause unfair business competition, especially contractual activities between business actors, one of which is a cartel The actions of this cartel have an impact on the sustainability and welfare of consumers as a result of price and production regulation in the market. In proving the realm of unfair business competition, namely cartel, it can be proven through indirect evidence. Indirect evidence according to the Regulation of the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition Number 1 of 2010 concerning Procedures for Handling Cases is a guide. The cartel case approach which is regulated through Article 11 of Law Number 5 of 1999 adopts the principlerule of reason tend to see and examine the reasons of business actors who commit an act that is considered to violate the competition law. However, the success of disclosing cartel cases is still experiencing obstacles. Several countries have implemented leniency program as a response to cartel cases. The process of enforcing business competition law in Indonesia has not been able to overcome cartel cases that have harmed consumers. The results of this study explain the difficulty in disclosing cartel cases in Indonesia because there are no parties or informants to assist law enforcement to ascertain the alleged cartel. The urgency of the leniency program is the only way to reduce difficulties and restore an efficient and effective economic situation so that consumers are able to prosper.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA SENI LUKIS DIGITAL MENURUT FATWA MUI NOMOR 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 TENTANG HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DI KOTA MEDAN Wanda Hamidah Polem; Ahmad Zuhri
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.480

Abstract

Nikmat akal merupakan salah satu karunia Allah SWT kepada manusia. Karena anugerah ini, orang dapat bernalar, membuat penilaian moral, dan berkreasi dengan membuat berbagai alat yang membuat hidup mereka lebih mudah, terutama dalam hal penggunaan teknologi digital. Berkat teknologi yang serba digital ini, informasi dapat dengan mudah diperoleh dari jaringan internet di mana saja dan kapan saja. Namun, tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa isu lain muncul. Salah satunya adalah perlindungan hak cipta bagi seniman yang kreasi digitalnya diposting secara online. Metodologi penelitian hukum-empiris digunakan. Adalah tirani untuk memakai, mengungkapkan, membuat, memakai, menjual, mengimpor, mengekspor, mendistribusikan, memberikan, menerbitkan, mereproduksi, menjiplak, memalsukan, dan membajak hak kekayaan intelektual orang lain tanpa persetujuan mereka. Perundang-undangan tersebut inkonstitusional, menurut Fatwa MUI Nomor 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 Tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI). Selanjutnya menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, setiap orang yang memakai hak komersial atas suatu ciptaan harus terlebih dahulu mendapat persetujuan dari pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta. Upaya pembelaan hukum turut wajib sejalan terhadap hukuman yang keras serta memadai kepada pelanggar hak cipta oleh aparat penegak hukum berdasarkan pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada.
ANALISIS YURIDIS LEGALITAS CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBAYARAN DALAM TRANSAKSI BISNIS DI INDONESIA Selviana Margaretha; Elfrida Ratnawati
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.485

Abstract

Abstract The flow of world globalization has greatly impacted technological advances, especially in the payment technology sector which can assist in a fast, safe and secure payment system. At this time we have realized that there is a named currencycryptocurrency, but in Indonesia it has not been regulated concretely regarding the use and legal protectioncryptocurrency. This study aims to examine the regulation of legality and legal protection of cryptocurrencies based on laws and regulations and policies made by the Indonesian government using normative juridical law methods and statutory regulations approaches. Regarding the legal materials used by the authors in the form of primary and secondary legal materials obtained by the authors from books, journals, literature, and data from the Indonesian Government, then the authors analyzed the data using descriptive and legal arguments to obtain systematic and comprehensive research results. Regarding the results of the research, it explains that Cryptocurrency in Indonesia has not been fully regulated, but several rules and policies have been issued by the authorities. Bank Indonesia prohibits the use of Cryptocurrency as a legal means of payment, but the use of Cryptocurrency as a digital asset is still permitted. Bappebti regulates Crypto exchanges, DGT regulates taxes on profits from Cryptocurrency transactions, and OJK warns the public about the risks of investing in the Crypto market. The Indonesian government is in the process of regulating cryptocurrencies more comprehensively through revisions to the capital market law and tax laws.
FUNGSI PENGAWASAN DPRD TERHADAP PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MEWUJUDKAN APARATUR PEMERINTAH DAERAH YANG BERINTEGRITAS UNTUK KESEJAHTERAAN RAKYAT Muhammad Arsyi Jailolo; Aminuddin Ilmar; Anshori Ilyas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.486

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the supervisory function of the Makassar City DPRD on the performance of the Makassar City Government itself as an ideal variable aspect of regional government administration. This research was conducted at the Makassar City DPRD and Makassar City Government. The time of this research is for two months (February to March 2023). This study uses an empirical-qualitative method and uses primary data collected by giving questions in the form of interviews to respondent representatives from DPRD and Makassar City Government. Furthermore, the method of data analysis was systematically inventoried and then the content material was analyzed using an analytical conceptual approach with qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the substance of the DPRD's oversight function in Makassar City runs with the process of budgeting, legislation, and supervising the enforcement of local regulations. the implementation mechanism is by monitoring evaluation and absorption of community aspirations. The obstacle is that not all DPRD recommendations are implemented by the Makassar City Government. The problem lies in the firmness of human resources in the Makassar City DPRD
DASAR DAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENGABULKAN PERMOHONAN PELAKSAKSANAAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA (STUDI PUTUSAN NO. 622/PDT.P/2018/PN.MKS.) Nur Hidayah
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.487

Abstract

In the provisions of the Marriage Law, there are no clear provisions regarding the arrangement of interfaith marriages, giving rise to a legal vacuum, to carry out marriages of different religious statuses, they must first obtain a stipulation granted by the PN. PN can be granted by the judge. Even though the Marriage Law does not regulate marriage with different religious statuses. The type of research chosen by the author in this study is normative (normative juridical). This relates to reviewing, explaining, and analyzing legal regulations relating to interfaith marriages, by examining legal materials such as a copy of Case Determination No. 622/Pdt.P/2018/PN.Mks regarding Basis for Judge Considerations in Granting Applications for Execution of Different Marriages Religion. Whereas the basis for the Makassar District Court judge in granting the request of the applicant named X (pseudonymized name) of the applicant and the applicant named Y (pseudonymized name) regarding the implementation of marriages of different religions is to prevent the application of smuggling of social and religious values "samen leven" or cohabiting and smuggling applicable laws. Then the judge's consideration was that the wishes of the applicants must be respected as part of human rights according to what was mandated in articles 27 and 29 of the 1945 Constitution and guided by the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No: 1400 K/Pdt/1986 dated 20 January 1989.
KAJIAN TEORI HUKUM CHAOS TERHADAP PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN DI KOTA MAKASSAR Hasdiwanti Hasdiwanti; Wiwie Heryani; Audyna Mayasari Muin
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.488

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hukum pidana formil dan materil terkait penanganan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan di Kota Makassar dan bagaimana kajian teori hukum chaos terhadap penanganan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan di Kota Makassar. Jenis penelitian yang penulis gunakan yakni penelitian hukum normatif-empiris. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kota Makassar yakni di Polrestabes Makassar, Kejaksaan Negeri Makassar, Pengadilan Negeri Makassar, LSKP, LSM GMBI, KNIP, AJI, Ormas Oi, dan PBHI-LBH Makassar. Hasil yang diperoleh selanjutnya dianalisis dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Penegak hukum belum menerapkan hukum pidana formil dan materil dalam menangani begal dengan baik. Adapun penanganan terhadap begal yang dilakukan masyarakat bertentangan dengan hukum pidana formil maupun materil, mereka melakukan perbuatan main hakim sendiri yang bertentangan dengan Pasal 365 dan Pasal 170 KUHP serta Pasal 44 dan Pasal 33 ayat (1) Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. 2) Kegagalan penegak hukum untuk meminimalisir terjadinya begal di Kota Makassar membuat masyarakat menjadi tidak percaya dengan kinerja penegak hukum hingga menggunakan cara sendiri dalam menanganai begal telah mengakibatkan kekacauan hukum. Namun, terlepas dari kekacauan yang terjadi, menurut teori chaos, maka hukum akan kembali pada kondisi yang teratur dengan kerjasama masing-masing pihak.
ASPEK KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG DALAM PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI NASIONAL Rizqi Muallif; Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.491

Abstract

Economic and trade developments caused many debt problems in the community, followed by the monetary crisis that occurred in Indonesia, which had a negative impact on the national economy. Regarding the Debt Payment Obligation Postponement (“PKPU”) and bankruptcy, the case process has reached the highest number of up to 1,298 within one year. The number of PKPU processes is a serious concern considering that if this continues, the process of national economic recovery will take a long time. Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation (“Bankruptcy and PKPU Law”) was established to meet the interests of the business world and to resolve debt problems effectively. The effectiveness of PKPU in preventing bankruptcy depends on the existence of good faith and a sense of cooperation (cooperative sense) from both the debtor and creditor so that the Reconciliation Plan can be negotiate and determined properly until the fulfillment of all debts is achieved. One example that has an impact when a company goes bankrupt is when the employees in the company that will be terminated will also have an impact on the state’s burden on the economy. The determination of the application of PKPU or bankruptcy declaration lies with the debtor who is expected to consider everything, especially the things that will have the most impact, including in the period of economic development in Indonesia. management and/or settlement of assets.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN TERHADAP PENEGAKAN EKOSISTEM KAWASAN HUTAN LINDUNG Algazali Harris; Maskun Maskun; Zulkifli Aspan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.492

Abstract

Deforestation causes the availability of forest land for ecosystem and environmental, Forest management activities in Indonesia have been regulated in Law Number 41 of 1999 concerning. The Forestry Law states that all forests within the territory of the Republic of Indonesia, including the natural wealth in them, are controlled by the state for the greatest prosperity of the people. there is an environmental law enforcement agency appointed to supervise or take action against illegal loggers as well as a forest use licensing mechanism, however, the facts on the ground show that there are still many forestry activities that damage forest ecosystems and are even increasing. This research was conducted at the Kalaena Forest Management Unit (KPH) which carried out supervision in the Protected Forest Area area, This research is Empirical Research. The data used are primary, secondary and tertiary data. All data and materials obtained from the results of the research were compiled and analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively.

Page 33 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 31   32   33   34   35 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue