cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnallexlibrum@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnallexlibrum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26219867     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Published by the Palembang Youth Pledge College of Law (STIHPADA) which aims to be academic media for discussing legal science issues. Contains scientific writing, summaries of research results, book reviews, and ideas. The editorial team invites lecturers, experts, students, practitioners and the public who are interested in expressing their thoughts into scientific writing. Publishing schedule 2 (two) times year in June and December. Submissions must be guided by scientific writing methods and writing instructions as attached.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 215 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
Penguatan Lembaga Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Melakukan Penydidikan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Ramadona, Bintang
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v8i2.478

Abstract

Indonesia and at the same time as an attempt to encourage the Anti-Corruption Commission to fight corruption crimes. In the case of money laundering, there is a special link between organized crime and legal markets related to the art trade, the financial sector, and real estate. When it comes to corruption, there is a difference between corruption at the political, law enforcement, or administrative level. Van Dijk found a strong link between levels of corruption and organised crime around the world, as by Transparency International.But ties with illegal organizations are just one aspect of corruption. It is important to talk about corruption as a crime phenomenon because there are additional aspects associated with it. As mentioned earlier, criminologists place corruption in the category of organized crime. In the case of corporate crime, a company can act as an agent offering bribery in order to a company's objectives, such as obtaining a project or a government license. On the other hand, in the context of a crime in a company, members of a private organization or a public service will receive bribe for their own benefit, in exchange for services that may not be provided by an organization authorized by the Anti-Corruption Commission to commit a violation.
Penguatan Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Melakukan Penyadapan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Belmento, Belmento
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v8i2.479

Abstract

In Indonesia, corruption involves government and business. Because it's considered a long-term, systematic disease.The study, entitled "The Prosecutor's Authority in Prosecuting Corruption Crimes under the Law No. 16 of 2004 on Prosecutors", suggests that the prosecution has been given additional authority to prevent and combat corruption crimes. The methodology used in this research uses normative research methodology. In addition to the Act No. 16 of 2004 on the Prosecution, the Law No. 19 of 2019 on Electronic Transaction Information regulates the authority of the prosecution to carry out criminal proceedings of corruption. This is done to improve the efficiency and efficiency of prosecution performance because the resulting investigation data can be held accountable. This allows the prosecution to optimize the handling of corruption criminal cases. Criminal acts of corruption include facade acts which are strictly prohibited in Islamic law as they can cause various distortions to the life of the state and society.
Analisis Yuridis Pemberian Remisi Bagi Anak Yang Dipidana Penjara Di Bawah Satu Tahun Di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pemasyarakatan Akmal, Rifki
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v8i2.480

Abstract

Everyone has the right to a remission or reduction in the term of sentence. However, in practice, a prisoner sentenced to less than one year of imprisonment will not receive a reduction during his term. With a criminal fall under one year, prisoners can return to their families and surrounding communities as well as participate in the development. This research uses empirical law research methods. Juridic analysis of the granting of remission to children sentenced to imprisonment under one year in a child special training institution according to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 12 of 1995: Implementation of the remission must take into account the effectiveness of criminal prison in the Lapas Rutan in Indonesia, which can be reviewed from the fundamental aspects of the purpose of the funding, namely the protection of the public and the aspects the perpetrator. First, the first and second phases of advanced construction begin after the prisoners enter Lapas
Independensi Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Royani, Ita
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v10i2.481

Abstract

The handling of corruption crimes is carried out by the Prosecutor's Office as a law enforcement agency, and the prosecutor, in addition to being a general prosecution officer, has a strong and planned legal foundation. Especially in the investigation as has been regulated in Article 30 (1) of Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Under article 2 of Act No. 16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, prosecutors are empowered to prosecute corruption offences independently without the assistance of any other party. The guarantees given by the law to prosecutors as part of the legal structure should result in a fair and human prosecution to maintain law and order and security.
Organisasi Advokat Pasca Surat Ketua MA Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v11i1.485

Abstract

The division among the lawyer organizations has led them to claim themselves as the leaders of the organization. This division also affects who has the right to appoint and swear in lawyers. The letter from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 has provided a new direction in the management of the advocate organization in Indonesia. This letter reaffirms the principle of non-intervention by the Supreme Court in internal disputes of the law organization while also strengthening the principle of independence in the legal profession. However, the impact has given rise to various interpretations regarding the structure and regulation of the ideal lawyer organization. This research aims to analyze the impact of the letter on the dynamics of the lawyer organization, both from legal, institutional, and professional aspects. Through a juridical-normative approach and analysis of secondary data, this research identifies the challenges and opportunities faced by advocacy organizations following the issuance of the letter. The research findings indicate that this letter encourages lawyer organizations to be more independent in resolving internal conflicts, but on the other hand, it creates doubts about the mechanisms of oversight and professional accountability. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations that can bridge the interests of the parties to maintain the integrity of the legal profession in Indonesia.
SINERGITAS KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA PENEGAK HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA GRATIFIKASI DALAM STRUKTUR HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA Kesuma, Derry Angling; Husnaini, Husnaini
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2019: Volume 6 Nomor 1 Desember 2019
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v6i1.486

Abstract

Abstrak Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi atau KPK adalah lembaga negara bantu yang dalam melaksanakan tugas dan wewenangnya bersifat independen dan bebas dari pengaruh kekuasaan manapun. Walaupun memiliki independensi dan kebebasan dalam melaksanakan tugas dan kewenangannya, namun KPK tetap bergantung kepada cabang kekuasaan lain dalam hal yang berkaitan dengan keorganisasian. KPK juga memiliki hubungan kedudukan yang khusus dengan kekuasaan yudikatif, karena Pasal 53 Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi mengamanatkan pembentukan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor) yang bertugas dan berwenang memeriksa serta memutus tindak pidana korupsi yang penuntutannya diajukan oleh KPK. Harmonisasi antara KPK, Kepolisian, serta Kejaksaan mengenai kewenangan sama-sama bisa menangani tindak pidana korupsi sesuai dengan tugas pokok dan fungsinya masing-masing. Khusus KPK bisa menangani kasus korupsi dengan syarat melibatkan aparat penegak hukum, penyelenggara negara, dan orang lain yang ada kaitannya dengan tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak hukum atau penyelenggara Negara, mendapat perhatian yang meresahkan masyarakat dan menyangkut kerugian negara paling sedikit Rp. 1.000.000.000,00 (satu milyar rupiah). Kata Kunci : Penegakan Hukum, Sinergitas, Tindak Pidana Korupsi Abstract The Corruption Eradication Commission or KPK is an auxiliary state institution which in carrying out its duties and authorities is independent and free from the influence of any power. Although it has independence and freedom in carrying out its duties and authorities, the KPK still relies on other branches of power in matters relating to the organization. The KPK also has a special position relationship with judicial power, because Article 53 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission mandates the establishment of a Corruption Criminal Court (Tipikor) which has the task and authority to examine and decide on corruption crimes whose prosecution is filed by the Corruption Eradication Commission. KPK. Harmonization between the KPK, the Police, and the Prosecutor's Office regarding their respective authorities can handle corruption in accordance with their respective main duties and functions. Specifically, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) can handle corruption cases on condition that it involves law enforcement officers, state administrators, and other people who are related to corruption crimes committed by law enforcement officers or state administrators, receive attention that is disturbing to the public and involves state losses of at least Rp. 1.000.000.000,00 (one billion rupiah).
International Humanitarian Law Perspective on the Armistice between Russia and Syria Gunawan, Yordan; Damayanti, Marselina Putri; Safitri, Diva Aisya; Salim, Andi Agus
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2021: Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juni 2021
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v7i2.489

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze how the perspective of International Humanitarian Law and The 1949 Geneva Conventions are related to the armistice case between Russia and Syria involving civilians as victims of war crimes. By analyzing the applicable international law as the legal basis for the armed conflict case, it is possible to produce an explanation regarding the legal protection provided to civilians as victims of the armistice carried out by Russia in Syria. The type of writing used in this paper is a normative legal study that contains comments, summaries, and thought from several sources written based on the data collected and explained in a statement, not in the form of numbers. The research method used in writing this paper is a normative legal research method that refers to several laws and regulations as guidelines in solving a problem. In the case of the armed conflict in Syria, which has not yet been resolved, even though it has been resolved through an armistice which in fact still result in conflict, the United Nations, as one of the supporters of the world security forum, seeks to resolve it through diplomatic negotiations in order to realize the agreement in the 1949 Geneva Convention as a point of departure clearly related to the resolution of the armed conflict in Syria.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK YANG MEMBAWA ATAU MENYIMPAN SENJATA TAJAM DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRESTA YOGYAKARTA Ibadata, Tekun
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v11i2.493

Abstract

Children are the greatest treasure of a nation, the survival of a nation is determined by the quality of existing children and how the child grows both in terms of character, mental and spiritual. Today there are many juvenile delinquency, ranging from violations to criminal acts, one of which is the crime of carrying and storing sharp weapons. The police as the bearer of security and law enforcement functions are required to be able to prevent, enforce the law, and formulate future regulatory patterns against the crime of carrying and storing sharp weapons by children. From the results of the study, it can be concluded, regarding the prevention efforts carried out by the Yogyakarta Police with pre-emptive, preventive, and repressive actions. Law enforcement efforts through non-penal media are carried out by pre-emptive and preventive law enforcement, while law enforcement with penal media is repressive by conducting an investigation process in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The pattern of law enforcement in the future is to formulate pre-emtive and preventive activities as well as repressive law enforcement as a fair solution to problems and the enforcement of children's rights.
SINERGITAS KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA PENEGAK HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA GRATIFIKASI DALAM STRUKTUR HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA Merita, Enni; Djufri, Darmadi
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2021: Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juni 2021
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v7i2.498

Abstract

Abstrak Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi atau KPK adalah lembaga negara bantu yang dalam melaksanakan tugas dan wewenangnya bersifat independen dan bebas dari pengaruh kekuasaan manapun. Walaupun memiliki independensi dan kebebasan dalam melaksanakan tugas dan kewenangannya, namun KPK tetap bergantung kepada cabang kekuasaan lain dalam hal yang berkaitan dengan keorganisasian. KPK juga memiliki hubungan kedudukan yang khusus dengan kekuasaan yudikatif, karena Pasal 53 Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi mengamanatkan pembentukan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor) yang bertugas dan berwenang memeriksa serta memutus tindak pidana korupsi yang penuntutannya diajukan oleh KPK. Harmonisasi antara KPK, Kepolisian, serta Kejaksaan mengenai kewenangan sama-sama bisa menangani tindak pidana korupsi sesuai dengan tugas pokok dan fungsinya masing-masing. Khusus KPK bisa menangani kasus korupsi dengan syarat melibatkan aparat penegak hukum, penyelenggara negara, dan orang lain yang ada kaitannya dengan tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak hukum atau penyelenggara Negara, mendapat perhatian yang meresahkan masyarakat dan menyangkut kerugian negara paling sedikit Rp. 1.000.000.000,00 (satu milyar rupiah). Kata Kunci : Penegakan Hukum, Sinergitas, Tindak Pidana Korupsi Abstract The Corruption Eradication Commission or KPK is an auxiliary state institution which in carrying out its duties and authorities is independent and free from the influence of any power. Although it has independence and freedom in carrying out its duties and authorities, the KPK still relies on other branches of power in matters relating to the organization. The KPK also has a special position relationship with judicial power, because Article 53 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission mandates the establishment of a Corruption Criminal Court (Tipikor) which has the task and authority to examine and decide on corruption crimes whose prosecution is filed by the Corruption Eradication Commission. KPK. Harmonization between the KPK, the Police, and the Prosecutor's Office regarding their respective authorities can handle corruption in accordance with their respective main duties and functions. Specifically, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) can handle corruption cases on condition that it involves law enforcement officers, state administrators, and other people who are related to corruption crimes committed by law enforcement officers or state administrators, receive attention that is disturbing to the public and involves state losses of at least Rp. 1.000.000.000,00 (one billion rupiah).
CYBER NOTARY MENJADI SOLUSI PROBLEMATIKA PERJANJIAN ENDORSEMENT Prihantiwi, Lidwina Tessa Kurnia
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v12i1.502

Abstract

This article aims to identify the issues arising from endorsement agreements made without a Notarial Deed and analyze why many endorsers and endorsees prefer to make such agreements without a Notarial Deed, despite the potential legal problems that may arise. Additionally, the article proposes solutions to address these issues. This study employs a normative juridical approach with a prescriptive nature. The data used are secondary, collected through document and literature studies, with analysis conducted using a deductive method. The research findings reveal two main issues stemming from endorsement agreements made without a Notarial Deed: violations of the principle of freedom of contract and the potential use of such agreements for money laundering purposes. The reasons endorsers and endorsees prefer agreements without a Notarial Deed include the desire for a quick and practical process, while creating an agreement with a Notarial Deed is more time-consuming. Despite the potential issues, such as standardized agreements and the risk of money laundering, endorsers and endorsees continue to choose agreements without a Notarial Deed. To address these issues, the implementation of Cyber Notary is needed in the endorsement agreement process.

Page 14 of 22 | Total Record : 215

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2014 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Juni Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): Desember Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Juni Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023): Desember Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Juni Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): Desember Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Juni 2021: Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juni 2021 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021): Desember 2020: Volume 7 Nomor 1 Desember 2020 2020: Volume 6 Nomor 2 Juni 2020 2019: Volume 6 Nomor 1 Desember 2019 2019: Volume 5 Nomor 2 Juni 2019 2018: Volume 5 Nomor 1 Desember 2018 2018: Volume 4 Nomor 2 Juni 2018 2017: Volume 4 Nomor 1 Desember 2017 2017: Volume 3 Nomor 2 Juni 2017 2016: Volume 3 Nomor 1 Desember 2016 2016: Volume 2 Nomor 2 Juni 2016 2015: Volume 2 Nomor 1 Desember 2015 2015: Volume 1 Nomor 2 Juni 2015 2014: Volume 1 Nomor 1 Desember 2014 More Issue