cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Adam Mudinillah
Contact Email
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Phone
+6285379388533
Journal Mail Official
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jorong Kubang Kaciak Dusun Kubang Kaciak, Kelurahan Balai Tangah, Kecamatan Lintau Buo Utara, Kabupaten Tanah Datar, Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Kodepos 27293.
Location
Kab. tanah datar,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology
Published by Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi
ISSN : 30483832     EISSN : 30482208     DOI : 10.70177/jseact
Core Subject : Science,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed integrative review articles, special thematic issues, reflections or comments on previous research or new research directions, interviews, replications, and intervention articles - all pertaining to the research fields of Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology research. All publications provide breadth of coverage appropriate to a wide readership in Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology research depth to inform specialists in that area. We feel that the rapidly growing Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology community is looking for a journal with this profile that we can achieve together. Submitted papers must be written in English for initial review stage by editors and further review process by minimum two international reviewers.
Arjuna Subject : Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (semua kategori) - Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)" : 5 Documents clear
Impact Investing vs. Philanthropy: A Comparative Analysis of Funding Models for Long-Term Sustainability in Social Entrepreneurship Murah, Murah; Rahman, Rashid; Harris, Robert
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jseact.v2i4.2595

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship has emerged as a critical force for addressing complex global challenges. However, the long-term sustainability of these ventures remains a significant hurdle. A central debate within the sector concerns the efficacy of its two primary funding paradigms: traditional grant-based philanthropy, which prioritizes social outcomes, and market-driven impact investing, which demands both social and financial returns. This research provides a rigorous comparative analysis of impact investing and philanthropic funding models. It specifically investigates how each model distinctly influences the long-term operational and financial sustainability, scalability, and mission integrity of established social enterprises. A qualitative, multiple case study methodology was employed. The study analyzed a purposively selected sample of (n=12) mature social enterprises, stratified into two cohorts: six funded primarily by philanthropy and six funded primarily by impact capital. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with founders/CEOs and longitudinal analysis of organizational reports and financial statements. The findings indicate that philanthropic funding is essential for early-stage risk-taking and deep-impact programming but often correlates with restricted growth and long-term funding dependency. Conversely, impact investing successfully drives operational discipline and scalability. This model, however, introduces significant pressures that increase the risk of “mission drift” as enterprises prioritize financial benchmarks over core social objectives. Neither funding model is unilaterally superior. The research concludes that long-term sustainability in social entrepreneurship is not an “either/or” proposition. It is best achieved through a strategically phased, hybrid financial ecosystem that leverages philanthropy for mission-critical capacity-building and impact investing for scaling proven, market-based solutions.
From Passion to Profit: An Analysis of Entrepreneurial Management Strategies in Scaling Local Coffee Shop Creative-Preneurship Wijaya, Wijaya; Chai, Napat; Khan, Jamil; Abdullah, Abdullah
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jseact.v2i4.2616

Abstract

The rise of creative-preneurship in the local coffee sector, exemplified in Indonesia, presents a critical managerial challenge: the transition from passion-driven ventures to scalable, profitable enterprises. Many founders fail to navigate this “passion-to-profit” transition, often due to a “founder-centric bottleneck.” This study aims to identify, analyze, and model the effective entrepreneurial management strategies that differentiate high-growth, creative-led coffee shops from low-growth or stagnant ventures. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, analyzing a purposive sample of 30 Indonesian coffee shops. This involved a comparative analysis of high-growth (N=15) and low-growth (N=15) ventures using quantitative financial and operational surveys and 45 in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Quantitative findings reveal a stark divergence: high-growth firms averaged 45.2% CAGR and 25.1% employee turnover, versus 6.1% CAGR and 78.4% turnover for low-growth firms. Qualitative analysis identified “Formalized Creative Systems” and “Decentralized Leadership” as key success strategies. Inferential analysis confirmed “Formalized Creative Systems” as the strongest predictor of successful scaling (\beta = 2.14, p < 0.01). Scaling a creative-preneurial venture is contingent upon the founder’s ability to systematize their creative vision. This research provides the Scalable Creative-preneurship Framework (SCF), an empirically-validated model for resolving the “art-commerce” paradox.
Circular Economy Start-Ups: An Innovative Business Model for Sustainable Fashion and Textile Waste Reduction Supardi, Edi; Ivanov, Dmitry; Rasmussen, Ida
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jseact.v2i4.2620

Abstract

The fashion industry is a primary global polluter, characterized by a linear “take-make-dispose” model that generates enormous textile waste. While the Circular Economy (CE) presents a viable sustainable alternative, the specific business models (BMs) for CE start-ups in this sector remain under-researched. Understanding their unique operational strategies, barriers, and success factors is critical for industry-wide transformation.  This study investigates the innovative business models employed by circular economy start-ups in the sustainable fashion industry. It aims to identify and analyze the key strategies these enterprises use to reduce textile waste while balancing environmental impact with commercial viability. A qualitative, multiple case-study methodology was adopted. The research analyzed ten (n=10) prominent circular fashion start-ups across Europe. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with founders (n=15) and analysis of internal documents (business plans, impact reports), then coded using a framework based on circular business model archetypes. The findings reveal that successful start-ups integrate multiple circular strategies, primarily “resource recovery” (upcycling, recycling) and “slowing the loop” (rental, repair services). Key innovations were identified in value proposition (marketing sustainability as a premium) and value capture (monetizing waste streams). Significant barriers include scaling reverse logistics and overcoming consumer resistance to non-linear consumption patterns. Circular economy start-ups are essential innovators, but their success demands more than novel design. Their business models require systemic innovation in logistics and robust consumer education. This study concludes that a supportive policy ecosystem is essential for these models to scale and effectively challenge the linear fashion paradigm.
Gamifying Social Change: Designing a Mobile Game to Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviors as a Social Entrepreneurship Initiative Wong, Lucas; Jiwon, Seo; Olsson, Ingrid; Riatmaja, Dodi Setiawan
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jseact.v2i4.2642

Abstract

The environmental “attitude-action gap” persists, as most “green apps” fail to motivate users or achieve long-term financial sustainability. This study aims to design, develop, and test a mobile game framework that bridges this gap by integrating behavioral psychology with a sustainable social entrepreneurship model. Design-Based Research (DBR) approach was used, culminating in a 6-week, mixed-methods pilot study (n=500). Data was collected via in-game analytics, pre/post-test surveys (Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale, PEBS; Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, IMI), and qualitative interviews. The intervention yielded strong engagement (28.1% Wk6 retention) and a statistically significant increase in self-reported Pro-Environmental Behaviors (PEBS) (p < .001, Cohen’s d = 0.82). High intrinsic motivation (4.4/5.0 IMI) was observed, with ‘Social Relatedness’ (? = .45) being the strongest predictor of retention. The B2C social enterprise model was validated., when co-designed as a social enterprise, is empirically validated as an effective and sustainable framework for motivating PEBs. The model successfully bridges the attitude-action gap by prioritizing social connection.
Beyond Immersion: The Efficacy of Virtual Reality (Vr) Simulations in Developing Technical Skills for Vocational Education Erwis, Fauzi; Xiang, Yang; Koskinen, Jari
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jseact.v2i4.2677

Abstract

Traditional vocational education (VET) for complex psychomotor skills is costly, risky, and difficult to scale. While Virtual Reality (VR) is a potential solution, research has focused on “immersion,” not empirical “efficacy.” The critical gap is the unverified “transfer-of-training” from virtual simulations to real-world, physical tasks. This study aimed to empirically evaluate the efficacy of VR-only training versus traditional hands-on methods. It specifically sought to measure (1) “virtual-to-real” skill transfer, (2) long-term skill retention, and (3) training efficiency. An experimental pre-test/post-test/retention-test design was used. 80 (N=80) novice welding trainees were randomized to a VR-Only (n=40) or Traditional (n=40) group. Psychomotor skill was measured on physical equipment at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and 4-week retention (T3) using an expert-validated rubric (PAR), analyzed with ANCOVA. The VR-Only group demonstrated statistically superior skill transfer on the physical post-test (T2) (p < .001, \eta_p^2 = .710). This superiority was durable, with significantly higher skill retention at the T3 follow-up (p < .001). The VR group also achieved competency 27% faster (6.4 vs 8.8 hours) and at zero consumable material cost. -fidelity VR, driven by instantaneous data-driven feedback, is a more effective, efficient, and cost-effective training modality than the traditional “gold standard” for novice psychomotor skill acquisition. This study provides robust validation for the “virtual-to-real” transfer-of-training.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)