cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wahyu Mutajab
Contact Email
wahyu@iblam.ac.id
Phone
+6282186310996
Journal Mail Official
Wahyu@iblam.ac.id
Editorial Address
CV. Era Digital Nusantara Taman Balaraja blok G 2 no.1 RT 03 RW 08 Desa Parahu Kec. Sukamulya Kab. Tangerang - Banten 15610
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Journal Evidence Of Law
Published by CV. Era Digital Nusantara
ISSN : 28303350     EISSN : 28285301     DOI : 10.59066/jel
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Journal Evidence Of Law merupakan jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh CV. Era Digital Nusantara, terbit secara berkala 3 kali dalam 1 tahun sejak tahun 2022 pada bulan Januari, Mei dan Septemeber dengan ISSN Print: 2830-3350 , ISSN Online:2828-5301 berbahasa Indonesia dan berbahasa Inggris. Journal Evidence Of Law menerima naskah tulisan baik hasil pemikiran normatif maupun hasil penelitian empiris, dengan cakupan dibidang hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum tata negara/hukum administrasi negara, hukum internasional, hukum Islam, hukum lingkungan, hukum pemerintahan daerah dan Hukum Pemerintahan Desa maupun hukum adat.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 275 Documents
 22   23   24   25   26 
Corporations as Corruption Offenders: Challenges and Solutions for Restorative Justice-Based Punishment Kilikily, Nikolas Johan; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Akkapin, Supaphorn
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1447

Abstract

The criminal prosecution of corporations involved in corruption in Indonesia has yet to demonstrate substantial effectiveness, both in terms of substantive justice and the enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Although corporations are legally recognized as subjects of criminal liability, enforcement practices remain limited, and sanctions imposed tend to be formalistic without triggering structural reforms within the company. This study employs a normative legal and comparative law approach to evaluate the effectiveness of existing regulations and to propose a more progressive model of corporate criminal liability. The findings indicate that corporate punishment should include preventive, restorative, and internal restructuring measures, rather than mere financial penalties. Therefore, regulatory reform and the application of multi-level sanctions are essential to establish deterrence and ensure sustainable justice in combating corporate corruption.
Legal Reformulation of Ultra-Micro Financing as an Instrument for Strengthening the People's Economy in Indonesia Tambunan, Melpa; Prasetyo, Dedy Ardian; Patarawadee, Patarawadee
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1448

Abstract

Ultra Microfinance (UMi) is one of the inclusive strategies to encourage people's economic growth, especially for small businesses that have not been reached by the formal financial system. However, the implementation of this program still faces obstacles due to the lack of comprehensive and responsive legal regulations. This research aims to analyze the gap between legal norms and the practice of ultra-micro financing implementation in the field and offer an adaptive and equitable legal reformulation model. Using a juridical-normative and empirical approach, data was collected through a literature study, interviews with micro business actors, and focus group discussions (FGDs) with lending institutions and stakeholders. The results show that the lack of legal protection, regulatory incoherence, and low legal literacy of the community hinder the effectiveness of the UMi program. Therefore, regulatory reformulation is needed in the form of a master legal framework that includes clear legal substance, strong institutional structure, and participatory legal culture. This research offers a conceptual model of legal reformulation of ultra-micro financing based on the principles of distributive justice, financial inclusion, and legal responsiveness. The results are expected to provide conceptual and practical contributions in the development of financing law policies that favor the community and support inclusive and sustainable national economic development.
Ultimum Remedium as a State Loss Recovery Mechanism in Corporate Tax Crimes Astuti, Dwi; Latif, Abdul; Suasoongern , Sineenart
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1449

Abstract

The ultimum remedium principle in tax criminal law is designed as the last limit in law enforcement, which is only used when administrative efforts are no longer effective. However, in the practice of handling corporate tax crimes in Indonesia, this principle is often ignored, so that punishment becomes the first step instead of the last resort. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of the ultimum remedium as a mechanism to recover state losses and assess the extent to which its implementation reflects the principles of justice and fiscal efficiency. Using a normative juridical approach with the support of empirical data from court decisions and interviews, this research finds that the principle has not been applied consistently, and tends not to have a significant impact on state financial recovery. As a novelty, this research proposes a restorative fiscal justice approach model that places the ultimum remedium as an active strategy to recover losses, not just a criminal limitation principle. The findings are expected to strengthen the direction of economic criminal law reform that is more proportional, efficient, and adaptive to the country's fiscal needs.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi para pihak dalam Penerbitan Letter of Credit Puspitorini, Lucky; Prasetyawati, Endang
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1452

Abstract

The Letter of Credit (L/C) is a crucial instrument in international trade, providing payment assurance for exporters and certainty for importers. However, its issuance process involves several legal risks that require specific attention. This research aims to examine the available forms of legal protection, the roles and responsibilities of banks in L/C issuance, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms. A normative juridical approach was employed for this study. Findings indicate a lack of dedicated national regulations specifically governing L/Cs. This regulatory gap creates a legal vacuum with the potential for disputes. Therefore, harmonization between the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP 600) and national regulations is essential. This can be achieved through the adoption and ratification of specific L/C rules, either as government regulations or Bank Indonesia regulations. Such efforts are vital to ensure legal certainty for all parties involved. Furthermore, challenges in implementation and varying legal interpretations across different jurisdictions underscore the urgent need for legal reform. This research thus recommends policy reformulation and enhanced understanding of the legal risks associated with L/C issuance.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penentuan Unsur Wanprestasi dan Kerugian dalam Kasus Fraud Telemedicine: Studi Perspektif Hukum Perdata pada Era Layanan Kesehatan Digital Badjuka, Muhammad Alfitho
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1456

Abstract

This article discusses the legal analysis of the elements of breach of contract and damages in a fraud case that occurred in telemedicine services, highlighting the civil law perspective in the era of health digitalization. Telemedicine services provide efficient access to healthcare, but are vulnerable to fraudulent practices, such as false diagnoses, unreasonable billing, or manipulation of medical data. This study employs a normative legal method by examining relevant regulations, jurisprudence, and doctrines, while highlighting the complexity of proving breach of contract in electronic contracts between patients and service providers. The findings reveal that breach of contract may arise from violations of contract terms, including failure to provide medical services in accordance with standards or lack of transparency in information. Proving breach of contract and damages, both material and immaterial, poses a unique challenge amid digital data control by providers and low legal literacy among patients. Harmonization of regulations in the fields of health, consumer protection, and personal data protection is essential to strengthen legal protection for patients. This article recommends the importance of strengthening electronic evidence authentication mechanisms and synergy between legislators, regulators, and telemedicine industry players in formulating adaptive guidelines to ensure fairness, certainty, and legal protection within the digital healthcare ecosystem. Responsive civil law enforcement is considered crucial to address challenges and ensure maximum protection for all parties involved.
Analisis Yuridis Terkait Persyaratan Notaris Pengganti Dan Implikasi Terhadap Akta Otentik Pati, Kresna Yudha; Tahegga Primananda A.
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1474

Abstract

Penelitian ini berusaha untuk melakukan analisa mengenai kecukupan dari persyaratan notaris pengganti sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Hal ini menjadi penting karena memiliki implikasi pada kekuatan hukum akta otentik yang dibuat oleh notaris pengganti. Metode yang dibuat adalah dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang akan mengkaji Pasal 33 UUJN serta menganalisa putusan pengadilan yang berkaitan. Hasil dari penelitian ini didapatkan bahwa memang sudah ada pengaturan mengenai notaris pengganti, namun persyaratan kompetensi belum secara jelas dipersyaratkan pada notaris pengganti. Sehingga, implikasi yuridisnya akan menimbulkan grey area terkait kepastian hukum pada akta otentik yang dibuat, terutama dalam hal kapasitas legal, dan pertanggungjawaban profesional. Pada akhir penelitian ini, penulis merekomendasikan perlu ada penyempurnaan terkait peraturan yang mengatur mengenai standar kompetensi serta batasan yang dimiliki notaris pengganti untuk mencapai kepastian hukum pada akta otentik yang mereka buat.
Edukasi Publik atau Pelanggaran Kode Etik: Analisis Hukum Pembuatan Akun Tiktok untuk Notaris Zaman, Nizar; Fatmawati, Nynda
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1483

Abstract

Penelitian ini untuk menganalisa sejauh mana batasan yang dimiliki notaris pada khususnya berkaitan dengan promosi diri yang berakibat pada rusaknya martabat dari profesi notaris. Metoda yang digunakan berupa metode normatif dengan kajian berfokus kepada peraturan dan jurnal ilmiah. Hasil dari tulisan ini adalah media sosial dapat dikatakan mengedukasi publik apabila bersifat informatif. Namun, akan menjadi pelanggaran kode etik ketika ada klaim berlebihan atas jasa yang ditawarkan serta melakukan perbandingan dengan sesama notaris lain. Sedangkan, jika konten yang ditawarkan menawarkan tarif maka termasuk dalam kategori pelanggaran. Pada akhir tulisan, penulis merekomendasikan perlunya pedoman khusus dan detail dari pihak terkait agar notaris dapat beradaptasi dengan baik di era digital tanpa ada pelanggaran integrasi profesi.
The Integration of Generative AI in Legal Practice: Opportunities and Challenges White, Alan Robert; Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad; Yuhelson, Yuhelson
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1489

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool within the legal profession, enhancing productivity and shifting the dynamics of legal service delivery. This desktop review synthesizes recent literature on AI adoption in law firms, focusing on the potential of GenAI in automating routine tasks, the challenges of ethical concerns, and the role of policy and education in mitigating risks. While AI presents numerous opportunities, it also requires careful integration into legal workflows to ensure compliance with ethical standards and professional obligations. This paper explores the current state of GenAI in the legal field and offers insights into future directions, including necessary policy development and professional training.
Hak Ulayat dan Kepentingan Nasional di IKN : Mana yang Lebih Didahulukan? Pribadi, Izaz Dhiasyabana; Moh Saleh
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1509

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hak ulayat dalam pembangunan IKN serta menilai keseimbangan antara pengakuan hak masyarakat adat dengan tuntutan kepentingan nasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, serta doktrin hukum, yang dipadukan dengan studi literatur mengenai praktik pengelolaan hak ulayat di berbagai daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara konstitusional hak ulayat diakui dan dilindungi, namun pelaksanaannya sering kali dibatasi oleh dalih kepentingan nasional, khususnya dalam proyek strategis negara seperti pembangunan IKN. Ketidakharmonisan regulasi dan lemahnya mekanisme perlindungan hak masyarakat adat berpotensi menimbulkan konflik sosial dan ketidakadilan. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan adanya kebijakan integratif yang menempatkan hak ulayat sebagai bagian dari kepentingan nasional, bukan sebagai hambatan, sehingga pembangunan IKN dapat berlangsung secara berkeadilan, berkelanjutan, dan sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum.
Batasan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa (PMPJ) oleh Notaris dalam Verifikasi Surat Kuasa Digital Intani, Aulia Anugrah; Moh Saleh
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1511

Abstract

Penelitian ini untuk menganalisa sejauh apa batasan pada tanggung jawab notaris untuk memverifikasi surat kuasa digital karena terdapat PMPJ. Dalam implementasinya PMPJ untuk memverifikasi kuasa digital menghadapi tantangan validasi identitas dan otentifikasi dokumen. Penelitian ini akan menganalisa batasan penerapan PMPJ terkait keterbatasan alat verifikasi pada identitas digital serta kesenjangan pada aturan notaris dan PMPJ dalam ranah digitalisasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini yakni normatif dengan menganalisa peraturan dan jurnal. Hasil pada tulisan ini menyatakan bahwa notaris perlu pedoman dalam mengintegrasikan PMPJ untuk memverifikasi surat kuasa digital. Rekomendasi akan difokuskan pada penyempurnaan pada undang-undang jabaran notaris (UUJN) agar sejalan dengan perkembangan transaksi digital dan adanya peningkatan untuk kapasitas identifikasi dokumen digital.

Page 24 of 28 | Total Record : 275

 22   23   24   25   26 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Inpress Desember) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (April) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (April) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (April) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Journal Evidence Of Law (April) More Issue