cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Reza Muamar Zaki
Contact Email
info@polteksci.ac.id
Phone
+6287743788687
Journal Mail Official
support@jolastic.id
Editorial Address
Desa Penambangan, Sedong, Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Law and Social Politics
Published by Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional
ISSN : 29886740     EISSN : 29886740     DOI : 10.59261
Core Subject : Humanities, Science, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences
The Journal Of Law and Social Politic provides a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal that can be examined empirically. The Journal Of Law and Social Politic will publish scientific articles in the fields of education, including education, economics, history education, geography education, Pancasila and citizenship education and other fields of social science education that have not been listed. Published articles are articles from critical and comprehensive research, scientific studies or studies on important and current issues, or reviews of scientific books.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (semua kategori) - Ilmu Pengambilan Keputusan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 97 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
The Influence of Political Ideology on Legal Decision-Making Hermawan, Asep
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.56

Abstract

The intersection of political ideology and judicial decision-making has been a subject of extensive debate in legal and political scholarship. Courts, especially in common law jurisdictions, are often viewed as impartial arbiters of justice. However, empirical research suggests that judges' ideological leanings influence their rulings, particularly in politically charged cases. This study aims to explore the extent to which political ideology shapes judicial reasoning and decision-making processes. Utilizing a qualitative approach, this research analyzes judicial opinions, legal commentaries, and case law from high courts in various jurisdictions. A comparative analysis of rulings on constitutional rights, administrative law, and social justice issues is conducted to identify patterns linked to ideological stances. The findings indicate that conservative-leaning judges are more likely to favor restrictive interpretations of statutes and constitutional provisions, whereas liberal-leaning judges tend to adopt an expansive approach, particularly on civil rights and regulatory matters. Additionally, the study highlights how external political pressures and institutional structures mediate these ideological influences. The study concludes that while judicial decision-making is framed within legal principles, political ideology remains an underlying factor shaping legal interpretations. Recognizing these influences can inform judicial selection processes and foster transparency in legal reasoning. This research contributes to legal scholarship by providing a nuanced understanding of the ideological dimensions of judicial behavior, emphasizing the need for judicial accountability and impartiality in upholding the rule of law.
The Role of Courts in Addressing Social Inequality Dikrurahman, Diki
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.57

Abstract

Social inequality remains a persistent global issue, manifesting in various forms such as economic disparity, racial discrimination, gender bias, and unequal access to justice. The judiciary plays a crucial role in mitigating these inequalities by interpreting and enforcing laws that promote social justice. This study aims to examine the extent to which courts influence social equity through landmark rulings, judicial activism, and policy enforcement. This research employed a qualitative approach, utilizing doctrinal legal analysis and case study methodology to assess key judicial decisions from different jurisdictions over the past five years. By analyzing court rulings, legislative interpretations, and the impact of judicial decisions on marginalized communities, this study explores the effectiveness of courts in addressing systemic disparities. The findings indicate that courts have played a pivotal role in advancing social justice, particularly in areas such as civil rights, labor law, and environmental justice. However, limitations exist due to political influences, institutional constraints, and inconsistent enforcement mechanisms. The study also highlights the necessity for a more proactive judicial approach and collaborative governance to ensure sustainable social change. In conclusion, while courts serve as essential instruments for promoting equality, their effectiveness depends on broader systemic support, including legal frameworks, public policy, and civic engagement. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on judicial intervention in social justice by providing insights into best practices and challenges in leveraging the legal system for equitable reform.
The Relationship Between Law and Public Policy in Social Development Sutrisno, Endang
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.58

Abstract

Law and public policy play a fundamental role in shaping social development by providing the legal framework and governance mechanisms that regulate economic, political, and social interactions. In modern democracies, the relationship between law and public policy is crucial in addressing societal challenges such as inequality, economic growth, and human rights protection. However, discrepancies between legal frameworks and public policies can hinder effective governance and social progress. This research examines how law influences public policy formulation and implementation in the context of social development, identifying key challenges and proposing strategies for enhancing legal and policy coherence. This study employed a qualitative research approach, utilizing a comparative analysis of legal frameworks, policy-making processes, and case studies from various jurisdictions. Data is collected from legal documents, government policies, scholarly articles, and expert opinions. The findings revealed that effective social development requires a strong alignment between legal frameworks and public policy goals. Legal rigidity, political interference, and inconsistent enforcement mechanisms often create barriers to successful policy implementation. On the other hand, well-integrated legal and policy mechanisms contribute to improved governance, economic stability, and social welfare. This research concludes that strengthening the synergy between law and public policy through transparent legal processes, institutional reforms, and inclusive policy making can enhance social development outcomes. The findings contribute to academic discussions on governance, law, and social progress, offering valuable insights for policymakers and legal scholars
Social Justice and Human Rights: A Legal Perspective Setiawan , Andri Herman; Sunandar, Firman Nurdiansyah; Fajar, Ahmad
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.59

Abstract

Social justice and human rights are fundamental principles that shape the legal and political frameworks of modern societies. This study explores the legal dimensions of social justice and human rights by examining their conceptual foundations, international legal instruments, and practical implications in national legal systems. The research delves into the interplay between human rights law and social justice theories, highlighting the role of legal institutions in promoting equality, non-discrimination, and access to justice. Furthermore, it analyzes contemporary challenges such as economic disparities, marginalized communities, and state obligations under international human rights treaties. Through a doctrinal legal approach, this study reviews relevant legal frameworks, case law, and scholarly debates to provide a comprehensive understanding of how social justice is realized through the law. The findings underscore the necessity of a rights-based legal framework to address structural inequalities and ensure the protection of fundamental freedoms for all individuals. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on legal mechanisms that enhance social justice within the broader context of human rights law.
Judicial Independence and Political Influence in Modern Democracies Fathya, Adinda Zahra; Santika, Rani
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.60

Abstract

This research examines contemporary human rights violations and evaluates the effectiveness of international legal mechanisms in addressing these issues. Using a qualitative approach, it employs doctrinal legal analysis and case studies to assess the role of international courts, tribunals, and human rights organizations. Key legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute, are analyzed to understand their impact on prosecuting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Reports from the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and regional human rights bodies highlight enforcement challenges, such as political constraints, jurisdictional limitations, and state non-cooperation. Case studies on Ukraine, Myanmar, Ethiopia, and Venezuela illustrate both the successes and shortcomings of international legal interventions. Strengthening global accountability requires enhanced cooperation, judicial independence, and more effective sanction mechanisms. The study also explores judicial independence as a fundamental pillar of democracy, assessing the extent of political influence on judicial autonomy. Through content analysis of judicial reforms and constitutional changes in democratic nations, the research identifies key patterns of political interference, including judicial appointments, budgetary control, and legislative restrictions on judicial review. While judicial independence upholds constitutional integrity and civil liberties, political interference can erode democratic institutions. The study concludes that safeguarding judicial autonomy necessitates strong legal frameworks, institutional transparency, and active civil society participation. These findings contribute to legal and political discourse, offering policy recommendations to enhance judicial resilience and democratic governance.
Constitutional Law and Social Change: A Global Perspective Suratno, Ujang
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.61

Abstract

Constitutional law shapes social change, influencing governance, human rights, and democratic resilience across diverse political and cultural contexts. As societies evolve, constitutional frameworks must adapt to emerging challenges, including populism, digital transformation, and global crises such as pandemics and climate change. This study explores the dynamic relationship between constitutional law and social change from a global perspective, examining how legal frameworks respond to and shape societal transformations. The research aims to analyze key constitutional developments worldwide, focusing on constitutional amendments, judicial interpretations, and landmark decisions that reflect societal shifts. Using a qualitative approach, this study synthesizes legal analyses, case studies, and comparative constitutional research to identify patterns in constitutional adaptation across different legal systems. The findings reveal that constitutional law serves as both a catalyst for progressive change and a tool for maintaining stability. While some jurisdictions leverage constitutional mechanisms to advance human rights and democracy, others experience constitutional regression through legalistic autocracy. The study highlights the crucial role of judicial independence, civic engagement, and international legal frameworks in sustaining constitutional resilience amid shifting social dynamics. The research concludes that constitutional law is an evolving instrument that both reflects and influences societal change. By examining global case studies, this study contributes to the discourse on constitutional adaptability, offering insights for policymakers, legal scholars, and human rights advocates on fostering democratic resilience through legal frameworks.
The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance Rifa’i, Iman Jalaludin; Abdullah, Abdullah
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.62

Abstract

Democratic governance is fundamentally upheld by the rule of law, which ensures transparency, accountability, and citizen participation. However, in many jurisdictions, weak legal frameworks, judicial inefficiencies, and political interference hinder the effectiveness of democratic institutions. Strengthening the legal framework is crucial for sustaining democracy and preventing authoritarian tendencies. This research analyzes the role of law in reinforcing democratic governance by examining legal principles, institutional mechanisms, and case studies from various democratic nations. It identifies key legal elements that contribute to a stable and effective democracy. This research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing doctrinal legal analysis and comparative case studies. Legal documents, judicial decisions, and governance reports are analyzed to assess the impact of legal frameworks on democratic governance. The findings indicate that robust legal systems, independent judiciaries, and strong constitutional safeguards are pivotal in promoting democratic governance. Countries with well-established legal protections for civil liberties and checks on executive power tend to exhibit greater political stability and public trust. Conversely, weak legal systems often correlate with corruption, electoral fraud, and democratic backsliding. Strengthening the rule of law is essential for sustaining democracy. A well-functioning legal system safeguards human rights, ensures governmental accountability, and enhances public participation in governance. This research contributes to legal and political scholarship by providing a framework for assessing the effectiveness of legal systems in democratic governance. It offers insights for policymakers and legal scholars on how legal reforms can strengthen democratic institutions globally.
The Impact of Legal Reforms on Social Equity Sudrajat, Arip Rahman; Urbaningrum, Rexy Nakula
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.63

Abstract

Legal reforms play a critical role in shaping social equity by influencing access to justice, economic opportunities, and human rights protections. Historically, legal systems have both reinforced and dismantled systemic inequalities, depending on the nature and implementation of reforms. This study aims to analyze the impact of legal reforms on social equity, specifically focusing on how legislative changes affect marginalized communities. The research adopts a qualitative approach, employing a systematic literature review and comparative case studies from various jurisdictions to examine the effectiveness of legal reforms in reducing social disparities. The findings reveal that legal reforms have contributed to greater social equity in areas such as anti-discrimination policies, labor rights, and criminal justice. However, disparities persist due to inconsistent enforcement, socio-political resistance, and economic barriers. The study highlights that successful legal reforms integrate participatory governance, public accountability, and equitable enforcement mechanisms. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, particularly in ensuring that reforms are effectively implemented and do not inadvertently exacerbate existing inequalities. In conclusion, legal reforms serve as a crucial mechanism for fostering social equity, but their success depends on robust institutional frameworks and active civic engagement. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on law and social justice by providing insights into best practices for designing and implementing legal reforms that promote equitable outcomes. Future research should explore the long-term socio-economic effects of legal reforms across different legal traditions.
Legal Responsibility of Digital Platform Companies for Protecting Shareholder Losses in The Era Siregar, Boni; Sihotang, Lesson; Nababan, Roida
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i2.64

Abstract

The era of e-commerce has presented a great opportunity for digital platform companies to expand financial services, including stock investment. However, the complexity of technology and business models often poses risks for investors. This article aims to analyze the legal responsibilities of digital platform companies in protecting stock investors in the era of e-commerce. This research uses a normative method with a legislative approach and case studies. The results show that the protection of stock investors is highly dependent on adaptive regulation and the implementation of strict legal responsibilities by digital platforms. It is recommended that companies improve transparency, technology security, and user education to strengthen investor confidence. What is the legal responsibility of digital platform companies in protecting stock investors from legal and technological risks in the e-commerce era? And what are the regulatory efforts in Indonesia able to ensure legal protection for stock investors who use digital platforms, and what steps need to be taken to overcome the regulatory loophole?
Protection of Women's Rights in Polygamy in Indonesia Puput Putri Utami; Asep Saepullah; Akhmad Shodikin
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v1i1.2

Abstract

With the existence of the principle of monogamy adhered to by Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, polygamy in Indonesia is only permitted during an emergency and if the requirements stipulated by the Law are fulfilled. However, the practice of polygamy that occurs in society is much wider and more diverse, including in the Cirebon Religious Court. One of them is case Number 910/Pdt.G/2019/PA.CN. The Petitioner was granted by the Religious Court to practice polygamy, even though the Respondent (first wife) was still able to carry out her obligations properly, had no disease or disability, and was able to give birth to offspring. According to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, the application must be rejected. The research method used in this study is qualitative with a descriptive-analytical approach. This research uses a type of normative legal research, namely doctrinal legal research or library research because this research is only aimed at written regulations. The results of the study show that the judge considers social justice with the consent of the first wife to be a legal consideration in granting the application for a polygamy permit as an effort to protect women's rights and in terms of civil order the Panel of Judges guarantees heirs and certainty of joint assets to save the rights of the first wife. The judge decided on a polygamy permit Number 910/Pdt.G/2019/PA.CN. granted through his suspicions and beliefs when exploring a case that was preceded by proof. By considering the benefits and harms that will arise from this polygamy and referring to the consent of the first wife, the application for a polygamy permit is appropriate to be granted even though the facultative conditions are not met in case Number 910/Pdt.G/2019/PA.CN.

Page 5 of 10 | Total Record : 97

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Law and Social Politics