cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rengga Kusuma Putra
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
+6282359594933
Journal Mail Official
Jumadi@apji.org
Editorial Address
Iser, RT. 002, RW. 003, Kel. Iser, Kec. Petarukan, Pemalang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Published by Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia
ISSN : 30890942     EISSN : 30646332     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum, Merupakan kumpulan makalah atau artikel ilmiah yang telah dipresentasikan pada Konferensi Penelitian Nasional yang diselenggarakan secara rutin setiap tahun oleh Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. Topik makalah yang dimuat dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum, yaitu: (a). Hukum Ekonomi, (b). Hukum Perdata, (c). Hukum Lingkungan dan Tata Ruang, (d). Hukum Internasional, (e). Hukum dan Teknologi, (f). Hukum Pidana, (g). Hukum Tata Negara, (h), Hukum Tata Negara, (i). Hukum dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, (j). Hukum Acara (Peradilan), (k). Bidang-bidang lain yang relevan. Jurnal ini terbit 1 tahun 2 kali (Juni dan Desember).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 37 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
Water Justice Amid Climate Crisis: Implementing Risk-Based Water Allocation and Strengthening Farmer Association In-stitutional Capacity Hari Kusuma Yuda Tama; Waluyo Waluyo
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum,
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v2i2.80

Abstract

Historically, water resource management in Indonesia has faced significant complexities, often dominated by commercialization and investment-oriented policies that threaten the fundamental rights of farmers. The Constitutional Court’s decision to annul the previous Water Resources Law marks a crucial turning point, demanding a comprehensive policy reformulation. This entails a shift from a market-based paradigm to one grounded in human rights and social welfare, reaffirming state sovereignty over water for the prosperity of the people. The urgency of this reformulation is compounded by the imminent threat of climate change, which introduces high uncertainty into the hydrological cycle—manifesting as extreme droughts and floods—thereby directly impacting the agricultural sector. This research aims to formulate a climate-adaptive water resource management policy that secures the priority rights of farmers. Employing a Normative Legal Research Method with Statutory and Conceptual Approaches, the findings present a new, holistic legal and institu-tional framework. This framework centers on two pillars: first, the firm assertion and absolute legal protection of irrigation water allocation for farmers, even during periods of scarcity; and second, the adoption of a Climate-Adaptive Governance Model. This governance model integrates a unified climate monitoring system, resilient water infrastructure, and the empowerment of Water User Associations (P3A) at the grassroots level to independently respond to shifting climate patterns. This reformulation is essential for achieving water management that is just, sustainable, and effective in maintaining national food security
Penguatan Tata Kelola Perguruan Tinggi dalam Mewujudkan Layanan Akademik yang Transparan dan Akuntabel Andy Chairuddin; Wahira Wahira; Suarlin Suarlin; Andi Aslinda; A. Kasmawati; Andi Cudai Nur
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum,
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v2i2.81

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the strengthening of higher education governance in realizing transparent and accountable academic services. In the context of the globalization of higher education and increasing public accountability demands, universities are required not only to excel academically but also to provide services that are open, responsive, and accountable. This research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies involving university leaders, academic administrators, lecturers, and students. Data analysis was conducted interactively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that the principle of transparency has been implemented through digital-based academic information systems; however, consistency in updating information still needs improvement. Accountability has been supported by standard operating procedures and service evaluations, although performance measurement based on indicators has not been fully integrated. Stakeholder participation has been facilitated through evaluation forums, but involvement in strategic decision-making remains limited. Overall, the dimensions of transparency, accountability, participation, effectiveness, and responsibility are interrelated in shaping the quality of academic services. This study emphasizes that strengthening governance must be systemically internalized within organizational culture and institutional operational systems to enhance trust and stakeholder satisfaction.
Reformasi Birokrasi Digital dan Kesiapan Aparatur dalam Mewujudkan Pelayanan Publik Adaptif di Pemerintahan Daerah Fatmawati A Rahman; Jasruddin Daud; Rifdan Rifdan; Wahira Wahira
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum,
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v2i2.82

Abstract

cf
Kekuatan Pembuktian Dokumen Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti Perluasan dalam Persidangan Perdata di Era Transformasi Digital Susy Putri Wihadi; Alfred Ariyanto; Nunuk Jati Saputri; Thomas Mulyanto Kurniawan
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v3i1.83

Abstract

The digital transformation of the Indonesian judicial system through the implementation of e-court and e-litigation necessitates a redefinition of conventional evidentiary laws, which have historically been governed by the Herziene Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) and the Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg). This research aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of electronic documents as expanded means of proof in civil proceedings and to identify the challenges regarding their implementation. The research method employed is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings indicate that based on the principle of functional equivalence, electronic documents hold a legal status equivalent to paper-based documents, provided they meet the requirements of integrity, accessibility, and authenticity through certified electronic signatures as mandated by Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. The evidentiary strength of an electronic document may reach the level of conclusive evidence, similar to an authentic deed, if supported by a reliable electronic system. However, implementation still faces technical hurdles concerning metadata verification and limited human resource competency within the judiciary. This research recommends the urgent need for a new codification of civil procedural law and the standardization of digital forensic procedures in trials to ensure legal certainty and justice for all parties in the digital era.
Transformasi dan Dinamika Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia: Integrasi Asas, Sistem Pembuktian, dan Digitalisasi Peradilan Fredy Ied Fitriadi; Aldhitama Ramadhan; Fasub Hanal; Jimmi MP Aritonang
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v3i1.84

Abstract

This study examines the foundational framework and evolving dynamics of Indonesian civil procedural law (Hukum Acara Perdata) amid its transformation from colonial legal heritage toward a modern, digitalized justice system. Using normative-doctrinal legal research methodology combined with empirical court statistics from 2022–2024, the study analyzes four dimensions: (1) core procedural principles rooted in the HIR and RBg; (2) the mandatory mediation framework under PERMA No. 1 of 2016; (3) the evolution of evidence law toward electronic evidence under the amended UU ITE (Law No. 1 of 2024); and (4) mechanisms of judicial decisions and legal remedies. Findings show that e-court implementation has dramatically increased efficiency minutasi productivity rose from 64.35% (2022) to 96.50% (2024)—while 594,816 users registered through e-court by 2023. The study concludes that Indonesia’s civil procedural law is actively adapting to technological disruption, though structural challenges such as digital inequality, electronic evidence authentication gaps, and regulatory harmonization remain unresolved.
Analisis Prosedur Hukum Acara Perdata Terkait Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah: (Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat) Violla Evarista; Kristanto Kristanto; Vinanda Langgeng Kencana; Riyan Ardiansyah; I Komang Agus Tri Wismantara
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v3i1.85

Abstract

Land rights disputes arising from overlapping land certificates remain a complex agrarian law issue frequently encountered in Indonesia. This phenomenon reflects weaknesses in the land administration system, particularly in data collection, land measurement, and certificate issuance. Such disputes create conflicts, legal uncertainty, and reduced public trust in the land registration system. In practice, these disputes are generally resolved through civil litigation procedures in the District Court. This study aims to comprehensively analyze civil procedural law in resolving land rights disputes involving overlapping certificates and to examine the evidentiary strength of land certificates in judicial proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by primary and secondary legal materials. The findings indicate that dispute resolution begins with the filing of a lawsuit, followed by mediation, court examination, and the evidentiary process as the most crucial stage in determining lawful ownership. Land certificates serve as strong evidence; however, they are not absolute, as they may be challenged if administrative or substantive legal defects are identified. Judges play a central role in assessing certificate validity by considering land history, physical possession, good faith, and compliance with legal procedures. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of dispute resolution still requires improvement through better land administration, enhanced data accuracy, and stronger institutional integration.
Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Bukti Elektronik Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Gusni Cahaya Putri; Evandito Raihan Prayoga; Abram Sahing; Febri Gumelar
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v3i1.86

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology has increased the use of electronic documents in legal and business activities, thereby affecting the evidentiary system in Indonesian civil procedural law. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of electronic evidence and its evidentiary strength in resolving civil cases under Indonesian civil procedural law. The research method used is normative juridical research with statutory and library research approaches. The data were obtained from primary and secondary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively. The results show that electronic evidence has been legally recognized through Law Number 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Its evidentiary strength has the same legal position as other forms of evidence as long as it fulfills the requirements of authenticity, integrity, and validity of electronic data. Therefore, more detailed regulations regarding authentication standards and examination procedures for electronic evidence are still needed to ensure legal certainty in civil court practices.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 37

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Juni : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Juni : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum