cover
Contact Name
Sufyan
Contact Email
sufyan@pdfaii.org
Phone
+628992932000
Journal Mail Official
sufyan@pdfaii.org
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Djuanda Km 03, RT 001 RW 005 Desa Singaraja Kecamatan Indramayu Kabupaten Indramayu Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. indramayu,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29641470     DOI : https://doi.org/10.58355/lectures.v2i1.17
LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies is a peer-reviewed journal published by Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu. The journal is aimed at spreading the research results conducted by academicians, researchers, and practitioners in the field of Islamic Education. In particular, papers which consider the following general topics are invited: Islamic Education Researcj, Islamic Teaching in Schools, Islamic Learning in Madrasah, Islamic Learning in Islamic Boarding Schools, Learning Islamic Religion in Higher Education, Islamic Education Philoshopy, Curriculum in Islamic Education, Islamic Education Management, Tafsir Tarbawy, Hadith Tarbawy, and Innovation in Islamic Teaching and Learning.
Articles 103 Documents
Applying Interactive, Islamic Methods Enhances Students' Noble Character Understanding Fadillah, M Renaldy; U Abdullah Mu’min; Azizi Abu Bakar; Anisa Aulia; Yusup Maulana
LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Progressive Islamic and Education Studies
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/lectures.v4i4.172

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive learning methods based on Islamic values in improving the understanding of noble character among fifth-grade students at MI Al Hasanah, with a focus on the values of honesty, responsibility, and politeness. Using a qualitative approach with a case study design, data were collected through participatory observation, semi-structured interviews with 20 students and three teachers, and analysis of learning documents. Data triangulation and thematic analysis based on Miles and Huberman (1994) were conducted to ensure validity. The results showed that interactive methods, such as group discussions, inspirational stories, and Quran-based simulations, increased student engagement by 90% and moral understanding scores from 65 to 82. Ninety percent of students demonstrated positive behavioral changes, with a 60% reduction in inter-student conflicts. Teacher training was identified as a key factor in the success of this method. The study concluded that this method is effective in shaping student character, with recommendations for developing instructional guidelines and teacher training for sustainability.
An Appraisal of the Practice and Procedure of Sulh (Settlement out of Court) an Islamic Law Perspective Adamu, Abubakar; Ardo, Hamidu
LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Progressive Islamic and Education Studies
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/lectures.v4i4.180

Abstract

Sulh Meaning Amicable Settlement or Conciliation is a Fundamental Mechanism in Islamic Jurisprudence for Resolving disputes outside formal Court Proceedings rooted in the Principle of Justice and Social Harmony. This Appraisal Examines the Legal framework, historical eviction and contemporary application of Sulh in Islamic Law, it explore how Sulh is Structured in the context of different legal schools and compares it with more than Alternatives Dispute Resolution (ADR) Mechanisms highlighting both the Similarities and the features of Islamic Settlement Processes. In Islamic legal Introduction, Sulh is Permissible in matters of Personals disputes, Property Rights, and even some Criminal cases, provided it does not contravene divine injunctions or Public welfare. The appraisal concluded by evaluating the Potential of Sulh in contemporary legal context, advocating for it integration within modern ADR Practices and Proposing reforms to enhance its applicability Particularly in multi-cultural and Pluralistic societies. This Study also highlights the benefit of Sulh in Preventing relationship and promoting Peace making.   It is an Enduring Modern Dispute Resolution in both Muslim and Non-Muslims Communities.  
Between ʿAql and Naql: Negotiating Reason and Revelation in the Islamic Intellectual Tradition Nazir Ahmad Zargar
LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Progressive Islamic and Education Studies
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/lectures.v4i4.192

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between ʿaql (human reason) and naql (divine revelation) in Islamic intellectual history. After defining these terms, it studies classical perspectives from early rationalists to Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī (874–936 CE) and Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (853–944 CE) theologians on whether apparent conflicts between reason and scripture can arise. Drawing on Qur’anic tafsīr and theological works of scholars like al‑Ghazzālī (1058–1111) and Ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328), the study shows how genuine contradiction is considered impossible (since both reason and revelation originate from One Single God — Allāh ﷻ) but how unusual instances like mu‘jizāt (miracles) and ghāʾib (the unseen) may challenge habitual expectations. Case studies, like the ḥadīth about the fly, the Qur’ān (13:12-13) on lightning and thunder, and Day of Judgment signs like the westward sunrise, illustrate how premodern and contemporary scholars distinguish contrary to reason (logically impossible) from contrary to habit (empirically rare). A comparison between scientific reasoning and daily experiences with scriptural texts is made to show that true reconciliation involves contextual interpretation, recognition of the limits of reason, and assent to divine omnipotence. The paper concludes that in mainstream Sunni thought, reason and revelation are ultimately harmonious: any apparent conflict must be addressed by careful analysis, metaphorical readings, or admission that human knowledge is incomplete.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 103