cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 453 Documents
 36   37   38   39   40 
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMUTUS KASASI TERDAKWA PERKARA KORUPSI PUTUSAN NOMOR 5190K/PID.SUS/2023 Triwardani, Mahaldika Nilan; Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.96305

Abstract

This article analyzes the field of Criminal Procedure Law related to the considerations of the Justice in examining and deciding the cassation filed by the Defendant in a corruption case. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the justice's considerations in issuing a cassation decision in decision Number 5190K/Pid.Sus/2023 are in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research method used is doctrinal or normative legal research. This research is prescriptive in nature which uses the collection of legal materials by means of literature study and the legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the Supreme Court Judge (/justice?) has appropriately determined the cassation decision in the corruption case in decision Number 5190K/Pid.Sus/2023 because of the judge did not find any errors in the application of the law made by Judex Factie so that the Defendant is considered not to meet the requirements as stipulated in Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and states that the Defendant's cassation is rejected with revisions.  
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 79/PID.B/2024/PN SNG Dermawan, Muhammad Tio; Kurniawan, Itok Dwi
Verstek Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i2.98324

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis hukum acara pidana terkait dengan pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pemidanaan perkara pembunuhan berencana dalam Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2024/PN Sng. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara pembunuhan berencana dalam Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2024/PN Sng telah sesuai dengan Pasal 183 KUHAP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari dua, yaitu bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder dengan pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan untuk menjawab permasalahan dapat disimpulkan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim dalam memutus perkara tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama dalam Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2024/PN Sng telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 183 KUHAP. Hal ini dikarenakan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana kepada terdakwa telah mempertimbangkan sekurang-kurangnya 2 (dua) alat bukti yang sah yaitu keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli, surat, dan keterangan terdakwa. 
RASIO DECIDENDI DALAM PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 203/PID.SUS/2023/PN JKT TIM) Najwa, Tarisa Aulia; Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i2.87627

Abstract

Artikel yang berjudul Rasio Decidendi Dalam Putusan Bebas Pencemaran Nama Baik (Tinjauan Putusan Nomor 203/Pid.Sus/2023/PN JKT.TIM) mengkaji dan mendeskripsikan permasalahan yang terjadi di Indonesia terkait dengan bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus bebas perkara pencemaran nama baik khususnya dalam studi perkara Putusan Nomor 203/Pid.Sus/2023/PN JKT.TIM). Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertimbangan hakim sekaligus menjadi preseden baru pertimbangan hakim dalam hal perkara tindak pencemaran nama baik. Penulis ingin mendalami pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap perkara pencemaran nama baik telah sesuai atau tidak dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Negara Indonesia.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt Pst Agatha, Laurencia Dian Flaviana; Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.97865

Abstract

This study aims to assess the appropriateness of using expert testimony as evidence in the proving corruption  cases,  specifically  in  verdict  Number  51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN  Jkt.  Pst.  This  research  is normative legal research and it is prescriptive in nature, with legal sources obtained from primary and secondary legal resources. The technique of collecting legal in this research is by means of literature study and legal materials are obtained and processed using the deductive syllogism method. The author analyzes Articles 2 and 3 of the Law on the Against of Corruption Crime as the major premise, with Verdict Number 51/Pid.SusTPK/2024/PN Jkt. Pst. as the minor premise.The results showed that the judge's considerations in imposing a criminal sentence are consistent with Article 183 of KUHAP. In their legal reasoning, the panel of judges based their decision on the evidence and exhibits  presented,  which  convinced  them,  coupled  with  the  absence  of  any  findings  of  the  criminal irresponsibility.  
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KETERANGAN AHLI AUDITOR DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA TIPIKOR (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 84/PID.SUS-TPK/2023/PN BDG) Pratiwi, Aldini; Sukma, Dara Pustika
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.95912

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of an auditor’s testimony as an expert witness in corruption trials and to evaluate whether the judge’s considerations in delivering the verdict align with the provisions of Article 183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research adopts a normative legal approach with a case-based methodology, focusing on court verdict No. 84/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Bdg as the primary object of analysis. Legal materials used in this research include primary sources, such as statutes and court verdicts, and secondary sources, including books, journals, and articles. Legal material collection was conducted through library research, and the analysis employed a syllogistic deduction method. The findings reveal that the auditor’s testimony as an expert witness in corruption proceedings in Verdict No. 84/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Bdg holds legitimacy and significant evidentiary value in clarifying technical information regarding financial conditions relevant to corruption offenses. Furthermore, the judge’s considerations in issuing the verdict in the corruption case of Verdict No. 84/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Bdg adhere to the requirements of Article 183 of KUHAP, which mandates at least two valid pieces of evidence and the judge's conviction in ruling on a criminal case.
KEDUDUKAN PENELITIAN KEMASYARAKATAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARA NARKOTIKA DENGAN TERDAKWA ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR: 1/PID.SUS-ANAK/2024/PN.SKT Kuncoroyakti, Damar Aji; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i1.97932

Abstract

This research in legal writing aims to determine the position of social research in narcotics cases with child defendants and examine the judge's considerations in giving a criminal decision in decision number: 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/Pn.Skt). who sentenced him to imprisonment for 6 (six) months at YPAN BHINA PUTERA Surakarta based on Article 127 paragraph 1 letter a of Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The type and nature of this research is normative legal research and is prescriptive in nature. The approach used is the case approach, the case approach is an approach carried out by examining cases that relate to legal issues and have received a decision by a judge that has permanent legal force. Legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials in this research is library research. The legal material obtained is then processed using the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on this research, research results were obtained which showed that the position of the social research report in this case was in accordance with Article 60 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law and based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
PENJATUHAN SANKSI PEMBINAAN BAGI ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN MENYEBABKAN MATI Asrori, Faarkhaan; Sukma, Dara Pustika
Verstek Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i1.86151

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana pembinaan terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana penganiayaan menyebabkan mati ditinjau dari 2 (dua) hal yakni kesesuaian dengan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak dan rasa keadilan keluarga korban. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan dengan studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang digunakan adalah dengan studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat diketahui bahwa pada pertimbangannya, hakim mengedepankan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak sebagai pelaku dengan menjamin haknya sebagai anak yang mempunyai masa depan panjang, meskipun begitu terhadap rasa keadilan keluarga korban juga harus mendapat perhatian lebih dari penegak hukum apalagi jika melibatkan pelaku yang masih dibawah umur yang memerlukan kehati-hatian dalam penjatuhan sanksi pidana
BAGAIMANA PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PERKARA PENCABULAN ANAK PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR: 36/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Lbb Akbar, Ricky Febriyansyah; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.101940

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of testimonium de auditu (hearsay witness testimony) in a child molestation case, as addressed in Decision No. 36/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Lbb. The research method employed is normative or doctrinal legal research, which is prescriptive and applied in nature. The approach used in this study is a case study approach. The legal materials utilized consist of both primary and secondary sources. Primary legal materials include statutory regulations and court decisions, while secondary legal materials comprise books, legal journals, theses/dissertations, and online sources. The legal materials were collected through a literature study and analyzed using syllogistic deduction, based on major and minor premises. The study concludes that the hearsay witness testimonies submitted in this case were not taken into consideration by the judges, as they originated from unsworn witnesses and were inconsistent, thereby failing to establish judicial conviction.
SAHAM SEBAGAI OBJEK LELANG NON EKSEKUSI SUKARELA Silviana, Ana; Chang, Stefhanie Theresia
Verstek Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i2.115931

Abstract

Penelitian ini melakukan analisis yuridis normatif terhadap saham sebagai objek lelang non-eksekusi sukarela di Indonesia. Dengan merujuk Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 122/PMK.06/2023, Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas, dan Undang-Undang Pasar Modal, penelitian mengkaji dasar hukum, proses due diligence oleh Pejabat Lelang Kelas II, serta kekuatan hukum risalah lelang sebagai bukti kepemilikan saham. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa saham secara normatif dapat dilelang secara sukarela dengan memberikan transparansi, persaingan harga, dan kepastian hukum yang tinggi melalui risalah lelang sebagai akta autentik. Namun, praktiknya masih minim karena keterbatasan due diligence administratif, risiko beban hukum laten, dan tantangan integrasi dengan sistem pencatatan KSEI. Penelitian merekomendasikan pengaturan lebih rinci untuk meningkatkan efisiensi dan daya tarik mekanisme lelang saham sukarela..  
PERATURAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 1 TAHUN 2024 Pradana, Aditya Anaris; Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i2.92071

Abstract

Supreme Court (PERMA) Regulation No. 1 of 2024 on Restorative Justice integrates the principles of restorative justice into the Indonesian criminal justice system, with the aim of creating a more just, humane, and sustainable solution in the handling of criminal offences. Restorative justice emphasizes the recovery of victims' losses, the accountability of perpetrators, and the restoration of social ties disrupted by crime. This article discusses the basic principles of restorative justice, the procedures of filing and enforcement, the benefits offered, as well as the challenges faced in its implementation. With adequate training, effective socialization, and infrastructure development, restorative justice is expected to make a positive contribution to the criminal justice system in Indonesia.

Page 38 of 46 | Total Record : 453

 36   37   38   39   40 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 12, No 3 (2024): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-MARET Vol 10, No 4 (2022): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 10, No 3 (2022): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 10, No 2 (2022): APRIL-JUNI Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JANUARI-MARET Vol 9, No 4 (2021): OKTOBER-DESEMBER Vol 9, No 3 (2021): JULI-SEPTEMBER Vol 9, No 2 (2021): APRIL-JUNI Vol 9, No 1 (2021): JANUARI-MARET Vol 8 No 3 (2020): SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 8, No 2 (2020): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1 (2020): JANUARI-APRIL Vol 7, No 3 (2019): SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2 (2019): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 1 (2019): JANUARI-APRIL Vol 6, No 3 (2018): SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 6, No 2 (2018): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 6, No 1 (2018): JANUARI-APRIL More Issue