cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Ridho Mahaputra
Contact Email
siberpublisher.info@gmail.com
Phone
+6281188062006
Journal Mail Official
siberpublisher.info@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Tokyo Riverside, Jl. Otto Iskandar Dinatta, PIK 2, Teluk Naga, Tangerang, Indonesia
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (SNLPR)
Published by Siber Nusantara Research & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30892287     DOI : https://doi.org/10.38035/snlpr
Core Subject :
The scope of fields contained in SNLPR includes the following areas: International law Constitutional law Civil law Economic Law Environmental law Criminal law State Administrative Law Technology, Information and Communication Law Human Rights Law Islamic and Family Law Agrarian Law Political science International Relations Administration Science (Commerce, State, Public, Development, etc.) Criminology Legal studies Public administration Social and Political Sciences Development Studies (Development Planning, Territory, Cities) National defence Police Science Public policy Other Unlisted Fields of Political Science Social Welfare Science Sociology Humanities and Eduction Regional Studies (Europe, Asia, Japan, Middle East etc.) Archeology Social Sciences and Managment Population (Demography, and Other Population Sciences) Sharia Economic Law Cultural Studies Islamic Broadcasting Communications Communication Studies Anthropology Articles published on research results and literature reviews using acceptable research methodologies, qualitative studies, quantitative studies, or a combination of the two, statistical analysis, case studies, field research, and historical studies. SNLPR accepts manuscripts from various related groups, such as relevant researchers, professors, students, policy makers, scientists, and others.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 41 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
The Sipepeg Application: Policy and Implementation in Social Welfare Administration Services Nur Wulan Imadri; Sri Wulandari
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.838

Abstract

This study looks at how social welfare administrative services are implemented at the Cirebon Regency Social Affairs Office using the Administrative Information System for Social Welfare Service Recipients (SIPEPEG). This study’s goal is to examine how digital-based social service policies are implemented, as well as the factors that support, hinder, and optimize them. This study’s goal is to examine how digital-based social service policies are implemented, as well as the factors that support, hinder, and optimize them. Van Meter and Van Horn’s policy implementation theory was used to analyze the study’s qualitative methodology, which include in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Although it hasn’t been fully optimized, the results show that SIPEPEG’s implementation has aided in streamlining social assistance administration. The main obstacles are lack of human resource, low public digital literacy, poor infrastructure, especially internet connectivity, technical issues with the application, limitations on the income deciles of aid recipients, and the length of the approval process. On the other hand, PUSKESOS employees’ dedication, interagency cooperation, the Social Affairs Office’s support, and public confidence all help to implement policies. Strengthened coordination, community support, capacity building for implementers, and preparations for the creation of a more integrated service system are all used to carry out optimization efforts.
Semiotic Analysis of The “Mandala” Symbol in The Film “Ketika Berhenti di Sini” as a Representation of The Process of Letting Go Sri Purwati Pertiwi Kusumawati; Farida Nurfalah
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.895

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the representation of the mandala symbol in the film Ketika Berhenti di Sini as a visual construction of the process of letting go. The study employs a qualitative approach using media text analysis through Roland Barthes’ semiotic framework, which examines meaning at the levels of denotation, connotation, and myth. The analysis is further enriched by Stuart Hall’s theory of representation and Carl Gustav Jung’s analytical psychology to understand the construction of meaning and the psychological dynamics of the characters. The findings reveal that the mandala symbol functions as a system of signs that maps the transformation of the main character’s inner condition from imbalance, attachment, and denial toward the attainment of inner balance and self-wholeness (the Self). The shift in meaning associated with the north, west, south, and east directions represents the stages of the individuation process. Interview findings with filmmakers and audiences indicate that the mandala symbol serves as a narrative device that strengthens the representation of the character’s psychological dynamics while also opening spaces for diverse interpretations among viewers. This study contributes to the development of Indonesian film semiotics by integrating representation theory and analytical psychology in interpreting visual symbols as representations of characters’ psychological dynamics.
POSITION AND AUTHORITY OF THE PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINARY COUNCIL IN RESOLVING HEALTH WORKER CASES UNDER LAW NUMBER 17 OF 2023 ON HEALTH Emma Choerunnisa; Prasetyo Edi
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.963

Abstract

Abstract: Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health fundamentally reshapes the legal architecture for enforcing professional discipline among Indonesian health workers by establishing the Professional Disciplinary Council (Majelis Disiplin Profesi/MDP), replacing sectoral bodies such as the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honor Council (MKDKI). This article analyzes the position, legal basis, and authority of the MDP in handling alleged professional discipline violations by health workers, including its relationship with criminal and civil liability processes. A normative legal method is applied through statutory and conceptual approaches, drawing on Law Number 17 of 2023, Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024, Minister of Health Regulation Number 3 of 2025, and Minister of Health Decree Number HK.01.07/MENKES/775/2025 as primary legal materials. The findings indicate that the MDP holds substantially broader authority than the former MKDKI, since it not only imposes administrative disciplinary sanctions but also issues recommendations that function as a precondition for criminal and civil proceedings against medical and health personnel under Article 308 of the Health Law. This mechanism operates as a primum remedy intended to prevent the criminalization of health workers for inherent medical risks, yet it simultaneously raises concerns regarding the certainty of examination timeframes, potential overlap with the investigative function of law enforcement, and the dependence of civil proceedings on the initiative of the health worker being sued. The article recommends strengthening technical regulations on examination deadlines, clarifying the boundary between disciplinary and investigative authority, and improving health workers' awareness of their rights and procedures before the MDP to achieve legal certainty, utility, and justice for both health workers and patients.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF PATIENT MEDICAL RECORDS IN INDONESIA IN REALIZED LEGAL CERTAINTY: English Angga Perwira; Prassetyo Edi
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.964

Abstract

Medical records are documents containing confidential patient health information and therefore require legal protection. Digitization through electronic medical records has improved the quality of healthcare services, but has also given rise to various legal issues, particularly regarding the protection of patient personal data. Although Indonesia has regulations through Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 24 of 2022 concerning Medical Records, and the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions, these regulations are not yet fully harmonized, thus potentially creating legal uncertainty in the protection of patient medical records. The problems of this research are: (1) how are the regulations for legal protection of patient medical records according to laws and regulations in Indonesia; (2) what form of disharmony exists between the regulations for legal protection of patient medical records between the Health Law, the Law on Personal Data Protection, the Regulation of the Minister of Health on Medical Records, and the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions; and (3) how efforts to harmonize regulations for legal protection of patient medical records can achieve legal certainty in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal study that examines legal norms, legal principles, synchronization of laws and regulations, and legal harmonization through legislative, conceptual, comparative, and analytical approaches. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for patient medical records has been regulated in various laws and regulations. However, there is still disharmony in regulations related to the status of data controllers, patient rights, data protection mechanisms, legal accountability, and the imposition of sanctions, so that they do not fully provide legal certainty. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is needed through synchronization of content between regulations, strengthening personal data protection mechanisms, and affirming the authority and responsibilities of the parties to realize legal certainty in the protection of patient medical records in Indonesia.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF CONSUMERS AGAINST NON-CONFORMITY OF GOODS IN E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS : AN ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS ACTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES: English Muhammad Zidan Rohmatualloh; Ratu Mawar Kartina
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.965

Abstract

The development of electronic commerce (e-commerce) in Indonesia has simplified the process of buying and selling goods. However, this has also given rise to many legal issues, particularly those related to discrepancies between the information provided by business actors and the goods received by consumers. This situation causes losses for consumers and requires legal protection. The research questions in this study are as follows: (1) how do Indonesian laws and regulations regulate consumer legal protection against product discrepancies in online transactions; and (2) how are business actors responsible for providing compensation to consumers. The research methodology used in this study is normative legal research, which includes legal and conceptual techniques. Among the legal texts used are Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and its revisions, and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 concerning Commerce Through Electronic Systems. The analysis uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The study findings indicate that consumer legal protection in e-commerce transactions is governed by preventive and repressive strategies. The obligation of business actors to provide accurate, correct, and transparent information about the products they sell is an example of preventive protection. Customers' rights to refund and dispute resolution processes provide some protection in the meantime. In circumstances of non-conforming items, business actors are liable for replacement goods, refunds, or other comparable compensation, which generally reflects the strict responsibility concept in reality. In conclusion, even while normative legal protection for consumers is thought to be sufficient, its application is still not ideal. This is brought about by inadequate oversight, a lack of understanding among business players, and the intricacy of legal relationships in multi-party e-commerce transactions.
Putusan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara Dalam Sengketa Satgas Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 442K/TUN/2023) Rani Aldaba; H. E. Rakhmat Jazuli; Ahmad Rayhan
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.1005

Abstract

Krisis moneter 1997–1998 mendorong pemerintah mengucurkan dana Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (BLBI) kepada bank bermasalah, dan hingga kini sebagian besar piutang negara dari dana tersebut belum diselesaikan oleh obligor. Guna mempercepat penagihan, pemerintah membentuk Satuan Tugas Penanganan Hak Tagih Negara Dana BLBI (Satgas BLBI) melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 2021. Tindakan Satgas BLBI menetapkan ulang nilai kewajiban obligor berdasarkan LHP BPK RI dan melaksanakan penyitaan aset digugat ke PTUN Jakarta, hingga melahirkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 442K/TUN/2023. Research gap penelitian ini terletak pada belum adanya kajian yang secara khusus menghubungkan putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan perlindungan keuangan negara melalui mekanisme primum remedium. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim atas legalitas tindakan Satgas BLBI dan peran putusan sengketa TUN dalam penyelamatan keuangan negara. Menggunakan teori perlindungan hukum dan teori penyelesaian sengketa TUN, penelitian ini menerapkan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan deskriptif, bersumber pada wawancara dengan hakim PTUN Jakarta dan Hakim Yustisial Mahkamah Agung RI. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Mahkamah Agung menegaskan tindakan Satgas BLBI sah secara hukum administrasi, didasarkan pada kewenangan atributif Keppres Nomor 6 Tahun 2021, keabsahan LHP BPK RI, dan terpenuhinya Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, tanpa unsur penyalahgunaan wewenang. PTUN berperan sebagai primum remedium dalam penyelamatan keuangan negara, meski implementasinya masih terkendala disharmoni antar rezim hukum dan keterbatasan kapasitas kelembagaan.
Legal Analysis Of The Legal Relationship Between The Government, Railway Organizers, And The Public In Fulfilling The Safety Of Railway Level Crossing Users Rendy Maulana; Ratu Mawar Kartina
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.1022

Abstract

The existence of unauthorized railway level crossings remains a significant issue in many regions of Indonesia. These crossings not only increase the risk of accidents but also raise complex legal questions regarding the legal relationship between the government, railway operators, and the public, particularly in determining liability when losses or damages occur. This study aims to examine the legal relationship among these parties in the use of unauthorized railway level crossings and to analyze civil liability arising from accidents based on Law Number 23 of 2007 on Railways and Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code concerning unlawful acts. This research employs an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through a review of statutory regulations, legal literature, and relevant doctrines, supported by field observations and interviews with stakeholders involved in the management and use of railway crossings. The findings reveal that the legal relationship among the government, railway operators, and the public is inherently complex, as it encompasses both public and private law dimensions. The government is responsible for regulation, supervision, and infrastructure provision, while railway operators are obliged to ensure the safety of railway operations. Meanwhile, the public is required to comply with applicable laws and safety regulations. The study further demonstrates that civil liability for accidents occurring at unauthorized railway crossings should not be imposed solely on one party. Instead, liability must be determined by considering the degree of fault, the causal relationship between the act and the resulting damage, and the respective roles of each party. A proportional allocation of liability provides a more equitable approach to ensuring legal certainty, justice, and legal protection for all parties involved.
The Impact of Modern Medical Technology on the Transformation of Healthcare Service Contract Structures from Conventional Face-to-Face Contracts to Digital Contracts: An Indonesian Health Law Perspective Adji Annisa Rahmadina; Prassetyo Edi
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.1039

Abstract

The rapid integration of digital technologies into healthcare has fundamentally reshaped the legal framework governing healthcare service delivery. Medical consultations, informed consent, health records, prescriptions, and payment systems are increasingly conducted through electronic platforms, altering the manner in which legal relationships between patients and healthcare providers are established and performed. This transformation raises important legal issues concerning the validity of electronic healthcare contracts, the legal status of therapeutic agreements concluded in digital environments, the protection of personal health data, and the allocation of legal responsibility among healthcare professionals, healthcare institutions, and electronic system providers. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Primary legal materials include the Indonesian Civil Code, Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, and Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions as last amended by Law Number 1 of 2024. The study demonstrates that the digitalisation of healthcare services does not alter the juridical nature of the therapeutic agreement as the legal basis of the physician–patient relationship. Digitalisation instead transforms the structure of healthcare service contracts by introducing electronic consent, electronic medical records, digital evidence, and multiple contractual actors whose rights and obligations extend beyond the traditional relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. Existing legal provisions have yet to provide a comprehensive framework governing these evolving contractual relationships. A reconstruction of healthcare service contracts is therefore required to accommodate digital healthcare practices while preserving legal certainty, safeguarding patients' rights, ensuring personal data protection, and maintaining accountability within Indonesia's healthcare system.
Analysis of the Legal Liability of Hospitals and Medical Device Vendors for Medical Device Failures that Result in Rejection of Health Insurance Claims to Patients Apnas Rachmawati; Prassetyo Edi
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.1040

Abstract

Advances in healthcare technology have significantly improved the quality of medical services through the increasing use of sophisticated medical devices. However, medical device failures may cause substantial harm to patients, including the rejection of health insurance claims, thereby creating complex legal issues regarding the allocation of liability among hospitals, medical device vendors, and health insurance companies. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibilities of hospitals and medical device vendors for medical device failures that result in patient losses and the rejection of health insurance claims under the Indonesian health law framework. It also seeks to formulate an ideal legal framework for the allocation of responsibilities among the relevant parties to ensure fair legal protection for patients. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research, including legislation, legal literature, and scholarly journals, and were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that hospitals bear legal responsibility under the doctrine of corporate liability to ensure the safety, quality, and proper management of medical devices used in healthcare services. Medical device vendors are liable under the principle of product liability for product defects, technical failures, and negligence in maintenance and after-sales services. Meanwhile, health insurance companies are obligated to process and settle claims in accordance with the principle of utmost good faith and may not reject claims arbitrarily without conducting an objective investigation into the cause of the loss. This study concludes that Indonesia requires a more comprehensive legal framework governing the allocation of responsibilities through an integrated investigation mechanism that promotes legal certainty, justice, accountability, and effective legal protection for patients as the most vulnerable parties in healthcare services.
Medical Records as Evidence of the Performance of Obligations in Therapeutic Agreements: An Analysis of Legal Certainty and Legal Protection in Indonesian Hospital Services Dewi Indrayani; Prassetyo Edi
Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/snlpr.v2i2.1041

Abstract

Advances in healthcare technology have significantly improved the quality of medical services through the increasing use of sophisticated medical devices. However, medical device failures may cause substantial harm to patients, including the rejection of health insurance claims, thereby creating complex legal issues regarding the allocation of liability among hospitals, medical device vendors, and health insurance companies. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibilities of hospitals and medical device vendors for medical device failures that result in patient losses and the rejection of health insurance claims under the Indonesian health law framework. It also seeks to formulate an ideal legal framework for the allocation of responsibilities among the relevant parties to ensure fair legal protection for patients. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research, including legislation, legal literature, and scholarly journals, and were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that hospitals bear legal responsibility under the doctrine of corporate liability to ensure the safety, quality, and proper management of medical devices used in healthcare services. Medical device vendors are liable under the principle of product liability for product defects, technical failures, and negligence in maintenance and after-sales services. Meanwhile, health insurance companies are obligated to process and settle claims in accordance with the principle of utmost good faith and may not reject claims arbitrarily without conducting an objective investigation into the cause of the loss. This study concludes that Indonesia requires a more comprehensive legal framework governing the allocation of responsibilities through an integrated investigation mechanism that promotes legal certainty, justice, accountability, and effective legal protection for patients as the most vulnerable parties in healthcare services.

Page 4 of 5 | Total Record : 41

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (October 2025 - March 2026 ) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April - September 2026) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (April-September 2025) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review (October-March 2024)