cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Contact Email
yuriska@uwgm.ac.id
Phone
+6282271400197
Journal Mail Official
yuriska@uwgm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Wahid Hasyim 2 No.28, Sempaja Sel., Kec. Samarinda Utara, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur 75243
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Published by Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda
ISSN : 20857616     EISSN : 25410962     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v17i1.3124
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum which is published periodically to publish the results of research, development, study of thought or theoretical studies related to the field of law. With pISSN 2085-7616 and eISSN 2541-0962 publish twice a year in February and August.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 201 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
MEMPERTEGAS KEDUDUKAN HUKUM KESATUAN MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DALAM MEMENUHI HAK- HAK KONSTITUSIONAL Yulianingrum, Aullia vivi
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i1.270

Abstract

Keberadaan dan hak-hak masyarakat hukum adat telah diterima dalam kerangka hukum tidak tertulis maupun hukum positif di Indonesia. Pada kenyataannya issue yang berkembang tentang kehadiran dan hak- hak masyrakat hukum adat adalah terbatasnya ruang dan gerak bagi komunitas-komunitas adat dalam mewujudkan demokratisasi pengelolaan wilayah adanya secara berkelanjutan, Konflik tenurial, keterbatasan dan kondisi kekayaan alam yang meliputi tanah dan kekayaan alam yang terkandung di dalamnya tidak asimetris dengan pertambahan penduduk. Sehingga perlu adanya  penegasan kembali bahwa adanya korelasi antara Kesatuan Masyarakat Adat dengan Pemerintah terkait pemenuhan  hak Konstitusionalnya yang terkandung dalam pasal Pasal 18B ayat (2), Pasal 28I ayat (3) dan Pasal 32 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945  dimana aturan ini merupakan semangat otonomi yang diberikan seluas-luasnya kepada daerah. Ketentuan tersebut yang paling sering dirujuk ketika membicarakan mengenai keberadaan dan hak-hak masyarakat hukum adat. Kehadiran Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai The Protector of the citizen’s and Constitutional Rights and guardian of constitution juga memberikan secercah harapan bagi para pencari keadilan khususnya yang berkaitan dengan perlindungan terhadap hak masyarakat hukum adat.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KEPALA DESA KARANG TUNGGAL KECAMATAN TENGGARONG SEBERANG KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA DALAM HAL PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAN ASET DESA (DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA) Marbun, Andreas Susanto; Pratiwie, Dinny Wirawan
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.351

Abstract

The Unitary Republic of Indonesia's Republic of Indonesia in organizing the system of government embraces the principle of Decentralization by providing opportunities and freedom to the regions to organize Regional Autonomy. Indonesia is a regional entity consisting of central government and local government, as regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which states that the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is divided into provinces and provinces are divided into districts and city, where each province, district, and city have local government, which is regulated by law. The district / municipality government comprises the subdistrict area, and each sub-district has village / village in it, the village's new face becomes the hope of accompanying the establishment of Law No. 6 of 2014 on the Village which becomes the starting point of the village's hope to be able to determine the position, role and authority over himself so that the village can be politically and politically swayed as the foundation of village democracy, as well as economically and culturally dignified as the face of village self-reliance and rural development. Article 26 has given the village chief the opportunity to manage the finances and assets owned by the village. The stages of the village financial management have been regulated by the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 113 of 2014 on Village Financial Management, and the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2016 on Village Asset Management regulates the procedures for managing village assets. The management of village finances and assets can’t be separated from the ability of the Village Head and other village apparatus. The responsibility of the Village Head in managing village finances and assets properly, transparently and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations is necessary to promote the development and economy of the village, including Karang Tunggal village as one of government under Kutai Kartanegara.
KAJIAN HUKUM KEDUDUKAN BANGUNAN DI ATAS HAK PAKAI ATAS TANAH YANG TELAH DI BATALKAN (Di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 40 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan Dan Hak Pakai Atas Tanah) Jaelani, Mahmud; Mukmin, Abdul
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.352

Abstract

The right to use is regulated in Article 41 through Article 43 which is further regulated in Government Regulation No. 40 of 1996 concerning Right to Cultivate, Right to Build and Right to Use of Land Article 41 to Article 58. In Article 41 paragraph (1) of Law Basic Agrarian Law, is defined as the Right to Use is the right to use and / or collect proceeds from land that is directly controlled by the state or land of the Property of another person, who gives authority and obligations specified in the decision to grant it by an official authorized to give it or in an agreement with the owner of the land, which is not a lease agreement or land processing agreement, everything originating does not conflict with the spirit and provisions of this law.So that the cause of the cancellation of the second right is the position of the building above the usufructuary rights to the land that has been cancelled. The position of the building this case is not only in the physical sense concerning the location and magnitude of the building alone, more than that it has a legal meaning concerning the legal position of the building. This is related to ownership rights and land rights attached to it. The method used in this study is a normative research study with legislation as primary legal material, books, literature as secondary legal material and information and data as secondary material from this study.In principle, the matter that causes the Right to Use of Land can be canceled is the expiration of the term or canceled by the authorized official, the management right holder or the landowner before the expiry date, released voluntarily by the right holder before the term expires, the right of use is revoked, abandoned, the land is destroyed and the Right of Use holder does not qualify as the Right to Use holder. Whereas in relation to the position of the building above the Use of Land Rights by the Indonesian Citizen who has been cancelled depends on the agreement that accompanies when the right to use is granted, but for foreigners through the right to use can transfer their assets through inheritance.  
KAJIAN HUKUM TENTANG PENGUKURAN DAN PEMETAAN UNTUK PENDAFTARAN TANAH DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN MENTERI AGRARIA DAN TATA RUANG/KEPALA BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS PERATURAN MENTERI AGRARIA DAN TATA RUANG/KEPALA BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERCEPATAN PELAKSANAAN PENDAFTARAN TANAH SISTEMATIS LENGKAP Putra, Garda Viska; Mukti, Hudali
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.353

Abstract

The measurement and mapping of land parcels for land registration is the initial subject in the framework of land certification to obtain a land title certificate. Problems and constraints that occur in the measurement and mapping of land parcels if not given a solution that can certainly cause more land disputes. Complete Systematic Land Registration is one of the efforts of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning or the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia in order to resolve the problems that occur, including the uncharted land parcels with old land titles and other fields that have not been granted land titles. a method of measuring the old parcels of land that are not in accordance with the current conditions, parsing land parcels that have experienced land disputes.
KESIAPAN BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KOTA SAMARINDA DALAM PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT 1 (SATU) LEMBAR (MENURUT PERATURAN MENTERI AGRARIA DAN TATA RUANG / KEPALA BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG /BENTUK DAN ISI SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH) Zakiy, Muchamad Naufal; jaidun, Jaidun
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.354

Abstract

Human and land have a strong relations, very pure and undivided. It can be understood, because land is a home, provide food, birth place, buried place, and home of the ancestor. There are always a relations between human and land, society and a land. The constitution in 1945 article 33 clause 3 mention that earth, water and space with all its contents are controlled by nation and uses for public prosperity, that regulated in land laws are the gift of God almighty, based on rule right from the nation, so its become the government responsibility to perform land registration in all of territory of Republic Indonesia based on law number 5 year 1960 about basic rule of principles of agrarian that further mentioned in UUPA that individualistic, communal, religious, it aims to protect the land and manage the relation of land right through the certificate submission as a proof of land right for it owner. Article 4 clause 2 mention that certificate that mentioned in clause 1 is printed in one sheet based on information from physical and juridical data also equipped by owner’s photo. As one of society essential needs, land have an important roles in society lives. In the process of achieving the certificate, land registration process must be adjusted to law and technology development and society needs that regulated in Ministerial Regulation of Agrarian and Spatial / Head of National Land Agency number 7 year 2017 about shape and content of certificate of land right.
MEMANTAPKAN LANDASAN HUKUM FORMIL SEBAGAI ALAT SINGKRONISASI DAN HARMONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN Nur, Insan Tajali
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.355

Abstract

The regulation in the Regional Regulation is faced with the problem of how the Regional Regulation can regulate the affairs of authority in accordance with the characteristics of the region. But it does not conflict with the higher laws and regulations. One of the problems is Disharmony legislation resulting in differences in interpretation in its implementation; the emergence of legal uncertainty; Legislation is not carried out effectively and efficiently, and legal dysfunction, in a disharmonic manner, the rules and regulations - Invitation under the above laws and regulations is an evaluation material. But de facto, there are a number of draft regulations based on rules outside the order of the laws.Whereas in Article 7 paragraph 2 of Act Number 12 of 2011 confirms the strength of the laws of the legislation in accordance with the hierarchy in paragraph 1. Continued related to Article 140 paragraph (3) of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning the Establishment of Legislation as has undergone the second amendment to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2015 concerning Regional Government, states that the procedure for preparing a draft Regional Regulation from the Governor or Regent / Mayor is regulated by a Presidential Regulation. Then Article 141 paragraph (2) of the Law on Regional Government states that further Provisions concerning the procedure for preparing the Regional Regulation are regulated in the DPRD Rules of Procedure.Based on the principle of the formation of laws and regulations, the Minister of Home Affairs's regulation violates the principle of conformity between types and materials of content, because the substance should be the material of the contents of the Presidential Regulation as part of the hierarchy of the Order of Regulations - Invitation and the contents of the DPRD Rules of Procedure.
PEMBENAHAN TERHADAP LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DAPAT MENIADAKAN OPSI HUKUMAN MATI BAGI NARAPIDANA DI INDONESIA (THE IMPROVEMENT OF QUALITY OF PENITENTIARY CAN ELIMINATE THE DEATH PENALTY OPTIONS OF CONVICTED CRIMINALS IN INDONESIA) Siahaan, Nomensen Freddy
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.359

Abstract

After a long time was not heard to the public area, lately death penalty toward the criminal cases that classified as extraordinary crime are appear. The author discovers electronic article about the execution of the death penalty which is the prosecutor prepares to execute death penalty toward the drugs dealer. The president of Republic of Indonesia stated that it is necessary to give a deterrent effect to the convicted  criminal and keep the morality of Indonesian teenagers. According to my opinion, the author argues that it will be better and wiser if we discuss about renovating all of the Penitentiary in Indonesia than debating whether death penalty could be done in Indonesia or not, because it will be displeasure many parties, death penalty infringed the human rights of the convicted criminals and cause psychological burden to them, families, the executor of the death penalty, and other parties. Because if we have to improve the quality of the Penitentiary, if the function of Penitentiary for fostering moralily has been optimal or properly enough to the convicted criminals, Indonesia will be no longer need the death penalty option as sanction to the convicted crimanals including for the extraordinary crime (especially for drugs trafficking in our country). Penitentiary is one of the public services which aims for fostering the people that initially have bad habits (commited to the crime), so that they will have the awareness to change their bad attitude into the be better ones, will not harm others, and positively contributed to the society. Already Penitentiary’s conditions should be designed in such a way and as good as possible, so that the inmates feels like at their own home (like having a second home after his own home), and feel humaner to spend their days in the Penitentiary. The author believes that if the Penitentiary has been improved and optimized its function well, then the real purpose of Penitentiary will definitely achieved. As stated in Law Number 12 Year 1995 regarding to Penitentiary Article 2 which states "sanction system are organized in order to fostering the convicted criminals in order to be the real man, aware of their fault, improve themselves, and not to repeat the criminal act so that they can be friendly received by the community, can actively participated in the development of our country, and can socialize themselves as good citizen."Article 3 on this regulation also intensifies the function of Penitentiary "the function of Penitentiary is to prepare convicted criminals to be able to properly integrated to the society, so they can be accepted again as members of the public who are free and responsible ones."
Efektifitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Perilaku “Ngelem” Pada Anak Remaja Sebagai Pelaku Sekaligus Korban (Self Victimizing) Di Kawasan Kampung Zombie Kota Samarinda Pratiwie, Dinny Wirawan; Linanda, Ayu
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i1.453

Abstract

Keberadaan salah satu kawasan kampung di wilayah Kota Samarinda yang menjadi pusat atau markas dari anak remaja untuk melakukan aktivitas menghisap lem,  yang sebelumnya dikenal dengan istilah Kampung Zombie, terletak di Kelurahan Mangkupalas, Kecamatan Samarinda Seberang Kota Samarinda, menjadi sebuah fenomena sosial yang cukup memprihatinkan. Dalam menyikapinya, diperlukan korelasi yang bersinergi dengan semua stakeholder dalam rangka mewujudkan efektifitas penegakan hukum terhadap perilaku ngelem pada anak remaja melalui upaya-upaya penegakan hukum terhadap perilaku “ngelem” yang menjadi tolak ukur keberhasilan penegakan hukum pada perilaku anak remaja “ngelem” sebagai pelaku sekaligus korban (self victimizing) khususnya di Kawasan Kampung Zombie, Kota Samarinda.
Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Pakai Tanah Sebagai Aset Pemerintah Pada Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Samarinda (Di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Menteri Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Tata Cara Pemberian Dan Pembatalan Hak Atas Tanah Negara Dan Hak Pengelolaan) Chandra, Angga Septika; Mukti, Hudali
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i1.454

Abstract

Pembatalan sertifikat hak pakai tanah pada tanah negara sebagai bagian dari aset pemerintah menimbulkan polemik terkait dapatkah sertifikat hak pakai tanah pada tanah negara yang telah menjadi nilai aset pemerintah dibatalkan oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional atau tidak dapat dibatalkan karena telah menjadi aset tetap pemerintah. Selain itu bila dapat dibatalkan bagaimana dengan status tanah akibat pembatalan sertifikat hak pakai tanah diatas tanah negara sedangkan tanah negara tersebut telah tercatat sebagai aset pemerintah. Dalam ruang lingkup daerah Pemerintah Kota Samarinda juga tidak terlepas dari polemik tersebut. Banyaknya tanah negara yang tercatat sebagai aset Pemerintah Kota Samarinda yang diakui hanya sebagian saja yang bersertifikat hak pakai tanah sedangkan sebagian lagi masih belum di sertifikasikan namun telah diinventarisasi sebagai aset Pemerintah Kota Samarinda. Hal tersebut mendorong Badan Pertanahan Nasional yang diwakili oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Samarinda untuk lebih aktif turut serta dalam menyelesaikan polemik terkait prosedur pembatalan sertifikat hak pakai atas tanah sebagai satu-satunya alat penegak hukum agraria nasional dengan melaksanakan sesuai ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku salah satunya ialah Peraturan Menteri Negeri Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Tata Cara Pemberian Dan Pembatalan Hak Atas Tanah Negara Dan Hak Pengelolaan.
Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Kota Samarinda (Studi Di Kelurahan Pelabuhan Kota Samarinda) Safitri, Wahyuni; Rustiana, Rustiana
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i1.455

Abstract

Korupsi merupakan salah satu masalah terbesar yang dihadapi oleh bangsa Indonesia khususnya kota Samarinda Kalimantan Timur. Banyak Orang yang tidak percaya lagi dengan penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi, dengan berbagai alasan kasus korupsi lepas dari tuntutan hukum membuat komponen masyarakat menjadi kehilangan kepercayaan terhadap penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi. Dampak yang dilahirkan akibat korupsi sangat berbahaya yang berakibat pada perkonomian dan pembangunan negara secara nasional. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah metode pendekatan empiris yang merupakan pendekatan yang relevan dengan permasalahan yang diteliti yaitu pendekatan langsung ke Masyarakat. Sehingga dapat memperoleh gambaran tentang persepsi masyarakat terhadap penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi dan kendala pelaksanaan penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di kota samarinda.  Berdasarkan hasil dan luaran yang dicapai dalam program penelitian adalah khususnya teruntuk masyarakat RT 29 Kelurahan Pelabuhan Kecamatan Samarinda Kota adalah pemahaman masyarakat yang ingin diketahui meliputi kesadaran (awareness), pengetahuan (knowledge), dan sikap (attitude) serta perilaku (behavior) masyarakat mengenai tindak pidana korupsi. Analisis dari tulisan ini menunjukan bahwa masyarakat banyak yang belum begitu mengerti dan paham mengenai penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi. Gambaran hasil dari kegiatan survey ini diharapkan dapat dijadikan masukan dan saran yang dapat membantu mengembangkan strategi yang efektif dalam memberantas korupsi serta peran masyarakat sebagai pengawas.

Page 10 of 21 | Total Record : 201

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2009 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 17 No. 2 (2025): AGUSTUS Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): Februari Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024): Agustus Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024): Februari Vol. 15 No. 2 (2023): Agustus Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): Februari Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022): Agustus Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): February Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): August Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): February Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): August Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): August Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): February Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018): February Vol. 9 No. 2 (2017): August Vol. 9 No. 1 (2017): February Vol. 8 No. 2 (2016): August Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016): February Vol. 7 No. 2 (2015): August Vol. 7 No. 1 (2015): February Vol. 6 No. 1 (2014): February Vol. 5 No. 1 (2013): February Vol. 4 No. 2 (2012): August Vol. 4 No. 1 (2012): February Vol. 3 No. 2 (2011): August Vol. 3 No. 1 (2011): February Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010): August Vol. 2 No. 1 (2010): February Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009): February More Issue