cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
ISSN : 14120917     EISSN : 24433616     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching or Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) was founded in 1993 and published qualitative and or quantitative research concerning mathematics and science teaching. JPMIPA is published by Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (FPMIPA-UPI) in association with Indonesian Society for Science Educators (JPII), twice a year in April and October with 16 articles per number or 32 articles per year.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 419 Documents
 38   39   40   41   42 
HOW DOES STUDENTS RESEARCH SKILLS ENCOURAGED IN BIOLOGY LEARNING TEXT BOOK? Pelita Sukma Febrina; Rini Solihat; Amprasto Amprasto; Arie Nursanti
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 2 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 2, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.48783

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the provision and the levels of research skills in the 10th grade Biology Textbook. The sample is a biology textbook named Biologi untuk Kelas X SMA/MA. The units analyzed are only focus on 4 components books, namely Diskusi; Kuis Bio; Tugas Mandiri; and Aktivitas. Research skills referred to the Research Skills Development (RSD) framework developed by Willison and O’Regan. The result of the analysis stated that about 66.21 % of component books identified providing students to have research skills. As for the level of Research Skills, most of it is in level 1 (Prescribed Research).
THE INFLUENCE OF INTEGRATED AND SEPARATE TRAINING ON STUDENTS’ META-AFFECTIVE DURING SCIENCE LEARNING Lilit Rusyati; Nuryani Y. Rustaman; Ari Widodo; Minsu Ha
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 27, No 2 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 2, 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v27i2.50835

Abstract

Affective dimension is one that must be assessed. Unfortunately, there is no learning that teaches students specifically how to recognize and control affective. Therefore, this study provides training to students on meta-affective strategies during science learning. The Static-group pretest-posttest design was chosen as the research method because it compares integrated training (facilitated by the teacher) and separate training (independent by students). MATS (Meta-Affective Trait Scale) questionnaire was adapted by adding 34 statements so that the total number is 51 statements. There were two experimental groups, each consisting of 50 students. Statistical tests show that there is no difference in students' meta-affective in integrated training and separate training. However, analysis per statement showed that separate training were better at recognizing and regulating meta-affective. In addition, in both integrated training and separate training, it is equally difficult to reduce negative emotions. This result implies that science learning should also focus on the affective and teacher should not give negative labels to students.
Using Rule-based Procedural Content Generation to Generate Students Cognitive and Affective Ability in Game Teaching Enjun Junaeti; Dicky Kurniawan; Yaya Wihardi; Siti Fatimah; Rasim Rasim; Jajang Kusnendar
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 27, No 1 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 1, 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v27i1.52943

Abstract

Permainan mengajar merupakan sebuah permainan kategori simulasi dimana user bertindak sebagai seorang guru yang mengajar di kelas virtual dengan kondisi yang dibuat semirip mungkin dengan keadaan riil kondisi pembelajaran di kelas. Kenaikan kemampuan kognitif dan afektif siswa yang dipandang sebagai bagian dari indikator dalam menilai performa kemampuan guru dalam mengajar menjadi suatu factor penting dalam pengembangan game teaching. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan kondisi kemampuan kognitif dan afektif siswa virtual pada awal simulasi pembelajaran dengan menggunakan metode rule-based procedural content generation. Data awal diperoleh dari kuisioner yang diberikan baik kepada guru maupun kepada siswa untuk memperoleh gambaran kondisi kemampuan kognitif dan afektif siswa diawal pembelajaran. Selanjutnya kondisi kognitif dan afektif siswa yang dibangun diimplementasikan pada suatu game teaching untuk memperbesar tingkat kesamaan kondisi real dan kondisi pada kelas virtual. Game Teaching kemudian diujicobakan kepada mahasiswa Pendidikan untuk diminta tanggapannya melalui Game Experience Questionnaire. Berdasarkan penelitian yang telah dilakukan, diperoleh data bahwa Game Teaching yang menggunakan Rule-Based Procedural Content Generation memiliki poin penilaian lebih dibandingkan dengan Game Teaching yang tidak menggunakan Rule-Based Procedural Content Generation.
PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ SYMBOL SENSE BEHAVIOR: THE CASE OF EQUATIONS Al Jupri
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.52930

Abstract

Symbol sense refers largely to an ability to give meaning and to see important structures in symbols, expressions, formulas, and equations. This ability shows an algebraic proficiency in dealing with symbolic representations and is considered important for pre-service mathematics teachers for their future careers. This study aims to investigate pre-service mathematics teachers’ symbol sense ability when dealing with equations. To do so, we set up a qualitative case study. First, after conducting a literature study, we designed symbol sense tasks according to symbol sense characteristics on the topic of equations. Second, we administered an individual written test involving 31 pre-service mathematics teachers (18-19-year-old) at the beginning of the School Mathematics course. Third, we analyzed written work using a symbol sense perspective. The results showed that about two-thirds of the participants lacked symbol sense since they tend to use more procedural strategies than symbol sense strategies in solving equations.ABSTRAKKepekaan simbol secara umum dapat diartikan sebagai kemampuan untuk memaknai dan melihat struktur penting dalam simbol, bentuk aljabar, rumus, dan persamaan. Kemampuan ini menunjukkan kecakapan aljabar dalam menghadapi representasi simbolik dan dipandang penting sebagai bekal bagi calon guru matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi kepekaan simbol calon guru matematika ketika menyelesaikan persamaan. Untuk mencapai tujuan ini, kami melakukan penelitian kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus dengan langkah-langkah sebagai berikut. Pertama, setelah melakukan studi literatur, kami mendesain soal-soal kepekaan simbol sesuai dengan karakteristik kepekaan simbol pada topik persamaan. Kedua, kami mengadakan tes tertulis individu yang melibatkan 31 calon guru matematika (18-19 tahun) di permulaan perkuliahan Matematika sekolah. Ketiga, berdasarkan hasil tes, kami menganalisis pekerjaan tertulis calon guru tersebut menggunakan perspektif kepekaan simbol. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sekitar dua pertiga dari jumlah peserta yang terlibat dalam tes tertulis kurang memiliki kepekaan  simbol karena mereka cenderung menggunakan strategi prosedural daripada strategi kepekaan simbol dalam menyelesaikan persamaan.
STUDENTS' CONCEPTIONS, TROUBLESOME KNOWLEDGE, AND THRESHOLD CONCEPT OF CATALYST EFFECT ON REACTION RATE Wiji Wiji; Iqlima Rahayu; Tuszie Widhiyanti; Sri Mulyani
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 27, No 1 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 1, 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v27i1.49957

Abstract

Student conceptions provide valuable information for understanding learning difficulties and provide insight into how they can be addressed appropriately. Analyzing students' conceptions can also provide insight into what concepts are troublesome or serve as concepts affecting learning. Using the Interview About Event-Mental Model Diagnostic Test (TDM-IAE), twenty-one high school and university students' conceptions, troublesome knowledge, and threshold concepts for understanding the effect of catalyst to reaction rate were identified. Students mostly held partial mental models or mental models with misconceptions in which three concepts were considered troublesome and threshold concepts for understanding the effect of catalyst on reaction rate.
OPTIMIZATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BASED ON DIGITAL MODULES IN POST- COVID -19 PANDEMIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS COURSES Entit Puspita; Ririn Sispiyati; Cece Kustiawan
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 27, No 2 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 2, 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v27i2.52225

Abstract

This study aims to describe the experiences experienced by students regarding optimizing the use of digital module-based LMS in post-pandemic differential calculus lectures. This study's qualitative descriptive method was chosen and involved 46 third-semester students at one of the tertiary institutions in Indonesia who have experienced online and offline classes. Questionnaire and interview data analysis was carried out through identification, clarification, reduction, analysis, and description techniques according to the problem under study. The study results show that the sudden shift from face-to-face to online learning has positive aspects in the form of documentation of lecture activities and presentation of digital-based and varied lecture content. The learning videos were most in demand by the participants because they had advantages over other displays. The weaknesses in implementing online lectures are more technically related (internet or electricity network stability). The positive things detected from online courses can be followed up after the pandemic, especially in the development of LMS content which can be integrated into face-to-face classes
BUILDING UNDERSTANDING AND AWARENESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION THROUGH COMIC Riandi Riandi; Dieni Asma Mardiyah; Wahyu Surakusumah
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 21, No 2 (2016): JPMIPA: Volume 21, Issue 2, 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v21i2.57591

Abstract

Environmental problems such as widespread pollution are ongoing threats to the livelihood of the current and future generations. Engaging learning media such as comics can be used to instill the importance of understanding our role in solving environmental pollution problems. This paper reports the promising benefit of using comics in building junior high school students understanding and awareness of water, soil, dan air pollution. Comic is a visual medium, and whether students' specific learning styles play a role in learning results was also determined and discussed.
Finding Your Place in Science: Factors Influencing Students' Decision in Choosing Science as a Subject to Study N.N. Azizah
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v26i1.58673

Abstract

Studies have uncovered that educators, scientists, and policymakers are concerned that students' interest in pursuing science has grown visibly smaller. Recent Indonesian Ministry of Education data even suggested that the number of students enrolled in science majors was only a fifth of students enrolled in economics majors. This paper investigated factors contributing to why students' decided to pursue science majors as subjects to study and how these factors illuminated the steps that can be taken to improve how students see science and renew their faith and interest in pursuing science for their future careers.
REGULATING COGNITIVE LOAD: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ACTIVATION IN LEARNING ECOSYSTEM Dzihni Andiasari
Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Vol 27, No 2 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 2, 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18269/jpmipa.v27i2.59075

Abstract

The ecosystem is a multidiscipline and complex subject which interrelated with other biological concepts, making it challenging to understand and may lead to cognitive overload. This paper analyzed the effects of prior knowledge activation using video on students' cognitive load when learning about the ecosystem. Data were obtained from prior knowledge tests, a task complexity worksheet, a subjective rating scale, and reasoning ability tests as learning achievement. The effect of prior knowledge activation using video on intrinsic cognitive load (ICL) and extraneous cognitive load (ECL) was evaluated and discussed.

Page 42 of 42 | Total Record : 419

 38   39   40   41   42 

Filter by Year

1993 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 27, No 2 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 2, 2022 Vol 27, No 1 (2022): JPMIPA: Volume 27, Issue 1, 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 2, 2021 Vol 26, No 1 (2021): JPMIPA: Volume 26, Issue 1, 2021 Vol 17, No 2 (2012): JPMIPA: Volume 17, Issue 2, 2012 Vol 25, No 2 (2020): JPMIPA: Volume 25, Issue 2, 2020 Vol 25, No 1 (2020): JPMIPA: Volume 25, Issue 1, 2020 Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - Oktober 2020 Vol 25, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2020 Vol 24, No 2 (2019): JPMIPA: Volume 24, Issue 2, 2019 Vol 24, No 1 (2019): JPMIPA: Volume 24, Issue 1, 2019 Vol 24, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2019 Vol 23, No 2 (2018): JPMIPA: Volume 23, Issue 2, 2018 Vol 23, No 1 (2018): JPMIPA: Volume 23, Issue 1, 2018 Vol 23, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - Oktober 2018 Vol 23, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2018 Vol 22, No 2 (2017): JPMIPA: Volume 22, Issue 2, 2017 Vol 22, No 1 (2017): JPMIPA: Volume 22, Issue 1, 2017 Vol 22, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - Oktober 2017 Vol 22, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA - April 2017 Vol 21, No 2 (2016): JPMIPA: Volume 21, Issue 2, 2016 Vol 21, No 1 (2016): JPMIPA: Volume 21, Issue 1, 2016 Vol 20, No 2 (2015): JPMIPA: Volume 20, Issue 2, 2015 Vol 20, No 1 (2015): JPMIPA: Volume 20, Issue 1, 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2014): JPMIPA: Volume 19, Issue 2, 2014 Vol 19, No 1 (2014): JPMIPA: Volume 19, Issue 1, 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2013): JPMIPA: Volume 18, Issue 2, 2013 Vol 18, No 1 (2013): JPMIPA: Volume 18, Issue 1, 2013 Vol 17, No 1 (2012): JPMIPA: Volume 17, Issue 1, 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2011): JPMIPA: Volume 16, Issue 2, 2011 Vol 16, No 1 (2011): JPMIPA: Volume 16, Issue 1, 2011 Vol 15, No 2 (2010): JPMIPA: Volume 15, Issue 2, 2010 Vol 15, No 1 (2010): JPMIPA: Volume 15, Issue 1, 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2009): JPMIPA: Volume 14, Issue 2, 2009 Vol 13, No 1 (2009): JPMIPA: Volume 13, Issue 1, 2009 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): JPMIPA: Volume 12, Issue 2, 2008 Vol 11, No 1 (2008): JPMIPA: Volume 11, Issue 1, 2008 Vol 9, No 2 (2007): JPMIPA: Volume 9, Issue 2, 2007 Vol 9, No 1 (2007): JPMIPA: Volume 9, Issue 1, 2007 Vol 8, No 2 (2006): JPMIPA: Volume 8, Issue 2, 2006 Vol 8, No 1 (2006): JPMIPA: Volume 8, Issue 1, 2006 Vol 6, No 2 (2005): JPMIPA: Volume 6, Issue 2, 2005 Vol 6, No 1 (2005): JPMIPA: Volume 6, Issue 1, 2005 Vol 5, No 2 (2004): JPMIPA: Volume 5, Issue 2, 2004 Vol 5, No 1 (2004): JPMIPA: Volume 5, Issue 1, 2004 Vol 4, No 2 (2003): JPMIPA: Volume 4, Issue 2, 2003 Vol 4, No 1 (2003): JPMIPA: Volume 4, Issue 1, 2003 Vol 3, No 1 (2002): JPMIPA: Volume 3, Issue 1, 2002 Vol 2, No 2 (2001): JPMIPA: Volume 2, Issue 2, 2001 Vol 2, No 1 (2001): JPMIPA: Volume 2, Issue 1, 2001 Vol 1, No 1 (1993): JPMIPA: Volume 1, 1993 More Issue