cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Jumadi
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
+6282359594933
Journal Mail Official
indexsasi@apji.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Batursari, Mranggen Kab. Demak Jawa Tengah 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Published by International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers
ISSN : 29875188     EISSN : 29874211     DOI : 10.59581
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum dengan e-ISSN : 2987-4211 p-ISSN : 2987-5188 adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers. Jurnal ini memuat kajian-kajian di bidang ilmu hukum dan Sosial Politik baik secara teoritik maupun empirik. Fokus jurnal ini tentang kajian-kajian hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, hukum acara dan hukum adat, politik dan ilmu sosial. Jurnal ini diterbitkan 4 kali setahun (Maret, Juni, September dan Desember).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 273 Documents
 24   25   26   27   28 
Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum oleh Kepolisan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kendaraan Motor (Curanmor) di Wilayah Polsek Kota Timur Kota Gorontalo Junaedy Arter Andasia; Bunga, Marten; Robby Waluyo Amu
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6250

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of law enforcement by the police against perpetrators of motor vehicle theft in the jurisdiction of Kota Timur Police Sector, Gorontalo City, and to identify the factors that influence its implementation. This research applies empirical legal research with a field-based approach. Data were obtained through interviews with investigators at Kota Timur Police Sector and through an examination of motor vehicle theft case data from 2022 to 2025. The results show that law enforcement against motor vehicle theft has been carried out through several stages, including receiving police reports, conducting inquiries and investigations, arresting suspects, preparing case files, and transferring cases to the public prosecutor. The case data indicate that all recorded cases during the research period were resolved. However, the effectiveness of law enforcement has not been fully optimal due to fluctuations in the number of cases and the possibility of repeat offenses. Several factors influence the effectiveness of law enforcement, including legal substance, law enforcement officers, facilities and infrastructure, community participation, and legal culture. The main obstacles include the limited number of investigators, heavy workloads, inadequate supporting facilities, and low public participation in providing information. Therefore, strengthening the capacity of police officers, improving investigative facilities, increasing routine patrols, and enhancing public legal awareness are necessary to improve the effectiveness of law enforcement against motor vehicle theft.
Algorithmic Constitutionalism dan Masa Depan Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia: Menakar Batas Kekuasaan Algoritmik dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Publik Mariyanti Mile; Roy Marthen Moonti
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6432

Abstract

The digital transformation of government has introduced algorithms and artificial intelligence as new instruments in public decision-making. This change raises constitutional issues because state decisions are no longer entirely implemented through officials and administrative procedures, but also through computational systems that are at risk of being closed, biased, discriminatory, and difficult to account for. This article aims to analyze the development of the concept of algorithmic constitutionalism and its relevance to the future of Indonesian constitutional law, particularly in limiting algorithmic power in the public sector. The method used is a literature review by examining books, journal articles, institutional reports, regulations, and policy documents related to digital constitutionalism, algorithmic governance, algorithmic accountability, personal data protection, and government administrative law. The analysis is conducted descriptively and qualitatively through concept identification, literature mapping, comparison of findings, and normative synthesis. The results of the review indicate that Indonesia already has a regulatory basis through the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Public Service Law, the Government Administration Law, the Public Information Disclosure Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and the SPBE policy, but the regulations are still fragmented and do not specifically regulate the accountability of algorithm-based public decisions. This article concludes that public algorithms should be understood as a form of state power that must adhere to the principles of legality, meaningful transparency, the right to explanation, auditability, human control, non-discrimination, objection, remedy, proportionality, and public participation.
Rekonstruksi Penanganan Perkara Pidana melalui Restorative Justice Berbasis Kepastian Hukum di Polda Gorontalo Wawan Thaib; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6434

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in handling criminal cases at the Gorontalo Regional Police and formulate a reconstruction model based on legal certainty and protection of victims' rights. The study uses empirical legal methods with a juridical-sociological, legislative, and conceptual approach. Primary data were obtained through interviews with investigators, victims, perpetrators, legal advisors, and community leaders, while secondary data were sourced from laws and regulations, books, journals, decisions, and case documents. Data were analyzed qualitatively through reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study indicate that the application of restorative justice still faces differences in interpretation of material and formal requirements, lack of uniformity in case eligibility indicators, weak inter-institutional coordination, and suboptimal guarantees of voluntariness and victim recovery. Peace is often still understood administratively through a written agreement, without ensuring the implementation of restitution, rehabilitation, security protection, and prevention of re-victimization. Therefore, reconstruction is needed in the form of technical guidelines, case assessment matrices, victim loss and vulnerability assessments, tiered case titles, professional assistance, an integrated database, and a monitoring mechanism for the implementation of the agreement. This model is expected to achieve consistent, transparent, accountable, and substantively just case handling, while also providing legal certainty for victims, perpetrators, law enforcement officials, and the community. This reconstruction also places the fulfillment of victims' rights as the primary measure of successful criminal case resolution through a sustainable restorative approach.

Page 28 of 28 | Total Record : 273

 24   25   26   27   28 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Desember : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): September : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Maret : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum  More Issue