cover
Contact Name
Alwi Padly Harahap
Contact Email
alwi3006233002@uinsu.ac.id
Phone
+6282267157243
Journal Mail Official
jurnalarba@albahriah-institut.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Jermal 15 Komplek D’Perdana Residence, Kecamatan Medan Denai, Kota Medan, Provinsi Sumatera Utara, 20227
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31095607     DOI : https://doi.org/10.64691/nizamiyah
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin adalah jurnal ilmiah yang menerbitkan hasil penelitian, kajian teoretis, dan analisis kritis dalam berbagai bidang ilmu pengetahuan, khususnya sains, ilmu sosial, dan kajian multidisiplin. Jurnal ini berfungsi sebagai wadah akademik bagi para peneliti, dosen, praktisi, dan mahasiswa untuk menyampaikan temuan-temuan ilmiah yang berkontribusi pada pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan solusi permasalahan masyarakat terkini. Cakupan jurnal ini meliputi pendidikan, kesehatan, ekonomi, sosiologi, politik, agama, dan bidang multidisiplin lainnya yang relevan dengan tantangan zaman. Diterbitkan oleh Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia, Nizamiyah berkomitmen untuk menjunjung tinggi integritas ilmiah dan keterbukaan terhadap pendekatan interdisipliner. Dengan sistem penerbitan yang teratur dan proses peer-review yang ketat, jurnal ini bertujuan untuk menjadi rujukan utama dalam pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan yang inklusif, inovatif, dan aplikatif. Kehadiran jurnal ini diharapkan dapat menjembatani kolaborasi antara dunia akademik dan masyarakat luas dalam membangun peradaban yang berbasis pada ilmu pengetahuan dan nilai-nilai.
Articles 34 Documents
Ekonomi Kreatif dan UMKM Risol: Strategi Membangun Identitas Produk di Tengah Kompetisi Kuliner Harahap, Nasya Putri Afrida; Ramadani , Fairuza; Berutu, Cinta Zuluna; Hafis, Egas; Zainarti, Zainarti
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.109

Abstract

Spring roll MSMEs face increasingly fierce culinary competition, particularly amid product diversification, changing consumer preferences, and demands for continued differentiation. This study aims to analyze product identity development strategies that can strengthen the position of spring roll MSMEs in both local and digital markets. Using a qualitative approach with a document analysis design, data were collected through document and marketing searches, as well as content analysis of promotional materials to capture actual practices in building product image. The research findings indicate that flavor innovation plays a significant role as a differentiation tool, enabling spring roll products to appear unique through the exploration of ingredient variations, non-traditional flavor combinations, and adaptation to taste trends, thus creating memorable sensory value for consumers. Visual branding and packaging design have been shown to increase brand visibility through consistency in color, typography, and graphic elements that emphasize product character while strengthening quality associations. Storytelling makes a strong contribution to building unique value by linking products to narratives of origin, creative processes, and authentic messages that trigger consumer emotional engagement and expand product meaning. In addition, responsive distribution strategies, such as the use of digital platforms, delivery services, and adaptive point-of-sale arrangements, along with a holistically designed customer experience through friendly service, fast response, and quality assurance, encourage consistent strengthening of product identity. The theoretical implications of this research enrich the study of the creative economy by providing a comprehensive understanding of the construction of MSME product identity. In contrast, its practical implications offer strategic guidelines for business actors to increase competitiveness based on creativity and consumer experience.
Inovasi dan Strategi Pemasaran UMKM Bakso untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Siregar, Sri Intan Nur’aini; Dalimunthe , Siti Nurkholijah; Putri , Naila Atika; Siregar, Nadya Faiza; Zainarti, Zainarti
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.110

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasingly fierce competition in the culinary MSME sector, especially in meatball businesses, which require business actors to develop innovative and adaptive marketing strategies to maintain competitiveness and increase revenue. The objectives of this study are to analyze the forms of product innovation undertaken by meatball MSMEs, digital marketing strategies that leverage online platforms to expand consumer reach, conventional marketing strategies that remain relevant for building closeness with local customers, and to examine how integrating both approaches contributes to increased revenue. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method; data are collected through a literature review, then analyzed using data reduction techniques, data presentation, and systematic conclusion drawing. The results show that product innovation, such as menu variations, improved raw material quality, and flavor differentiation, are proven to expand market segments and increase perceived value in the eyes of consumers, while digital marketing strategies through the use of social media, digital catalogs, and interactive promotions significantly increase brand visibility and accelerate the purchasing process; at the same time, conventional marketing strategies continue to play a vital role in building trust through direct interaction, friendly service, and local promotions, so that both work complementary in forming a marketing ecosystem that strengthens loyalty and improves the revenue performance of meatball MSMEs. These findings have theoretical implications for the importance of integrating innovation and marketing as a unified business strategy, and offer practical implications for culinary MSMEs to optimize product creativity and utilize marketing channels in an integrated manner.
Dinamika Baper dalam Interaksi Sosial Generasi Zilenial: Studi Sensitivitas Emosi dan Komunikasi Hia, Elisama; Sirikole , Indra; Hatlan, Ruby
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.82

Abstract

The phenomenon of baper (carrying feelings) is increasingly found in the social interactions of the Ziennial generation, especially amidst increased social media use, pressure for digital validation, and high exposure to emotional content. Empirically, this generation shows a tendency towards higher emotional sensitivity compared to previous generations, as evidenced by increased conflict due to miscommunication, social anxiety, emotional withdrawal, and a high reliance on digital responses such as likes and comments. Various field findings and psychological reports also indicate that the 18–35 age group experiences a surge in stress, anxiety, and difficulty regulating emotions, particularly due to rapid but miscontextualized digital interactions. This condition shows that baper is not merely a generational stereotype, but a real psychosocial problem that requires treatment. Departing from this urgency, this study aims to understand the phenomenon of baper as a form of emotional sensitivity in the social interactions of the Ziennial Generation. The study used a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews, non-participatory observation, and open-ended questionnaires with purposively selected participants aged 18–35. The results showed that baper is influenced by family parenting patterns, intensity of social media use, the need for digital validation, and mental health challenges such as anxiety and stress. These findings confirm that emotional outbursts reflect the need for social acceptance and emotional stability shaped by the digital context and contemporary culture. The study concludes that empathetic communication strategies, early mental health education, and strengthening emotional intelligence are necessary to enable the Ziennial generation to build healthy and adaptive social interactions in the digital age.
Ontologi Islam: Hakekat Ilmu dan Worldview Tauhid Islam serta Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam Afima, Oby Ara; Amril M
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.113

Abstract

This article examines the concept of Islamic ontology as a philosophical foundation for understanding the nature of knowledge and the Islamic monotheistic worldview, as well as its implications for Islamic religious education. Ontology, as a branch of philosophy that discusses the nature of existence, from an Islamic perspective, asserts that everything originates from God as the Obligatory Being, while humans and nature are creations dependent on Him. The nature of knowledge in Islam is not only empirical and rational, but also transcendental, as knowledge is viewed as a divine mandate aimed at bringing humans closer to God and fostering noble morals. The Islamic monotheistic worldview places the oneness of God as the central orientation in the pursuit and development of knowledge, so that knowledge is not neutral, but rather bound to divine values ​​that shape the character, morals, and spirituality of students. This study uses a qualitative method with a library research approach and descriptive-analytical analysis to examine the relationship between ontology, the nature of knowledge, and the monotheistic worldview in Islamic education. The results of the study indicate that Islamic religious education must be understood as a process of developing ontological awareness of monotheism, which integrates knowledge, faith, and morals into one whole. Thus, Islamic education not only functions as a transfer of knowledge but also as a means of tazkiyah (purification of the soul) and the formation of an integral personality (insān kāmil) who can face global challenges while adhering to the value of monotheism. The tawḥīd worldview emphasizes that knowledge must always be tied to divine values, so that no knowledge is free from moral responsibility.
Metode Integratif Takhrīj Hadis: Prosedur Sistematis Penelusuran Sanad dan Matan dalam Studi Interdisipliner Surya, Muhammad; Pransetia, Arya Handika; Harahap, Selfi Anna; Uzmanarati, Ulya
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.117

Abstract

Methodological fragmentation in the practice of takhrīj hadith remains a fundamental problem in contemporary hadith studies, primarily due to the separation of sanad analysis and matn analysis, which proceeds partially and uncoordinated within a unified procedural framework. This condition results in a weak consistency in the historical assessment of hadith and limits the analytical exploration of the dynamics of transmission and the construction of hadith meaning. This article aims to formulate an integrative and systematic takhrīj hadith method by positioning sanad and matn analysis as two interrelated dimensions in an interdisciplinary study process. This study uses a qualitative research type based on a literature study with the main data sources being classical and contemporary works in the science of hadith, as well as supporting literature from historical and social science studies. The analytical approach is carried out through the integration of sanad criticism, matn criticism, and contextual reading of the social, intellectual, and historical conditions of the narration. The results show that the integrative takhrīj hadith method has the main character of a logical unity between the verification of transmission lines, evaluation of the coherence and substance of matn, and analysis of the context of hadith production and reproduction. The stages of this method include comprehensive mapping of the sanad, examining the relationship between the sanad and the text (matn), and synthesizing contextual analysis as the basis for historical assessment of hadith. This integration forms a methodological logic that is not linear, but rather dialogical and reflective. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of reformulating the takhrīj hadith methodology to be more adaptive, systematic, and relevant for the development of contemporary hadith studies oriented toward historical accuracy and analytical rigor.
Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ Sebagai Metode Kritik Wacana: Menyingkap Bias Otoritas dalam Sejarah Transmisi Hadis Nasution, Maslan; Aini, Putri Sagita Anugrah; Sajidah, Saffina; Siregar, Idris; Nasution , Syah Fitriani
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.118

Abstract

This article departs from the epistemological problem in hadith studies, which positions takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ primarily as a normative verification technique to determine the quality of narrations, thereby tending to overlook the dimensions of power relations, the production of authority, and the discursive dynamics at work in the history of hadith transmission. This approach limits the takhrīj’s ability to read the sanad selection process as a socio-intellectual practice laden with interests and scholarly hierarchies. This study aims to reconstruct takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ as a tool of discourse criticism that enables the disclosure of authority bias in the formation of the hadith canon. The study uses a qualitative method based on literature studies with a critical discourse analysis approach to takhrīj texts, works of rijāl al-Ḥadīṡ, and the dominant sanad assessment practices in the classical tradition. The results of this study indicate that takhrīj operates as a non-neutral discursive practice, as it systematically reproduces certain authorities through hierarchies of narrators, privileging dominant transmission networks, and mechanisms of exclusion against narrations originating from marginalized or outside-the-mainstream figures. The analysis also reveals that the criteria for authenticity are not merely technical, but are articulated in the configuration of scholarly discourse that affirms the legitimacy of certain groups while limiting the possibility of alternative interpretations. The implications of this study emphasize the need to reposition takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ in contemporary hadith studies as a critical-analytical tool capable of reading hadith not only as normative texts, but also as products of power relations and constructions of historical authority, thus opening up a more reflective and contextual reading space.
Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ sebagai Metode Analisis Historis: Integrasi Kritik Sanad, Matan, dan Konteks Sosial Periwayatan Siregar, Idris; Sari, Friskila Santika; Putri, Aprilia; Siregar, Faliha Aulia; Siregar, Agung Julian
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.119

Abstract

This article departs from the methodological problems in contemporary hadith studies that tend to reduce takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ as a technical-verification procedure to assess the validity of the sanad, while ignoring the historical, discursive, and social dimensions of the hadith transmission process. This reduction causes analytical limitations in understanding hadith as a product of knowledge transmission that occurs in a specific spatial and temporal context. This study aims to reconstruct takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ as an integrative historical analysis method by combining sanad criticism, matn criticism, and analysis of the social context of transmission within a single integrated methodological framework. This study uses a qualitative method with a historical-critical approach through a review of classical and contemporary hadith literature, a comparative analysis of transmission routes, and an examination of the relationship between hadith texts, narrators, and the socio-intellectual conditions that underlie them. The results of this study indicate that the integration of sanad criticism, matn criticism, and social context allows analysis of the reading of hadith not only as a static normative text, but as a dynamic historical process, reflecting the interaction between the authority of the narrators, social structures, and the epistemic needs of the early Muslim community. This approach reveals variations in redaction, shifts in meaning, and social rationalities that influence the selection and transmission of hadith. Theoretically, this study has implications for the development of contemporary hadith study methodology by expanding the function of takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ from a verification tool to an instrument of historical analysis capable of bridging the classical critical tradition with modern scientific approaches.
Metodologi Takhrīj Berbasis Rijāl: Menggabungkan Jarḥ wa al-Taʻdīl dan Evidence-Based Approach Juwita, Frasiska Sari; Munthe , Khoirotun Nisah Br; Irhamsyah, Muhammad; Rifa’i, M. Mashduqi; Siregar, Idris
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.122

Abstract

The study of takhrīj hadith has so far been dominated by a normative approach that positions the assessment of rijāl primarily as a reproduction of classical authority, so that the process of verifying narrator and sanad data often lacks a systematic, transparent, and methodologically traceable evaluation mechanism. This condition has implications for the limited consistency and replicability of hadith assessment in the context of contemporary hadith studies that demand higher scientific accountability. This study aims to reconstruct the methodology of takhrīj based on rijāl through the integration of the principles of jarḥ wa al-Taʻdīl with an evidence-based approach, so that the assessment of narrators and sanad is not only based on normative authority, but also on structured data management and verification. The study uses a qualitative-analytical approach with a critical analysis of rijāl literature, works of jarḥ wa al-Taʻdīl, and the scientific evidence framework that has developed in the modern research tradition. The results of this study indicate the formation of a takhrīj methodological framework that places rijāl data as the primary basis of analysis through the stages of source inventory, cross-verification of narrator information, assessment of the evidential weight of jarḥ and taʻdīl, and consistent synthesis of findings in the evaluation of sanad. This framework allows for a more structured, transparent, and consistent hadith assessment process, while minimizing subjectivity and fragmentation of assessment. The implications of this research lie in strengthening the validity and reliability of hadith assessment, as well as its contribution to developing a takhrīj methodology that is adaptive to the demands of contemporary hadith studies without abandoning the foundations of classical scholarship.
Menilai Ulang Objektivitas Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ: Antara Klaim Metode Ilmiah dan Bias Ideologis Aulia, Annisa Rahma; Harahap, Nurul Amelia; Siregar, Idris; Simangungsong, Liwardha; Salman, Salman
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.123

Abstract

This article reassesses the claim of objectivity of takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ, which has long been positioned as a scientific and neutral methodological procedure in the discipline of ʻulūm al-Ḥadīṡ, by highlighting the problem of ideological bias inherent in its historical and epistemological practices. The research background departs from the dominant assumption that takhrīj functions solely as a value-free sanad and matan verification technique, while several textual indications and scientific practices point to the intervention of mażhab preferences, the hierarchy of narrators’ authority, and the construction of orthodoxy that influence the results of hadith assessments. This study aims to critically evaluate the methodological objectivity of takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ by examining the epistemic consistency between the claim of scientific procedures and their operational reality in classical hadith literature and contemporary discourse. This study employs a qualitative-critical approach with an epistemological analysis of representative takhrīj works, the rijāl al-Ḥadīṡ, and modern methodological studies, through comparative reading and critical discourse analysis. The results demonstrate a structural tension between technical procedures claimed to be objective—such as assessing the fairness and reliability of narrators—and ideological influences operating through source selection, establishing credibility standards, and legitimizing certain scholarly authorities. These findings indicate that the objectivity of takhrīj is historically and discursively framed, not absolute, thus demanding a more reflective methodological reformulation. The theoretical implications of this study lie in strengthening the critical paradigm in hadith studies, by encouraging the integration of epistemological analysis and ideological criticism to broaden the horizon of a more transparent and accountable hadith methodology.
Takhrīj al-Ḥadīs Digital: Tantangan Epistemologis Penggunaan Basis Data Hadis dalam Verifikasi Riwayat Agustina, Mery; Siregar, Idris; Bintang , Muhammad Arif Yasin; Masliani, Masliani; Nidaulhaq, Fatiya
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.124

Abstract

The development of information technology has driven a significant shift in the practice of hadith retrieval, from manual searches based on classical texts to the use of digital hadith databases that offer speed, accessibility, and ease of search. This shift, while providing methodological efficiency, raises complex epistemological issues, particularly regarding the validity of knowledge, scholarly authority, and the relationship between classical hadith methods and computational logic. This study aims to critically analyze the use of digital hadith databases in the process of narration verification, highlighting the accompanying epistemological implications. The study uses a qualitative-analytical method through an epistemological approach, supported by a review of classical and contemporary literature, as well as a critical analysis of a number of digital hadith platforms widely used in hadith studies. The results of the study indicate a shift in scientific authority from the individual competence of muḥaddith to technological authority that relies on data structures and algorithm design, the limitations of search algorithms in representing the complexity of sanad and matn, the fragmentation of the scientific context of hadith due to the separation of narration from its historical and methodological framework, and the fundamental tension between the evaluative-qualitative epistemology of ʻulūm al-Ḥadīs and the quantitative and reductionist digital logic. These findings confirm that digital hadith databases cannot yet replace the critical function of classical methodology, but rather act as supporting instruments that require a strict epistemological framework. Academically, this study has implications for the need to develop an integrative takhrīj model that synergizes traditional scientific authority with digital technology critically and reflectively in the digital era.

Page 3 of 4 | Total Record : 34