cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rachmat Hidayat
Contact Email
dr.rachmat.hidayat@gmail.com
Phone
+6288225053819
Journal Mail Official
dr.rachmat.hidayat@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Social Science and Politic, Universitas Sriwijaya Inderalaya, South Sumatera, Indonesia
Location
Kab. ogan ilir,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Published by Universitas Sriwijaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27224252     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v2i2.16
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Social Sciences
OAIJSS invites manuscripts in the various topics including : 1. Public Policy and Administration 2. Sociology 3. Communication Science 4. International Relation.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 256 Documents
 22   23   24   25   26 
Deconstructing the Stigma: A Meta-Analysis of Peer-Led and Community-Based Psychosocial Support Interventions on Quality of Life and Stigma Reduction Among Tuberculosis Patients Rifki Sakinah Nompo; Wahyuni Maria Prasetyo Hutomo; Adellia Dinanda Setyawardani; Yuliana Baru
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v8i6.312

Abstract

Peer-led psychosocial support interventions represent a potentially transformative approach to addressing the dual burden of diminished quality of life and enacted, anticipated, and internalized stigma among tuberculosis (TB) patients. Evidence from rigorous trials remains inconsistent, warranting a systematic synthesis. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines examined randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, and observational studies evaluating peer-led or community-based interventions in adults with TB. Searches covered PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, and regional databases through March 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using study-design-specific tools (RoB 2.0 for RCTs, NOS for observational studies, MRAT for reviews). We conducted separate random-effects meta-analyses for two primary outcomes: quality of life and stigma reduction, using Hedges' standardised mean difference (SMD) with DerSimonian-Laird estimation. GRADE certainty assessment was performed. Twelve effect sizes from seven studies (N=1,449 across primary outcomes, with two contributing systematic reviews) were included. Quality of life improved significantly (k=6, SMD=0.3899, 95% confidence interval [0.2911, 0.4886], p<0.001, I²=0.00%, Tau²=0). Stigma reduction also reached statistical significance (k=6, SMD=−0.4175, 95% CI [−0.5208, −0.3142], p<0.001, I²=0.00%, Tau²=0). The overall pooled estimate across both outcomes was non-significant (SMD=−0.0273, 95% CI [−0.2925, 0.2379], p=0.8399), reflecting outcome-specific effects rather than universal benefit. Sensitivity analyses excluding systematic reviews and by study design confirmed directional consistency. Publication bias assessment (Egger's t=−0.26, p=0.80) revealed no evidence of small-study bias. GRADE ratings: moderate certainty for quality of life (due to design heterogeneity), moderate certainty for stigma reduction. In conclusion, peer-led psychosocial support interventions demonstrate efficacy for both quality of life enhancement and stigma reduction in TB patients. The zero heterogeneity finding (I²=0%) warrants cautious interpretation and suggests consistency despite implementation heterogeneity. Clinical integration requires standardised training, fidelity monitoring, and measurement protocols. Future research must employ larger, multi-country pragmatic trials with mechanistic substudies and long-term follow-up.
Catalyzing Female Empowerment through Heritage Tourism: Propensity Score Matching Evidence from the Ulos Micro-Economy in North Sumatra Indri Suryani Manik; Iis Sugandhi
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v8i6.315

Abstract

Heritage tourism has been theorized as a structural mechanism through which indigenous women artisans can advance their economic, social, and psychological standing, yet causal evidence anchored in counterfactual reasoning has remained scarce. This study quantified the impact of integration into the heritage tourism supply chain on the multidimensional empowerment of female Ulos weavers in North Sumatra, Indonesia. A cross-sectional observational design was applied to 450 women artisans (200 treated, 250 control) across three Ulos-producing districts. The 100-point Women’s Empowerment Index combined economic, social, and psychological sub-indices with adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.83). Propensity score matching with a 0.05 caliper was used to construct a counterfactual based on age, education, marital status, dependents, weaving experience, and baseline wealth. After matching, 185 treated and 185 control units were retained, and the mean standardized bias declined from 28.3 percent to 3.2 percent. The Average Treatment Effect on the Treated indicated that tourism integration increased the overall empowerment score by 14.3 points (95% CI 10.18–18.42), the economic sub-index by 21.6 points, the social sub-index by 13.3 points, and the psychological sub-index by 8.0 points, with a monthly income premium of 1,450,000 IDR (all p < 0.01). Sensitivity analyses using kernel matching and inverse probability weighting yielded comparable results. Heritage tourism functioned as a measurable catalyst of multidimensional female empowerment among Ulos artisans. Strategic policy attention to direct market access, capacity building, and protection of indigenous designs is needed.
Algorithmic Control, Financial Precarity, and Subjective Well-being Among Indonesian Gig Workers: Evidence from PLS-SEM Using the Job Demands-Resources Framework Muhammad Hasan; Henry Peter Paul
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i1.314

Abstract

The rapid expansion of platform-mediated gig work in the Global South has intensified debate over whether digital labor constitutes economic liberation or structured precarity. This study examined the structural associations among algorithmic management, financial precarity, perceived autonomy, subjective well-being, and job satisfaction among Indonesian gig workers, anchored in the job demands-resources (JD-R) framework. This investigation represents the first large-scale PLS-SEM analysis to delineate the financial precarity pathway within Indonesia's on-demand economy, addressing a critical gap in the Global South platform labor literature. A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed, with data collected from 684 motorcycle taxi and courier drivers across Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan between March and May 2024 using stratified random sampling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with 5,000-subsample bootstrapping was applied via SmartPLS 4.0. Common method bias was assessed using Harman's single factor test (variance explained = 28.4%, below the 50% threshold). Measurement model assessment confirmed strong reliability (rho_A range: 0.847–0.928; AVE range: 0.688–0.810). Structural analysis revealed that algorithmic management was significantly positively associated with financial precarity (β = 0.642, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with subjective well-being (β = −0.210, p < 0.001). Financial precarity mediated this relationship (indirect β = −0.328, 95% CI [−0.392, −0.265], p < 0.001), constituting partial mediation. Perceived autonomy was positively associated with job satisfaction (β = 0.315, p < 0.001). In conclusion, algorithmic management in Indonesia's on-demand economy operates primarily through financial fragility to suppress worker well-being. These findings support urgent regulatory reform mandating algorithmic transparency and minimum income protection floors for platform workers.
Resource Nationalism, Enclave Industrialization, and Regional Divergence: A Spatial Econometric Assessment of Indonesia's Hilirisasi Mandate Iqbal Anugerah; Selma Fajic
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i1.316

Abstract

Indonesia's hilirisasi (downstreaming) mandate, enforced through a definitive nickel mineral export ban from January 2020, represents one of the most consequential applications of resource nationalism in contemporary Southeast Asian political economy. While aggregate indicators documented substantial Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows into metallurgical industrial parks, the sub-national distributional consequences remained critically underexplored prior to this study. Employing a Spatial Durbin Difference-in-Differences (SDM-DiD) framework applied to a balanced provincial panel of 34 Indonesian provinces across the period 2015 to 2024 (N = 340 observations), this study empirically decomposed the direct, indirect (spatial spillover), and total effects of the export ban on regional economic growth and income inequality. The treatment group comprised the three primary nickel-downstreaming hub provinces: Central Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, and North Maluku. Moran's I statistics confirmed significant spatial autocorrelation across all study years (range: 0.245-0.312, p < 0.001), validating the spatial modeling approach. The SDM-DiD estimation revealed a significant positive direct effect on regional GDP per capita in treated provinces (beta = 0.084, SE = 0.019, p < 0.001), confirming localized growth. However, the spatial spillover effect was significantly negative (theta = -0.052, SE = 0.021, p = 0.013), documenting a pronounced backwash effect on adjacent provinces. Within treated regions, income inequality widened significantly (Gini direct effect: beta = 0.018, p < 0.001), driven by skill-biased structural transformation associated with capital-intensive smelting operations. These findings established that Indonesia's hilirisasi mandate functions structurally as an enclave industrialization model, generating spatial polarization rather than inclusive regional development. Inter-regional fiscal equalization, enforceable backward linkage obligations, and peripheral human capital investment are identified as critical complementary policy mechanisms.
Citizen Trust, Perceived Surveillance, and Polycentric Governance Participation in Indonesian Smart City Programs Arya Ganendra; Jasmila Tanjung
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i1.317

Abstract

Smart city programs in Indonesia expand digital governance infrastructure while raising concerns about citizen surveillance and data privacy. Understanding how perceived surveillance affects citizen trust and participation in polycentric governance structures is critical for sustainable smart city development. This study examined 352 citizens across nine Indonesian cities representing three administrative tiers (Tier-1: Jakarta, Bandung, Surabaya; Tier-2: Semarang, Makassar, Medan; Tier-3: Palembang, Balikpapan, Manado) to investigate the relationships among perceived surveillance intensity, citizen trust in governance institutions, and participation in polycentric governance mechanisms. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed a statistically significant model explaining 42.1% of variance in citizen trust (R² = 0.421, adjusted R² = 0.399, f² = 0.727). Facial recognition perceived intensity demonstrated the strongest negative predictor (β = -0.378, 95% CI [-0.498, -0.258]), while multi-stakeholder governance participation showed the strongest positive predictor (β = 0.334, 95% CI [0.218, 0.450]). Additional significant predictors included closed-circuit television surveillance intensity (β = -0.312), citizen feedback mechanisms (β = 0.298), data transparency (β = 0.287), decentralized decision-making participation (β = 0.256), governance literacy (β = 0.213), e-government service use (β = 0.189), and educational attainment (β = 0.145). These findings indicate that while surveillance technologies undermine institutional trust, inclusive governance processes and transparency mechanisms strengthen citizen confidence. Indonesian smart city programs should prioritize polycentric governance structures, data transparency, and digital literacy initiatives to mitigate surveillance-related trust erosion. Results support policy recommendations emphasizing stakeholder participation, technological accountability, and institutional transparency as essential components of citizen-centric smart city governance.
Community Dynamics and Policy Resistance as Determinants of Green Transition Adoption: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesian Cities Dwi Valinia Ivanka; Rheina Weisch Fedre; Sarah Armalia
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i1.318

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in Southeast Asian cities has intensified environmental pressures, yet the adoption of green transition practices remains uneven across communities. While individual-level determinants have been extensively studied, the contributions of community-level social factors remain poorly understood in developing urban contexts. This cross-sectional study examined determinants of green transition adoption (GTA) among 398 residents of four Indonesian cities—Surabaya, Semarang, Bandung, and Yogyakarta—between March and August 2024. Binary logistic regression with nine predictors revealed that Community Dynamics was the strongest predictor (AOR=2.87, 95% CI: 1.79–4.60, p<0.001), followed by Policy Resistance (AOR=2.18, 95% CI: 1.39–3.42, p<0.001) and Social Equity Perception (AOR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.23–3.00, p=0.004). Environmental Knowledge Score and Health Risk Perception were not significant in the multivariate model. The model demonstrated adequate discrimination (AUC=0.79) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.548), explaining 32.6% of outcome variance. Mediation analysis revealed that 35% of the CD–GTA relationship operated through social equity perception (Sobel z=3.21, p=0.001). Community-level social cohesion and institutional legitimacy are more powerful drivers of green transition adoption than individual knowledge or risk perception.

Page 26 of 26 | Total Record : 256

 22   23   24   25   26 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 5 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 7 No. 6 (2024): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 7 (2023): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 6 (2023): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 5 (2023): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 6 (2022): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 5 (2022): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 4 (2022): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 6 (2021): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 5 (2021): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 4 (2021): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences More Issue