cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Otto Fajarianto
Contact Email
ofajarianto@gmail.com
Phone
+6281296890687
Journal Mail Official
collegiumawl@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Jl. Bukit Raya No. 25, Sungai Pinang Dalam Kec. Sungai Pinang, Kota Samarinda 75117
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Collegium Studiosum Journal
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Samarinda
ISSN : 27974332     EISSN : 27973751     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Collegium Studiosum Journal adalah Jurnal Ilmiah yang diterbitkan secara berkala oleh LPPM STIH AWANG LONG. Collegium Studiosum Journal memilik e-ISSN 2797-3751 dan p-ISSN 2797-4332. Pemilihan dan penggunaan kata Collegium Studiosum Journal dimaksudkan untuk menunjukkan pemetaan lingkup ide dan gagasan dari para praktisi, akademisi, dan ilmuan hukum yang difokuskan pada berbagai isu strategis mengenai penelitian di tingkat nasional maupun international. Collegium Studiosum Journal terbit dalam setahun sekali yaitu pada bulan Juni. Pengiriman artikel dapat dilakukan melalui daring dengan melakukan registrasi terlebih dahulu pada website ini. Collegium Studiosum Journal menerima artikel pada bidang kajian hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum tata negara, hukum administrasi negara, hukum international, hukum masyarakat pembangunan, hukum islam, hukum bisnis, hukum acara dan hak asasi manusia.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 384 Documents
 35   36   37   38   39 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN IMPLIKASI ULTRA PETITA PADA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN PAJAK Anton Amperiano Manik; Christin Septina Basani
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2184

Abstract

Ultra petita pada prinsipnya dilarang dalam hukum acara perdata karena hakim hanya boleh memutus perkara sesuai dengan tuntutan yang diajukan oleh para pihak dalam petitum gugatan. Larangan ini berkaitan dengan asas hakim bersifat pasif dan asas ne eat judex. Ultra petita partium yang bertujuan menjaga kepastian hukum serta batas kewenangan hakim. Namun dalam praktik pengadilan pajak terdapat karakteristik berbeda karena hakim memiliki kewenangan untuk menentukan jumlah pajak yang sebenarnya terutang berdasarkan fakta persidangan. Kondisi ini menimbulkan permasalahan hukum mengenai apakah ultra petita dapat dibenarkan dalam pengadilan pajak serta bagaimana implikasi hukumnya dalam penyelesaian sengketa pajak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan yang meliputi bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan dan putusan pengadilan, serta bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku dan jurnal ilmiah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ultra petita dimungkinkan dalam pengadilan pajak berdasarkan Pasal 80 UU No. 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak dan Pasal 26 ayat (3) UU KUP yang memberikan kewenangan kepada hakim untuk menentukan jumlah pajak yang sebenarnya terutang. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ultra petita dalam pengadilan pajak harus diterapkan secara terbatas dengan tetap memperhatikan prinsip kepastian hukum, perlindungan hak wajib pajak, dan batas objek sengketa. Oleh karena itu penerapannya harus dilakukan secara proporsional agar keadilan fiskal dapat tercapai tanpa mengabaikan hak wajib pajak dalam proses peradilan.
INTEGRASI TEKNOLOGI AI DALAM PROSEDUR PEMBUATAN AKTA OTENTIK: TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA Andi Suriangka; Amalia Hamzah; Muhd. Alif Fathan
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2297

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into notarial work is no longer a distant possibility, but an emerging issue in Indonesia’s legal services. This article examines how AI can be used in the procedure of drafting authentic deeds without weakening the essential character of authenticity, legal certainty, and the public trust attached to the notarial office. The study applies a normative legal method through statutory, conceptual, and limited comparative approaches. Primary legal materials include the Civil Code, the Notary Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and regulations on electronic systems. Secondary materials include recent literature on cyber notary, legal technology, AI governance, and comparative AI regulatory models. The findings show that AI may support notaries in preliminary drafting, document consistency checking, archive management, risk detection, and preparation of administrative checklists. However, AI cannot replace the notary’s authority to verify the parties’ will, read the deed, assess legal capacity, ensure formal requirements, and assume personal responsibility for the deed. The absence of sector-specific rules on AI in notarial practice creates legal uncertainty concerning authenticity, liability, confidentiality, and data protection. This article proposes an AI-assisted authentic deed model based on human-in-command, limited delegation, auditability, data protection by design, and system certification. Proper regulation is needed so that AI strengthens, rather than erodes, the evidentiary value and social legitimacy of authentic deeds in Indonesia.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM PERJANJIAN PAYLATER PADA E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA Machmuda Aghisna; Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2299

Abstract

The development of financial technology in the e-commerce sector has given rise to an innovative digital credit-based payment system known as PayLater. While this instrument offers convenience for consumers to conduct transactions without immediate payment, it raises legal issues regarding contractual agreements, the use of standard clauses, and consumer legal protection from a civil law perspective. The imbalance in the bargaining position of the parties within electronic agreements is the primary reason for conducting this study, considering that PayLater has become an integral part of the modern financing system widely utilized in Indonesian digital trade practices. This study employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations related to civil law, consumer protection, and electronic transactions, as well as secondary legal materials comprising legal literature, scientific journals, and expert doctrines. The analysis technique is carried out qualitatively through legal interpretation of prevailing norms to assess the conformity between legal regulations and the practice of PayLater agreements in e-commerce. The results of the study indicate that PayLater constitutes a valid form of electronic-based loan agreement under Indonesian civil law, provided it meets the requirements of Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and is recognized under the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE). Nonetheless, agreement practices reveal a dominance of standard clauses that create an imbalance of position between business actors and consumers. The study concludes that legal protection for consumers in PayLater agreements is normatively regulated, yet it still requires strengthening in aspects of implementation, information transparency, and supervision to guarantee equity between the parties in digital transactions.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMAAFAN HAKIM (RECHTERLIJK PARDON) DALAM UU NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA Imelda Hasibuan; Muhammad Japri
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2300

Abstract

The transformation of the sentencing paradigm under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code reflects a shift from a retributive orientation toward an approach that emphasizes prevention, rehabilitation, and the restoration of social balance. One of the significant reforms introduced is the regulation of judicial pardon (rechterlijk pardon), which grants judges the authority not to impose punishment even when the defendant has been proven guilty of committing a criminal offense. This study aims to analyze the regulation, implementation, and legal implications of judicial pardon from the perspective of sentencing objectives through normative legal research employing statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings demonstrate that judicial pardon represents a progressive development in criminal law, reflecting a transition toward an integrative sentencing paradigm. Judicial pardon does not eliminate the unlawfulness of the act or the offender’s culpability; rather, it constitutes judicial discretion to refrain from imposing punishment when such punishment is deemed unnecessary to achieve broader legal objectives. Its application must be carried out selectively, rationally, transparently, and accountably to maintain a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice. Although it may potentially lead to disparities in judicial decisions, judicial pardon can strengthen a humane and restorative approach within Indonesia’s criminal justice system when applied based on clear and measurable parameters.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN PRINSIP BEST PRACTICES DIGITAL FORENSICS DALAM MENJAMIN KEABSAHAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA Alif Nur Azis; Sunariyo Sunariyo; Bayu Prasetyo
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2310

Abstract

Digital transformation has altered criminal behavior and evidentiary practices in the modern criminal justice system, particularly in cases involving cybercrime and technology-based offenses. Electronic information and electronic documents are increasingly used as evidence, yet their admissibility in court cannot rely solely on formal legal recognition; it is also determined by their authenticity, integrity, reliability, and a verifiable chain of custody. The urgency of this research is driven by the inherent nature of electronic evidence, which is easily altered, copied, transferred, manipulated, and even deleted without leaving easily identifiable traces. These conditions demand adequate legal and technical standards to ensure that electronic evidence can be accepted and evaluated objectively at trial. The purpose of this research is to analyze the admissibility of electronic evidence in the Indonesian criminal justice system, compare it with the evidentiary framework in the United States, and examine the relevance of implementing international digital forensics best practices to strengthen the admissibility of electronic evidence in Indonesia. This study employs normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research analysis is grounded in the theory of evidence and the theory of digital forensics best practices. Both theories are used consistently as an analytical framework to examine the compatibility between the normative recognition of electronic evidence and the technical digital forensics standards required in criminal evidence. The primary legal materials used include Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code, ISO/IEC 27037:2012, NIST Special Publication 800-86, and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The research gap lies in the fact that while Indonesian law normatively recognizes electronic evidence, it has not yet provided uniform technical procedures regarding the acquisition, preservation, authentication, forensic analysis, and presentation of electronic evidence in court. Based on the conducted research, it is established that the ITE Law and the Criminal Procedure Code have recognized electronic evidence as valid evidence, but the regulations remain predominantly normative and lack uniform technical procedures. This contrast with the United States, which possesses more detailed evidentiary parameters through principles of authentication, relevance, the best evidence rule, self-authentication, hearsay exceptions, and expert testimony based on the Daubert standard. This study concludes that the admissibility of electronic evidence in Indonesia requires harmonization between legal norms and forensic technical standards, specifically through the implementation of ISO/IEC 27037 and NIST SP 800-86 to guarantee authenticity, integrity, chain of custody, reliability, legal certainty, and accountability at every stage of digital evidence handling.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBELI BERITIKAD BAIK DARI JERAT PIDANA PENADAHAN DALAM TRANSAKSI MEDIA SOSIAL Adi Wijaya; Eli Tri Kursiswanti; Muhammad Arganata Thamrin
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2312

Abstract

The rise of second hand goods transactions through social media has created a fast, inexpensive, and accessible economic space. Nevertheless, it also produces a risk of criminalisation against buyers who temporarily possess goods later alleged to originate from a crime. This article examines legal protection for good faith purchasers in second-hand mobile phone transactions conducted through social media, particularly when the transaction occurs through cash on delivery, the device is locked, the seller applies pressure, and the buyer pays a down payment merely to avoid further conflict. This research applies a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and normative case-study approaches. The article argues that receiving stolen goods under Article 591 of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the National Criminal Code cannot be established solely by physical possession. Investigators must prove the subjective element that the buyer knew or should reasonably have suspected that the goods originated from a crime. Defects of consent caused by intimidation, pressure, and deception may undermine the mens rea element. Investigators must also verify the predicate crime, lawful owner, IMEI or item identity, and electronic transaction records before directing a buyer as a suspect. This article proposes a due-diligence-based evidentiary model and stronger procedural safeguards to prevent the criminalisation of good faith purchasers.
IMPLEMENTASI SMART VILLAGE DALAM PERSPEKTIF ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK: STUDI KASUS DI KOTA SAMARINDA KALIMANTAN TIMUR Linda Afriani; Adi Wijaya; Husni Fahrudin
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2326

Abstract

The implementation of the Smart Village concept has evolved as a strategic approach to address regional challenges, including gaps in public services and technological access. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Smart Village program in Samarinda City, East Kalimantan, from a public administration perspective using George C. Edward III’s policy implementation framework, which encompasses four variables: communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, focusing on case studies in Kelurahan Lempake and Kelurahan Pelita. Data were analyzed utilizing Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that the application of Smart RT and SamaGov/Samagov in both urban villages has successfully enhanced service efficiency, accelerated administrative processes, and enabled a paperless system. Nonetheless, the implementation continues to face challenges, such as low digital literacy among the public (particularly the elderly), limited human resource capacity of village/neighborhood (RT) officials, centralized archival data management at the city government level, and the absence of real-time monitoring dashboards at the urban village level. This study concludes that strong administrative commitment and adaptive communication patterns serve as the key determining factors for the success of this digital transformation.
SIFAT SUI GENERIS PERJANJIAN PEMANFAATAN TANAH INDUSTRI ATAS TANAH HAK PENGELOLAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA Arif Budi Santoso; Hwian Christianto
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2330

Abstract

This article examines the juridical character of Industrial Land Utilization Agreements (Perjanjian Pemanfaatan Tanah Industri/PPTI) that give rise to Building Use Rights (Hak Guna Bangunan/HGB) over Management Rights (Hak Pengelolaan/HPL) held by State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) managing industrial estates. The central problem lies in the legal classification of PPTI, which is often understood in practice as either a sale and purchase transaction or a lease agreement. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, limited case-based, and comparative approaches, this article analyzes the relationship between state control over land, HPL authority, contractual obligations, HGB as a land right, and legal certainty. The findings show that PPTI cannot be reduced to a conventional sale and purchase because HPL is not transferred to investors. It also cannot be treated as a pure lease because PPTI becomes the basis for the issuance of HGB, which has administrative and proprietary effects and may serve as collateral under certain legal requirements. Therefore, PPTI is more appropriately qualified as a sui generis agreement: a special contractual construction that combines public authority, private contractual relations, land administration, and property-law consequences. This classification contributes to legal certainty by clarifying the position of BUMN as HPL holders, investors as HGB holders, creditors as security holders, and public authorities in interpreting industrial land utilization consistently.
PRINSIP KEPASTIAN HUKUM YANG BERKEMANFAATAN TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN METERAI ELEKTRONIK DALAM TRANSAKSI DIGITAL DI INDONESIA Ratnaningsih; Siti Umiyatun Azizah; Bangkit Luhur Prio Wicaksono
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2282

Abstract

Digital transformation has led to the implementation of innovations in stamp duty affixation systems, one of which is the application of barcode-based electronic stamps (e-stamps). This research aims to examine the legal certainty regarding the validity of agreements affixed with e-stamps by referring to the Civil Code (KUH Perdata) and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE). Using a normative juridical research method, it was found that the use of e-stamps is legally valid as proof of duty payment on documents, even though it's not a condition for the validity of an agreement according to Article 1320 of the Civil Code. E-stamps positively contribute to strengthening the proof of digital agreements, including electronic transactions, accelerating administrative processes, and maintaining document integrity and authentication. However, their implementation still faces obstacles such as a lack of public literacy, limited access to technology, and inconsistent acceptance by several institutions. Therefore, clearer technical regulatory support, increased public understanding, and legal reforms are needed so that e-stamps can fully provide legal certainty in the practice of electronic transactions in Indonesia.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM DAN PEMENUHAN SISA KEWAJIBAN DALAM KONTRAK PEMASARAN DIGITAL SETELAH KEMATIAN INFLUENCER MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA Anggraini Eklesia I Lafau; Benhard Kurniawan Pasaribu; Muhammad Iqbal Huzair
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2306

Abstract

Perkembangan pemasaran digital melalui kerja sama endorsementantara influencer dan pemilik bisnis semakin meningkat, namun belum diimbangi dengan pengaturan hukum yang secara khusus mengatur hubungan tersebut. Pengaturan yang ada masih mengacu pada ketentuan umum dalam Buku III Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, sehingga menimbulkan permasalahan terkait keberlanjutan kontrak dan pemenuhan sisa kewajiban apabila influencer meninggal dunia, mengingat prestasi dalam kontrak endorsementbersifat personal (intuitu personae).Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan hukum serta kedudukan para pihak dalam kontrak pemasaran digital (endorsement), serta menganalisis akibat hukum terhadap sisa kewajiban setelah kematian influencer. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hubungan hukum antara para pihak merupakan hubungan perikatan yang menimbulkan hak dan kewajiban timbal balik. Influencer berkewajiban melakukan promosi sebagai prestasi untuk berbuat sesuatu, sedangkan pemilik bisnis berkewajiban memberikan imbalan. Kematian influencer mengakibatkan kewajiban promosi yang belum terpenuhi tidak dapat dilaksanakan dan tidak dapat dialihkan kepada ahli waris karena bersifat personal. Kondisi ini termasuk dalam keadaan memaksa (force majeure), sehingga tidak dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai wanprestasi. Dengan demikian, kontrak berakhir pada bagian prestasi yang telah dilaksanakan, sedangkan sisa kewajiban menjadi hapus dan tidak dapat dituntut pemenuhannya.

Page 37 of 39 | Total Record : 384

 35   36   37   38   39 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2018): Collegium Studiosum Journal More Issue