cover
Contact Name
Sularno
Contact Email
soelarno@unidha.ac.id
Phone
+6288270875130
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.ittc@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Veteran dalam no.24d, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25112
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik
Published by CV ITTC Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30318882     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47233/jkhkp
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik (JKHKP)(E-ISSN : 3031-8882 ) merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh CV.ITTC INDONESIA. Jurnal ini berfokus kepada kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal ini berbahasa Indonesia dan sifatnya terbuka. Semua makalah yang diterbitkan secara online oleh JKHKP terbuka untuk pembaca dan siapapun dapat mendownload atau membaca jurnal tanpa melanggan maupun membayar. JKHKP diterbitkan Dua Kali dalam Setahun; yaitu pada bulan Januari-Juni dan Juli-Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 315 Documents
Epistimologi Hukum Islam Lubisa, Syarifuddin; Anwar Husein; Uswatun hasanah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/rrg1qb17

Abstract

The study of the epistemology of Islamic law is essential to understanding the foundations of knowledge and methodologies underlying the formulation of Islamic legal thought that is rational, contextual, and just. This research arises from the need to re-examine the structure of Islamic legal knowledge to ensure its relevance in facing social transformations and modern challenges. The study employs a qualitative approach using library research methods by examining primary sources such as the Qur’an, Hadith, and classical juristic works, as well as secondary sources from contemporary literature. The literature review reveals that the epistemology of Islamic law rests on three main foundations: bayani (textual), ‘aqli (rational), and ‘irfani (spiritual), each complementing the others in the process of deriving legal rulings (istinbat al-ahkam). The discussion shows that the interaction between revelation and reason produces a legal system that is not only normative but also applicable and adaptive. The analysis of modern Islamic scholars’ perspectives indicates a paradigm shift from a purely textual approach toward an integrative one that incorporates maqasid al-shariah as a guiding principle for understanding the ultimate objectives of Islamic law. The study concludes that the epistemology of Islamic law constitutes a unified system of knowledge that harmonizes revelation, reason, and social reality in order to achieve justice, welfare, and balance in human life.
Peran Hukum Perkawinan Dalam Optimalisasi Perlindungan Hak Anak Lubisa, Syarifuddin; Hasibuan, Putra halomoan
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/negavf71

Abstract

Marriage, as a social and legal institution, plays a crucial role in shaping the family environment, which serves as the primary setting for a child's growth and development. Marriage law in Indonesia not only governs the relationship between husband and wife but also serves to protect the rights of children born from such marriages. This research aims to examine the role of marriage law in optimizing the protection of children's rights in Indonesia by analyzing the prevailing legal provisions and the challenges in their implementation. The research method used is normative-empirical through literature studies and field observations. The findings show that although legal foundations such as Law No. 1 of 1974 and Law No. 35 of 2014 are in place, there are still obstacles to child protection due to early marriage and children born out of wedlock. Optimizing the protection of children's rights requires synergy among the government, families, communities, and legal institutions in law enforcement and public awareness efforts to ensure sustainable child protection.
Reformulasi Peraturan Digital Forensic Di Dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia Senajaya, Sacvio Fath; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/av9bjg92

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah membawa perubahan signifikan terhadap pola dan modus operandi tindak pidana korupsi, yang semakin banyak melibatkan penggunaan sistem elektronik dan data digital. Kondisi ini menjadikan alat bukti digital sebagai elemen penting dalam proses pembuktian perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengaturan digital forensik yang jelas, sistematis, dan adaptif terhadap perkembangan teknologi, khususnya di lingkungan Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia. Namun demikian, pengaturan hukum yang berlaku saat ini masih bersifat umum dan tersebar dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan, sehingga belum memberikan pedoman teknis yang komprehensif mengenai penanganan alat bukti digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi reformulasi peraturan digital forensik dalam proses pembuktian perkara tindak pidana korupsi serta mengkaji peran pengaturan internal Kejaksaan dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dan kualitas pembuktian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiadaan pengaturan khusus mengenai digital forensik berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakseragaman praktik penanganan alat bukti digital, melemahkan nilai pembuktian di persidangan, serta berisiko melanggar prinsip due process of law. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembentukan Peraturan tentang Digital Forensik di linhkungan Kejaksaan RI sebagai bentuk reformulasi kebijakan hukum untuk memperkuat standar pembuktian dan efektivitas penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di era digital.
Reforma Agraria Sebagai Bentuk Kemajuan AtauKemunduran Pengelolaan Tanah Di Indonesia sadzili, muchlis
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/a29e3r17

Abstract

Penulisan ini merupakan kajian singkat terhadap suatu kebijakan yang dibuat pada masa pemerintahan Presiden Joko Widodo (Jokowi) yaitu kebijakan soal Reforma Agraria. Semangat dari kebijkan ini adlah untuk redistribusi tanah atu bagi-bagi sertifikat tanah. Namun pada pelaksaannya jauh dari semangat tersebut dan jutru mengalami kemunduran dalam hal pengelolaan tanah di Indonesia. Adanya hal tersebut terjadi tidak terlepas dari politik hukum pembuatan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (UU CILAKA). Padahal sbeelumnya semangat dari Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) sudah sangat baik bahkan mendapat apresiasi dari dunia karena adanya pengaturan terhadap pengelolaan tanah yang baik. Maka dari itu selayaknya dan sudah semestinya negara menjalankan reforma agraria sejati.
Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Residive Tindak Pidana Peredaran Narkotika (STUDI KASUS PERKARA NOMOR 254/PID.SUS/2024/PN PDG) Liza Puspita; Engrina Fauzi
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/c682gz93

Abstract

The illegal distribution of narcotics in Indonesia has reached a critical point, posing a threat to national stability, public health, and the future of the younger generation. This type of crime is extremely dangerous, so the actions taken must be firm, structured, and based on justice. One form of law enforcement that has received attention is the application of the death penalty, especially for perpetrators who have previously been involved in similar crimes and have served their sentences. This study legally explores the decision of the Padang District Court in case number 254/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Pdg, in which a life sentence was given to the defendant, a recidivist, as an alternative to the death penalty. The legal basis used includes Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, specifically Article 114 paragraph (2), as well as provisions in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and other related laws and regulations. The state is making efforts to eradicate the illicit distribution of narcotics with various approaches, not only through repressive criminal law, but also with preventive, educational, and rehabilitative approaches to protect society, especially the younger generation. The problems discussed in this research are: (1) How does Indonesian positive law regulate the death penalty for recidivists in narcotics trafficking cases?; (2) How effective is the death penalty compared to life imprisonment in preventing recidivism in case 254/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Pdg?; and (3) How does the application of the death penalty compare to countries with civil law systems? The purpose of this study is to legally analyze the application of the death penalty to recidivists in narcotics crimes and to evaluate the legal considerations used by the panel of judges in imposing a life sentence instead of the death penalty, as well as to compare the death penalty with countries that adopt a civil law system. The method used is a normative method with a legislative and case approach, and data collection through literature studies on laws and regulations, legal literature, and court decision documents. The research concludes that drug trafficking, particularly by repeat offenders, poses a serious threat to national security that cannot be optimally addressed. Therefore, a balance is needed between the objectives of punishment and the principle of justice in the implementation of criminal law in Indonesia.