cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sularno
Contact Email
soelarno@unidha.ac.id
Phone
+6288270875130
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.ittc@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Veteran dalam no.24d, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25112
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik
Published by CV ITTC Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30318882     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47233/jkhkp
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik (JKHKP)(E-ISSN : 3031-8882 ) merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh CV.ITTC INDONESIA. Jurnal ini berfokus kepada kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal ini berbahasa Indonesia dan sifatnya terbuka. Semua makalah yang diterbitkan secara online oleh JKHKP terbuka untuk pembaca dan siapapun dapat mendownload atau membaca jurnal tanpa melanggan maupun membayar. JKHKP diterbitkan Dua Kali dalam Setahun; yaitu pada bulan Januari-Juni dan Juli-Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 328 Documents
 29   30   31   32   33 
Epistimologi Hukum Islam Lubisa, Syarifuddin; Anwar Husein; Uswatun hasanah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/rrg1qb17

Abstract

The study of the epistemology of Islamic law is essential to understanding the foundations of knowledge and methodologies underlying the formulation of Islamic legal thought that is rational, contextual, and just. This research arises from the need to re-examine the structure of Islamic legal knowledge to ensure its relevance in facing social transformations and modern challenges. The study employs a qualitative approach using library research methods by examining primary sources such as the Qur’an, Hadith, and classical juristic works, as well as secondary sources from contemporary literature. The literature review reveals that the epistemology of Islamic law rests on three main foundations: bayani (textual), ‘aqli (rational), and ‘irfani (spiritual), each complementing the others in the process of deriving legal rulings (istinbat al-ahkam). The discussion shows that the interaction between revelation and reason produces a legal system that is not only normative but also applicable and adaptive. The analysis of modern Islamic scholars’ perspectives indicates a paradigm shift from a purely textual approach toward an integrative one that incorporates maqasid al-shariah as a guiding principle for understanding the ultimate objectives of Islamic law. The study concludes that the epistemology of Islamic law constitutes a unified system of knowledge that harmonizes revelation, reason, and social reality in order to achieve justice, welfare, and balance in human life.
Peran Hukum Perkawinan Dalam Optimalisasi Perlindungan Hak Anak Lubisa, Syarifuddin; Hasibuan, Putra halomoan
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/negavf71

Abstract

Marriage, as a social and legal institution, plays a crucial role in shaping the family environment, which serves as the primary setting for a child's growth and development. Marriage law in Indonesia not only governs the relationship between husband and wife but also serves to protect the rights of children born from such marriages. This research aims to examine the role of marriage law in optimizing the protection of children's rights in Indonesia by analyzing the prevailing legal provisions and the challenges in their implementation. The research method used is normative-empirical through literature studies and field observations. The findings show that although legal foundations such as Law No. 1 of 1974 and Law No. 35 of 2014 are in place, there are still obstacles to child protection due to early marriage and children born out of wedlock. Optimizing the protection of children's rights requires synergy among the government, families, communities, and legal institutions in law enforcement and public awareness efforts to ensure sustainable child protection.
Reformulasi Peraturan Digital Forensic Di Dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia Senajaya, Sacvio Fath; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/av9bjg92

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah membawa perubahan signifikan terhadap pola dan modus operandi tindak pidana korupsi, yang semakin banyak melibatkan penggunaan sistem elektronik dan data digital. Kondisi ini menjadikan alat bukti digital sebagai elemen penting dalam proses pembuktian perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengaturan digital forensik yang jelas, sistematis, dan adaptif terhadap perkembangan teknologi, khususnya di lingkungan Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia. Namun demikian, pengaturan hukum yang berlaku saat ini masih bersifat umum dan tersebar dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan, sehingga belum memberikan pedoman teknis yang komprehensif mengenai penanganan alat bukti digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi reformulasi peraturan digital forensik dalam proses pembuktian perkara tindak pidana korupsi serta mengkaji peran pengaturan internal Kejaksaan dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dan kualitas pembuktian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiadaan pengaturan khusus mengenai digital forensik berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakseragaman praktik penanganan alat bukti digital, melemahkan nilai pembuktian di persidangan, serta berisiko melanggar prinsip due process of law. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembentukan Peraturan tentang Digital Forensik di linhkungan Kejaksaan RI sebagai bentuk reformulasi kebijakan hukum untuk memperkuat standar pembuktian dan efektivitas penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di era digital.
Reforma Agraria Sebagai Bentuk Kemajuan AtauKemunduran Pengelolaan Tanah Di Indonesia sadzili, muchlis
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/a29e3r17

Abstract

Penulisan ini merupakan kajian singkat terhadap suatu kebijakan yang dibuat pada masa pemerintahan Presiden Joko Widodo (Jokowi) yaitu kebijakan soal Reforma Agraria. Semangat dari kebijkan ini adlah untuk redistribusi tanah atu bagi-bagi sertifikat tanah. Namun pada pelaksaannya jauh dari semangat tersebut dan jutru mengalami kemunduran dalam hal pengelolaan tanah di Indonesia. Adanya hal tersebut terjadi tidak terlepas dari politik hukum pembuatan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (UU CILAKA). Padahal sbeelumnya semangat dari Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) sudah sangat baik bahkan mendapat apresiasi dari dunia karena adanya pengaturan terhadap pengelolaan tanah yang baik. Maka dari itu selayaknya dan sudah semestinya negara menjalankan reforma agraria sejati.
Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Residive Tindak Pidana Peredaran Narkotika (STUDI KASUS PERKARA NOMOR 254/PID.SUS/2024/PN PDG) Liza Puspita; Engrina Fauzi
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/c682gz93

Abstract

The illegal distribution of narcotics in Indonesia has reached a critical point, posing a threat to national stability, public health, and the future of the younger generation. This type of crime is extremely dangerous, so the actions taken must be firm, structured, and based on justice. One form of law enforcement that has received attention is the application of the death penalty, especially for perpetrators who have previously been involved in similar crimes and have served their sentences. This study legally explores the decision of the Padang District Court in case number 254/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Pdg, in which a life sentence was given to the defendant, a recidivist, as an alternative to the death penalty. The legal basis used includes Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, specifically Article 114 paragraph (2), as well as provisions in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and other related laws and regulations. The state is making efforts to eradicate the illicit distribution of narcotics with various approaches, not only through repressive criminal law, but also with preventive, educational, and rehabilitative approaches to protect society, especially the younger generation. The problems discussed in this research are: (1) How does Indonesian positive law regulate the death penalty for recidivists in narcotics trafficking cases?; (2) How effective is the death penalty compared to life imprisonment in preventing recidivism in case 254/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Pdg?; and (3) How does the application of the death penalty compare to countries with civil law systems? The purpose of this study is to legally analyze the application of the death penalty to recidivists in narcotics crimes and to evaluate the legal considerations used by the panel of judges in imposing a life sentence instead of the death penalty, as well as to compare the death penalty with countries that adopt a civil law system. The method used is a normative method with a legislative and case approach, and data collection through literature studies on laws and regulations, legal literature, and court decision documents. The research concludes that drug trafficking, particularly by repeat offenders, poses a serious threat to national security that cannot be optimally addressed. Therefore, a balance is needed between the objectives of punishment and the principle of justice in the implementation of criminal law in Indonesia.  
Perbandingan Hukum Tentang Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebelum Dan Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang No 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Aravi, Jumadil; Sovya Sy, Armina Aya; Maghfirah, Nadya; Nosi, Veoni Sinta; Maharani, Putri; ., Mesrizal; Agustria, Salmi; Geovani, Cinta; Latita, Khairani; Nazif, Muhammad; Rollanda, Kaka; Algusti, Divo; Marwenny, Elwidarifa
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/0s02fa85

Abstract

This study aims to examine the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the amendment of Law No. 30 of 2002 through Law No. 19 of 2019. The approach used is juridical-empirical using literature studies. Data were collected by compiling journals on the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and related literature. The results of the study indicate that the Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission through Law Number 19 of 2019 is one of the most controversial legislative changes in the history of legal reform in Indonesia. This change has fundamental implications for the position, institutional character, and level of independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as a state institution specifically established to eradicate corruption. This article aims to comprehensively examine the position of the KPK after the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019 from the perspective of constitutional law and the principles of the rule of law. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and historical approach. The results of the study indicate that the change in the position of the KPK as a state institution within the executive branch of power, the establishment of the Supervisory Board, and the change in the status of KPK employees to State Civil Apparatus (ASN) have shifted the paradigm of KPK independence. Although the changes are claimed to be aimed at strengthening accountability and oversight, in practice they have the potential to weaken the effectiveness of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as an independent institution in eradicating corruption.
Tata Kelola Kelautan, Governansi Ekonomi, dan Investasi Berkelanjutan di Asia Tenggara Pujawanti Saragih
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/cp2jje46

Abstract

This research examines the interrelationships between marine governance, economic governance, and sustainable investment, focusing on Southeast Asian and Indo-Pacific case studies. Using a qualitative approach based on policy studies and recent empirical studies, this research explores how blue economy policies are implemented in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Timor-Leste. The analysis shows that integrated marine governance can strengthen maritime economic stability, increase investment transparency, and support the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 14). The implementation of Marine Spatial Planning in Indonesia and cross-border blue economy projects in ASEAN demonstrate positive synergies between the public and private sectors. This research confirms that adaptive and participatory marine governance is key to the success of sustainable marine economic development in the Asia-Pacific region.
Pemeriksaan Setempat (Local Inspection) dalam Sengketa Harta Bersama: Analisis Normatif Peran Hakim dalam Perspektif Asas Hakim Pasif Risandra, Salsabila Arza; Syifa , Fathimah; Salsabila , Adinda Amirah; Handayani , Sri
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/3f40j565

Abstract

Marriage within the Indonesian legal system entails various legal consequences, one of which concerns the existence of marital property acquired during the marriage. In judicial practice, marital property disputes following a divorce often present complex evidentiary issues, especially when the objects of the dispute consist of immovable property such as land and buildings. These conditions require judges to obtain an accurate factual overview of the disputed objects, not only through conventional evidence but also through the mechanism of local inspection. The implementation of local inspection raises specific legal concerns when associated with the principle of judicial passivity in civil procedural law.This study uses a normative legal research method with a descriptive analytical approach through the examination of statutory regulations, doctrines, and relevant legal literature. The research findings indicate that local inspection is not positioned as formal evidence but rather as judicial knowledge that serves to complement and strengthen the assessment of evidence submitted by the parties. Within the context of the principle of judicial passivity, local inspection remains permissible as long as it does not exceed the limits of judicial authority, specifically by not shifting the burden of proof between the parties and not placing the judge in an active role to seek evidence for the interest of a single party. Consequently, local inspection plays an important role in the evidentiary process of marital property disputes, provided it is applied proportionally and in harmony with the principle of judicial passivity to ensure justice, legal certainty, and the utility of the judgment.
Implikasi Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi melalui Mekanisme Non-Litigasi terhadap Kepastian Hukum dan Kekuatan Eksekutorial di Indonesia Idrus, Chalisa Raniah; Almaira, Alifah Kahillah; Sabrina , Najwa; Nurfitrah, Mesya Assauma
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/b8yc1v04

Abstract

Resolving default disputes through non-litigation mechanisms is gaining popularity in Indonesia due to its time and cost efficiency compared to litigation. However, its implementation still faces challenges related to legal certainty and the enforceability of decisions. This study examines two main issues: first, the legal implications of resolving default claims through non-litigation mechanisms for the legal protection of the parties; and second, the enforceability of arbitration decisions in the Indonesian civil procedural law system. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. Primary legal materials include the Civil Code and Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, while secondary legal materials come from legal literature and scholarly journals. The results show that resolving default disputes through arbitration provides legal protection by strengthening the principles of freedom of contract and due process of law, but still leaves behind the problem of high costs and limited corrective legal remedies. Arbitration awards have the same enforceable power as court decisions after being registered with the district court and issued by the chief justice. However, the effectiveness of enforcement remains hampered by broad interpretations of the concept of public order and resistance from the losing party. This study concludes that although arbitration awards are recognized as having enforceable power, their successful implementation depends heavily on the harmony between arbitration institutions and general courts, as well as the good faith of the parties.
Kesenjangan Regulasi Pembuktian Elektronik di Era Society 5.0: Analisis Putusan PA Sungailiat dan Efektivitas Regulasi Mahkamah Agung Hasanah, Siti Fatiya; Mersita , Nabila; Nurfitrah, Mesya Assauma
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/2hwsm293

Abstract

Entering the Society 5.0 era, digital transformation in the judicial system demands comprehensive procedural law readiness. This study aims to analyze the legal standing and evidentiary strength of electronic evidence and identify procedural challenges in practice. The research method employed is legal normative with a statute approach and a case approach, specifically analyzing the Sungailiat Religious Court Decision Number 0190/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Sglt. The results indicate that although Law Number 1 of 2024 (Second Amendment to the ITE Law) provides strong legitimacy for digital evidence, a regulatory gap persists in practice. Internal regulations of the Supreme Court, such as PERMA Number 7 of 2022 and SEMA Number 1 of 2014, are considered ineffective as they focus primarily on administrative aspects and have yet to address technical standards for authentication and verification of electronic evidence. Findings from the Sungailiat decision confirm that the absence of standard operating procedures causes the assessment of electronic evidence to rely entirely on judicial discretion, which often leads to the disregard of the digital evidence's material strength for the sake of substantive justice. Therefore, a reform of civil procedural law is necessary to regulate forensic audit standards and specific electronic evidence governance to ensure legal certainty in the digital judiciary era.

Page 32 of 33 | Total Record : 328

 29   30   31   32   33 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Desember Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Januari - Juni Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Juli - Desember Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Januari - Juni Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik