cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mukhammad Nur Hadi
Contact Email
mukhammad.nur.hadi@uinsa.ac.id
Phone
+6285280179576
Journal Mail Official
al_hukama@uinsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. A. Yani 117, Surabaya
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
ISSN : 20897480     EISSN : 25488147     DOI : 10.15642/alhukama
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Al-Hukama serves academic discussions of any Indonesian Islamic family law issues from various perspectives, such as gender, history, sociology, anthropology, ethnography, psychology, philosophy, human rights, disability and minorities, digital discourse, and others. It intends to contribute to the debate in classical studies and the ongoing development debate in Islamic family law studies in Indonesia, both theoretical and empirical discussion. Al-Hukama always places the study of Islamic family law in the Indonesian context as the focus of academic inquiry.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 226 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
Islamic Legal Reform and the Principle of Moderation: A Study of Indonesian Family Law Ilma, Mughniatul
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.68-93

Abstract

The ethos of moderation (wasaṭiyyah) serves as a foundational principle in Islamic law, particularly within the domain of family law. However, the codification of Islamic law into state legislation raises a critical question: Does the legal positivization of these norms reinforce, constrain, or obscure the spirit of moderation? This article examines how the principle of moderation is articulated and institutionalized in the reform of Islamic family law in Indonesia, with particular reference to Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law. Utilizing a normative legal methodology with a conceptual and statutory approach, this study finds that the reforms reflect key values of moderation, particularly in provisions concerning the minimum age of marriage, the status of children born out of wedlock, and the regulation of polygamy. These developments demonstrate a conscious effort to balance Sharia with evolving societal needs, uphold justice, and integrate local wisdom and universal human rights. In doing so, Indonesia's model of Islamic family law reform illustrates how Islamic legal principles can remain both contextually responsive and normatively grounded in the ethical vision of Islam.
Framing the Digital Discourse on Childfree in BincangSyariah.com: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Perspective Umumah, Mega Zakhirul; Rizki Dwi Aprilianto; Achmad Afandy; Muhammad Iqbal Wi'an Ekaputra; Nur Lailatul Musafa'ah; Shavia, Andina Najma
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.94-124

Abstract

The discourse on childfree has emerged as a complex and multidimensional topic within both digital spaces and contemporary Islamic legal thought. When articulated online, this discourse reflects varying forms of partiality and narrative framing, shaped by the distinctive character and ideological orientation of each platform. This study aims to explore how BincangSyariah.com presents the issue of childfree through the lens of maqāṣid al-sharīʿa. Employing a normative-legal methodology with a conceptual and philosophical approach, the research utilizes qualitative-descriptive analysis. The primary data consists of selected articles on childfree published by BincangSyariah.com, while secondary sources include classical and contemporary Islamic legal literature, alongside scholarly discussions on gender and digital media. Analytical tools include Robert N. Entman’s framing theory and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. The findings reveal that BincangSyariah.com presents childfree not as a deviation from Islamic norms, but as a legitimate life choice when supported by rational considerations and contextualized within Islamic legal and ethical discourses. The site provides a discursive space where the perspectives of Islamic law, hadith, gender, and social analysis intersect. From a maqāṣid al-sharīʿa perspective, the framing aligns with the objectives of preserving intellect (ḥifdh al-ʿaql) and lineage (ḥifd al-nasl). This study highlights the pivotal role of Islamic digital media in addressing contemporary socio-religious issues while upholding ethical commitments rooted in Islamic law.
Between Theoretical Sharia and Practical Realities: A Critical Analysis of Interfaith Marriage in Classical Texts and Contemporary Legal Contexts Nasrulloh, Muhammad; Witro, Doli; Baskoro, Aji; Ahmad, Sabarudin; Ermawan, Muhammad Zakky Ubaid; Alghani, Raid
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.1-35

Abstract

Islamic law does not categorically prohibit all forms of interfaith marriage. However, this permissibility requires critical re-examination in light of contemporary socio-legal realities. In the Indonesian context, the increasing occurrence of interfaith marriages, compounded by the issuance of Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023, which explicitly prohibits their recognition, raises urgent questions regarding the relevance and applicability of classical Islamic legal doctrines in modern legal systems. This article explores whether the permissibility of interfaith marriage in Islamic law is both theoretically coherent and practically feasible, or whether it remains a doctrinal ideal with limited applicability in real-world contexts. Utilizing a normative legal methodology that incorporates conceptual, statutory, and historical approaches, and employing a contemporary fiqh-based analysis, the study argues that the marriage of a Muslim man to a Christian or Jewish woman (ahl al-kitāb) remains valid under classical Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). Nevertheless, such permissibility should not be generalized as a communal norm, especially within Muslim-majority societies. Instead, interfaith marriages should be addressed on a case-by-case basis, particularly in exceptional circumstances, such as in non-Muslim majority societies where access to Muslim partners is severely limited, including certain localities in Indonesia. The findings highlight the significance of contextual legal reasoning (ijtihād) and the discretionary application of Islamic legal norms in accommodating interfaith marriages within Indonesia's pluralistic legal and social framework.
Assessing Couples’ Readiness and Child’s Best Interests: A Comparative Analysis of Mojokerto Religious Court Decisions on Marriage Dispensation Arif, Alfiyah Faizatul
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.36-67

Abstract

The issue of marriage dispensation (dispensasi nikah) continues to attract significant scholarly attention in Indonesia, especially after the legal reform that raised the minimum marriage age to 19 for both men and women. This change has led to an increase in dispensation requests submitted to religious courts, where judges have the discretionary power to approve or reject each case based on its unique circumstances. This article analyzes two contrasting rulings from the Mojokerto Religious Court—Case Number 321/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Mr and Case Number 597/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Mr—both filed due to pregnancy outside marriage. Despite similar legal grounds, the court granted the petition in the first case but denied it in the second. Using a normative legal approach that combines statutory and philosophical perspectives alongside legal interpretation theory, the study reveals that both decisions employed teleological reasoning. However, judges assessed the couples’ readiness for marriage differently, taking into account psychological, social, and economic factors. In Case 321, with a 15-week pregnancy, the applicants were deemed ready, while in Case 597, involving a 12-week pregnancy, they were not. Both rulings relied heavily on recommendations from the Integrated Service Center for the Empowerment of Women and Children (P2TP2A). While judges emphasized the child’s best interests, the analysis highlights a tendency to prioritize institutional opinions over independent judicial reasoning (ijtihād). This raises important questions about the extent to which human rights considerations are deeply engaged in contemporary Islamic family law decisions in Indonesian religious courts.
Fiqh and Divorce Law in Indonesian Cinema: A Critical Analysis of Talak 3 and Wedding Agreement Zuhroh, Poetri Lailatuz
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.125-148

Abstract

As a form of popular culture, film serves as an engaging medium for disseminating and popularizing family law in a more appealing and accessible way. However, narrative distortions and misrepresentations of legal norms within cinematic stories are possible. This article examines how the concept of triple divorce in Indonesian Islamic Family Law is portrayed in two Indonesian marriage-themed films: Talak 3 and Wedding Agreement. Both films depict divorce proceedings within the jurisdiction of Indonesia’s Religious Courts. Through a normative legal analysis combined with qualitative content analysis, this study finds that the cinematic depiction of divorce processes in these films is not entirely consistent with the principles of Indonesian Islamic family law. Talak 3 depicts the pronouncement of three divorces at once as constituting an irrevocable major divorce (ṭalāq ba’in kubrā). At the same time, Wedding Agreement portrays consecutive triple divorces occurring outside the court, similarly resulting in an irrevocable major divorce when submitted to the Religious Court. These portrayals tend to reflect classical fiqh doctrines rather than Indonesia’s codified Islamic family law, thereby reinforcing a conservative perspective. Such misrepresentations within Indonesian films risk perpetuating public misunderstandings and undermining efforts to modernize family law. Given the film’s influence in shaping legal awareness, accurate legal depiction in popular media is essential. This study urges scholars and practitioners to ensure that films accurately represent family law, thereby enabling cinema to positively support legal literacy and the progressive development of Indonesian Islamic family law.
Regulating Arbitrary Divorce in Islamic Family Law: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah–Based Comparative Analysis of Muslim-Majority Legal Systems Fadhilah, Nur; Musonnif, Ahmad; Hadisiswati, Indri
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): December (In Progress)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.2.149-175

Abstract

This article examines how contemporary Islamic family law regulates arbitrary divorce and evaluates the extent to which such regulation operationalizes maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, particularly as conceptualized by Jamāl al-Dīn ʿAṭiyyah. Arbitrary divorce is understood as unilateral marital dissolution that occurs without adequate judicial oversight, substantive justification, or fair compensation, resulting in harm to women and children. The study asks how different legal systems constrain or reproduce arbitrary divorce and which regulatory model most effectively realizes substantive justice. Employing a qualitative and comparative method, the research analyzes statutory regulations, judicial structures, and doctrinal frameworks governing divorce in Indonesia, Iran, and Algeria as material objects of study. The findings demonstrate three distinct regulatory patterns. Indonesia adopts a procedural model that formally judicializes divorce but fails to prevent substantive injustice due to weak enforcement and partial protection of women’s financial and custodial rights. Iran reflects an administrative–doctrinal model that retains significant male prerogatives while introducing limited compensatory mechanisms. In contrast, Algeria represents a substantive maqāṣid-oriented model in which expanded judicial authority, mandatory reconciliation, and compensation for harm effectively constrain unilateral divorce and promote financial justice and child welfare. The study concludes that effective regulation of arbitrary divorce depends not on procedural formality alone but on the institutional capacity to translate ethical objectives into enforceable outcomes. This maqāṣid-based typology contributes to Islamic family law scholarship by offering a comparative framework for evaluating justice-oriented legal reform.

Page 23 of 23 | Total Record : 226

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

2011 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): December (In Progress) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): December Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): December Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): Desember Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022): Juni Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021): Desember Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Juni Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): Desember Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): Juni Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019): Desember Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Juni Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018): Desember Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): Juni Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): Desember Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017): Juni Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016): Desember Vol. 6 No. 1 (2016): Juni Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015): Desember Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015): Juni Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): Desember Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014): Juni Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013): Desember Vol. 3 No. 1 (2013): Juni Vol. 2 No. 2 (2012): Desember Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012): Juni Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): Desember Vol. 1 No. 1 (2011): Juni More Issue