cover
Contact Name
Vira Dwi Agustin
Contact Email
garuda@apji.org
Phone
+6285700037105
Journal Mail Official
info@appihi.or.id
Editorial Address
Perum Cluster G11 Nomor 17 Jl. Plamongan Indah, Pedurungan, Kota Semarang 50195, Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 50195
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
ISSN : 30325862     EISSN : 30325854     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia in particular include the study of Communication, Politics, Government, International Relations, and Social Affairs.
Articles 153 Documents
Kontribusi Filsafat Ilmu dalam Penelitian Ilmiah dan Kehidupan Sosial Rosita Dongoran; Amelia Rahima Hasibuan; Nabilah Mahmud Sibuea; M.Fikri Pratama; Muhammad Raihan
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i3.414

Abstract

Philosophy of science needs its presence in the midst of the development of science and technology which is marked by the sharpening of scientific specialization. Philosophy of science as a theoretical framework and research method has a relationship with scientific research.Philosophy of science explains the problem of science or science whichis the basis for logical assumptions (ethical neutralistic doctrine), the empirical results achieved, and the limits of their abilities. Meanwhile, the research methodology describes efforts to develop science based on the scientific method, which consists of two parts, namely both deductive and inductive.The contribution of the philosophy of science in scientific research is: Asabasis for the development of science or theory, the philosophy of science as a means of testing scientific the ory reasoning.Philosophy of science is abletotest,reflect,criticizeas sumptions and scientific methods in a scientific research. As a foundation in science at the university level. Philosophy of science provides a logical basis for research methodology. The contribution of the philosophy of science in research methodology can also be filling and broadening the cognitive horizons (reason) of what is called science, which is expected to create understanding for the discipline in scientific work,aswel lasin crease the motivation of a researcher to carry out tasks seriously. Writing this article uses a qualitative approach by using library research, namely by examining reading sources that have to do with the study being discussed.
Analisis Pembagian Harta Warisan Kepada Ahli Waris Menurut Hukum Perdata (BW) Dika Ratu Maru’atun; Dwi Juniyanto; Wahyu Rivaldi; Asep Sunarya
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i3.449

Abstract

Current developments have brought many changes to Indonesia. The many changes that have occurred have not changed one thing in Indonesia, namely heritage. This problem is what triggers arguments between families and the Indonesian people because they don't want to know how inheritance is distributed according to civil law, so as a result they divide inheritance assets at will and do not comply with the Civil Code regarding inheritance. Article 830 of the Civil Code states that inheritance law is the law that regulates the legal position of a person's assets after he dies, especially the transfer of assets to other people. This research also aims to determine the distribution of inheritance assets to heirs according to civil law (BW). In BW (civil) inheritance law, in terms of inheritance, there are three important elements, namely Heir (erflater), Heir (erfgenaam) and Inheritance (Nalatenshap). In the Civil Code there are four groups of heirs, namely Group I, Group II, Group III and Group IV. The research method used is a normative legal research method, namely legal research which focuses on literature study and the data used in this research is in the form of books, journals, laws, other references which are collected and processed to be presented to meet the need for new knowledge and ideas.
Perlindungan Hak Korban dalam Perspektif HAM Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus/2023/Pt BDG Tentang Binomo Berkedok Investasi Nindya Septica Andari
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i3.458

Abstract

This research examines the juridical protection provided by the government to victims of illegal online investment crimes as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Article 28 paragraph (1) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to the Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Apart from that, the provisions on criminal acts of gambling regulated in Article 303 bis Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code are also used as a reference in this research. This research analyzes the typology of victims and the factors that cause illegal investments both online and conventional. Based on this analysis, researchers identified three types of factors that influence victims of illegal investment, namely Latent or Predisposed Victims (victims influenced by economic factors), Participating Victims (victims with low education), and False Victims (victims due to consumer behavior). In this context, researchers recommend the need for more detailed legal updates regarding online investment regulations. This update aims to strengthen the protection of the rights of investors and society as a whole, so that they feel more confident and safe in making investments. With more comprehensive regulations, the government can provide better protection for victims of illegal investment crimes and prevent illegal practices that harm society.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Penyedia Jasa Platform Digital terhadap Pelanggaran Kekayaan Intelektual Ida Bagus Nyoman Adhi Wiguna
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.472

Abstract

This research discusses Tokopedia's legal responsibility for each consumer if there is a mismatch between goods in online buying and selling. Even though regulations have been formed regarding the technical implementation of electronic commerce, in fact these regulations still have weaknesses in terms of legal protection because parties in electronic transactions, both sellers and buyers, are often disadvantaged by parties who violate agreements and dispute resolution provided through digital platforms is considered still detrimental to one party. The development of digital platforms has opened the door to economic and creative activities. However, this success also carries the risk of intellectual property infringement. This research will explain the background, provide the legal context, and detail the urgency of this research in the legal context in Indonesia.This research uses empirical research methods, and the approach used is a statutory approach (law) Case approach (Case) which is carried out at the level of horizontal synchronization, which measures the extent of a governing law and case.
Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 300K/PDT/2010 dan Keterkaitannya dengan Konsepsi Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Adrasitta Khaliddya Fithrianni; Aam Suryamah; Agus Suwandono
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.479

Abstract

The Prita Mulyasari case in 2008 highlighted the challenges of protecting consumers from strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) suits. SLAPPs aim to stop and prevent individuals or non-governmental organisations from exercising their right to voice their opinions publicly. However, specific regulations addressing SLAPP in the realm of consumer protection in Indonesia are still lacking. The Prita Mulyasari case underscores the need for further attention to establish clear and specific rules to protect consumers from SLAPP practices. This research will further examine how the Supreme Court Decision No. 300K/PDT/2010 in the Prita Mulyasari case can serve as a benchmark in upholding consumer rights within the Indonesian legal framework, especially given the absence of a legal umbrella that protects consumers from lawsuits aimed at limiting public participation in the form of SLAPPs by businesses. This research will employ a normative juridical approach, focusing on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The study will analyze data gathered from literature reviews using a qualitative normative data analysis method. The research findings indicate that although the Supreme Court granted Prita Mulyasari’s appeal, the legal reasoning in Decision No. 300K/PDT/2010 did not explicitly address the concept of SLAPP. The Supreme Court’s considerations largely focused on the fulfilment of the elements of tort under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. However, the Supreme Court’s use of Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution to justify Prita Mulyasari's conduct is a crucial step in strengthening the legal position of those who express criticism or complaints, as well as their status as consumers.
Implementasi Pasal 54 Undang-Undang No 35 Tahun 2014 Pada Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Bullying di Kota Surakarta Wida Nur Hanita; Aris Prio Agus Santoso; Kresna Agung Yudhianto
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.480

Abstract

Article 54 of Law No. 35/2014 on Child Protection, an amendment to Law No. 23/2002, states that children in the educational environment must be protected from physical and psychological violence, sexual crimes, and other crimes that may be committed by educators, education personnel, fellow students, or other parties. However, despite this regulation, cases of bullying in schools still occur frequently. This study aims to evaluate the application of Article 54 of Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection and legal protection efforts for children who are victims of bullying with a legal certainty approach. The research method used is descriptive with qualitative data analysis. The results showed that Article 54 has been well implemented by the Surakarta City Office of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection and Population Control and Family Planning. They conduct socialization in schools and communities as a preventive measure and assist the mediation process for case resolution as a repressive measure. In addition, for the legal protection of child victims of bullying with a legal certainty approach, the Office also integrates bullying prevention and handling programs, facilitates and fosters education units, and provides educational facilities.
Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dengan Malaysia terhadap Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sigit Kamseno
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Januari : Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i1.518

Abstract

This research uses a normative juridical method by comparing criminal law arrangements related to corruption crimes enacted in two countries, namely Indonesia and Malaysia. This is motivated by the issue of corruption in both countries which is still a big problem, even though in terms of the Corruption Achievement Index (CPI), Malaysia is much better than Indonesia. From the results of the research, it is found that there are similarities and differences in the arrangements related to corruption crimes in the two countries. The similarities in both Indonesia and Malaysia are the implementation of the reverse proof system and the establishment of a special institution to eradicate corruption. While the difference is that Indonesia has more legal regulations, the existence of special courts for corruption crimes and the best evidentiary system is applied generally to every form of corruption crime. Meanwhile, Malaysia only has one legal regulation, does not have a special court for corruption and the reverse proof system applied is only limited to bribery cases. From these differences, it can be seen that in terms of the legal system and handling of corruption crimes, Indonesia is better than Malaysia.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pasal 54 UU Narkotika: Rehabilitasi Sebagai Solusi Bagi Pecandu dan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Muhammad Hairul; Desi Anisah
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.519

Abstract

The Article 54 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Drug Rehabilitation is a repressive action carried out for Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abuse. This rehabilitation is the restoration to the previous (original) position and the improvement of individuals, hospital patients or disaster victims so that they become useful human beings and can live in society. Rehabilitation actions are aimed at victims of drug abuse to restore or develop the physical, mental, and social abilities of the sufferer concerned. In addition to recovery, rehabilitation is also a treatment or treatment for drug addicts, so that they can recover from their addiction to narcotics. This research is focused on two problem formulations, namely how the legal status of rehab for addicts according to Law Number 35 of 2009. What are the steps of the Government's intervention in efforts to protect Drug Addicts. This research is normative research, which is descriptive analytical and sources of legal materials through primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Legal data collection techniques through document studies (literature studies), such as books, papers, articles, journals, newspapers or works from experts. From the results of this study, the provision of rehabilitation is one of the main objectives in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Where Narcotics Addicts can be classified into 2 types, namely people who use Narcotics in a state of physical or psychological dependence and people who abuse Narcotics in a state of physical and psychological dependence.
Sinergi KPU, BAWASLU, dan DKPP: Pilar Penegakan Demokrasi dalam Pemilu Indonesia Muhammad Maulana Nazril; Dicky Juliandi; Danii Rizky Mabrury; Surya Sukti
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.524

Abstract

General elections (elections) in Indonesia are a major pillar of democracy that require strict supervision and management to ensure fairness and transparency. Independent institutions such as the General Election Commission (KPU), the Election Supervisory Body (BAWASLU), and the Election Organizer Honorary Council (DKPP) play a key role in maintaining election integrity. The KPU is responsible for organizing elections at all levels of government, including planning, implementing, and supervising election stages, with a focus on transparency and public participation. BAWASLU functions as a supervisor to prevent and prosecute election violations, while the DKPP is tasked with handling violations of the election organizer's code of ethics. The research of this paper aims to understand the meaning and main tasks or authorities and functions of each of these institutions. The method used in this study is Library Research and Internet Searching, a literature review of literature in the form of books and articles from relevant internet sources. The results of the analysis show that the synergy between the KPU, BAWASLU, and DKPP is very important in creating democratic and integrity-based elections, with each institution having a role or authority, responsibility, and complementary functions. A deep understanding of the duties and functions of these three institutions is expected to improve the quality of election implementation in Indonesia.
Optimalisasi Pengawasan Bidang Pertahanan dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Transparansi Pada Sistem Pertahanan Negara Ramadhan Adi Prasetyo
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.525

Abstract

This study is motivated by the government's efforts to realize ideal national defense management by means of transparent supervision and control by a relevant government institution. Because, in the government environment, maladministration, and violations of laws and regulations are still found. The purpose of this research is to comprehensively understand external supervision in the national defense system, the formation of effective supervisory mechanism regulations, internal supervision in the national defense system, and reform of national defense institutions. The research method used is a descriptive analysis approach through literature study. Based on the results of the discussion, it is found that in organizing a good defense system, it is necessary to optimize the control mechanism by conducting effective supervision. This supervision is carried out by government agencies, both the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, the Inspectorate General within the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia and the Indonesian National Army

Page 6 of 16 | Total Record : 153