cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Recca Ayu Hapsari
Contact Email
recca@ubl.ac.id
Phone
+6285640245878
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.fh@ubl.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. ZA Pagar Alam No 26 Labuhan Ratu Kedaton Bandar Lampung, Indonesia (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bandar Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Progressive Law Review
Published by Universitas Bandar Lampung
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27162141     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36448/plr
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Progressive Law Review (PROLREV) is an journal Faculty of Law University of Bandar Lampung. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as private laws and public laws which include constitutional and administrative law as well as criminal law, international laws concerning Indonesia, to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed. A recommendation by the Editors on specific research issues to be covered in each volume may be made available to prospective contributors prior to publication of the volume in April and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 65 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NOTARIES AND MONEY LAUNDERING CRIMES Navisa, Fitria Dewi
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i1.254

Abstract

Abstract: In this case, the social function of the notary is very important to provide authentic deeds for the community. A person in a respectable position who is able to carry out the requirements of an authentic deed is needed by the community, which guarantees legal certainty and builds trust in the production of written evidence. In addition to being responsible for themselves, this individual is also responsible for society. A notary must be moral in order to be able to carry out his responsibilities, investigating and reporting transactions made by service users to PPATK, the authorized organization. Notaries are not harmed by their role as Whistleblowers in Government Regulation Number 43 of 2015 in accordance with the mandate of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes. Regulation Number 9 of 2017 concerning the Application of the Principle of Recognizing Notary Service Users in order to help eradicate money laundering crimes.
Eksplorasi Pendekatan Restorative Justice sebagai Mekanisme Pengurangan Angka Residivisme: Analisis Kritis terhadap Efektivitas Teori Relatif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Nabila Maulidiya; Indi Ulya Kamalin; Jelita Yupitasari
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i1.255

Abstract

Indonesia’s criminal justice system faces significant challenges related to rising recidivism rates. Data from the Directorate General of Corrections suggests that Indonesia's recidivism rate could reach 24% by 2023, indicating the limitations of conventional sentencing approaches. This research critically analyses the effectiveness of relative punishment theory and explores restorative justice as a potential alternative to reduce recidivism. Using a literature review methodology, this research examines empirical data, theoretical frameworks, and implementation challenges of restorative justice in the Indonesian legal context. Comparative analysis shows that restorative justice approaches have a significantly lower recidivism rate of 12.7%, compared to 37.8% for punitive approaches and 28.4% for rehabilitation-based approaches. The research identified key implementation factors, including law enforcement commitment, active community participation, comprehensive policy support, and effective rehabilitation programs. Structural and cultural barriers were also examined, with recommendations for adapting restorative justice to the Indonesian socio-cultural context. The study concludes that integrating restorative justice principles into the criminal justice system is a strategic approach to address recidivism.
MARRIAGE OF THE LAMPUNG COMMUNITY (MAK DIJEK SIANG TRADITION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 16 OF 2019) Idham; Lenny Nadriana; Lina Maulidiana
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i1.265

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the marriage customs of the indigenous Lampung community, particularly regarding the traditional prohibition (Mak Dijuk Siang) against divorce during one’s lifetime, from the perspective of the Marriage Law. Mak Dijuk Cerai is part of the Lampung customary traditions that govern marriage and uphold high moral values and norms. This research employs legal and social research methods with an empirical approach. Primary data was obtained through interviews and field findings, which were then analyzed using theories relevant to the issues being studied, such as classical texts, books, journals, articles, legal dictionaries, encyclopedias, and previous related research in order to draw conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the Mak Dijuk Siang custom (prohibition of divorce) in the Lampung ethnic community does not conflict with the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974, as amended by Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. The Mak Dijuk Siang custom can be categorized as part of customary law that remains valid and respected in the Lampung community. Moreover, there is no provision in the Marriage Law that explicitly prohibits or regulates this custom. The Mak Dijuk Siang tradition can thus be regarded as part of Indonesia’s cultural and customary legal heritage that remains relevant and applicable within the Lampung community.
Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Penyebaran Informasi Menyesatkan Yang Disampaikan Melalui Iklan Aulia, Elvita Septavianty; Sanggup Leonard Agustian; Fajar Sugianto
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i1.262

Abstract

Advertising is a form of communication delivered by business actors to fulfill marketing functions. Advertising is one of the most effective communication mediums to promote a product, so that the product has a high selling value. However, many business actors promise advantages from excessive product use. Often the information conveyed does not match the actual condition of the product. Information conveyed through electronic media, print media and other promotional media must comply with the provisions of the Indonesian advertising code of ethics which emphasizes that information conveyed through advertising must be true, clear, honest and appropriate and imbued with a sense of healthy competition, and not excessive and meet other methods. However, these provisions are often ignored by business actors who want to make large profits through advertising and cause losses to consumers. The problems in this study are: (1) How is the regulation of responsibility for the dissemination of misleading information reviewed from Indonesian laws and regulations? (2) How are the efforts to resolve consumer disputes carried out by business actors over the spread of misleading information conveyed through advertising? By using normative research methods and legal approaches, it is known that: (1) The regulation of the responsibility of business actors for the suitability between the information conveyed through advertisements and the specifications and conditions of the products being traded has weaknesses. Laws and Regulations in Indonesia have not regulated the responsibility of business actors for the spread of misleading information conveyed through advertisements with the condition of the product received by consumers; and (2) Dispute resolution can be divided into two, namely outside the court and in court and there has been no certainty and legal justice for consumers in trusting product information conveyed through advertising.
THE ROLE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN STRENGTHENING THE ENFORCEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN INDONESIA Syam, Fauzi; Yusra Pebrianto, Dony; Bambang Marsudi, Eko; Amala Rizki, Khana
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i1.258

Abstract

Administrative law is a fundamental instrument in realizing a transparent, accountable, and equitable government. However, its implementation in Indonesia still faces various challenges, including jurisdictional conflicts between judicial bodies, the lack of public legal awareness, limited human resources, and suboptimal technological infrastructure. This study aims to analyze the role of public policy in strengthening the enforcement of administrative law through regulatory reform, the digitalization of the judicial system, and the enhancement of public participation. The research method used is a normative legal approach, analyzing legislation, legal doctrines, and national and international scholarly literature. The findings show that public policy plays a central role in supporting the transformation of the administrative legal system. The implementation of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded the authority of the Administrative Court (PTUN) to adjudicate on government actions that were previously outside the reach of the law. Additionally, judicial digitalization through the e-Court system has proven to expedite case handling processes and enhance public access to justice, particularly in remote areas. Strengthened public participation through Law No. 25 of 2009 and Law No. 14 of 2008 also contributes to reinforcing oversight over state administrative practices. However, the effectiveness of these policies is still limited by implementation challenges, which require further policy strategies such as regulatory harmonization, public legal education, and investment in infrastructure and human resources

Page 7 of 7 | Total Record : 65

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2019 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025 Vol. 6 No. 01 (2024): APRIL Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): November Vol. 5 No. 01 (2023): APRIL Vol. 4 No. 02 (2022): November Vol 4 No 01 (2022): April Vol 3 No 02 (2021): November Vol 3 No 01 (2021): April Vol 2 No 02 (2020): November Vol 2 No 01 (2020): April Vol 1 No 01 (2019): November More Issue