cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Floribertus Herichis Wanto Tapo
Contact Email
jurnalledalero@gmail.com
Phone
+6281239632643
Journal Mail Official
jurnalledalero@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Ledalero 861542, Maumere, Flores, NTT, Indonesia
Location
Kab. flores timur,
Nusa tenggara timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ledalero
Published by Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero
ISSN : 14125420     EISSN : 25034316     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Humanities, Science, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
In accord with the motto of IFTK Ledalero, the institute that publishes this journal, “Diligite Lumen Sapientiae” (“Love Light & Truth”), Jurnal Ledalero: Wacana Iman dan Kebudayaan (Discourse on Faith and Culture) is dedicated to publishing quality articles intended to assis its readers to love light and truth. Via the published articles, this journal endeavours to enlighten, to sharpen the minds, and to broaden the way of thinking of its readers. Jurnal Ledalero: Wacana Iman dan Kebudayaan (Discourse on Faith and Culture) encourages researchers, academics, professionals, practitioners, and students to submit articles which ae the fruit of their research and critical analysis in the fields of philosophy, theology, and the social sciences, such as cultural studies, sociology, politics, psychology, language, anthropology and art.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Filsafat
Articles 188 Documents
 15   16   17   18   19 
Sistematika dan Pemetaan Konsep Ketuhanan Agama-Agama Lokal di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Agama Sunda Wiwitan, Agama Kaharingan, dan Agama Towani Tolotang Agus Himmawan Utomo; Galuh Nur Fattah
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.340.143-164

Abstract

Abstract: Indonesia has an invaluable cultural heritage, one of which is the existence of various indigenous religions that are widespread throughout the country. Despite their significant number, their presence is oftendisregarded by the majority of society who have adopted formal religions that are recognized by the state. Followers of indigenous religions are often deemed misguided by formal religion practitioners because theyperceive these ancestral religions as worshiping entities other than God, as recognized by their own religious tradition. This is exacerbated by the government's attempt to integrate indigenous religions into one of therecognized formal religions, which poses a threat to the preservation of the teachings and religious practices of indigenous religion followers as their religious practices will inevitably be influenced by the standardizations of the formal religions, which are essentially religions of foreign origin. All forms of discrimination arise, among others, from the weakness or inability of indigenous religion followers to explain their theological systems and concepts of divinity. Therefore, this study attempts to explain the concept of divinity in indigenous religions by using three casestudies: Sunda Wiwitan, Kaharingan, and Towani Tolotang. The results of this study show that there are authentic characteristics of divinity in each of the studied indigenous religion systems, which are specifically categorized as henotheism and Animism-Dynamism.Keyword: Indigenious Religions, Concept of Divinity, Henotheism, Animism-Dynamism
Menilik Pembatasan Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan dalam Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia Fransiska Widyawati
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.378.186-199

Abstract

Abstract: The right to marry and the right to practice a religion are fundamental human rights that are not mutually exclusive. The fulfilment of one does not necessitate the compromise of the other. However, in Indonesia, many couples from diverse religious backgrounds face complexities in exercising these rights due to the constraintsimposed by Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974, which does not explicitly accommodate interfaith marriages. According to this law, the legal recognition of a marriage necessitates a religious ceremony, and religious institutions often resist interfaith marriages. They typically urge couples from different religions to adopt a common faith to facilitate their acceptance into matrimony. This requirement often compels individuals to convert to their partner’s religion, thereby challenging their freedom of religion and belief. In the pursuit of a legally recognized marriage, individuals may find themselves coerced into relinquishing their religious freedom. This article examines the challenges faced in actualizing human rights and religious freedom in Indonesia within the context of interfaithmarriages. The methodology employed is Critical Discourses Analysis (CDA), a critical study based on text (in this case, Marriage Law No. 1/194) and context (random examples). Through critical analysis, this article posits that government regulations requiring legal recognition of marriages by religious institutions serve as an impediment to the fulfilment of religious rights and beliefs for citizens engaged in interfaith relationships. Consequently, this article advocates for amendments to the marriage regulations to actualize the human rights of freedom of religionand belief.Key words: Marriage, Human Rights, Indonesia, Marriage Law, Inter-religious Marriage
Tractatus Politicus dan Demokrasi: Risalah Model-model Rezim yang Rasional Norbertus Jegalus; Yohanes Subani
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.379.102-119

Abstract

Abstract: Tractatus Politicus is a work of Spinoza's political philosophy which discusses regime models arranged in stages according to the level of use of reason: Monarchy is rational, aristocracy is more rational, and democracy is most rational. Spinoza, who is known as the prophet of reason, established rationality as a normative standard forthe three types of regimes. The rationality of a regime is measured by the size of the council which is tasked with discussing and controlling all state policies and Spinoza considers democracy to be the most rational because democracy allows for a people's council that is bigger than monarchy and aristocracy. Supomo adopted Spinoza's views as one of the philosophical sources for his state theory known as the "Staatsidee Integralistik". Interestingly, Spinoza saw democracy as the best model of government, while Supomo, who referred to Spinoza, actually rejected democracy. Simanjuntak then conducted a critical study of the philosophical source of the controversial “Staatsidee Integralistik”. However, Simanjuntak's study became more controversial, because he found that not only Supomo rejected democracy but also Spinoza. This study aims to respond to all these controversies and finds that while it is true that Supomo rejects democracy, it is not true that Spinoza rejects democracy. Spinoza was a staunch rationalist who supported democracy.Key words: Politics, democracy, theocracy, organistic state, integralistic state.
Telaah filosofis tentang keadilan kontributif dan Martabat kerja manusia serta implikasinya bagi Paradigma ekonomi Petrus Tan; Yolinda Yanti Sonbay; Beatrix Yunarti Manehat
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.380.120-142

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to present the limitations of distributive justice theory as a conceptual foundation of the paradigm of the growth and prosperity in economy, and then proposing the idea of contributive justice and the dignity of human work as a new economic paradigm. Why is contributive justice important, and what is its relevance in the discourse of economic paradigm? By using the method of literature study and critical analysis, this article indicates that the idea of contributive justice is essential to overcome the lack of distributive justice. The distributive justice fails to understand that human labour is not only economic. Human labor is not just an instrument for consumption purpose. Human labour is essentially social and cultural. Based on the very idea of contributive justice, human labour is a source of individual self-social esteem, the way of contributing for common good and winning the social recognition from the society. Amid the global economic competition that intensifies the social and economic inequality, contributive justice offers the idea of dignity of human work as a new paradigm of economy. This article concludes that economic efforts in the 21st century, both in the global and in Indonesia, must considerthe dignity and value of human work.Key Words : Distributive justice; contributive justice; economy; the dignity of human work.
Pembacaan kembali Traditionis Custodes Paus Fransiskus terhadap penggunaan Missale Romanum 1962. Sebuah tinjauan Liturgis-Eklesiologis dalam terang reformasi Konsili Vatikan II Christianus Watu
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.349.220-240

Abstract

Traditionis Custodes is an Apostolic letter issued by Pope Francis in the form of a Motu Proprio, i.e. on his own initiative. The content of this letter is about the use of the Roman Liturgy prior to the Reform of 1970. The main object of focus is the celebration of Mass with the Missale Romanum 1962. The Motu Proprio of the two previous Popes, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, permitted the use of the Missale Romanun 1962. The aim was to make room for those who were still attached to earlier forms of liturgical celebration. The implication is that the Missale Romanum 1962 is permitted as an extraordinary form of liturgical celebration, while the Missale Romanum 1970 is the ordinary or normal form. Pope Francis, through Traditionis Custodes, abrogated all the norms, instructions, consensus and customs of the previous Motu Proprio. He established the Missale Romanum 1970 as the only lex orandi (prayer order of the Church) of the Roman rite. This decision caused turmoil in the Church,especially strong criticism from users of the Missale Romanum 1962. This Motu Proprio was seen as a regression of the Church and a personal desire to abolish Church Tradition. Is this really the case? Why did Pope Francisabrogate the norms of the previous Motu Proprio? What is different about the 1962 and 1970 Missale Romanum? This article attempts to answer these questions with a liturgical-ecclesiological overview of the reforms of the Second Vatican Council.Key words: Ecclesial communion; liturgical reform; Traditionis Custodes; Summorum Pontificum; MissaleRomanum 1962.
Misteri Buah Ara Dalam Retorika Yeremia 24 Venantius, Supriyono; Ule, Silvester; Kota, Dominggus Mite
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2024
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v23i1.444.59-73

Abstract

This article aims to present an analysis of Jeremiah 24:1-10, with a focus on the text's structure and rhetoric. This research treats Jeremiah 24:1-10 as a cohesive unit, differing from the views of redactional theorists who commonly consider verse 1b in Jeremiah 24:1-10 as a redactional addition. According to them, reading Jeremiah 24 without verse 1b would not significantly impact the understanding of the passage. Verse 1b, mentioning King Jeconiah, the officials of Judah, the artisans, and the smiths, is added as propaganda reflecting Jeconiah’s claims or legitimization and that of his supporters to live and rule in Jerusalem and Judah. In contrast to this perspective, this article views verse 1b as one of the structural and rhetorical elements that demonstrate how the text is organized. This article will identify structural devices such as keyword repetitions and contrasts that can indicate the rhetoric or persuasive techniques employed in the text. The analysis finds that Jeremiah 24:1-10 contains rhetoric of God's mysterious providence, showcasing God's full authority to change or determine the fate of nations or kingdoms that humans sometimes cannot comprehend.  Key words :  rhetoric, providence, mystery, paradox, quality, civilisation
Telaah filosofis tentang keadilan kontributif dan Martabat kerja manusia serta implikasinya bagi Paradigma ekonomi Petrus Tan; Yolinda Yanti Sonbay; Beatrix Yunarti Manehat
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.380.120-142

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to present the limitations of distributive justice theory as a conceptual foundation of the paradigm of the growth and prosperity in economy, and then proposing the idea of contributive justice and the dignity of human work as a new economic paradigm. Why is contributive justice important, and what is its relevance in the discourse of economic paradigm? By using the method of literature study and critical analysis, this article indicates that the idea of contributive justice is essential to overcome the lack of distributive justice. The distributive justice fails to understand that human labour is not only economic. Human labor is not just an instrument for consumption purpose. Human labour is essentially social and cultural. Based on the very idea of contributive justice, human labour is a source of individual self-social esteem, the way of contributing for common good and winning the social recognition from the society. Amid the global economic competition that intensifies the social and economic inequality, contributive justice offers the idea of dignity of human work as a new paradigm of economy. This article concludes that economic efforts in the 21st century, both in the global and in Indonesia, must considerthe dignity and value of human work.Key Words : Distributive justice; contributive justice; economy; the dignity of human work.
Demokrasi dan Kontradiksi-Kontradiksinya, Perspektif Sejarah Filosofis Pierre Rosanvallon Dua, Mikhael
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2024
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v23i1.456.23-41

Abstract

This Article discusses on Pierre Rosanvallon’s conceptual history of democracy both as a method to understand the antinomy and the pathology of democracy and as a reflection of the generality of moral politics. Using a philosophical analysis, it answers the philosophical problem of man’s desire to be recognized as a human being with dignity in democracy into three parts: the first one deals with Rosanvallon’s conceptual history of democracy, the second part delves into the problem of antinomy and pathology of democracy, and the third part focuses of the search for the empirical normativity which is based on the moral generality. The article arrives at the idea that behind the political contradictions in democracy Rosanvallon puts the empirical normativity which is based on social relationship into his conceptual history of democracy as a condition of possibility of political recognition. Keywords: Conceptual History, Democracy, Empirical Normativity, Epikeia, Pathologies, Piere Rosanvallon.
Pembacaan kembali Traditionis Custodes Paus Fransiskus terhadap penggunaan Missale Romanum 1962. Sebuah tinjauan Liturgis-Eklesiologis dalam terang reformasi Konsili Vatikan II Christianus Watu
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.349.220-240

Abstract

Traditionis Custodes is an Apostolic letter issued by Pope Francis in the form of a Motu Proprio, i.e. on his own initiative. The content of this letter is about the use of the Roman Liturgy prior to the Reform of 1970. The main object of focus is the celebration of Mass with the Missale Romanum 1962. The Motu Proprio of the two previous Popes, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, permitted the use of the Missale Romanun 1962. The aim was to make room for those who were still attached to earlier forms of liturgical celebration. The implication is that the Missale Romanum 1962 is permitted as an extraordinary form of liturgical celebration, while the Missale Romanum 1970 is the ordinary or normal form. Pope Francis, through Traditionis Custodes, abrogated all the norms, instructions, consensus and customs of the previous Motu Proprio. He established the Missale Romanum 1970 as the only lex orandi (prayer order of the Church) of the Roman rite. This decision caused turmoil in the Church,especially strong criticism from users of the Missale Romanum 1962. This Motu Proprio was seen as a regression of the Church and a personal desire to abolish Church Tradition. Is this really the case? Why did Pope Francisabrogate the norms of the previous Motu Proprio? What is different about the 1962 and 1970 Missale Romanum? This article attempts to answer these questions with a liturgical-ecclesiological overview of the reforms of the Second Vatican Council.Key words: Ecclesial communion; liturgical reform; Traditionis Custodes; Summorum Pontificum; MissaleRomanum 1962.
Oscar Romero dan John Prior: Model Imam Terlibat Yosef Keladu Koten; Ignas Ledot; Kris Ibu
JURNAL LEDALERO Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023
Publisher : Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31385/jl.v22i2.372.200-219

Abstract

This article aims to introduce two inspiring figures or models of involved priests, namely Oscar Romero and John Prior. Through comparative analysis of qualitative data, it is discovered that there are differences between Romero and John in terms of historical background, context, and methods or forms of involvement. Romero was a priest who later became a bishop and faced the authoritarian government in El Salvador, while Prior was a priest and intellectual who was concerned with the internal realities of the Church in Indonesia. Romero used the method of preaching and prophetic discourse, while John’s method is sharing the Scriptures. Despite these differences, both are two inspirational figures who contextualize their faith in God by being in solidarity with and living with the poor. The suffering experienced by the marginalized has honed the sensitivity to act and the ability to go beyond the boundaries of social partition. They do not confine themselves to a sacred space and stay away from the profane world, but instead merge themselves into the midst of people who are marginalized either by an oppressive regime or by stigmatization. Romero and John are models of involved priests because for them involvement with the marginalized is a form of priestly accountability before God and the people they serve.Key words : involved priest, profile, method, Oscar Romero, John Prior

Page 17 of 19 | Total Record : 188

 15   16   17   18   19 

Filter by Year

2011 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 24, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2025 Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2024 Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2024 Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2023 Vol 22, No 1 (2023): JURNAL LEDALERO EDISI JUNI 2023 Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Desember 2021 Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ledalero Edisi Juni 2021 Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ledalero Vol 18, No 1 (2019) Vol 17, No 2 (2018) Vol 17, No 1 (2018): RADIKALISME Vol 16, No 2 (2017): SAMPAH Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Seratus Tahun Sesudah Perang Dunia Pertama Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Lima Ratus Tahun Reformasi Protestan Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Korupsi Vol 14, No 2 (2015): HIV : Pesawat Tempur Siluman NTT Vol 14, No 1 (2015): Tolak Tipu, Lawan Lupa Vol 13, No 2 (2014): Gerakan Sosial untuk Perubahan Sosial Vol 13, No 1 (2014): MANUSIA MEMPERDAGANGKAN MANUSIA Vol 12, No 1 (2013): Tanggal Hujat , Tempuh Dialog : 50 Tahun Konsili Vatikan II Vol 12, No 2 (2013): AGAMA DAN NEGARA Vol 10, No 2 (2011): RELIGIOSITAS POPULER More Issue