cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Safnowandi
Contact Email
lp3kamandanu@gmail.com
Phone
+6287865818141
Journal Mail Official
pantherajurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. TGH. Lopan, Griya Rumak Asri, Kediri, Lombok Barat, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83362
Location
Kab. lombok barat,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan
Published by Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian Kamandanu
ISSN : 28083636     EISSN : 2808246X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36312/panthera
Core Subject : Science, Education, Social,
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Education Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Mathematics Physics Social Sciences
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan (P : JIPST), offers an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed, contributed and invited research articles of the highest quality that address different topics of science education with implications for improving and enhancing science education practices and theories. The topics involves biology, chemistry, mathematics, physics, as well as some applications pedagogy and teacher development. The journal provides an invigorating and informative variety of research papers that expand and deepen our theoretical understanding. It also provides practice and policy based implications in the relevant contexts of science education and applied science.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 392 Documents
 36   37   38   39   40 
Analisis Proses Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika pada Soal Cerita melalui Perspektif Model Polya Agusfianuddin Agusfianuddin; Ahmad Muzaki; I Ketut Sukarma; Ria Saputri
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): July (In Progress)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian Kamandanu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/panthera.v6i3.1725

Abstract

Solving word problems serves as an indicator of prospective mathematics teachers' critical thinking skills, specifically their ability to link contextual representations with mathematical models. However, in reality, many prospective mathematics teachers are not yet accustomed to using problem-solving models, such as Polya’s model. This study aims to analyze the problem-solving processes of prospective mathematics teachers when solving word problems, viewed through the lens of Polya’s model. Polya’s model comprises four stages: understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back (reviewing the results). This is a qualitative descriptive study employing a case study design. The subjects consisted of 60 students from the Mathematics Education Study Program at Mandalika University of Education, drawn from various semesters. Purposive sampling was used to select participants based on high, medium, and low ability categories. Data collection involved source triangulation using tests, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation in the form of teaching practice videos. Subsequently, the data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. The results indicate that while students could identify the given information and the questions asked, they tended not to write them down. Students demonstrated competence in the "carrying out the plan" stage but showed weaknesses in the "devising a plan" and "looking back" stages. These findings highlight the need to strengthen conceptual understanding, systematic thinking skills, metacognitive abilities, and the capacity to solve non-routine problems, as well as to provide training in reflective thinking, so that prospective teachers can apply Polya’s model more comprehensively in mathematical problem-solving. The study's findings are expected to serve as a basis for reflection for educators and prospective educators regarding the importance of incorporating problem-solving model procedures into the learning process.
Efektivitas Blended Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Sains: Systematic Literature Review I Wayan Karmana
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): July (In Progress)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian Kamandanu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/panthera.v6i3.1880

Abstract

Blended learning is a learning model that integrates face-to-face learning with online learning to create a more flexible, interactive, and student-centered learning experience. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of blended learning on science learning outcomes through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. The study was carried out by referring to the PRISMA guidelines through the stages of identification, screening, feasibility assessment, and inclusion. Literature searches were conducted on Scopus, ScienceDirect, ERIC, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink databases with a publication range of 2019–2025. Based on the selection process, as many as 19 articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using narrative synthesis. The results showed that 84.2% of studies reported that blended learning significantly improved science learning outcomes compared to conventional learning, while 15.8% of studies found no significant difference despite showing an increase in student motivation, engagement, and learning satisfaction. In addition to improving cognitive learning outcomes, blended learning also contributes to improving critical thinking skills, problem solving, science literacy, science process skills, and learning independence. The effectiveness of the implementation of blended learning is influenced by the quality of learning design, teacher competence, student readiness, and technological infrastructure support. These findings show that blended learning is an effective learning strategy to improve the quality of science learning at various levels of education, with the record that its implementation is supported by systematic planning and optimal use of technology.

Page 40 of 40 | Total Record : 392

 36   37   38   39   40 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): July (In Progress) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): April Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): October Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): July Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): April Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): January Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): October Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): July Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): April Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): October Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): July Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): April Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): January Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): October Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): July Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): April Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): January Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): October More Issue