cover
Contact Name
Muh Ibnu Sholeh
Contact Email
indocelllular@gmail.com
Phone
+6282144444454
Journal Mail Official
editorijhsp@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Tambakberas Barat Jombang, Tambak Rejo, Kec. Jombang, Kabupaten Jombang, Jawa Timur 61419
Location
Kab. jombang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
International Journal of Health Systems and Policy
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31095267     DOI : 10.71305
Core Subject : Health, Science,
International Journal of Health Systems and Policy (IJHSP) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that focuses on advancing research, policy analysis, and innovation in health systems and health policy globally. The journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue on system design, governance, financing, and reform, particularly in relation to equity, Universal Health Coverage (UHC), and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). IJHSP welcomes original research, policy papers, case studies, and reviews in areas including (but not limited to): Health system governance and accountability Health financing and insurance reform Policy evaluation and comparative health systems Public health infrastructure and emergency preparedness Digital health and health technology innovation Human resources for health planning and management Health systems in fragile, conflict, or post-conflict settings Cross-sectoral policies and social determinants of health Equity and access to care for vulnerable populations Policy responses to pandemics and global health threats The journal encourages submissions from academics, public health professionals, policymakers, development practitioners, and researchers working in global, regional, or national health system contexts.
Articles 5 Documents
Evaluating Emergency Preparedness And Health System Resilience: A Cross-Country Analysis Of COVID-19 Responses In OECD And LMIC Contexts Muh Ibnu Sholeh; Himad Ali
International Journal of Health Systems and Policy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Vol 1 No 1 June 2025
Publisher : Ponpes As-Salafiyyah Asy-Syafi'iyyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71305/ijhsp.v1i1.338

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic provided an unprecedented stress test for health systems and governance structures across both high-income (OECD) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to evaluate how countries with differing economic capacities responded to the pandemic by analyzing three key dimensions: health system capacity, governance and emergency response, and recovery and adaptation policies. Using a mixed-methods comparative approach, we examined data from WHO, OECD, World Bank, and the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, supplemented by in-depth case studies of selected countries including Germany, South Korea, Indonesia, and Nigeria. Findings reveal that while OECD countries generally had higher baseline capacities such as hospital bed density and workforce ratios outcomes varied significantly due to differences in policy timing, public trust, and crisis coordination. Some LMICs, despite limited infrastructure, mobilized resources effectively through strong community engagement and past epidemic experience, notably in Vietnam and Rwanda. Governance quality, transparency, and prior exposure to health emergencies emerged as more critical to resilience than economic status alone. The study concludes that health system resilience is a multidimensional construct shaped by institutional adaptability, citizen compliance, and leadership capacity. These insights underscore the importance of integrating equity, trust-building, and cross-sector coordination into future global health preparedness strategies.
Intersectoral Action For Addressing Social Determinants Of Health: Policy Integration Across Health, Education, And Social Protection Bambang Wahrudin; Mochammmad Syafiuddin Shobirin
International Journal of Health Systems and Policy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Vol 1 No 1 June 2025
Publisher : Ponpes As-Salafiyyah Asy-Syafi'iyyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71305/ijhsp.v1i1.339

Abstract

Persistent health inequities across Latin America are deeply rooted in structural social determinants, including poverty, unequal access to education, and inadequate social protection systems. This study investigates how intersectoral policy integration has been employed as a strategic response to these challenges, focusing on the alignment of health, education, and social protection policies within national frameworks. Utilizing a comparative case study approach, the research analyzes intersectoral strategies implemented in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. These countries were selected based on the existence of national SDH policies, availability of data, and documented outcomes in health equity. The analysis draws from government policy documents, international reports, and academic literature, and applies the “Health in All Policies” (HiAP) framework as an analytical lens. The findings indicate that interministerial coordination, high-level political commitment, and flexible local implementation are critical to success. Brazil’s integration of health and cash transfer programs, Colombia’s territorial equity planning, and Peru’s centralized coordination through MIDIS illustrate diverse but effective models. Despite measurable progress, challenges remain, including fragmented information systems, uneven institutional capacity, and political instability. The study concludes that sustained, equity-focused governance is essential for effective intersectoral action and that Latin America’s experiences offer valuable lessons for global public health policy and development planning.
Health Financing Strategies In Fragile And Conflict-Affected Settings: Lessons From Humanitarian And Development Synergies Muh Habibulloh; M. Munif
International Journal of Health Systems and Policy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Vol 1 No 1 June 2025
Publisher : Ponpes As-Salafiyyah Asy-Syafi'iyyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71305/ijhsp.v1i1.340

Abstract

Health financing in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS) presents complex challenges due to weak governance, insecure environments, and limited institutional capacity. Traditional financing mechanisms, which are often rigid and siloed, are inadequate for the dynamic needs of conflict zones. This study analyzes adaptive and hybrid financing models that integrate humanitarian assistance with long-term development approaches to support more resilient health systems. Drawing on case studies from South Sudan, Yemen, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the analysis highlights the effectiveness of pooled funding, flexible donor strategies, joint planning platforms, and community engagement in improving health service delivery. Findings show that hybrid models are better suited to maintaining continuity, equity, and system responsiveness during protracted crises. Local ownership, especially through participatory planning and accountability mechanisms, is a key enabler of sustainability. However, challenges remain, including short funding cycles, fragmented coordination, and capacity limitations in financial and health information systems. Addressing these barriers requires a shift from isolated interventions toward integrated, inclusive, and long-term financing strategies. The study concludes that institutionalizing humanitarian-development synergies is essential for building adaptive, accountable, and equitable health systems in FCAS. These insights provide valuable guidance for donors, policymakers, and international agencies committed to improving health outcomes in complex emergency settings.
Strengthening Health System Governance For Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Comparative Study Of Policy Reforms In Southeast Asia Nur 'Azah; Siti Fatinnah Binti Ab Rahman
International Journal of Health Systems and Policy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Vol 1 No 1 June 2025
Publisher : Ponpes As-Salafiyyah Asy-Syafi'iyyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71305/ijhsp.v1i1.342

Abstract

Achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) necessitates not only increased financial investments in health services but also the establishment of strong governance and accountability mechanisms that ensure equity, transparency, and system-wide efficiency. This article offers a comparative analysis of health system governance reforms in three middle-income Southeast Asian countries Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam each of which has undertaken distinct strategies to accelerate UHC implementation. Using a qualitative policy analysis approach, the study examines institutional reforms, decentralization processes, regulatory innovations, and performance-based accountability tools that have shaped national health agendas. The findings indicate that while all three countries have expanded access to healthcare, the outcomes of governance reforms vary significantly based on factors such as political leadership, subnational administrative capacity, and policy coherence. Indonesia’s efforts in strategic purchasing, the Philippines’ enactment of the Universal Health Care Act, and Vietnam’s emphasis on digital governance and financial transparency each offer context-specific insights into effective reform. Nonetheless, ongoing challenges such as local-level disparities, fragmented data systems, and limited stakeholder influence persist. The article concludes that governance should be viewed not as a peripheral concern but as a central pillar of UHC. Its findings are intended to inform both regional and global policy dialogues on building resilient and accountable health systems.
Strengthening Health System Resilience Through Governance Reform Sirojuddin Abror; Hawwin Muzakki
International Journal of Health Systems and Policy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Vol 1 No 1 June 2025
Publisher : Ponpes As-Salafiyyah Asy-Syafi'iyyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71305/ijhsp.v1i1.343

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical structural weaknesses in global health systems and underscored the importance of effective governance in sustaining progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This study presents a cross-national comparative analysis of five countries New Zealand, South Korea, Germany, the United States, and Brazil to evaluate how governance dynamics influenced health system resilience and the trajectory toward UHC during the pandemic. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study integrates policy reviews, public health data, and expert interviews to assess four key governance dimensions: response speed, policy coherence, public trust, and enforcement effectiveness. The results reveal that countries with responsive and transparent governance structures were better able to maintain essential health services, safeguard vulnerable populations, and ensure equitable access without imposing significant financial burdens. Conversely, nations with fragmented or incoherent policy environments experienced greater disruptions and setbacks in their UHC pathways. The study concludes that governance reform must be positioned as a strategic imperative not merely an administrative function in global health planning. Strengthening cross-sectoral coordination, enhancing data transparency, and building institutional trust are essential for constructing health systems that are not only resilient to future crises but also inclusive and equitable in the pursuit of UHC.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5