cover
Contact Name
Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Contact Email
yuriska@uwgm.ac.id
Phone
+6282271400197
Journal Mail Official
yuriska@uwgm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Wahid Hasyim 2 No.28, Sempaja Sel., Kec. Samarinda Utara, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur 75243
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
ISSN : 20857616     EISSN : 25410962     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v17i1.3124
Core Subject : Social,
Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum which is published periodically to publish the results of research, development, study of thought or theoretical studies related to the field of law. With pISSN 2085-7616 and eISSN 2541-0962 publish twice a year in February and August.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 205 Documents
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Terhadap Hilangnya Nyawa Orang Di Lubang Tambang Batu Bara Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana (Studi Kasus PT. Cahaya Energi Mandiri (CEM), kelurahan Sambutan Kecamatan Samarinda Ilir) Rustiana, Rustiana
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i2.523

Abstract

The use of natural resources in coal mining has many positive and negative impacts. The positive impact is increasing economic and social development both for the community in terms of employment and the government of the Province of East Kalimantan and the Regency of the City of the Producer in terms of Regional Original Revenue (ROR). Negative impacts include the destruction of forests in the area around the mine, contamination of the sea, disease outbreaks for people who live in the area around the mine, even the real negative impact on mining that makes the loss of one's life due to ex-mining holes, legally the case of responsibility for loss of life the person in the coal mine pit is not one person responsible, but there are some responsible parties.The object of research is PT. Cahaya Energi Mandiri, and the Government and the police related to the loss of life of people in mining pits or Mining Business License (IUP) of PT. Cahaya Energi Mandiri. So the purpose of this first thesis is to know and analyze the Legal Responsibility to the Loss of People Life at the Coal Mine Hole Judging from the Perspective of Criminal Law, the second to know and analyze the elements of criminal acts associated with the field of coal mining.The research method used is the normative-empirical legal research method that is merging between the approach of normative law with the addition of various empirical element.From the results of the research can be seen that the loss of life of the pit hole people have met the elements in the provisions of criminal law, because the loss of the lives of people perforated mine has met the elements in Article 359 KUHP and article 112 of Law Number 32 the Year 2009 on Protection and Environmental Management. While the criminal law responsibility can be imposed on the holders of IUP and the Government as the party responsible for environmental monitoring by punishment in the form of imprisonment or restitution or compensation for the victim or his family by the perpetrator.  
EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019 EFFERIN, JAMES RIDWAN
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i1.789

Abstract

ABSTRACTOn the 6th day of January 2020, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued a Decree Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (“the Constitutional Court Decree”), which decides that regarding the phrase “has an equal enforceable power as the court decisions that have permanent legal force” on Article 15 Paragraph (2) of the Law number 42 year 1999 on Fiduciary (“the Law No. 42/1999”), is in contradiction with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and shall have no legal binding power if it is not considered to be “towards any fiduciary that have no consent on default and the debtor has raised an objection to surrender the fiduciary object voluntarily. Furthermore the phrase “default” on Article 15 Paragraph (3) of the Law No. 42/1999 is in contradiction with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and shall have no legal binding power if it is not considered to be “a default shall not be determined solely by the creditor, but should be based on a consent between the creditor and debtor or based on any legal actions which determine the said default.”The Constitutional Court gives a legal interpretation that the executorial power of the Fiduciary Certificate is not considered automatically being applicable, but it shall depend on certain condition(s), i.e.: a consent on default by the creditor and debtor, and /or the willingness of the debtor to voluntarily surrender its fiduciary objects. This Decree will give an impact to the creditor because Fiduciary is supposed to have a character of ease on the execution if the debtor is in default (Elucidation of Article 15 Paragraph (3) Law No. 42/1999), but now if the debtor refused to cooperate, then the creditor should have a decree from the Court first before executing any fiduciary object.The type of this legal research is juridical normative with a legal and conceptual approaches. Keywords: Constitutional Court Decree No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019; Execution; Fiduciary ABSTRAK  Pada tanggal 6 Januari 2020 Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia telah mengeluarkan Putusan Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (“Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”)  yang menentukan bahwa frasa “kekuatan eksekutorial” dan “sama dengan putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap” pada Pasal 15 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia (“UU No. 42/1999”), bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang tidak dimaknai “terhadap jaminan fidusia yang tidak ada kesepakatan tentang cidera janji dan debitur keberatan menyerahkan secara sukarela objek yang menjadi jaminan fidusia. Selain itu frasa “cidera janji” pada Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU No. 42/1999 juga dinyatakan bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang tidak dimaknai bahwa “adanya cidera janji tidak ditentukan secara sepihak oleh kreditur melainkan atas dasar kesepakatan antara kreditur dengan debitur atau atas dasar upaya hukum yang menentukan telah terjadinya cidera janji.”Mahkamah Konstitusi telah memberikan penafsiran hukum bahwa kekuatan eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia tidak serta merta dapat diberlakukan, namun digantungkan pada suatu keadaan tertentu, misalnya: kesepakatan cidera janji oleh kreditur dan debitur, dan/atau kesediaan debitur untuk menyerahkan objek jaminan fidusia dengan sukarela.Keputusan ini memberikan dampak kepada kreditur karena seharusnya Jaminan Fidusia mempunyai sifat mudah dalam eksekusi apabila debitur wanprestasi (Penjelasan Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU No. 42/1999), tetapi saat ini apabila debitur menolak bekerjasama, maka kreditur harus memperoleh putusan pengadilan lebih dahulu sebelum melakukan eksekusi.Tipe penelitian hukum ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Kata Kunci: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 18/PUU-XVII/2019; Eksekutorial; Fidusia
MARAKNYA KORUPSI DI PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH DALAM ERA DESENTRALISASI Guntara, Bima
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i1.813

Abstract

Keinginan bagi kita semua bangsa Indonesia untuk memiliki pemerintahan yang terbebas dari praktik korupsi, namun itu semua terasa hanya sebuah angan-angan saja melihat maraknya praktik korupsi yang terjadi di negara ini, hal ini di perparah dengan banyaknya praktik korupsi yang dipertontonkan oleh aparatur pemerintah daerah. Praktik korupsi yang menjamur di daerah menjadikan cita-cita demokrasi yang terbebas dari praktik korupsi di pemerintahan daerah seakan sulit terwujud. Penanganan terkait semakin maraknya praktik korupsi pun telah dilakukan oleh negara mulai dari membuat regulasi hingga membentuk sebuah lembaga yang khusus menangani penyakit yang tak kunjung terobati dan terus menggerogoti sendi-sendi kehidupan di tanah air yang kita cinta ini. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini ialah untuk mengetahui tren korupsi yang terjadi di pemerintahan daerah dalam era desentralisasi. Penulis memilih menggunakan pendekatan studi pustaka dengan teknik analisis deskriptif dalam metode penulisan agar mengetahui lebih jauh mengenai lahirnya desentralisasi dan tren korupsi dalam hubungannya dengan penerapan otonomi daerah serta fenomena menjamurnya praktik korupsi yang terus berlangsung di daerah.Kata Kunci: Korupsi; Pemerintahan Daerah; Desentralisasi
Perlindungan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Jack Up Drilling Rig Services Antara HUSKY-CNOOC MADURA LIMITED Dengan PT COSL INDO (Analisis Putusan KPPU No. 03/KPPU-L/2016) suradiyanto, suradiyanto; Pratiwie, Dinny Wirawan
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i1.824

Abstract

Conspiracy use various way for coordinate activities they like through settings production, determination price horizontally, collusive tendering, division area, division consumer as a non-territorial, and division share market, even though similarly we need realize it that effective conspiracy it is not easy for achieved. However there trend the perpetrators business will always attempted maximizing profit his company respectively. Must there is some requirement in occurrence a conspiracy is must existence deal agreement or collusion between perpetrators effort. There is two form collusion in conspiracy, namely: collusion explicit, where the member communicate and coordinate deal they on real/live can declared with some document agreement already they agree, the data regarding the joint audit, management conspiracy, policies-policies writing, sales data and other data. There is also collusion secretly, where the perpetrators business member conspiracy no communicate on blatant, usually meetings too held on secret. And regular use as the media is association industry, so meetings member conspiracy camouflaged with legal meetings such as meeting associations. Form the second collusion this very difficult for detected by enforcer law. However experience from various country prove that at least 30% of conspiracy is involve associations.
Peranan UPT Dinas Pasar Dalam Melakukan Pemungutan Retribusi Di Lingkungan Pasar Segiri Kota Samarinda Wati, Hasrina; Suhadi, Nainuri
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i1.865

Abstract

This study aims to determine the role of the Market Service UPT in collecting retribution in the Segiri Market Area of Samarinda City in Review of Samarinda City Regulation Number 2 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Regional Regulation Number 13 of 2011 concerning Public Service Retribution and Market Service actions against money withdrawal carried out by thug persons to traders who illegal sales outside the Segiri Market area of Samarinda City. This research is an empirical legal research that comes from primary legal material and secondary legal material. The results showed that the role of the Market Service in collecting levy in the Segiri Market Area of Samarinda City (reviewed from the Regional Regulation of Samarinda City Number 2 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Regional Regulation Number 13 of 2011 concerning Public Service Retribution), namely three roles, first giving direction, provide supervision and provide guidance. Whereas the actions of the Market Service UPT against money withdrawals made by individual thug to traders who sell illegal outside the Segiri Market area of Samarinda City are divided into two, the first action of the Segiri Market Service UPT against the thug includes conducting thug raids and controlling the land gangster extortion, then secondly, the action of the Segiri Market Service UPT against illegal traders, which includes the provision of sanctions, enforcement, confiscation of merchandise.
Kajian Hukum Atas Hubungan Antara Nasabah Dan Bank Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan Astuti, Andriany Widie; Safitri, Wahyuni
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i1.866

Abstract

The relationship between banks and customers is based on the two most related elements, namely law and trust. A bank can only carry out activities and develop its bank, if the community "believes" to place its money, on banking products that exist in the bank. The higher the trust of the community, the higher the public's awareness to save money with the bank and to use other banking services. Public trust is the main key to the development or failure of a bank, in the sense that without the trust of the community, then a bank will not be able to carry out its business activities. For business people, banks are the main complement in carrying out daily activities, controlling the entry and exit of funds and achieving success, and are usually in the form of checking accounts. Based on this, the writer wants to examine more deeply the relationship between customers and banks regarding account information, bank rights and customer rights, and is associated with existing regulatory regulations.
Urgensi Pengaturan Pengawasan dan Penegakan Hukum Oleh BPOM Terhadap Tindak Peredaran Obat dan Makanan Ilegal: Basic Urgency of Indonesian FDA (BPOM) Law In Conducting Supervision and Law Enforcement In The field of Drug and Food Kurniasanti; Setiyono, Joko
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i2.884

Abstract

Food and drug arrangement is scattered in several statutory regulations. As the community grows both nationally and internationally, the problems relating to the production, circulation and use of medicinal and food commodities continue to evolve. The country is obliged to safeguard and protect the people of Indonesia, one of which is guaranteed availability of medicines and food that is safe, quality and has benefits. Research Method: This research is a normative, prescriptive study. The research approach includes a regulatory approach of Act No. 36 year 2009 on health and conceptual. Findings: The results of the analysis of the philosophical, sociological and juridical aspects show that to tackle the illegal food and drug distribution needed by BPOM. Conclusion: Based on this, it is important to do the renewal of supervision and law enforcement arrangements on the distribution of drug and illegal food by BPOM through the revision or establishment of statutory regulations.
Relevansi Nilai Barang Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Muhammad Djaelani Prasetya
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i2.941

Abstract

This research aims to provide prescriptions on what is the relevance of the Value of Goods toward Criminal Act of Theft and what should be done. This research is a Normative Research, with the approach was Conceptual, Statute and Case approach. Legal material itself was legislation, court rulings, legal journals, theses, and other official legal publications. The data then were analyzed qualitatively. The result of the researcher indicate that the Value of Goods as the causa prima has relevance to criminal act of theft. Misdriff or not, using regular or quick criminal procedure, both depend on the Value of Goods and the specific situation. On the other hand, the accusation of the public prosecutor has an essential role, especially in determining the loss, the specification of evidence, and the application of the Article which has implications for the consideration of judges' decisions. Finally, the high burden of cases and other problems can be prevented by strengthening the existence of misdriff through the adjustment or reconstruction of the Value of Goods until reconstruction of the Criminal Act of Theft.
Evfektivitas Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual Arya T. Putra, Nyoman Gede; Pello, Jimmy; Medan, Karolus Kopong
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i2.958

Abstract

Anak merupakan aset terbesar bagi suatu negara oleh sebab itu harus mendapat perlindungan hukum terhadap setiap kejahatan termasuk kejahatan kekerasan seksual. Adapun persoalan hukum yang dikaji yaitu Sejauh manakah perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kekerasan seksual di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur?. Jenis dari penelitian ini yaitu penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kekerasan seksual di Nusa Tenggara Timur telah berjalan hal ini dapat dilihat dari telah dibentuknya : Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (OPD), yaitu Badan Pemberdayaan Anak dan Perempuan Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur yang menangani masalah anak dan perempuan, Membentuk tim anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum, Mendirikan Rumah Korban (Ruban) yaitu rumah untuk menampung anak yang menjadi korban dan Membentuk tim-tim khusus yang menangani anak korban
Itikad Tidak Baik Pemegang Saham Nominee Yang Merugikan Beneficiary Ilham Mahendra, Renaldy; Joesoef, Iwan Erar
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i2.972

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan investigasi praktik perjanjian Nominee. Lingkup yang dikaji adalah perjanjian Nominee antara pemegang saham Nominee dan Beneficiary berdasarkan hukum dan undang-undang perseroan terbatas di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data sekunder berupa buku, jurnal, tesis bahan-bahan seminar serta regulasi dan putusan pengadilan terkait yaitu Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 1269 /Pid.B/2013/PN.Mdn. Fakta yang ditemukan adalah sengketa dalam putusan pengadilan disebabkan karena perbuatan memasukan keterangan palsu kedalam akta otentik sehingga Beneficiary mengalami kerugian. Namun hakim memutuskan bahwa perbuatan tersebut bukanlah wilayah pidana sehingga permasalahan antara beneficiary dengan pemegang saham nominee tidak terselesaikan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pebuatan perjanjian nominee tersebut bukanlah perbuatan yang sesuai dengan itikad baik dan permasalahan hukum antara nominee dengan beneficiary dapat diselesaikan secara keperdataan apabila salah satu pihak ada yang dirugikan.