cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 48   49   50   51   52 
ASPEK HUKUM CLASS ACTION DAN CITIZEN LAW SUIT SERTA PERKEMBANGANNYA DI INDONESIA Iqbal, Moch
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1 No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.89-112

Abstract

The assertion aspects and Citizen Law Class Action Law Suit in fact has been recognized and accepted by the Judge and Judicial us, this condition affirmed the issuance of the Supreme Court of Indonesia Regulation Number I of 2002. Legal Breakthrough Central Jakarta District Court that receive and examine claims has increased the belief of justice seekers denganadanya decisions on a lawsuit aqua. However, it must be recognized that in the particular jurisdiction in Indonesia, based on research results Research Center of Law and Justice of the Supreme Court still found many judges who do not understand the legal aspects of handling and class action law suit and the citizen. Characteristics of the class action lawsuits and citizen law suit is necessary shared understanding of both the Judge and the community as a plaintiff; To understand the uniqueness of this lawsuit we all need to do a comparison on other countries that have implemented first lawsuit is like America, Canada etc. Keywords: Aspects of Law, Class Action, Citzen Law Suit
MODEL IDEAL PROMOSI DAN MUTASI APARATUR PERADILAN INDONESIA Fachruddin, Irfan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1 No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.113-146

Abstract

Promotion and Implementation of the consequences of mutations causing a correlation between the quality of promotion and transfer to the performance and behavior of judges. Promotions and mutations that do not cause trouble families would improve morale and performance, instead the promotion and transfer of judges to make family life difficult and frustrating declining morale and performance. Then the fight promotion and transfer to the material does not encourage the growth of professionalism of judges and job performance. Hence the need for normative policy governing promotion and transfer mechanisms for the basis implementation equitable promotion and transfer. Compiled promotion and transfer patterns using the system region / territory with the division of the province, the region (some provinces), the national territory. Reclassification of the court by adding criteria case complexity and dynamics of the economy in addition to the substantive elements, circumstances of the case and supporting elements, population, population density, as well as communication and transportation. Imposed purely functional status. Promotion of judges / class civil servants are not hampered by the same leadership position the judge or judges of the lower classes of the judge concerned. It was also necessary to minimize the differences between leaders facility with the judge, so the judge does not have to hunt comfortably leadership positions and perform tasks on its position. Openness is limited, such inspraak and hearing, an opportunity to participate in determining the policy of the authority by a judge that the object of promotion and transfer. Keywords: Promotions and mutations, Justice Reform
TOLAK UKUR PENILAIAN PENGGUNAAN DISKRESI OLEH POLISI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA Said, Abbas
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1 No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.147-170

Abstract

Basically, the law works by providing boundaries. In the context of law enforcement by the police, the constraints in the form of control over the police in freedom Protect the order or stop crime. But there is a different reality when police faced with a reality in which the law could not answer the problem. In this position the use of discretion by police do legal interpretation as a bridge between the law with social objectives. The question that arises then is used is not appropriate discretion and not in accordance with the purposes of the law itself. The benchmark police discretion based on common interests or the interests of society at the level of practice is still very abstract to be applied in the implementation of police discretion related to criminal law enforcement policy. Because the benchmark Criteria or public interest in the use of police discretion are still abstract, causing authorities use discretion in some cases criminal process misapplied. Keywords: Discretion, Police
DIMENSION OF WHISTLEBLOWING SYSTEM: URGENSITY OF LEGISLATION STRENGTHENING Briando, Bobby; Bawono, Sri Kuncoro; Mirwanto, Tony
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.371-390

Abstract

Eradication of corruption in Indonesia is still the main agenda of the government in building good governance. One method to expose corruption is to use a whistleblower role that can help find the criminal mode of corruption. Whistleblower mechanism is divided into three main dimensions: Human, Structure and Process. But in practice whistleblower reporters in corruption cases in Indonesia have not received maximum legal protection. In Indonesia the normative regulation governing pursuant to Law No.13 of 2006 concerning Witness and Victim Protection as well as Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No.4 Year 2011 on Treatment of Criminal Reporting and Witness of Actors Cooperation The results show that from three dimensions of whistleblower system still does not yet have binding legislation. Whistleblower reporters only accept lightening relief. Specific whistleblower legislation is urgent. In legislation, at least, it should be in accordance with Whistleblower's protection.
URGENSI PEMBANGUNAN YURISPRUDENSI PEMIDANAAN KORPORASI PELAKU KORUPSI UNTUK EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA / URGENCY OF JURISPRUDENCY DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATION PUNISHMENT OF CORRUPTION ACTORS FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW IN INDONESIA Suhariyanto, Budi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.459-482

Abstract

Realitas pemberantasan tindak pidana korporasi di Indonesia banyak mengalami kendala, termasuk dalam perkara korupsi. Ketiadaan yurisprudensi yang bisa dijadikan pedoman bagi penegak hukum dan hakim menjadi persoalan yang mendasar dalam mengatasi kegalauan yang selama ini ada.Menarik dipermasalahkan yaitu bagaimanakah urgensi pembangunan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasi Pelaku korupsi untuk efektivitas penegakan hukum di Indonesia? Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendorong Mahkamah Agung menginisiasi pembentukan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasiPelaku korupsi. Jika telah ditetapkan sebagai yurisprudensi dapat berguna sebagai inspirasi dan dipedomani oleh penegak hukum dan hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatankasus. Hasil pembahasan mengemukakan bahwa beberapa putusan pemidanaan terhadap korporasi Pelaku korupsi memiliki kaidah hukum baru yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian penegak hukum dan hakim Pengadilan Tipikor. Kaidah hukum baru tersebut perlu dipertimbangkan untuk dijadikan yurisprudensi sehingga bisa menjadi solusi atas kendala efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi korporasi yang selama ini ada. Mengingat persyaratan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasi Pelaku korupsi telah terpenuhi maka sesegera mungkin dapat dimulai proses dan tahapannya oleh Mahkamah Agung.The reality of the eradication of corporate crime in Indonesia has many obstacles, including in corruption cases. The absence of jurisprudence that can be used as a guide for law enforcers and judges to be a fundamental problem in overcoming the turmoil that has been there. Interest in question is how urgency of jurisprudence development corporations corruption Actors of corruption for the effectiveness of law enforcement in Indonesia? The purpose of this study is to encourage the Supreme Court to initiate the formation of corporate criminal prosecution jurisprudence. If it has been established as jurisprudence can be useful as an inspiration and guided by law enforcement and judges. This research uses normative research method with the approach of legislation, conceptual approach and approach of case. The results of the argument suggest that some criminal verdicts against corporations Perpetrators of corruption have new legal rules that need to get the attention of law enforcers and judges of the Corruption Court. The new law rules need to be considered for jurisprudence so that it can be a solution to the obstacles to the effectiveness of corruption eradication of corporations that have been there. In view of the requirements of corporations punishment lawsuit The perpetrators of corruption have been fulfilled as soon as possible can begin the process and its stages by the Supreme Court.
PERSINGGUNGAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI ANTARA PENGADILAN TUN DAN PENGADILAN TIPIKOR / INTERCEPTION OF JUSTICE AUTHORITY OF DISCRETION ABUSE BETWEEN ADMINISTRATION COURT AND CORRUPTION COURTS Suhariyanto, Budi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.213-236

Abstract

Diskresi sebagai wewenang bebas, keberadaannya rentan akan disalahgunakan. Penyalahgunaan diskresi yang berimplikasi merugikan keuangan negara dapat dituntutkan pertanggungjawabannya secara hukum administrasi maupun hukum pidana. Mengingat selama ini peraturan perundang-undangan tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi tidak merumuskan secara rinci yang dimaksudkan unsur menyalahgunakan kewenangan maka para hakim menggunakan konsep penyalahgunaan wewenang dari hukum administrasi. Problema muncul saat diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 dimana telah memicu persinggungan dalam hal kewenangan mengadili penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) antara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada perkembangannya, persinggungan kewenangan mengadili tersebut ditegaskan oleh Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 bahwa PTUN berwenang menerima, memeriksa, dan memutus permohonan penilaian ada atau tidak ada penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) dalam Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan sebelum adanya proses pidana. Sehubungan tidak dijelaskan tentang definisi dan batasan proses pidana yang dimaksud, maka timbul penafsiran yang berbeda. Perlu diadakan kesepakatan bersama dan dituangkan dalam regulasi tentang tapal batas persinggungan yang jelas tanpa meniadakan kewenangan pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang diskresi pada Pengadilan TUN.Discretion as free authority is vulnerable to being misused. The abuse of discretion implicating the state finance may be prosecuted by both administrative and criminal law. In view of the fact that the law on corruption eradication does not formulate in detail the intended element of authority abuse, the judges use the concept of authority abuse from administrative law. Problems arise when the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 triggered an interception in terms of justice/ adjudicate authority on authority abuse (including discretion) between the Administrative Court and Corruption Court. In its development, the interception of justice authority is affirmed by Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2015 that the Administrative Court has the authority to receive, examine and decide upon the appeal there is or there is no misuse of authority in the Decision and / or Action of Government Officials prior to the criminal process. That is, shortly before the commencement of the criminal process then that's when the authority of PTUN decides to judge the misuse of authority over the case. In this context, Perma No. 4 of 2015 has imposed restrictions on the authority of the TUN Court in prosecuting the abuse of discretionary authority.
PEMBATALAN HUKUMAN CAMBUK BAGI PELAKU JARIMAH PENCABULAN ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh / CANING SENTENCE REVERSAL FOR JARIMAH CRIMINAL IN DECISION NUMBER 07/JN/ 2016/MS.Aceh Mansari, Mansari; Melayu, Hasnul Arifin
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.425-440

Abstract

Hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh melalui putusannya Nomor 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh membatalkan putusan Hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah Langsa yang menjatuhkan hukuman cambuk bagi pelaku pelecehan seksual kepada anak. Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah berbeda dengan tuntutan Jaksa Penuntut Umum yang menuntut ‘uqubat (hukuman) penjara selama 90 bulan kepada pelaku karena melakukan pelanggaran terhadap Pasal 47 Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim membatalkan hukuman cambuk bagi pelaku pelecehan seksual kepada anak dan mengkaji putusan Nomor 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh terkait terpenuhi kepentingan terbaik kepada anak atau tidak. Kajian ini termasuk penelitian yuridis normatif yang mengkaji tentang asas-asas, kaidah-kaidah hukum sesuai teori-teori yang terdapat dalam ilmu hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim membatalkan hukuman cambuk dalam putusan Nomor 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh dikarenakan putusan MS Langsa belum memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku, supaya anak tidak berjumpa dengan pelaku karenanya hakim tinggi menghukum dengan hukuman penjara, mementingkan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak dan membuatkan pelaku menjadi insaf manakala berada di dalam penjara. Putusan hakim telah memperhatikan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, karena membuat pelaku insaf, menjauhkannya dari anak, sesuai dengan konsep mashlahah murshalah dan adanya pengakuan secara aturan hukum berdasarkan Qanun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat dan Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Diharapkan kepada hakim yang mengadili kasus pelecehan seksual, dan pemerkosaan pada anak supaya memperberat hukumannya dan mengutamakan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak (the best interest of the child) dan masa depannya.Judge of the Court of Syar'iyah of Aceh through its verdict Number 07 / JN / 2016 / MS.Aceh annulled the verdict of the Court of Justice of Syar'iyah Langsa which imposed a whip for the perpetrators of child sexual abuse. The decision of the Court of Syar'iyah is different from that of the Public Prosecutor demanding 'uqubat (punishment) of imprisonment for 90 months to the perpetrator for violating Article 47 Qanun Aceh Number 6 Year 2014 on Jinayat Law. This study aims to determine the judge's consideration of cancellation of punishment for child abuse perpetrators and review the decision No. 07 / JN / 2016 / MS.Aceh related to the best interests of the child or not. This study includes normative juridical research that examines the principles, legal rules according to theories contained in the science of law. The result of the research shows that judge consideration cancels the caning punishment in decision No. 07 / JN / 2016 / MS.Aceh because the decision of MS Langsa has not given deterrent effect to the perpetrator, so that children do not meet with the perpetrator because high judge punish by prison sentence, and make the perpetrator become converted when in prison. The judge's decision has taken into account the best interests of the child, for making the perpetrators convert them away from the children, in accordance with the concept of masshlahah murshalah and the recognition of the rule of law based on Qanun Aceh Number 7 of 2013 on the Law of Jinayat and Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014 on Jinayat Law. It is expected that the judge who hears cases of sexual harassment, and rape on the child in order to aggravate the sentence and prioritize the best interest of the child and the future.
PENGUJIAN ADA TIDAKNYA PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN / EXAMINATION TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ABUSE OF AUTHORITY ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION LAW Simanjuntak, Enrico Parulian
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.237-262

Abstract

Dalam UUAP (Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan), penyalahgunaan wewenang merupakan genus yang terdiri dari tiga spesies yang berbeda-beda yakni (1) melampaui wewenang; (2) mencampur-adukan wewenang; (3) bertindak sewenang-wenang. UUAP tidak menjelaskan pengertian penyalahgunaan wewenang, ia hanya mengkualifikasi ke tiga jenis spesies penyalahgunaan wewenang sebagaimana disebut di atas. Dikaitkan dengan kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Peratun) dalam menguji penyalahgunaan wewenang vide pasal 21 UUAP haruslah dilihat dalam konteks yang terbatas yakni semata dalam aspek pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara. Pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam aspek bersifat parsial dan sangat terbatas jika dibandingkan dengan luasnya ruang lingkup dan kompleksitas pengertian penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam hukum administrasi.In the UUAP (Government Administration Law), abuse of authority is a genus consisting of three different species, namely (1) acting beyond authority; (2) mixing up authority; (3) acting arbitrarily. The UUAP does not clarify the definition of abuse of authority; it only classifies it into the three types of abuse of authority as mentioned above. When associated with the authority of the Administrative Court in examining abuse of authority pursuant to Article 21 of the UUAP, it must be seen in a limited context, namely only in the aspect of examination of abuse of authority that results in state financial losses. Examination of abuse of authority in this aspect is partial and very limited compared to the extent of the scope and complexity of the notion of abuse of authority in administrative law.
FALLACY (SESAT PIKIR) ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM DALAM MOTIVERING VONNIS (PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM) / THE ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM FALLACY IN MOTIVERING VONIS (LEGAL REASONING) Marbun, Rocky; Armilius, nfn
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.327-352

Abstract

Munculnya fallacy argumentum ad verecundiam dalam suatu putusan pengadilan merupakan suatu penalaran hukum yang tidak tepat, oleh karena penggunaan otoritas yang tidak dapat dibenarkan berdasarkan Ilmu Hukum, akan berakibat kepada validitas dari amar putusan—yang merupakan konklusi, yang dapat dibatalkan. Sifat pembatalan amar putusan tersebut bukanlah disebabkan karena amar putusannya yang tidak tepat, namun dikarenakan sumber logika yang digunakan adalah tidak tepat.The presence of the argumentum ad verecundiam fallacy in a court decision indicates erroneous legal reasoning, because the use of authority that cannot be justified based on the jurisprudence will affect the validity of the ruling, which is a conclusion of law, in that such ruling can be repealed. The repeal of the ruling is not because the ruling is incorrect, but because the source of the logic used is incorrect.
PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN INTERNAL PARTAI POLITIK SECARA MUFAKAT DAN DEMOKRATIS / DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF INTERNAL POLITICAL PARTIES IN CONSENSUS AND DEMOCRATIC Pradityo, Randy
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.375-386

Abstract

Penyelesaian perkara pada jalur litigasi yang cenderung lambat ditambah dengan penumpukan perkara, didukung dengan banyaknya celah atau kekurangan pada undang-undang partai politik, khususnya terkait penyelesaian perselisihan internal partai. Banyaknya permasalahan tersebut mengharuskan setiap individu yang terlibat untuk mengambil tindakan progresif dengan melampaui peraturan tersebut. Tindakan progresif yang dimaksud salah satunya melalui jalur non-litigasi yakni mediasi. Mediasi dilaksanakan dengan musyawarah mufakat, dengan melibatkan rakyat didalamnya, atau lebih tepatnya tokoh masyarakat yang dirasa netral. Terlepas hal itu merupakan sengketa internal partai, namun rakyatlah yang memiliki andil di dalam setiap roda kehidupan partai politik di dalam sistem demokrasi. Kemudian ada beberapa cara yang bisa ditempuh dalam rangka penyelesaian perselisihan internal partai politik, selain mediasi tadi, ada tiga sistem penunjang untuk mencegah potensi buruk yang ditimbulkan akibat gejolak internal partai. Pertama, melalui mekanisme internal yang menjamin demokratisasi melalui partisipasi anggota partai politik tersebut dalam proses pengambilan keputusan. Kedua, melalui mekanisme transparansi partai melalui rakyat di luar partai yang dapat ikut-serta berpartisipasi dalam penentuan kebijakan yang hendak diperjuangkan melalui dan oleh partai politik. Ketiga, menjamin kebebasan berpikir, berpendapat dan berekspresi, serta kebebasan untuk berkumpul dan berorganisasi secara damai.The settlement of cases in litigation pathways that tend to be slow coupled with the accumulation of cases, supported by the many gaps or shortcomings in the laws of political parties, especially related to the settlement of internal party disputes. The number of these problems requires every individual involved to take progressive action by exceeding these regulations. The progressive actions that are meant by one of them through non-litigation means mediation. Mediation is carried out through consensus deliberations, involving the people in it, or more precisely the community leaders who are perceived as neutral. Apart from that it is an internal party dispute, but it is the people who have a share in every wheel of the life of a political party in a democratic system. Then there are several ways that can be pursued in order to resolve internal political party disputes, in addition to the mediation, there are three support systems to prevent the bad potential arising from internal party turmoil. First, through an internal mechanism that guarantees democratization through the participation of members of the political party in the decision making process. Second, through the mechanism of party transparency through people outside the party who can participate in the determination of policies that are to be fought for through and by political parties. Third, guarantee the freedom of thought, opinion and expression, as well as the freedom to gather and organize peacefully.

Page 50 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 48   49   50   51   52 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue