AGRONES: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, AGRIBUSINESS WELFARE, TECHNOLOGI, HUMANITY, ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND ECONOMY
FOKUS AND SCOPE AGRONES: Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy is a multidisciplinary scientific journal that publishes high-quality research and studies across the interconnected fields of agriculture, agribusiness, community welfare, technology, human development, environmental sustainability, social sciences, and economic growth. This journal aims to serve as a platform for disseminating innovative research findings, critical analyses, and practical applications that contribute to building a sustainable, inclusive, and technology-driven agricultural and rural development sector. The scope of AGRONES includes, but is not limited to, the following areas: Agriculture and Agricultural Technology Precision agriculture, smart farming, and digital agriculture Mechanization and automation in farming systems Biotechnology and genetic innovation in crop production Post-harvest technology and agricultural product processing Innovations in sustainable farming practices Agribusiness, Economics, and Welfare Agribusiness management, entrepreneurship, and rural enterprise development Supply chain and value chain analysis in agricultural systems Agricultural policies, rural development, and community empowerment Marketing strategies, consumer behavior, and trade in agricultural products Socio-economic strategies for improving farmer welfare Humanity, Social, and Environmental Issues in Agriculture Climate change and its socio-economic impacts on agriculture Agroecology, environmental conservation, and biodiversity protection Soil and water management for sustainable production Waste reduction, recycling, and circular economy in agriculture Renewable energy applications in agricultural and rural communities Livelihoods, Social Development, and Inclusive Growth Community-based agricultural development Education and capacity building for farmers and rural youth Human welfare and equality in agricultural systems Social innovation and participatory development approaches AGRONES accepts original research articles, literature reviews, case studies, and technical reports that make significant contributions to the advancement of knowledge in these fields. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure their scientific quality, originality, and relevance. The journal adopts an open-access policy to enable global accessibility and the wide dissemination of research for sustainable agricultural and rural transformation.
Articles
35 Documents
<![CDATA[Ethnoveterinary Practices And Use Value Analysis Of Medicinal Plants Used For Cattle In Lelekaa Village, Wolasi District, South Konawe Regency ]]>
<![CDATA[Mega Indriyani]]>;
<![CDATA[Farra Sasmita]]>;
<![CDATA[Wa Ode Umrawati Latif]]>;
<![CDATA[Inal Inal]]>;
<![CDATA[Hajar Hajar]]>;
<![CDATA[Awal Maulid Sari]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): July - September 2026 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v2i2.940
<![CDATA[Ethnoveterinary knowledge is an important component of local community knowledge concerning the use of plant resources to help manage livestock health problems. This study aimed to describe ethnoveterinary practices among cattle farmers and analyze the Use Value (UV) of plants utilized by the community in Lelekaa Village, Wolasi District, South Konawe Regency. The study employed a descriptive-exploratory approach combining qualitative and quantitative data. A total of 35 informants were selected through total sampling based on their involvement in cattle husbandry and knowledge of medicinal plant use. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observation, and documentation. Qualitative data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while quantitative analysis used the Use Value index. The results showed that the community managed several groups of livestock health problems, including eye diseases (11 cases), oral cavity diseases (9 cases), digestive disorders and parasitic infections (8 cases), and skin diseases (7 cases). Five plant species were documented: Piper betle, Curcuma longa, Zingiber officinale, Alpinia galanga, and Annona muricata. The plant parts used were leaves and rhizomes, with preparation methods including boiling, crushing, squeezing, and mixing with feed, followed by oral or topical administration. The highest UV was recorded for Zingiber officinale (0.77), followed by Piper betle (0.69), Alpinia galanga (0.57), Annona muricata (0.49), and Curcuma longa (0.46). UV values indicate the relative level of utilization based on informant reports and do not constitute evidence of pharmacological effectiveness. Documenting this local ethnoveterinary knowledge is important as a foundation for further research on the safety and therapeutic effectiveness of medicinal plants used in cattle health management.]]>
<![CDATA[Community Responses To The Bali Cattle Development Program At UPTD Anduna, Laeya District, South Konawe Regency ]]>
<![CDATA[Guntur Guntur]]>;
<![CDATA[Awal Maulid Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Farra Sasmita]]>;
<![CDATA[Wa Ode Umrawati Latif]]>;
<![CDATA[Hajar Hajar]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): July - September 2026 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v2i2.947
<![CDATA[This study aimed to analyze community responses to the Bali Cattle Development Program at UPTD Anduna, Laeya District, South Konawe Regency, and to identify the factors influencing community responses to program implementation. The study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive method and was conducted at UPTD Anduna from October to November 2025. The study involved 15 informants who were directly involved in the program, including beneficiary farmers, UPTD personnel, and community leaders. Informants were selected using purposive sampling based on their involvement and knowledge of the program. Data were collected through observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation and were analyzed through data reduction, data display, conclusion drawing, and verification. Data trustworthiness was established through source and method triangulation. The findings indicate that community responses to the program were generally positive and participatory. In the cognitive dimension, most informants understood the objectives and benefits of the program, with 13 of 15 informants (86.7%) reporting awareness of the training and technical assistance provided by UPTD. In the affective dimension, community members demonstrated positive attitudes because the program was perceived as providing economic benefits and supporting livestock enterprise development. In the conative dimension, 12 of 15 farmers (80.0%) actively participated in training, cattle management, farmer-group activities, and implementation of technical recommendations. Community responses were influenced by internal factors, including knowledge, experience, and economic motivation, as well as external factors, including UPTD support, extension services, facilities, and farmer-group institutions. The main challenges included limited financial resources, unequal distribution of assistance, and insufficient intensity of extension activities. Program sustainability requires continuous technical assistance, equitable access to program support, stronger farmer groups, and improved farmer capacity.]]>
<![CDATA[The Effect Of Wheat Flour Substitution With Mocaf And Mung Bean Flour On The Organoleptic Characteristics And Chemical Composition Of White Bread ]]>
<![CDATA[Putu Budi Andika]]>;
<![CDATA[Hastian Hastian]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustan Ari]]>;
<![CDATA[La Oge]]>;
<![CDATA[Ruksanan Ruksanan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): July - September 2026 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v2i2.948
<![CDATA[This study aimed to analyze the organoleptic characteristics and chemical properties of white bread substituted with mocaf (Modified Cassava Flour) and mung bean flour. Five formulations were evaluated: P0 (100% wheat flour), P1 (90% wheat flour + 5% mocaf + 5% mung bean flour), P2 (80% wheat flour + 10% mocaf + 10% mung bean flour), P3 (70% wheat flour + 15% mocaf + 15% mung bean flour), and P4 (60% wheat flour + 20% mocaf + 20% mung bean flour). Organoleptic evaluation was conducted using a five-point hedonic test involving 30 untrained panelists who assessed color, aroma, texture, and taste. Because the organoleptic data were ordinal and did not meet the normality assumption, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used at a 5% significance level, followed by the Mann–Whitney test for parameters showing significant differences. The best substitution treatment was determined based on the highest and most consistent acceptance across the organoleptic attributes and was subsequently subjected to laboratory analysis. P0 obtained the highest overall acceptance, while P1 was the most consistently accepted substitution treatment. P1 showed favorable acceptance for color (3.4), aroma (3.3), texture (3.2), and taste (3.3). Statistical analysis showed a significant effect of substitution on color (P < 0.05), while aroma (P > 0.05), texture (P > 0.05), and taste (P > 0.05) were not significantly affected. P1 was therefore selected as the best substitution formulation for chemical analysis. Laboratory results showed that P1 had a mean moisture content of 22.46% and protein content of 10.53%. The moisture content was below the maximum limit specified by the applicable Indonesian National Standard (SNI), while the protein content exceeded the reference value reported by the Directorate of Nutrition, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. These findings indicate that P1 provides a favorable balance between sensory acceptance and protein content and has potential for further development as a white bread formulation using local flour resources.]]>
<![CDATA[Sustainable Conservation in Maize Fields: Analysing the Impact of Cosmos caudatus Refugia on Natural Enemy Diversity ]]>
<![CDATA[Awaluddin Awaluddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur Ana]]>;
<![CDATA[Waode Siti Anima Hisein]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahayu Rahayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Vit Neru Satrah]]>;
<![CDATA[Rian Ariani]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Oktober - Desember 2026 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v2i3.949
<![CDATA[Maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation is frequently affected by pest infestations that can reduce crop productivity. The use of refugia plants may support arthropods that provide ecological services in agricultural ecosystems. This study investigated the association between king’s salad (Cosmos caudatus) refugia and the diversity and abundance of arthropods in maize fields. The study was conducted at the Field Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia, from November 2025 to March 2026. A randomized block design with two treatments maize without refugia (R0) and maize with C. caudatus refugia (R1) and three replications was used. Arthropods were observed weekly from 1 to 6 weeks after planting using direct observation, sweep nets, and pitfall traps. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests. The results indicated higher arthropod abundance and Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′) values in R1 than in R0. The recorded arthropods represented four orders Araneae, Coleoptera, Orthoptera, and Hymenoptera—and included predatory taxa and pollinators. Carabidae was reported as the most abundant family. The final total abundance and statistical significance should be reported only after the counts have been reconciled across the results tables and the analyses have been verified. Overall, the findings suggest that C. caudatus refugia may be associated with differences in arthropod community abundance and diversity in maize fields.]]>
<![CDATA[The Relationship Between Digital Financial Recording, Financial Literacy, And Business Performance Among Beef Cattle Farmers In Palangka Raya ]]>
<![CDATA[Faizah Dani Pragita]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Agriculture, Agribusiness, Welfare, Technology, Humanity, Environment, Social, and Economy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Oktober - Desember 2026 Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Unsultra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.64690/agrones.v2i3.950
<![CDATA[Digital financial recording and financial literacy may support financial management in smallholder livestock enterprises, yet their relationships with business performance among beef cattle farmers remain insufficiently documented. This study examined the relationships between digital financial recording, financial literacy, and business performance among beef cattle farmers in Palangka Raya City, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. A quantitative descriptive design was employed, involving 10 farmers selected through census sampling from the accessible study population. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman's rank correlation. The mean scores for digital financial recording, financial literacy, and self-reported business performance were 3.586, 3.675, and 3.600, respectively, all above the scale midpoint. However, digital financial recording was not significantly associated with business performance ((rho=-0.198), (p=0.583)), and financial literacy also showed no statistically significant association with business performance ((rho=-0.020), (p=0.956)). These findings do not establish that the two financial capabilities lack practical value; rather, the relationships could not be demonstrated statistically in this small sample. The study contributes preliminary, context-specific evidence from beef cattle farming in Palangka Raya, a setting less frequently examined than general MSMEs and crop-farming enterprises. The findings suggest that digital bookkeeping and financial literacy initiatives may benefit from greater emphasis on practical applications, including production-cost calculation, cash-flow monitoring, and profitability analysis. Given the small sample, limited variation in financial literacy scores, and reliance on self-reported measures, the results should be interpreted as exploratory and should not be generalized to the wider population. Future research should use larger samples and objective financial-performance indicators.]]>
