cover
Contact Name
Joni Laksito
Contact Email
info@lpkd.or.id
Phone
+6285726173515
Journal Mail Official
info@lpkd.or.id
Editorial Address
Perum. Bumi Pucanggading, Jln. Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Kelurahan Batursari, Mranggen , Kab. Demak, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
ISSN : 30466180     EISSN : 30465648     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen. Jurnal ini adalah Jurnal ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara yang bersifat peer-review dan terbuka. Bidang kajian dalam jurnal ini termasuk sub rumpun Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara menerima artikel dalam bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia dan diterbitkan 4 kali setahun: Maret, Juni, September dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 201 Documents
Studi Yuridis Tentang Kewenangan Dokter Anestesi dalam Penetapan Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) pada Operasi Risiko Tinggi I Komang Agus Tri Wismantara; Aris Prio Agus Santoso; Rina Arum Prastyanti
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3136

Abstract

Bioethical and legal dilemmas arise when a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) status is applied within the context of high-risk surgery, where anesthesia inherently depresses vital functions in a manner mimicking cardiac arrest. This study aims to analyze the juridical basis of the anesthesiologist's authority in determining or suspending DNR status in the operating room, as well as its legal implications for medical liability and patient autonomy. This study employs a normative juridical research method utilizing a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Secondary data sources are derived from legislation regarding medical practice, health laws, and medical ethics literature. The findings indicate that the anesthesiologist's authority regarding DNR in high-risk surgeries is not absolute but is contingent upon the principle of required reconsideration. Juridically, anesthesiologists possess discretionary authority to perform limited resuscitation if cardiac arrest is induced by the anesthetic procedure (iatrogenic) rather than the natural progression of a terminal illness, to prevent malpractice and wrongful death claims. However, the absence of specific regulations governing "Intraoperative DNR" in Indonesia creates a legal vacuum that may lead to medical disputes. Consequently, explicit regulations regarding perioperative DNR re-evaluation protocols are necessary to ensure legal certainty for medical practitioners while upholding patient rights.
Rekonstruksi Hak Akses Advokat terhadap Berkas Perkara dalam Kuhap 2025 Berbasis Teori Dua Kaki Keadilan Arifin Andiwewang; Ibrahim Ahmad; Robby W. Amu
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3138

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of improving the professionalism of Satbrimob in riot control so that its actions remain firm, legal, proportional, accountable, and respectful of human rights. The objectives of this study are to analyze the regulations and existing conditions of the riot control capabilities of Satbrimob personnel, identify factors that hinder professionalism, and formulate an ideal and implementable capability development strategy.The type of research used is empirical juridical research with a socio-legal research approach, conducted through library research, interviews, limited observation, and normative-qualitative analysis.The results of the study indicate that the legal basis and standard operating procedures for riot control are relatively strong; however, their implementation has not been optimal due to the gap between regulations and field practices. The main obstacles include legal, institutional, human resource, infrastructure, and organizational culture aspects.The required strategies include realistic scenario-based training, strengthening field leadership, modernizing non-lethal equipment, improving tactical communication, and conducting continuous evaluation. This study recommends that Satbrimob strengthen human rights-based training, emotional control, cross-functional coordination, and a humanistic organizational culture so that riot control can be carried out professionally and gain public trust.
Analisis Yuridis Wanprestasi Pembayaran Iuran Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional oleh Badan Usaha: Studi Kasus Kantor BPJS Kesehatan Cabang Singaraja Andres Avelino Johan Simatupang
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3144

Abstract

The participation of business entities in the National Health Insurance (JKN) program is a constitutional obligation that is explicitly regulated in Indonesia's social security system regulations. However, in its implementation, the phenomenon of default in the form of non-compliance with premium payments by business entities remains a significant obstacle that hinders the optimization of health services. This study aims to analyze the factors causing default on BPJS Kesehatan premium payments by business entities in the Singaraja Branch Office's working area and to examine the legal remedies pursued from a business law perspective. The research method used is empirical legal research with a sociological juridical approach. The results of the study show that corporate economic factors, low legal awareness among employers, and internal administrative constraints are the main triggers of default. Resolution efforts are carried out through administrative approaches, persuasive mediation through the REHAB Program, and legal enforcement through litigation and non-litigation involving State Attorneys from the Buleleng District Attorney's Office. This collaborative step is essential to ensure that workers' constitutional rights to health insurance are fulfilled amid the challenges of local business dynamics.  
Nusyuz dalam Fiqh dan Praktik Modern Husnul Furqon; Heri Firmansyah
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3148

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of nusyuz from a classical Islamic jurisprudence perspective and its relevance in modern legal practice, against the backdrop of tensions between patriarchal understandings of Islamic jurisprudence and the values ​​of equality and justice. This study employed a normative legal method (library research) with a juridical-normative and conceptual approach, and analyzed qualitatively through content analysis and the maqasid al-sharia approach. The results indicate that the concept of nusyuz in classical Islamic jurisprudence is primarily directed toward wives, based on Surah An-Nisa', verse 34, while the concept of nusyuz for husbands, in Surah An-Nisa', verse 128, is less developed proportionally. In modern legal practice in Indonesia, this concept is still used in the Compilation of Islamic Law and religious courts, but has shifted toward a more contextual and equitable approach. Therefore, a reconstruction of the understanding of nusyuz is necessary to align it with the principles of justice and equality, so that it is no longer understood as a form of domination, but rather as a violation of shared commitments within the household that can be committed by both parties.
Kebijakan Kriminal terhadap Korporasi dalam Perspektif UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Indonesia Bambang Agus Pariyono; Suci Ramadani; Sumarno Sumarno; Alfonso Pahala Manihuruk; Doni Sabdan Tanjung
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3152

Abstract

This study is motivated by the increasing complexity of corporate crime, which necessitates the reform of criminal law policy in Indonesia, particularly through Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code. The research questions focus on how criminal policy toward corporations is formulated under the new Criminal Code and how effective its implementation is in addressing corporate crime. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by a literature review of primary and secondary legal sources published within the last five years.The findings indicate that the 2023 Criminal Code formally recognizes corporations as subjects of criminal law and adopts a flexible liability framework through a combination of identification theory, vicarious liability, and strict liability, while also providing a broader range of sanctions. However, the effectiveness of this policy remains constrained by challenges in proving corporate fault, potential sentencing disparities, and limited institutional capacity of law enforcement agencies.This study recommends the development of clear technical guidelines for corporate criminal liability, strengthening institutional capacity, and integrating penal and non-penal approaches through the implementation of good corporate governance principles.
Analysis of the Role of Internet of Things in Supporting Social Innovation and Digital Equity: A Multidisciplinary Approach in Digital Society Fithriawan Nugroho; Dimas Ridho Aldiansyah; Aidil Adhan
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3168

Abstract

The development of digital society has driven the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technology as a solution to address various social problems. This study aims to analyze the role of IoT in supporting social innovation and to identify the challenges that affect its implementation effectiveness within the context of digital equity. The research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review and thematic analysis of scientific sources published over the past ten years. This study also adopts a multidisciplinary approach that integrates technological, social, and policy perspectives to obtain a comprehensive understanding. The findings indicate that IoT plays a significant role in enhancing the quality of social innovation through real-time data collection, improved service efficiency, and strengthened data-driven decision making. However, the implementation of IoT still faces challenges such as the digital divide, data security risks, and limited technological literacy. This study concludes that the success of IoT is determined not only by technological aspects but also by ecosystem readiness, including infrastructure, policy, and human resource capacity. Therefore, integrative strategies are required to achieve inclusive and sustainable social innovation.
Analisis Yuridis Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah di Kabupaten Sukoharjo Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 Triyas Nuraini; Nides Fransisca Marshanda; Mutiara Devita Putri; Alya Maya Khonsa Rahayu
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3209

Abstract

This research intends to legally examine how waste management policies are applied in Sukoharjo Regency according to Regional Regulation Number 16 of 2011. The main problem identified in this study is the gap between well-defined legal standards and their actual implementation in practice at the field level. This study uses a normative legal research approach with statutory and conceptual methods, supported by secondary data obtained through library research from relevant legal literature and documents. The findings show that, from a normative perspective, the legal structure for waste management in Sukoharjo Regency is comprehensive and already incorporates modern principles of environmental law, including waste reduction, proper waste management, and the implementation of the 3R principles (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle). However, in practice, the implementation is not yet fully effective as expected. This is caused by several influencing factors such as low levels of public environmental awareness, inadequate supporting infrastructure, and weak enforcement of existing regulations by relevant authorities. This condition clearly reflects a gap between das sollen (what should be) and das sein (what is happening in reality) in the execution of waste management policy. Overall, the study emphasizes that stronger implementation efforts are needed to bridge the gap between legal norms and practical outcomes in environmental governance.
Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah dan Dampaknya terhadap Masyarakat: Studi Kasus Blokade Warga Jatirejo di Kota Surakarta Farrel Rama Dhitya Densen; Apriando Reubben Patrick; Ester Saur Maulina Sinaga; Abel Nafa Erfatiana; Anisa Ramadhani; Nur Achmad Faisal; Alya Maya Khonsa Rahayu
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3210

Abstract

This research intends to examine how waste management policies are carried out and their effects on the local community in Surakarta City, focusing on the blockade actions by Jatirejo residents near the Putri Cempo Landfill. The approach taken is empirical juridical research utilizing both a legislative angle and a case study perspective. Information was collected through literature reviews and documentation, which were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. Findings from the research reveal that the execution of waste management policies is not functioning effectively, even though there are regulations in place, such as the Decree of the Mayor of Surakarta Number 600.4.15/138 of 2025 and Circular Letter Number 25 of 2005 about waste separation. Key issues include inadequate facilities and infrastructure, poor coordination, and ineffective communication between the government and residents. The burdened state of the landfill leads to various environmental issues like air contamination, possible waste landslides, and health concerns for the public. Additionally, social consequences manifest as conflicts, highlighted by residents’ blockade actions as they protest against worsening environmental conditions.
Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Bidang Administrasi Kependudukan pada Program Paket Layanan (PAKLAY) Satu Hari Jadi di Kantor Desa Gaum, Kecamatan Tasikmadu, Kabupaten Karanganyar Widyantoro Yuliatmojo; Anita Tri Utami; Nindita Pramuktisari; Roni Prihanto
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3235

Abstract

Gaum Village, located in Karanganyar Regency, actively administers public services in the field of population administration. To cut bureaucratic red tape, the village government implemented an innovative "one-day service" initiative called the Paklay Program. However, operational bottlenecks, infrastructure limitations, and community grievances still present challenges in its execution. This study applied a qualitative descriptive method, selecting key informants through a purposive sampling technique. Primary insights were collected directly through structured interviews, supplemented by documentation studies. For data examination, a qualitative framework consisting of three interactive phases—data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing—was utilized, with data validity verified through triangulation. The empirical evidence demonstrates that the service quality at the Gaum Village Office has successfully reached a competent and satisfactory standard. This achievement is reflected in the favorable scores across all evaluated service quality dimensions (tangible, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy). The primary strengths of the program lie in the swift processing time, administrative precision, and responsive complaint handling. Conversely, the main structural drawbacks center on inadequate physical waiting room facilities, periodic internet connectivity issues, and a literacy gap regarding the digitized procedures among elderly residents. Ultimately, this study concludes that the administrative services offered through the Paklay program have successfully enhanced public service delivery, though tactical improvements in infrastructure and inclusive socialization are strictly required for optimal outcomes.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pekerja dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Meiske Abdullah; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3298

Abstract

The government needs to strengthen the industrial relations dispute resolution system so that it is more accessible to workers. This strengthening can be carried out through the equitable distribution of Industrial Relations Courts, simplification of litigation procedures, improvement of legal aid services, and assistance for workers who lack an understanding of labor law. The use of e-court also needs to be optimized, but it must be accompanied by digital literacy and supporting facilities so that it does not create new obstacles. In addition, a special enforcement mechanism should be established in industrial relations cases so that Industrial Relations Court decisions can be implemented immediately and workers’ rights are not delayed. Judges, mediators, labor inspectors, and labor unions also need to improve their capacity and commitment to substantive justice. Employers are expected to comply with court decisions voluntarily and prioritize deliberative settlement from the initial stage. Through these reforms, the Industrial Relations Court will not merely serve as a formal forum, but will truly function as a means of legal protection that is fast, affordable, certain, and just for workers.