cover
Contact Name
Rico Nur Ilham
Contact Email
radjapublika@gmail.com
Phone
+6281238426727
Journal Mail Official
radjapublika@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl.Pulo Baroh No.12 Lancang Garam Kecamatan Banda Sakti Kota Lhokseumawe, Aceh
Location
Kota lhokseumawe,
Aceh
INDONESIA
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Published by CV. RADJA PUBLIKA
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2808487X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas
This journal accepts articles on results of the research in fields of Education, Cross Culture, Law, Environmental Empowerment which are the latest issues from the results of activities or practical implementations that are problem solving, comprehensive, meaningful, latest and sustainable findings with clear goals and visionary in various activities that have innovation and creativity. So that they do not just replicate the same activities in different places but must have to measurable results and impacts for society and support the achievement of the goals set in modern human development.
Articles 939 Documents
THE EFFECT OF INFLATION, INTEREST RATE AND EXCHANGE RATE ON INDONESIA'S BALANCE OF PAYMENTS Nyimas Adheana Darnita; Weri; Asri Diana; Fitriyani; Diana Sapha A.H
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.3995

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the effect of inflation, interest rate and exchange rate on Indonesia's balance of payments by using annual data for the period 1993-2024. The method used is Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) which is able to identify short-term and long-term effects simultaneously, and accommodate the characteristics of non-stationary time series data with different levels of integration. The results show that in the short term, inflation has a positive effect, while exchange rates and interest rates have a negative effect on the balance of payments. Meanwhile, in the long run, exchange rates and interest rates have a positive effect, and inflation has a negative but insignificant effect. The novelty of this study lies in the use of ARDL model with long data coverage and explicit separation between short-run and long-run dynamics, which has rarely been comprehensively discussed in previous studies related to the balance of payments in Indonesia. The government's role is required to maintain price and interest rate stability through adaptive exchange rate management in order to maintain Indonesia's balance of payments.
JUDICIAL LIMITS OF INTERVENTION IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Nugroho, Prasetyo; Shinta Hadiyantina; Sudarsono
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4222

Abstract

This journal aims to analyze the intervention process in dispute resolution in the Administrative Court. This study identifies two main problems: first, the mechanism for third-party entry into the dispute resolution process in the Administrative Court, and second, the legal consequences of third-party intervention in the case under study. The results of the study show that based on Article 83 of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Courts, third parties can enter the trial process during the examination, either on their own initiative, at the request of one of the parties, or at the initiative of the judge. The legal consequence of the entry of this third party is that they obtain the status of the Second Defendant of Intervention, which gives them the right to defend their interests in the trial process. This study emphasizes the importance of the presence of third parties in maintaining justice and legal certainty in state administrative disputes. The conclusion of this paper is that although intervention provides an opportunity for interested parties to participate in the legal process, there is a need for renewal and codification of the code of procedure in the Administrative Court to be more responsive to the dynamics of existing dispute resolution.
THE URGENCY OF FORCED MONEY REGULATION IN THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS Ferio Wabarca Hutabarat; Shinta Hadiyantina; Sudarsono
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4320

Abstract

The regulation of forced money (dwangsom) within the State Administrative Court is an important instrument to ensure compliance of state administrative officials with court decisions that have permanent legal force. However, until now the regulations governing the mechanism for the implementation of forced money in the PTUN are still unclear, so it often causes obstacles in the practice of execution. This study aims to analyze the urgency of the regulation of forced money in the State Administrative Court by focusing on the implementation mechanism so that it can be implemented effectively. The research method used is a prescriptive method with a normative approach, namely examining applicable laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study show that the absence of strict regulations regarding the implementation of forced money creates legal uncertainty and has the potential to weaken the function of the PTUN as judicial control over government administrative actions. Therefore, a more comprehensive regulation is needed regarding the mechanisms, procedures, and parameters of the implementation of forced money in order to provide legal certainty, ensure the effectiveness of the execution of decisions, and strengthen the principle of the rule of law in the administration of government.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF PRETRIAL DECISIONS OUTSIDE THE OBJECT OF PRETRIAL CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 4 OF 2016 CONCERNING THE PROHIBITION OF REVIEW OF PRETRIAL DECISIONS Rahmat Hidayat; Yuliati; Abdul Majid
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4346

Abstract

Pretrial decisions have an important role in ensuring the protection of human rights and controlling coercive actions by law enforcement officers in the Indonesian criminal justice system. However, in judicial practice, dynamics have developed where pretrial judges decide cases outside the object of pretrial as limited by Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code, such as examining the validity of the determination of suspects, preliminary evidence, and even the main points of the case. This development has given rise to legal issues, especially after the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) Number 4 of 2016 which expressly prohibits the legal remedy of Judicial Review (PK) against pretrial decisions. This study aims to analyze: (1) the legal basis for the birth of pretrial decisions that exceed the limits of the object of authority; (2) the legal implications of these decisions on the principles of legal certainty, justice, and due process of law; and (3) the relevance of Perma No. 4 of 2016 in providing solutions to the lack of legal remedies for controversial pretrial decisions. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. The data were analyzed qualitatively through systematic and comparative legal interpretation of pretrial practices following Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 and other progressive pretrial decisions. The research results show that the expansion of pretrial objects is a consequence of the constitutional interpretation of the protection of the suspect's rights, but at the same time creates legal uncertainty and disharmony between the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code and judicial practice. The prohibition of judicial review in Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2016 limits access to justice by closing the room for correction of ultra vires pretrial decisions. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct the pretrial regulations in the future Criminal Procedure Code and open up space for limited legal remedies to prevent abuse of pretrial judges' authority.
LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VALUATION INSTITUTIONS AS FIDUCIARY SECURITY TO REALIZE LEGAL CERTAINTY I. Irfan Ibrahiem; Elfrida Ratnawati; Simona Bustani
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4358

Abstract

The utilization of Intellectual Property (IP) as an economic asset in Indonesia is significantly hampered when applied as fiduciary security due to profound legal uncertainty, particularly surrounding valuation mechanisms. A primary obstacle is the dearth of a standardized, legally recognized IP valuation institution, which inhibits the acceptance of IP as collateral by financial institutions. This study aims to analyze and reconstruct the legal framework governing these valuation institutions to establish legal certainty. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research identifies key issues: inadequate existing regulations, and the rejection of IP by banks owing to valuation difficulties, value fluctuation risks, and execution uncertainties. The findings conclude that a legal reconstruction of the IP valuation institution is essential. This reconstruction must establish standardized valuation criteria and fortify the legal framework, thereby enabling IP to function as an effective financing instrument and realizing legal certainty in Indonesia.
ENSURING THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD: JUDICIAL CONSIDERATIONS ON POST-DIVORCE CHILD SUPPORT IN LHOKSEUMAWE Muammar; Faisal; Marlia Sastro; Mukhlis
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4369

Abstract

This study examines the existence and effectiveness of the Sharia Court of Lhokseumawe’s rulings on post-divorce child support obligations through a normative-empirical legal research approach. Normatively, the analysis draws on Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection, while empirically it relies on case studies of court decisions and interviews with judges. The findings reveal that the court consistently upholds the father’s responsibility to provide child support after divorce, reflecting alignment with statutory provisions, Islamic principles, and the doctrine of the best interests of the child. However, variations in the determination of support amounts and weak enforcement mechanisms demonstrate a gap between “law in the books” and “law in action.” Sociological analysis further shows that ineffective enforcement disproportionately burdens women and children, exacerbating economic vulnerability and the feminization of poverty. The study concludes that while the normative foundation of child support rulings is strong, their practical effectiveness requires improvements in drafting quality, standardized guidelines, and enforcement mechanisms, alongside greater collaboration between the judiciary, government, and society to ensure substantive justice and child welfare.
LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE OFFICIAL MAKING LAND DEEDS IN UNAUTHORIZED LAND RIGHTS TRANSFERS: A CASE STUDY OF SHM 24451 Fanny Fernian Yahya Artikasari; Isharyanto; Rahayu Subekti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4375

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal accountability of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) in unauthorized land rights transfers in the case study of SHM 24451. In their function as a public authority, the PPAT, creates authentic deeds, particularly deeds of land rights transfer, which serve as evidence proving that a legal act of rights transfer has occurred lawfully and provides legal certainty. This research is normative juridical legal research using doctrinal, conceptual, and case approaches. A descriptive method is used to analyze data based on the theory of authentic deeds and the theory of official accountability. The problem arises when, during the deed-making process, there is suspicion of non-compliance with formal and material requirements, thus making the PPAT, as a public official, accountable for the legal acts performed. The results indicate that rights transfers that do not meet formal and material requirements can be subject to administrative, civil, and criminal liabilities. This causes legal violations and harms the community. These findings emphasize the importance of compliance with professional ethics, legal principles during the execution of tasks, authority as a PPAT, as well as maintaining the integrity of the profession, institution, and public trust.
RESILIENCE OF CUSTOMARY LAW IN FACING THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS IN PAYA NIE Fitri Maghfirah; Marlia Sastro; Sela Azkia; Muhammad Yusra; Nanda Setia Saputra
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4376

Abstract

This study employs a qualitative socio-legal approach to examine the role of customary law in addressing climate change and ecological challenges in the Paya Nie wetland ecosystem. Customary law is understood not only as written norms but also as living practices embedded in community life. Thus, the ecological crisis in Paya Nie marked by recurrent drought, flooding, and ecosystem degradation cannot be analyzed solely through normative legal perspectives but requires a broader socio-ecological framework. Research data were obtained from two main sources. Secondary data came from academic journals, legal documents, government reports, and research publications, providing the conceptual foundation to situate customary law within environmental governance. Primary data were collected through participatory observation and in-depth interviews with customary leaders, local stakeholders, and surrounding communities to capture social dynamics, communal solidarity, and unwritten customary mechanisms that remain influential in daily practice. Data were analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The analysis first mapped ecological problems in Paya Nie, then linked them to customary and formal legal instruments, including qonun gampong. Finally, the findings were interpreted through the lens of socio-ecological resilience theory to reveal how communities adapt, transform, and innovate in response to climate change. The study shows that customary law in Paya Nie functions not only as a set of traditional rules but also as an adaptive mechanism that strengthens community resilience. It plays a critical role in regulating land use, fostering solidarity, and sustaining ecological balance. These findings contribute to the broader discourse on how living customary law can serve as a local strategy for ecological resilience in the face of global environmental change.
THE INFLUENCE OF PEER ENVIRONMENT ON LEARNING MOTIVATION OF CLASS XI STUDENTS OF AL-AZHAR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MEDAN Hany Ataqiya Afan; Mohammad Fadel Hakeem; Ijlal Habibie; M. Ihza Al Amin
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4377

Abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of the friendship environment on the learning motivation of grade XI students of Al Azhar Superior High School Medan. The research uses a quantitative approach with an associative descriptive method. The population in the study was determined through random sampling techniques. Data collection was carried out using a Likert scale questionnaire which included two main variables, namely the friendship environment and learning motivation. The results of the study show that the friendship environment has a positive influence on students' learning motivation. Most respondents stated that their friends supported learning activities (68.9%) and did not influence them not to study (53.3% disagreed). In addition, 82.2% of students admitted to studying earnestly and 100% trying to understand the lessons given. These findings show that a positive friendship environment contributes to increased student learning motivation in excellent schools.
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANT, CAREFUL, CERTAIN AND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE CRITERIA IN THE REGULATION OF ARTICLE 173 OF THE HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT REGARDING EVIDENCE OF JUDGES' SUSPECTS Naufal Anfasa Firdaus; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Rachmi Sulistyarini
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4413

Abstract

The sentence in Article 173 HIR which states "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" is a regulation that is still abstract and can be interpreted in many ways, where this is like what category of important or very important circumstances are, then what is thorough or precise, how to assess certain conditions, and whether they correspond to each other whether they should be applied to 2 (two) types of evidence or what. The purpose of this study is to analyze the criteria contained in the sentence important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable in the regulation of Article 173 HIR. The research method used is legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on the research that has been carried out, it is known that normatively the criteria "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" in Article 173 HIR are not explained completely, then after a theoretical analysis through the doctrines of legal experts and linguistically, namely Indonesian and legal language, the meaning contained therein is obtained. The "important" criterion contains relevant and logical boundaries directly related to the subject matter of the case, the "thorough" criterion contains methodological boundaries for the application of caution, the "certain" criterion contains specific boundaries and the strength of the evidence is not questioned, and the "mutually agreed" criterion contains for consistency and mutually corroborating evidence.