cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Surya Sari Faradiba
Contact Email
fkip@unisma.ac.id
Phone
+6285649532920
Journal Mail Official
fkip@unisma.ac.id
Editorial Address
FKIP UNISMA JL. Mayjen Haryono 193 Malang 65144
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Published by Universitas Islam Malang
ISSN : 23376384     EISSN : -     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33474
Core Subject : Education,
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other
JP3 adalah Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran yang terbit dua kali setahun pada bulan Pebruari dan September, berisi artikel hasil penelitian dan non penelitian bidang pendidikan dan pembelajaran. Tulisan yang akan dimuat adalah artikel ilmiah hasil penelitian atau artikel ilmiah non penelitian yang belum pernah diterbitkan dalam media lain baik berbahasa Inggris atau berbahasa Indonesia. JP3 ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) Universitas Islam Malang.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 750 Documents
 66   67   68   69   70 
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN KONEKSI MATEMATIS DALAM MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI SELF CONCEPT SISWA DI MTs AL-AMIN PONCOKUSUMO MALANG Sukri Azizi; Surahmat Surahmat; Alifiani Alifiani
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 25 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (175.831 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak : Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan koneksi matematis peserta didik pada materi persamaan garis lurus kelas VIII di MTs Al-Amin Poncokusumo ditinjau dari self concept. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sumber data yang diberi soal tes dan angket sebanyak 28 orang peserta didik, dan sumber data yang diwawancarai sebanyak 6 peserta didik dengan kriteria 2 peserta didik dengan self concept tinggi, 2 peserta didik dengan self concept sedang, dan 2 peserta didik dengan self concept rendah. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dari hasil penelitian tentang kemampuan koneksi matematis peserta didik ditinjau dari self concept peserta didik 1) Peserta didik dengan tingkat self concept tinggi, mampu mengkaitkan koneksi dalam topik matematika maupun antar konsep atau mengkaitkan antar topik dan juga keterkaitan dengan kehidupan sehari-hari. 2) Peserta didik dengan tingkat self concept sedang beberapa indikator kemampuan koneksi matematis belum terpenuhi. 3) Peserta dengan tingkat self concept rendah, belum mampu mengkaitkan koneksi matematis seperti keterkaitan antar konsep ataupun koneksi antar topik dan keterkaitan dengan kehidupan sehari-hari. 4) Pengklasifikasian tingkat self concept tinggi dengan nilai rata-rata 83, 3, pengklasifikasian tingkat self concept sedang dengan nilai rata-rata 70, 2, pengklasifikasian tingkat self concept rendah dengan nilai rata-rata 58, 4, Dilihat dari hasil rata-rata yang didapat pada klasifikasi self concept rendah didapat rata-rata yang tidak melampaui nilai KKM dan dapat dikategorikan dalam tingkat rendah. Sehingga dalam penelitian ini dapat diketahui behwa peserta didik yang mempunyai self concept rendah, maka kemampuan koneksi matematis peserta didik masuk dalam kategori rendah.Kata Kunci: koneksi matematis, self concept, persamaan garis lurus.
EFL STUDENTS' PERCEPTION ON PLAGIARISM IN ACCOMPLISHING THESIS AT UNIVERSITAS ISLAM MALANG Muhammad Nur Khuzaini; Ali Ashari; Nuse Aliyah Rahmati
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Plagiarism has become one form of cheating that occurs in the academic system. Some students do plagiarism by their intelligent ways, for example by changing some grammatical structures. This study focused on knowing the students' perception. In writing with sources, plagiarism defined as the act of admission. The thesis is a scientific work written by undergraduate students on the subject of a specific topic or field. This study is a tool for providing multidimensional data required to gain an understanding of students' perception of plagiarism in the completion of the thesis. This research conducted through a questionnaire to collect the data needed. Some people think plagiarism is not good, and some think it is positive because plagiarism helps students finish their thesis. English Department students at Universitas Islam Malang did plagiarism. Plagiarism may also be positive or negative as plagiarism allows them to accomplish their tasks. Reasons include lack of motivation, laziness and less honesty. Key Words: Plagiarism, Perceptions, Thesis
STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON REFERENCE AND WRITING STRATEGIES IN AVOIDING PLAGIARISM Abdurrahman Hidayat; Eko Suhartoyo; Dzul Fikri
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: In academic writing, incorporating source from previous research and expert is essential to support an article. However, improper use of other’s works might cause plagiarism. it is important to understand what is plagiarism and strategies to avoid it. This study aims to identify students’ perception about source incorporation, plagiarism and unintentional plagiarism due to error in writing as well as the strategies that they use to avoid plagiarism. This study use narrative qualitative framework and semi structural interview as instrument of data collection. Research data collected from 10 late-semester students of English department from University of Islam Malang. The result shows that most students understands about plagiarism and incorporation of other’s idea, but participants only mention problems related to textual plagiarism, and none mention about plagiarism of idea or self-plagiarism. To avoid plagiarism, each participant use directquotation technique properly, but not everyone paraphrase and summarize effectively. Every participant has shown no intention to transgress in academic writing that indicates strong influence of prevention rules regarding plagiarism. Key Words: Academic Writing, Referencing Strategies, Plagiarism 
EXPLORING AUTONOMOUS AND SELF-REGULATION IN VOCABULARY LEARNING Thania Imani Janitra; Mutmainnah Mustofa; Imam Wahyudi Karimullah
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Vocabulary is the most fundamental aspect of language learning. However, the limitation of classroom-based vocabulary learning to cover large amount of vocabulary, implies the necessity of learning vocabulary independently and regulate their learning effectively. This study aims to identify the learners’ autonomy and self-regulation strategies in learning vocabulary as well as the benefits and difficulties of independent vocabulary learning. This study implements descriptive qualitative design with questionnaire as instrument in data collection. The researcher collects the data taken from 10 late-semester students in University of Islam Malang. The result shows that all students learn vocabulary independently on their own preferences, but only four students are autonomously self-regulate, the other respondents considered ineffective in self-regulation. In the identification of independent learning benefits and difficulties, the researcher found seven benefits and five problems. The research concludes that 10 out of 21 students are independent learners, but only 4 out of 10 students considered as an effective autonomous learners. Independent learners is greatly benefits vocabulary learning. Meanwhile most of the problems encountered by the students in this study aside from difficult words signify similar difficulties of other independent learning.Key Words: Autonomous, Independent-learning, self-regulated vocabulary learning
THE STUDY OF LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS IN LEARNING ENGLISH GRAMMAR zafira Ramdayani SA. Kadir; Alfan Zuhairi; Eko Suhartoyo
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The study aimed to investigate the grammar learning strategies frequently used by Indonesian EFL learners in general and grammar learning strategies frequently used by successful and less successful students in learning grammar. The research design of this study is a quantitative study in the form of comparative design. There were 70 students of the second years of English education department participate in this study, and they divided into successful and less successful categories by using the TOEFL structure test consisting of 15 multiple choices and 25 error analysis. Besides, 70 items of the GLSI questionnaire used to know the grammar learning strategies used by the students. The result of the study showed that EFL students used social strategies more frequently than the other strategies. Moreover, both successful and less successful students used the same grammar learning strategies while they were different in frequency use levels. It was also proved that there is no significant difference between successful and less successful EFL students in using grammar learning strategies.Keywords: Learning Strategies, grammar, achievement
The Effectiveness Of Uploaded-Recorded Video On Instagram At Second Graders’ Smai Al-Maarif Singosari For Speaking Skill On Hortatory Exposition Asifatul Himmah; Eko Suhartoyo; Febti Ismiatun
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to investigate the effectiveness of uploaded-recorded video on IGTV on student speaking skill at second grade of SMAI Al-Maarif Singosar. The design of this research was experimental research with types of Pre-Experimental research. The researcher focused on one class, that were XI IBB was 23. The instruments test was six topics which were chosen by the students’ self. The researcher conducted pre-test, treatment, and post-test. The data from both pre-test and post-test was analysed using t-test analysis. The score of experimental class was significantly higher than controlled class. The result of analyzing pre-test score and post-test showed that significant level of 0.000 for first test and 0.001 for second test which less than 0.05. it means that using uploaded-recorded on Instagram was effective in improving speaking skill at second graders’ of SMAI Al-Maarif Singosari. It can be concluded that the student who was taught using uploaded-recorded video on Instagram was better than student before using uploaded-recorded video on Instagram for speaking skill as it helped the students to improve their speaking performance and speaking skill, so it could improve their speaking achievement.Keywords: Speaking Skill, Uploaded-Recorded on IGTV
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND THEIR THINKING STYLES USE Nasukhah Nasukhah
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Many students feel difficult in learning English so that makes them very lazy and they are not interested in English. To be able to understand English easily, students have to employ the appropriate learning strategy and thinking style. Therefore, this study focuses on language learning strategies and thinking styles. Both of them are very helpful for beginner or students. This study aimed to find out what is the most language learning strategies and thinking styles that are usually applied by students when they are in learning process and to find out the relationship between language learning strategies and thinking styles. This study used quantitative method. The researcher took students of the eleventh graders of MA Almaarif Singosari. The linguistic major students as the participants consisting of 47 students from two classes. Questionnaire is the instrument of this study. To analyze the data, the researcher used SPSS version 20. The finding of the study indicated that metacognitive strategy is type of strategy mostly used at mean point 5.97 and executive style is  mostly applied by students at mean point 3.78. There is a correlation between language learning strategies and thinking styles at significant value .001. It can be summed up that metacognitive is the dominant strategy and executive is the style the most used by students and also there is a relationship between language learning strategies and thinking styles. Keywords: Language Learning Strategies, Thinking Styles 
LEARNERS’ PERCEPTION ON THEIR ONLINE READING COMPREHENSION AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Mazkhina Berlian Untari; Yahya Alaydrus; Dzurriyyatun Ni'mah
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study is to know the learners’ perception on their online reading comprehension learning at the English Education Department at the second semester of University of Islam Malang. A qualitative approach research design was used in this study. The participants are 30 students from second semester of English Education Department, class 2A and 2B. The instruments used to collect the data were questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 30 statements. Google Form was used to obtain the data and the result was used to analyze the data. As a result of the study, the researcher concluded that the benefits of online reading have had a substantial effect on the knowledge of learners' comprehension, and that students have strongly focused on the educational evaluation they read. The are advantages; the convenience when you understand the text because of the design/facilities, save print paper, transparent screen without bad printing quality, improve online translation, helpful to understand information, important to improve reading skills and the disadvantages; Incapability to leave a mark and make a notation, exhaustion of read many sentences on the light screen, and the distractions.Key Words : Learners’ Perception, Online Learning, Reading Comprehension
A STUDY ON THE ANXIETY OF THE LOW AND HIGH SPEAKING ACHIEVERS OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITY OF ISLAM MALANG Fahmi Arifin; Yahya Alaydrus; Eko Suhartoyo
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This current research focused on identifying the contributing factors of students’ anxiety and to describe the type of anxiety that faced by low and high speaking achievers. This study used descriptive qualitative research method. The result of this research showed that both categorized students placed at “anxious” (low speaking achievers) and “mildly anxious” (high speaking achievers). It also gives a description that anxious students do not have a low score and mildly anxious students may not always have a good score. In this research, 2 anxious students are having a bit lower score from the other students, meanwhile 2 other students with mildly anxious having satisfactory score. The percentage of students’ response was also classed into three type of anxiety. 33.3% of students experienced communicative apprehension, whereas 30.3% feel anxious in test anxiety, and 36.4% of them were getting anxious in fear of negative evaluation. The last type of anxiety got the highest percentage. Keywords: anxiety, low speaking achiever, high speaking achiever 
THE DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED AND STRATEGIES USED BY THE STUDENTS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT Yaumil Yaumil; Yahya Alaydrus; Dzul Fikri
Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Descriptive text is a crucial text that must be learned by the students. This article aims at knowing the students’ difficulties in writing descriptive text and the strategies that used by the students  to overcome their difficulties in writing descriptive text. The population of this research was the second semester students of English Departemtn at University of Islam Malang. The participants consisted of 34 students. In collecting the data, the researcher used questionnaire as the instrument that covered the difficulties and strategies in writing descriptive text. The finding of this research showed that the students’ biggest problems in writing descriptive text were lack of vocabulary, poor grammar knowledge, organizing idea, developing idea, and generic structure. To overcome these problems, there are some strategies used by the students in writing descriptive text included decide a topic before writing, use a dictionary to chek vocabulary, make an outline, revise a sentence, and share writing with one another.Key Words: Students’ Difficulties and Strategies, Writing, Descriptive Text

Page 68 of 75 | Total Record : 750

 66   67   68   69   70 

Filter by Year

2019 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 17 No. 30 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 29 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 28 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 27 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 26 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 25 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 24 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 23 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 23 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 22 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 17 No. 21 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian,Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 20 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian,Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 19 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 18 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian,Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 17 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 16 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 15 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 14 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian,Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 13 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 12 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian,Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 11 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 10 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 9 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 8 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 7 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 6 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 5 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 4 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 3 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 17, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 32 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 31 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 30 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 29 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 28 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 27 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 26 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 25 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 24 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 23 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 22 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 21 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 20 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 19 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 18 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 17 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 16 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 15 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 14 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 13 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 12 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 11 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 10 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 9 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 7 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 6 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 5 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 4 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 3 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 16, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 36 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 35 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 34 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 33 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 32 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 31 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 30 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 29 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 15 No. 28 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 27 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 26 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 25 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 24 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 23 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 22 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 21 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 20 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 19 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 18 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 17 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 16 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 15 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 14 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 15, No 13 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 12 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 11 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 10 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 9 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 8 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 7 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 6 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 14, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 13, No 4 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran Vol 13, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran More Issue