cover
Contact Name
lfina Wildatul Fitriyah
Contact Email
garuda@apji.org
Phone
+6285726173515
Journal Mail Official
stisnq.jember17@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Imam Sukarto No.60, Krajan, Balet Baru, Kec. Sukowono, Kabupaten Jember, Jawa Timur 68194
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
ISSN : 2962889X     EISSN : 29628903     DOI : 10.59246
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Jurnal ini adalah jurnal studi ilmu-ilmu Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora yang bersifat peer-review dan terbuka. Bidang penelitian dalam jurnal ini termasuk ilmu politik, sosial ,hukum, dan humaniora. Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Articles 295 Documents
Relevansi Pendekatan Mazhab dalam Hukum Islam Kontemporer: Tinjauan Literatur Hilma Aisya; Wildan Fikri Ansyah; Novilda Fitriningrum; Ummi Habibah; Siyono
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1745

Abstract

This article examines the relevance of the madhhab approach in shaping contemporary Islamic law through a comprehensive literature review. Rapid developments in modern social, economic, and technological contexts require more adaptive legal methodologies, while the classical madhhabs remain essential for providing structured usul al-fiqh principles and methodological foundations. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which madhhabs still function as a methodological basis, how they interact with modern forms of ijtihad, and how contemporary scholars integrate classical heritage with present-day demands. Using a descriptive–thematic literature review method, data were collected from accredited journals, scholarly books, and contemporary fatwas. The findings indicate that the madhhab tradition remains relevant when interpreted dynamically and aligned with the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah). Madhhabs continue to serve as analytical frameworks that can be combined with modern ijtihad, collective reasoning, and interdisciplinary approaches to address emerging issues such as digital finance, bioethics, and technological advancements. However, the study also identifies inherent historical limitations within the madhhab system, which necessitate methodological renewal to maintain practical relevance in contemporary legal challenges. Overall, the article highlights the importance of harmonizing classical tradition with contextual approaches as a foundation for developing modern Islamic legal epistemology.
Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Putusan No. 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.JKT.PST Aurora, Aretha
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1746

Abstract

Corruption is classified as an extraordinary crime that causes extensive harm to state finances and public welfare, particularly when committed during national emergencies. This study analyzes the application of the principle of proportionality in sentencing corruption offenders through Decision Number 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.JKT.PST concerning the corruption of Covid-19 social assistance funds involving the former Minister of Social Affairs, Juliari Batubara. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this article examines whether the imposed sentence reflects the seriousness of the offense, the scale of state losses, and the extraordinary circumstances of a national disaster. The analysis reveals that the court failed to optimally apply the principle of proportionality by not considering Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Anti-Corruption Law, which allows aggravated punishment in specific conditions. This study contributes to the development of proportionality-based sentencing discourse and emphasizes the need for stronger judicial reasoning to ensure substantive justice and deterrence in corruption cases with significant social impact.
Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Judicial Review terhadap Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Rafli Akbar Rabbani; Riva Nurkania; Soraya Salimah; Utang Rosidin
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1747

Abstract

The Constitutional Court (CC) was established following the amendments to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and holds a strategic role in upholding constitutional supremacy through its authority of judicial review. Although CC decisions are final and binding, their implementation often encounters political resistance, legislative delays, and weak institutional commitment, which may undermine legal certainty and constitutional governance. This study employs a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and library research, focusing on selected Constitutional Court decisions and their follow-up mechanisms. The findings show that the effectiveness of CC rulings is not solely determined by their juridical force, but largely depends on the responsiveness and synergy of legislative and executive institutions. Inconsistent implementation of CC decisions has led to regulatory gaps and uncertainty within the legal system. Therefore, strengthening institutional commitment and harmonizing judicial and legislative functions are essential to reinforce legal certainty, justice, and constitutional democracy in Indonesia.
Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Hak atas Lingkungan Hidup yang Baik dalam Kasus Pencemaran Lintas Batas: Telaah terhadap Prinsip Kedaulatan Negara Rena Zulfaidah; Utang Rosidin
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1748

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional review of the right to a good and healthy environment as guaranteed under Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia in the context of transboundary environmental pollution, with a focus on the interpretation of state sovereignty. Transboundary pollution raises serious legal challenges due to the limitations of national jurisdiction in protecting citizens’ constitutional rights from environmental harm originating outside state territory. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches by analyzing the 1945 Constitution, environmental legislation, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The findings indicate that a narrow and territorial interpretation of state sovereignty may undermine the effective protection of environmental rights. Therefore, the Constitutional Court is encouraged to adopt a progressive constitutional interpretation that reconceptualizes sovereignty as a protective constitutional obligation (state obligation) encompassing transnational dimensions, in order to ensure the effective fulfillment of citizens’ environmental rights.
Kepastian Hukum Ikrar dan Akta Wakaf Bawah Tangan untuk Legalisasi Wakaf melalui Program Lintas Sektor di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sukabumi Yogi Septio Adi Nugroho; Ani Yumarni; Sudiman Sihotang
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1761

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of informal waqf pledges and deeds, as well as the effectiveness of the Cross-Sector Program (LINTOR) in the legalization of waqf land in Sukabumi Regency. The research employs an empirical juridical method with statutory and sociological approaches, using document analysis, field observations, and interviews with the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA), the Land Office, and related stakeholders. The findings indicate that underhand waqf practices do not comply with Law Number 41 of 2004 on Waqf, thereby weakening legal evidentiary power and obstructing the waqf land certification process. Although the LINTOR Program conceptually facilitates the acceleration of waqf land registration, its implementation remains constrained by administrative deficiencies, weak inter-institutional coordination, and low public legal awareness. This study emphasizes the need to strengthen the role of KUA as Waqf Pledge Deed Officials, reinforce cross-sector technical regulations, and enhance legal literacy to ensure legal certainty in waqf land management.
Islam, Negara, dan Hak Konstitusional: Analisis terhadap Kebebasan Beragama dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan UUD 1945 Moh Alvin Kamal; Yusriansyah Yusriansyah; Muh Fadly Multazam; Kurniati Kurniati
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1773

Abstract

Freedom of religion is a fundamental right guaranteed in Islamic teachings as well as within the Indonesian constitutional framework. However, the practical implementation of this freedom has not fully aligned with the constitutional provisions that regulate it. Various events, including the restriction of worship facilities, discriminatory policies toward religious minorities, and the enforcement of blasphemy regulations, indicate a significant gap between constitutional norms and societal practices. This issue is relevant considering that religion in Indonesia is not only a sociological9 identity but also plays a normative role in the state system. This research aims to examine religious freedom from Islamic legal perspectives and analyze constitutional protection within the 1945 Constitution, while identifying points of harmonization between the two frameworks. A normative legal methodology using comparative analysis between Islamic jurisprudence and constitutional law was applied. Findings reveal that both Islam and the Indonesian Constitution recognize religious freedom while placing limits for public order, equality, and communal well-being. The Qur’anic principle la ikraha fid-din aligns with Article 28E and Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution, although implementation varies based on political and social context. This research recommends strengthening moderate Islamic interpretation and constitutional practice to ensure equal protection for all religious groups.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Elok Ainur Rohmah; Hilwiyatun Nadiroh
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1777

Abstract

This study examines the harmonization between the Child Protection Act and Law Number 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS) in strengthening legal protection for child victims of sexual violence in Indonesia. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes the shift in the legal paradigm from a perpetrator-oriented retributive model toward a victim-centered restorative justice approach. The findings indicate that the integration of these regulations enhances legal certainty through the expansion of valid evidence, including electronic evidence and expert testimony, as well as the recognition of restitution as an enforceable right of victims. The introduction of the victim fund mechanism further ensures the fulfillment of victims’ material and psychological recovery when perpetrators are unable to provide restitution. This study concludes that regulatory synchronization significantly improves procedural protection and reinforces the state’s responsibility in safeguarding the best interests of child victims.
Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak menurut Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Yunita Febriana
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1786

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis konsep dan kedudukan diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan perspektif teori perlindungan anak Eglantyne Jebb. Fokus kajian diarahkan pada fungsi diversi sebagai instrumen keadilan restoratif yang menyeimbangkan kepentingan penegakan hukum, perlindungan hak anak, dan pemulihan korban. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif diversi telah dirancang sebagai mekanisme wajib untuk menghindarkan anak dari dampak negatif proses peradilan formal, namun implementasinya masih menghadapi hambatan berupa perbedaan persepsi aparat penegak hukum, resistensi korban, dan budaya hukum yang retributif. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penegasan diversi sebagai elemen fundamental sistem peradilan pidana anak yang tidak hanya bersifat prosedural, tetapi juga mencerminkan perubahan paradigma hukum pidana anak menuju pendekatan yang humanis dan berorientasi pada kepentingan terbaik anak.
Tiktok sebagai Sumber Informasi Politik dan Dampaknya terhadap Partisipasi Politik Generasi Z dalam Musyawarah Desa: Studi Kasus Desa Kincang Kecamatan Rakit Kabupaten Banjarnegara Ibnu Kowimudin; Supartinah
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1791

Abstract

The development of social media has transformed patterns of political communication and participation, including at the village level. This study aims to analyze the role of TikTok as a source of political information and its impact on Generation Z’s political participation in the Village Deliberation Forum in Kincang Village, Banjarnegara Regency, which remains dominated by older age groups. This research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design, using in-depth interviews, observation of village deliberations, and documentation. Data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model. The findings indicate that TikTok serves as an initial gateway to political literacy for Generation Z through visual and easily accessible content, thereby increasing political awareness and political efficacy. However, the brief nature of TikTok content may lead to partial understanding, making the Village Deliberation Forum a crucial space for clarification and contextual learning. This study highlights the integration of digital public spaces and formal deliberative institutions as a novel contribution to strengthening youth political participation at the village level.
Analisis Model Pendidikan Politik Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI) dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Politik Kaum Muda di Kabupaten Wonosobo Sahrul Said; Dwian Akta Padma Eldo
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1795

Abstract

Political education is a strategic function of political parties in enhancing the quality of civic participation, particularly among young people. This study aims to analyze the political education model implemented by the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI) in Wonosobo Regency and to assess its effectiveness in promoting youth political participation. The research employs a qualitative case study approach using in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis. The findings reveal that PSI has developed a participatory and contextual political education model by integrating offline and online strategies and positioning party cadres as key educational actors. This model contributes to improved political understanding, attitudinal change, and the early emergence of youth political participation, although it remains constrained by digital literacy gaps and limited cadre capacity. The study highlights the importance of sustainable and adaptive party-based political education in strengthening local democracy.