cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sriono
Contact Email
sriono.mkn@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
advokasi@ulb.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan SM Raja Nomor 126 A, Aek Tapa, Rantauprapat, Labuhanbatu, Sumatera Utara
Location
Kab. labuhanbatu,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI
Published by Universitas Labuhanbatu
ISSN : 23377216     EISSN : 26206625     DOI : 10.36987/jiad
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Ilmiah ADVOKASI adalah jurnal yang dikelola oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Labuhanbatu, Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah ADVOKASI menerima artikel ilmiah dari hasil penelitian, diterbitkan 2 nomor dalam satu volume setiap bulan pada bulan Maret dan September. Jurnal ini fokus mempublikasi hasil penelitian orisinal yang belum diterbitkan di manapun pada bidang Ilmu Hukum dan aplikasi ilmu Hukum dan Perundang-undangan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 411 Documents
 38   39   40   41   42 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENGATURAN ASET KRIPTO DI INDONESIA DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Azhari Dzulqarnain; Aris Machmud
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8545

Abstract

The rapid development of crypto assets in Indonesia has created significant legal challenges, particularly regarding legal certainty and consumer protection. Although crypto assets have been recognized as tradable commodities and are currently undergoing regulatory transition into the financial sector, the coexistence of multiple regulatory regimes has generated uncertainty concerning their legal status, institutional authority, and mechanisms for consumer protection. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing crypto assets in Indonesia following the enactment of Law Number 4 of 2023 on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening (P2SK Law) and Government Regulation Number 49 of 2024, as well as to examine the adequacy of legal protection available to crypto-asset consumers. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings reveal that although Indonesia has established a more structured regulatory framework through the transfer of supervisory authority from Bappebti to the Financial Services Authority (OJK), the legal framework remains fragmented, resulting in overlapping institutional authority, uncertainty in dispute resolution mechanisms, and limited legal remedies for consumers. The study further demonstrates that existing regulations have not comprehensively integrated consumer protection principles, particularly regarding compensation mechanisms, platform accountability, and legal certainty for digital asset ownership. This research contributes by proposing an integrated regulatory model that harmonizes financial regulation, consumer protection law, and digital asset governance to strengthen legal certainty and enhance consumer protection within Indonesia's crypto-asset ecosystem.Keywords: Crypto Assets; Legal Certainty; Consumer Protection; Digital Financial Assets; Financial Regulation
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM IZIN POLIGAMI DAN HARTA BERSAMA (Studi Kasus Perkara Putusan Nomor 2/PDT.G/2025/PA.BBU) Jaka Tri Junius; Sri Zanariyah; Januri Januri
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8366

Abstract

Polygamy under Islamic law and Indonesian positive law is permissible only when strict legal requirements are fulfilled to safeguard the rights of wives, children, and jointly acquired marital property. Nevertheless, the judicial practice of granting polygamy permits continues to generate debate regarding the balance between procedural justice and substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning of judges in granting polygamy permits and its legal implications for the status of the first wife and jointly acquired property through an examination of Decision Number 2/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Bbu of the Blambangan Umpu Religious Court. The research employs a normative-empirical (socio-legal) approach using case and statutory approaches, supported by library research, judicial decision analysis, interviews, and observations. The findings reveal that the panel of judges based its decision on the first wife's health condition, the applicant's financial capability, and the wife's consent. However, the decision primarily emphasized compliance with formal legal requirements rather than critically assessing the voluntariness of the wife's consent and the protection of women's rights, thereby reflecting the predominance of procedural justice over substantive justice. Furthermore, the determination of jointly acquired property prior to the implementation of polygamy constitutes a preventive measure to protect the first wife's economic rights, although its effectiveness ultimately depends on the enforcement of the judgment and the husband's compliance with his legal obligations. The study recommends that Religious Courts adopt a more comprehensive assessment of the wife's consent and strengthen the protection of women's rights to ensure the realization of substantive justice in polygamy cases.Keywords: substantive justice; procedural justice; polygamy; protection of women's rights; judicial legal reasoning
PENGAJUAN KLAIM DANA PERTANGGUNGAN WAJIB KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN PERLINDUNGAN KORBAN Muhammad Akbar; Purwanto Purwanto; Febri Noor Hediati
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6831

Abstract

The Mandatory Road Traffic Accident Compensation Fund constitutes a form of social insurance designed to provide legal protection and financial compensation for victims of traffic accidents. This study aims to analyze the claim submission mechanism of the mandatory compensation fund from the perspective of legal certainty and victim protection, as well as to assess its effectiveness in implementation in Balikpapan City. The research employs a socio-legal approach supported by a normative analysis to examine the alignment between legal norms and their practical implementation. Data were collected through field research and an examination of relevant statutory regulations. The findings indicate that, normatively, the claim submission mechanism is supported by a clear legal framework and an adequate institutional structure. However, its effectiveness remains constrained by several factors, particularly the low level of public awareness and legal literacy regarding victims’ rights. This condition affects the optimal realization of legal protection intended for accident victims. Therefore, strengthening legal education, enhancing procedural transparency, and improving inter-agency coordination are necessary to ensure greater legal certainty and more effective victim protection.Keywords: Mandatory Compensation Fund; Legal Certainty; Victim Protection; Traffic Accidents
REFORMASI KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PERUNDUNGAN DI INDONESIA Fenti Darna Pradewi
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8842

Abstract

This study examines the legal response to the increasing incidence of bullying in Indonesia. The study aims to analyze the regulatory framework governing bullying in the national Criminal Code (KUHP) and to evaluate the application of restorative justice principles in its handling. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and comparative approaches; data sources include legislation, legislative drafting records, judicial decisions, and secondary literature; analysis is qualitative. Findings indicate that the National Criminal Code clarifies the legal basis for addressing bullying through provisions on insult, assault, threats, and cyber-related offenses, and creates space for diversion and restorative justice practices (e.g., out-of-court settlement clauses). However, implementation of restorative justice faces significant obstacles, including victim resistance, insufficient dissemination, and limited capacity of law enforcement agencies. This study contributes theoretically by formulating an analytical framework that integrates restorative justice principles into the interpretation of the National Criminal Code provisions on bullying, that intended to improve the effectiveness of bullying prevention and response in Indonesia.Keywords: Bullying; Indonesian law; Restorative justice; Reform of the Criminal Code.
IMPLEMENTASI PENUNTUTAN TERHADAP PENGEDAR SEDIAAN FARMASI ILEGAL BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI TUBAN Narita Tarasari; Maria Novita Apriyani
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8443

Abstract

The increasing circulation of illegal pharmaceutical products, particularly Double L pills, reflects weak compliance with health regulations and poses a significant challenge to criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. This issue highlights the need for an effective prosecution mechanism as an integral part of the criminal justice system to ensure legal certainty and protect public health. This study aims to analyze the implementation of prosecution against distributors of illegal pharmaceutical products under Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health at the Tuban District Prosecutor’s Office, as well as to identify the obstacles encountered and the measures undertaken to address them. This research employs a normative-empirical legal research (socio-legal) method using statutory, conceptual, and empirical approaches. Data were collected through library research, field observations, and interviews with public prosecutors and other relevant officials at the Tuban District Prosecutor’s Office, and were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. The findings indicate that the prosecution process has generally been conducted in accordance with the applicable legal framework through the application of the dominus litis principle. However, its effectiveness remains constrained by delays in case completion due to the repeated return of case files (P-19), differences in legal interpretation between investigators and public prosecutors, and the absence of explicit legal provisions governing the time limit for returning case files during the pre-prosecution stage. These findings underscore the need to strengthen institutional coordination among law enforcement agencies and to establish clearer legal regulations governing pre-prosecution procedures in order to enhance the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement against the illegal distribution of pharmaceutical products.Keywords: prosecution; illegal pharmaceutical products; health law; Tuban District Prosecutor’s Office; dominus litis.
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN SURVEI KEPUASAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA LEMBAGA REHABILITASI NARKOBA: STUDI KASUS DI KOTA PEKANBARU Mariana Mariana; Yeni Triana; Irawan Harahap
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6722

Abstract

Public dissatisfaction with the quality of public services at drug rehabilitation institutions in Pekanbaru City has shown an increasing trend, even leading to the closure of several rehabilitation centers. This condition highlights the importance of the Community Satisfaction Survey (CSS) as an evaluative instrument to improve the quality of public services. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Community Satisfaction Survey policy based on Regulation of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Number 14 of 2017, to identify obstacles to its implementation, and to examine the efforts undertaken by drug rehabilitation institutions in Pekanbaru City. This research employs a sociological legal research method with an empirical approach, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary data collected through interviews, document analysis, and literature review. The findings indicate that the implementation of the CSS policy has not been optimal, as several rehabilitation institutions have not consistently conducted community satisfaction surveys. The main obstacles include low legal awareness among institutional administrators, limited budget allocation, and insufficient human resource competence in conducting surveys. Furthermore, some institutions have not taken concrete and systematic measures to implement the policy. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening the government’s role through guidance, supervision, and the imposition of administrative sanctions, such as written warnings and fines, to ensure compliance of drug rehabilitation institutions with the public service satisfaction survey policy. Keywords: drug rehabilitation; public services; community satisfaction survey; policy implementation.
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST DESTRUCTIVE FISHING IN INDONESIA: JUDICIAL REASONING AND ECOLOGICAL JUSTICE IN JUDGMENT No. 152/Pid.Sus-LH/2025/PN.Pya Dedi Afrizal Hidayat; Rina Rohayu Harun; Yulias Erwin; Nurjannah Septyanun
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8593

Abstract

Destructive fishing continues to pose a serious threat to Indonesia's marine ecosystems, yet judicial responses remain predominantly oriented toward criminal punishment rather than ecological restoration. This article examines how destructive fishing regulations are implemented through judicial reasoning and whether court decisions incorporate ecological justice as part of environmental law enforcement. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to analyze Judgment No. 152/Pid.Sus-LH/2025/PN.Pya together with relevant fisheries and environmental legislation. The findings demonstrate that the judgment primarily reflects a conventional retributive model of criminal law enforcement by emphasizing imprisonment, fines, and the confiscation or destruction of evidence, while restorative obligations such as ecosystem rehabilitation, environmental recovery, and compensation for ecological damage are absent from the judicial order. These findings indicate that the implementation of destructive fishing regulations in judicial practice remains focused on formal legal compliance and deterrence rather than substantive ecological justice. This study contributes by proposing a responsive ecological law enforcement model that integrates criminal sanctions with ecosystem restoration, thereby encouraging courts to institutionalize environmental recovery as an essential component of judicial outcomes in destructive fishing cases.Keywords: destructive fishing; ecological justice; environmental restoration; law enforcement; responsive law.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA OLEH KEPOLISIAN DAERAH LAMPUNG: ANALISIS HAMBATAN DAN STRATEGI PENGUATAN PENYIDIKAN Berthiana Berthiana; Januri Januri; Rika Santina
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8397

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of narcotics abuse and illicit trafficking in Lampung Province poses a serious threat to public security, social order, and the effectiveness of Indonesia's criminal justice system. This condition requires strengthening law enforcement efforts that extend beyond punitive measures to address the various challenges encountered during criminal investigations. This study aims to analyze the enforcement of narcotics laws by the Lampung Regional Police (Polda Lampung), identify the factors hindering the effectiveness of criminal investigations, and formulate strategies to strengthen investigative processes. The research employs a normative-empirical (socio-legal) approach using statutory and case approaches, supported by library research, document analysis, and interviews with investigators at the Lampung Regional Police. The findings reveal that narcotics law enforcement has been implemented through both preventive and repressive measures. However, the effectiveness of investigations remains constrained by limited human resources, inadequate investigative facilities and technology, the complexity of organized narcotics trafficking networks, and insufficient inter-agency coordination. This study argues that strengthening investigators' professional capacity, modernizing investigative technologies, enhancing inter-agency collaboration, and optimizing community-based prevention programs constitute key strategies for improving the effectiveness of narcotics law enforcement in Lampung Province. Keywords: law enforcement; narcotics crime; Lampung Regional Police; criminal investigation; investigation strengthening strategy
EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PIDANA PENJARA TERHADAP ANAK YANG TELAH MELAMPAUI BATAS USIA 18 TAHUN DALAM PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK Nila Wahyuningtyas Wardani; Eka Nanda Ravizki
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6822

Abstract

This study analyzes the issues surrounding the execution of imprisonment sentences against offenders who have exceeded the age of 18 within the framework of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA), referring to Decision Number 2818 K/PID.SUS/2024. The problem arises at the stage of executing the court decision when the convicted individual has surpassed the age of 18, resulting in administrative and legal obstacles concerning placement in a Special Child Development Institution (LPKA). The refusal of admission by the LPKA places the prosecutor, as the executing authority, in a dilemma between enforcing the court’s ruling and complying with statutory regulations. This research employs an empirical juridical method with statutory and case approaches, supported by field data on the practical implementation of court decisions. The findings indicate a lack of judicial precision in determining the appropriate correctional placement, as normatively, individuals who have exceeded the age of 18 should be placed in a Youth Correctional Institution. This condition reflects a lack of synchronization between the operative part of the judgment and the provisions of the SPPA, resulting in legal uncertainty during the execution stage. Greater judicial accuracy and regulatory harmonization are required to ensure legal certainty and the protection of children's rights within the criminal justice system.Keywords: Execution of Judgment; Juvenile Offender; Juvenile Criminal Justice System; Legal Certainty
REKONSTRUKSI FUNGSI PENGAWASAN SYAHBANDAR TERHADAP PRAKTIK SHIP-TO-SHIP TRANSFER (STS) ILEGAL DALAM PENGANGKUTAN BBM BERSUBSIDI: ANALISIS NORMATIF ATAS KESENJANGAN PENGATURAN HUKUM Karso Raharjo; Kuat Puji Prayitno; Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8844

Abstract

Illegal ship-to-ship transfer (STS) practices involving subsidized fuel oil constitute a significant legal challenge because they facilitate the unlawful diversion of subsidized energy distribution, potentially causing state financial losses and undermining national energy policies. Although Indonesian Shipping Law authorizes the Harbormaster (Syahbandar) to supervise maritime activities, the existing legal framework remains primarily focused on navigational safety and administrative compliance, leaving substantive cargo legality and offshore STS activities largely beyond its regulatory reach. This study aims to analyze the legal construction of the Harbormaster's supervisory authority over illegal STS practices involving subsidized fuel transportation and to formulate directions for strengthening the existing regulatory framework. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches by examining the Shipping Law, Government Regulation Number 31 of 2021, and other relevant legal instruments governing subsidized fuel distribution. The collected legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through systematic legal interpretation. The findings reveal that the Harbormaster's supervisory authority is limited to administrative verification of vessel documents and does not extend to verifying cargo legality or tracing vessel movement history. This normative limitation creates legal loopholes that enable illegally transferred subsidized fuel cargoes to enter the port system through formally valid documentation. This study proposes strengthening the legal construction of the Harbormaster's supervisory function by expanding the scope of supervision, integrating maritime and energy regulatory frameworks, reinforcing inter-agency coordination, and introducing substantive cargo verification mechanisms to prevent the misuse of subsidized fuel distribution.Keywords: Harbormaster; ship-to-ship transfer; subsidized fuel; maritime supervision; legal construction

Page 41 of 42 | Total Record : 411

 38   39   40   41   42 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 4 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 9, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 8, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 7, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 6, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 5, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 5, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi More Issue