cover
Contact Name
Hasan
Contact Email
journal.annafis@gmail.com
Phone
+6281346536600
Journal Mail Official
journal.annafis@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Komplek Islamic Center Maburai, Murung Pudak, Tabalong Regency, South Kalimantan 71571
Location
Kab. tabalong,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
An-Nafis: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28294122     DOI : 10.62196
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
AN-NAFIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan encompasses research papers from researchers, academics, and practitioners. In particular, papers which consider the following general topics are invited: Teaching and Learning in Islamic Education English Language Teaching in The Islamic Context Arabic Language Teaching Curriculum Development Material Development
Articles 62 Documents
Qur'anic Interpretation and the Formation of Wasatiyyah Discourse in Contemporary Indonesia Fakhrie Hanief; Anwar Hafidzi
An-Nafis: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Published in April of 2026
Publisher : STIT Syekh Muhammad Nafis Tabalong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing religious polarization in Indonesia has triggered urgent debates about how moderate Islamic identity can be maintained in a diverse society. Within this context, the concept of wasatiyyah (moderation) has become a central theological and policy framework, yet most existing scholarship treats it as a static doctrinal category rather than a dynamically constructed discourse. This study addresses this gap by examining how Qur'anic interpretation actively shapes the formation of wasatiyyah discourse in contemporary Indonesia. The research aims to analyze the interpretive mechanisms through which Qur'anic verses related to moderation are mobilized by Indonesian scholars and religious institutions to construct inclusive religious narratives aligned with national policy agendas. Employing a qualitative methodology that integrates textual analysis of key Qur'anic verses (including ummatan wasatan, anti-ghuluw, and justice-related passages) with discourse analysis of interpretive frameworks from major Indonesian religious institutions, this study reveals three principal findings: first, wasatiyyah emerges as a polysemic concept negotiated through diverse interpretive strategies emphasizing balance, justice, tolerance, and social harmony; second, contemporary Indonesian tafsir increasingly adopts maqasid-oriented and contextual approaches that transform wasatiyyah from theological principle into policy-relevant discourse; and third, institutional actors such as Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, and the Ministry of Religious Affairs play decisive roles in mediating interpretive authority. The study concludes that understanding wasatiyyah as a discursive construct rather than fixed doctrine offers more productive pathways for strengthening religious moderation initiatives, and recommends greater attention to interpretive pluralism and contextual hermeneutics in moderation policy frameworks.
Dualisme Penetapan Itsbat Nikah atas Pernikahan Non-Muslim Pasca Konversi Agama di Pengadilan Agama Mulyadi; Gusti Muzainah; Amelia Rahmaniah
An-Nafis: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Published in April of 2026
Publisher : STIT Syekh Muhammad Nafis Tabalong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62196/nfs.v5i1.141

Abstract

This study examines the dualism in the determination of itsbat nikah (marriage legalization) for non-Muslim marriages following religious conversion at Religious Courts in Indonesia. Using normative-juridical research through case study analysis of Decision Number 25/Pdt.P/2023/PA.Mtw at the Muara Teweh Religious Court, this research investigates how judges reconcile the validity of marriages originally conducted under non-Islamic religious traditions when both spouses subsequently convert to Islam simultaneously. The findings reveal that judges apply classical Islamic jurisprudential principles, particularly the ijma of scholars documented in Bidayatul Mujtahid, which affirms that marriages conducted before conversion to Islam remain valid when both partners embrace Islam together, without requiring a new marriage contract. The court's legal reasoning demonstrates harmonization between the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974 and Article 7 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), alongside substantive Islamic jurisprudential principles. This research contributes to understanding legal pluralism in Indonesian family law, particularly regarding the intersection of customary religious practices, Islamic jurisprudence, and state administrative requirements. The study recommends clearer regulatory guidelines to address similar cases involving converts (muallaf) and reduce legal uncertainty, thereby ensuring the protection of family rights.